The aim of this article is to empirically analyse liberal peace arguments in the context of shared river basins. In particular, it argues that counter to the water war hypothesis, sharing a river need not necessary lead to conflict over the shared resource: relying on liberal arguments, joint democracy is expected to facilitate trust and thus cooperation over transboundary rivers. Furthermore, by mitigating asymmetries, facilitating (implicit) side-payments and issue linkage, both economic and political interlinkages may encourage cooperation over shared rivers. Previous work suggests that these factors might be a ‘fair-weather’ phenomenon, that is, that they play a role only for problems that are easy to solve. In this article, liberal effects are allowed to vary with the difficulty of the underlying problem by separating different issues and geographic situations. Empirically, the article focuses on intergovernmental behaviour using a new dataset on transboundary water events covering all international basins for a period of eleven years (1997–2007). The results show that indeed liberal peace factors matter with respect to intergovernmental interaction over shared river basins and the effect of joint democracy is more prominent under ‘fair-weather’ conditions.
BannettLynne LRaglandShannon EYollesPeter (1998) Facilitating international agreements through an interconnected game approach: The case of river basins. In: JustRichard ENetanyahuSinaia (eds) Conflict and Cooperation on Trans-boundary Water Resources. Norwell: Kluwer (61–84).
2.
BarrettScott (1994) Conflict and cooperation in managing international water resources. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper1303.
3.
BayerResat (2010) Peaceful transitions and democracy. Journal of Peace Research47(5): 535–546.
4.
BeckLucasBernauerThomasKalbhennAnna (2010) Environmental, political, and economic determinants of water quality monitoring in Europe. Water Resources Research46: W11543.
5.
BerginMichelle SJason WestJKeatingTerry JRusselArmistead G (2005) Regional atmospheric pollution and transboundary air quality management. Annual Review of Environmental Resources30: 1–37.
6.
BernauerThomas (2002) Explaining success and failure in international river management. Aquatic Sciences64(1): 1–19.
7.
BernauerThomasKalbhennAnna (2010) The politics of international freshwater resources. In: DenemarkRobert A (ed.) The International Studies Encyclopedia. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 5800–5821.
8.
BernauerThomasKoubiVally (2009) Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecological Economics68(5): 1355–1365.
9.
BernauerThomasKuhnPatrick (2010) Is there an environmental version of the Kantian peace? Insights from water pollution in Europe. European Journal of International Relations16(4): 77–102.
10.
BhaduriAnikBarbierEdward B (2008) Political altruism of transboundary water sharing. BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy8(1): 1–16.
11.
BoehmerCharlesGartzkeErikNordstromTimothy (2004) Do international organizations promote peace?World Politics57: 1–38.
12.
BrochmannMaritGleditschNils Petter (2006) Shared rivers and international cooperation. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, San Diego, March.
13.
BrochmannMaritHenselPaul R (2009) Peaceful management of international river claims. International Negotiation14(2): 393–418.
ConcaKenWuFengshiMeiCiqi (2006) Global regime formation or complex institution building? The principled content of international river agreements. International Studies Quarterly50(2): 263–285.
16.
CrescenziMark J CEnterlineAndrew J (2001) Time remembered: A dynamic model of interstate interaction. International Studies Quarterly45: 409–431.
17.
DinarArielDinarShlomi (2003) Recent developments in the literature on conflict and cooperation in international shared water. Natural Resources Journal43(4): 1217–1287.
18.
DurthRainer (1996) Grenzüberschreitende Umweltprobleme und regionale Integration: Zur Politischen Oekonomie von Oberlauf-Unterlauf-Problemen an internationalen Flüssen[Transboundary Environmental Problems and Regional Integration: The Political Economy of Upstream–Downstream Problems in International Rivers]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
19.
EspeyMollyTowfiqueBasman (2004) International bilateral water treaty formation. Water Resources Research40: W05S05.
GartzkeErikLiQuan (2003a) All’s well that ends well: A reply to Oneal, Barbieri & Peters. Journal of Peace Research40(6): 727–732.
24.
GartzkeErikLiQuan (2003b) War, peace, and the invisible hand: Positive political externalities of economic globalization. International Studies Quarterly47: 561–586.
25.
GaubatzKurt Taylor (1996) Democratic states and commitment in international relations. International Organization50(1): 109–139.
26.
GerlakAndrea KGrantKeith A (2009) The correlates of cooperative institutions for international rivers. In: VolgyThomas JŠabičZlatkoRoterPetraGerlakAndrea K (eds) Mapping the New World Order. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell (114–147).
27.
GiblerDouglas M (2007) Bordering on peace: Democracy, territorial issues, and conflict. International Studies Quarterly51: 509–532.
28.
GiblerDouglas MTirJaroslav (2010) Settled borders and regime type: Democratic transitions as consequences of peaceful territorial transfers. American Journal of Political Science54(4): 951–968.
29.
