This article presents an update on the Strategies of Resistance Data Project. It extends the original coding of organizations seeking greater self-determination, including demands made by organizations, use of violent and nonviolent tactics and accommodations made to movements with a temporal range of 1960–2020. We elaborate on the update procedures, highlight trends in the data, and provide an application of the data to a number of hypotheses about organizational survival. The article explores tactics and organizational survival in a diverse set of contexts using data on both violent and nonviolent tactics. We find that employing a diversity of large-scale nonviolent tactics is associated with greater organizational survival, while accommodation by the state decreases the chance of survival.
AcostaB (2014) From bombs to ballots: When militant organizations transition to political parties. The Journal of Politics76(3): 666–683.
2.
AcostaB (2016) Dying for survival: Why militant organizations continue to conduct suicide attacks. Journal of Peace Research53(2): 180–196.
3.
Agence France Presse (2001) Nigerian police arrest leader of pro-Biafra group, nine others. Agence France Presse, 8February2001.
4.
Agence France Presse (2004) One killed, two injured by gunmen in restive Bangladesh Hills. Agence France Presse, 25January2004.
5.
BarrancoJWislerD (1999) Validity and systematicity of newspaper data in event analysis. European Sociological Review15(3): 301–322.
6.
ChaharbaghiKLynchR (1999) Sustainable competitive advantage: Towards a dynamic resource-based strategy. Management Decision37(1): 45–50.
7.
ChenowethEPinckneyJLewisO (2018) Days of rage: Introducing the NAVCO 3.0 dataset. Journal of Peace Research55(4): 524–534.
8.
CohenJ (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1): 37–46.
9.
CroninAK (2009) How Terrorism Ends: Understanding the Decline and Demise of Terrorist Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
CunninghamDEGleditschKSSalehyanI (2013) Non-state actors in civil wars: A new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science30(5): 516–531.
11.
CunninghamKGBakkeKMSeymourLJM (2012) Shirts today, skins tomorrow: Dual contests and the effects of fragmentation in self-determination disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution56(1): 67–93.
12.
DaviesSPetterssonTÖbergM (2022) Organized violence 1989–2021 and drone warfare. Journal of Peace Research59(4): 593–610.
13.
EarlJMartinAMcCarthyJD, et al (2004) The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology30(1): 65–80.
14.
GibneyMHaschkePArnonD, et al (2023) The Political Terror Scale 1976–2022. Available at: https://www.politicalterrorscale.org/ (accessed 3 July 2024).
15.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonM, et al (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
16.
KrauseP (2017) Rebel Power: Why National Movements Compete, Fight, and Win. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
McHughML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica22(3): 276–282.
18.
MarshallMGurrTJaggersK (2019) Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2018. Dataset users’ manual. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2018.pdf (accessed August 2024).
19.
Newswatch (2001) Africa news, 10 April 2001.
20.
ParkinsonSE (2013) Organizing rebellion: Rethinking high-risk mobilization and social networks in war. American Political Science Review107(3): 418–432.
21.
ParkinsonSEZaksS (2018) Militant and rebel organization(s). Comparative Politics50(2): 271–293.
22.
PearlmanW (2011) Violence, Nonviolence, and the Palestinian National Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
RaleighCLinkeAHegreH, et al (2010) Introducing ACLED: An armed conflict location and event dataset. Journal of Peace Research47(5): 651–660.
24.
SchockK (2005) Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
StanilandP (2018) Networks of Rebellion: Explaining Insurgent Cohesion and Collapse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
VogtMBormannN-CRüeggerS, et al (2015) Integrating data on ethnicity, geography, and conflict: The ethnic power relations data set family. Journal of Conflict Resolution59(7): 1327–1342.
27.
WasowO (2020) Agenda seeding: How 1960s black protests moved elites, public opinion and voting. American Political Science Review114(3): 638–659.
