This article analyzes the relationship between truth and politics by asking whether the ‘publicness’ of a truth commission – defined by whether it has public hearings, releases a public report, and names perpetrators – contributes to democratization. The article reviews scholarship relevant to the potential democratizing effects of truth commissions and derives mechanisms that help explain this relationship. Work from the transitional justice field as well as democratization and political transition more generally is considered. Using a newly-constructed Truth Commission Publicness Dataset (TCPD), the analysis finds that even after statistically controlling for initial levels of democracy, democratic trends in the years prior to a commission, level of wealth, amnesties and/or trials, the influence of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and different cutoff points for measuring democratization across a number of models, more publicness predicts higher levels of democracy years after the commission has finished its work. The more public a truth commission is, the more it will contribute to democratization. The finding that more public truth commissions are associated with higher levels of democratization indicates particular strategies that policymakers, donors, and civil society activists may take to improve prospects for democracy in a country planning a truth commission in the wake of violence and/or government abuse.
AndersonRobert (2009) Nonparametric methods for modeling nonlinearity in regression analysis. Annual Review of Sociology35: 67–85.
4.
AppelBenjamin JLoyleCyanne E (2012) The economic benefits of justice: Post-conflict justice and foreign direct investment. Journal of Peace Research49(5): 685–699.
5.
ArendtHannah (2003[1967]) Truth and politics. In: BaehrPeter (ed.) The Portable Hannah Arendt. London: Penguin, 545–575.
6.
AsmalKaderAsmalLouiseRobertsRonald Suresh (1996) Reconciliation Through Truth: A Reckoning of Apartheid’s Criminal Governance. Cape Town: David Phillips.
7.
BackerDavid (2010) Watching a bargain unravel? A panel study of victims’ attitudes about transitional justice in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Transitional Justice4(3): 1–14.
8.
BickfordLouis (2007) Unofficial truth projects. Human Rights Quarterly29(4): 994–1035.
9.
BinningsbøHelga MalminLoyleCyanne EElsterJonGatesScott (2012) Armed conflict and post-conflict justice, 1946–2006. Journal of Peace Research49(5): 731–740.
10.
BoraineAlex (2000) Truth and reconciliation in South Africa: The third way. In: RotbergRobert IThompsonDennis (eds) Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 141–157.
BrinksDavidCoppedgeMichael (2006) Diffusion is no illusion: Neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy. Comparative Political Studies39(4): 463–489.
13.
BrouneusKaren (2008) Truth-telling as talking cure? Insecurity and retraumatization in the Rwandan Gacaca courts. Security Dialogue39(1): 55–76.
14.
BrouneusKaren (2010) The trauma of truth telling: Effects of witnessing in the Rwandan Gacaca courts on psychological health. Journal of Conflict Resolution54(3): 408–437.
15.
ChapmanAudrey RBallPatrick (2001) The truth of truth commissions: Comparative lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and Guatemala. Human Rights Quarterly23: 1–43.
16.
CrockerDavid (2000) Truth commissions, transitional justice, and civil society. In: RotbergRobert IThompsonDennis (eds) Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 99–121.
17.
CohenJacob (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin112(1): 155–159.
18.
CuevaEduardo Gonzalez (2004) The contribution of the Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission to prosecutions. In: SchabasWilliam ADarcyShane (eds) Truth Commissions and Courts: The Tension Between Criminal Justice and the Search for Truth. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, 55–66.
19.
DahlRobert A (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
DancyGeoffKimHunjoonWiebelhaus-BrahmEric (2010) The turn to truth: Trends in truth commission experimentation. Journal of Human Rights9(1): 45–64.
21.
de LangeJohnny (2000) The historical context, legal origins and philosophical foundation of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In: Villa-VicencioCharlesVerwoerdWilhelm (eds) Looking Back, Reaching Forward: Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press, 14–31.
22.
DukalskisAlexander (2011) Interactions in transition: How truth commissions and trials complement or constrain each other. International Studies Review13(3): 432–451.
23.
FreemanMark (2006) Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
FreemanMarkHaynerPriscilla (2003) Truth-telling. In: BloomfieldDavidBarnesTeresaHuyseLuc (eds) Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: A Handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
25.
GibsonJames L (2004) Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26.
GibsonJames L (2006) The contributions of truth to reconciliation: Lessons from South Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(3): 409–432.
27.
GrodskyBrian (2007) Producing truth: The politics of investigating past human rights violations in post-Communist states. World Affairs169(3): 125–133.
28.
GrodskyBrian (2009) Re-ordering justice: Towards a new methodological approach to studying transitional justice. Journal of Peace Research46(6): 819–837.
29.
HamberBrandon (2009) Transforming Societies after Political Violence: Truth, Reconciliation, and Mental Health. New York: Springer.
30.
HaynerPriscilla (2001) Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. New York: Routledge.
31.
HuntingtonSamuel P (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
32.
IgnatieffMichael (1996) Articles of Faith. Index on Censorship25(5): 110–122.
33.
KelsallTim (2005) Truth, lies, ritual: Preliminary reflections on the truth and reconciliation commission in Sierra Leone. Human Rights Quarterly27(2): 361–391.
34.
KempSusan (2004) The inter-relationship between the Guatemalan Commission for Historical Clarification and the search for justice in national courts. In: SchabasWilliam ADarcyShane (eds) Truth Commissions and Courts: The Tension Between Criminal Justice and the Search for Truth. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, 67–103.
35.
KimHunjoonSikkinkKathryn (2010) Explaining the deterrence effect of human rights prosecutions in transitional countries. International Studies Quarterly54(4): 939–963.
36.
LieTove GreteBinningsbøHelga MalminGatesScott (2007). Post-conflict justice and sustainable peace. Post-conflict transitions working paper No. 5, World Bank Policy Research working paper 4191.
37.
LinzJuan JStepanAlfred (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
LipsetSeymour M (1959) Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review53: 69–105.
39.
MamdaniMahmood (2000) The truth according to the TRC. In: AmadiumeIfiAn-Na’imAbdullahi A (eds) The Politics of Memory: Truth, Healing, and Social Justice. London: Zed, 176–183.
40.
ManiRama (2002) Beyond Retribution: Seeking Justice in the Shadows of War. Cambridge: Polity.
MarshallMonty JJaggersKeithGurrTed R (2011) Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. Version p4v2010 and p4v2010d. College Park, MD: University of Maryland (http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2010.pdf, accessed 1 September 2011).
43.
MaxwellScott E (2000) Sample size and multiple regression analysis. Psychological Methods5(4): 434–458.
44.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
McAdams AJames (2001) Judging the Past in Unified Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
MendeloffDavid (2004) Truth-seeking, truth-telling, and postconflict peacebuilding: Curb the enthusiasm?International Studies Review6(3): 355–380.
47.
MendezJuan E (2006) The human right to truth: Lessons learned from Latin American experiences with truth telling. In: BorerTristan Anne (ed.) Telling the Truths: Truth Telling and Peace Building in Post-Conflict Societies. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 115–150.
48.
MoonClaire (2008) Narrating Political Reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
49.
MunckGerardo LVerkuilenJay (2002) Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies35(1): 5–35.
NoblesMelissa (2010) The prosecution of human rights violations. Annual Review of Political Science13: 165–182.
52.
O’DonnellGuillermoSchmitterPhilippe (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53.
OlsenTricia DPayneLeigh AReiterAndrew G (2010) The justice balance: When transitional justice improves human rights and democracy. Human Rights Quarterly32(4): 980–1007.
54.
PevehouseJon C (2002) With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy. American Journal of Political Science46(3): 611–625.
55.
PhelpsTeresa Godwin (2004) Shattered Voices: Language, Violence, and the Work of Truth Commissions. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
56.
PopkinMargaretRoht-ArriazaNaomi (1995) Truth as justice: Investigatory commissions in Latin America. Law & Social Inquiry20(1): 79–116.
57.
PrzeworskiMichael AlvarezCheibubJoseLimongiFernando (2000) Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
RotbergRobertThompsonDennis, eds (2000) Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
SnyderJackVinjamuriLeslie (2003) Trials and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security28(3): 5–44.
60.
SteinerHenry (1997) Truth Commissions: A Comparative Assessment: An Interdisciplinary Discussion Held at Harvard Law School in May 1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School Human Rights Program.
61.
ThomsOskar NTRonJamesParisRoland (2010) State-level effects of transitional justice: What do we know?International Journal of Transitional Justice4(3): 329–354.
62.
United States Institute of Peace (USIP) (2010) Truth Commission Digital Collection, The Margarita/S Studemeister Digital Collections in International Conflict Management (http://www.usip.org/library/formin.html, accessed 31 March 2010).
63.
Villa-VicencioCharlesVerwoodWilhelm (2000) Constructing a report: Writing up the ‘truth’. In: RotbergRobert IThompsonDennis (eds) Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 279–294.
64.
WilsonRichard A (2001) The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