GizelisTheodora-IsmeneWoodenAmanda (2010) Water resources, institutions, and intrastate conflict. Political Geography29(8): 444–453.
30.
GleditschKristian Skrede (2002) Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution46: 712–724.
GleditschNils PetterFurlongKathrynHegreHåvardLacinaBethanyOwenTaylor (2006) Conflicts over shared rivers: Resource scarcity or fuzzy boundaries?Political Geography25: 361–382. The replication data files are available at: http://www.prio.no/CSCW/Research-and-Publications/Publication/?oid=173163
33.
GoertzGary (2008) A checklist for constructing, evaluating, and using concepts or quantitative measures. In: Box-SteffensmeierJanet MBradyHenry ECollierDavid (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press (97–118).
34.
HamnerJesse (2009) Drought and ‘hydro-cooperation'. Paper presented at the 50th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, New York, February.
HenselPaul RMitchellSara McLaughlinSowersThomas E (2006) Conflict management of riparian disputes. Political Geography25: 383–411.
38.
HenselPaul RMitchellSara McLaughlinSowersThomas EThyneClayton L (2008) Bones of contention: Comparing territorial, maritime, and river issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(1): 117–143.
39.
HestonAlanSummersRobertAtenBettina (2006) Penn World Table Version 6.2. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.
40.
HoffmanKelly Ann (2003) On water and power: The determinants of international cooperation over shared river basins. Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta, Georgia, August.
LeedsBrett Ashley (1999) Domestic political institutions, credible commitments and international cooperation. American Journal of Political Science43(4): 979–1002.
46.
LevyGilatRazinRonny (2004) It takes two: An explanation for the democratic peace. Journal of the European Economic Association2(1): 1–29.
47.
MansfieldEdward DMilnerHelen VRosendorffPeter B (2002) Why democracies cooperate more: Electoral control and international trade agreements. International Organization56(3): 477–513.
48.
MaozZeevRussettBruce M (1993) Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946–1986. American Political Science Review87(3): 624–638.
49.
MarshallMonty GJaggersKeith (2002) Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2002 (http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/).
50.
MartyFrank (1997) International river management: The political determinants of success and failure. University of Zurich, Studien zur Politikwissenschaft305.
51.
MartyFrank (2001) Managing International Rivers: Problems, Politics and Institutions. Bern: Peter Lang.
52.
McGillivrayFionaSmithAlastair (2004) Trust and cooperation through agent-specific punishments. International Organization54(4): 809–824.
53.
MidlarskyManus I (1998) Democracy and the environment: An empirical assessment. Journal of Peace Research35(3): 341–361.
54.
MitchellRonald B (2002–08) International Environmental Agreements Database Project (Version 2007.1). http://iea.uoregon.edu/, consulted 18 March 2008.
55.
MitchellSara McLaughlinPrinsBrandon C (2004) Rivalry and diversionary uses of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution48: 937–961.
56.
NeumayerEric (2002a) Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research39(2): 139–164.
57.
NeumayerEric (2002b) Does trade openness promote multilateral environmental cooperation?The World Economy25(6): 815–812.
58.
OnealJohn R (2003) Measuring interdependence and its pacific benefits: A reply to Gartzke & Li. Journal of Peace Research40(6): 721–725.
59.
OnealJohn RRayJames Lee (1997) New tests of the democratic peace: Controlling for economic interdependence 1950–85. Political Research Quarterly50(4): 751–775.
60.
PevehouseJon CNordstromTimothyWarnkeKevin (2004) The COW-2 International Organizations Dataset version 2.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science21: 101–119.
61.
Risse-KappenThomas (1997) Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
RussettBruce (1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
RussettBruceOnealJohn R (2001) Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.
64.
SattlerThomasBernauerThomas (2010) Gravitation or discrimination? Determinants of litigation in the World Trade Organization. European Journal of Political Research50(2): 143–167.
65.
SigmanHilary (2002) International spillovers and water quality in rivers: Do countries free ride?American Economic Review92: 1152–1159.
SongJenniferWhittingtonThomas (2004) Why have some countries on international rivers been successful negotiating treaties? A global perspective. Water Resources Research40: W05S06.
68.
StarrJoyce R (1991) Water wars. Foreign Policy82(Spring): 17–36.
69.
StinnettDouglas MTirJaroslav (2009) The institutionalization of river treaties. International Negotiation14(2): 229–251.
70.
StrohKassian (2004) Konflikt und Kooperation um Wasser. Eine Fallstudie über den Nil [Conflict and cooperation over water. A case study on the Nile]. Arbeitspapiere Forschungsstelle Dritte Welt, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich.
71.
StuckiPhilipp (2005) Water wars or water peace? Rethinking the nexus between water scarcity and armed conflict. PSIS Occasional Paper 3/2005. Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies.
72.
TirJaroslavAckermanJohn T (2009) Politics of formalized river cooperation. Journal of Peace Research46(5): 623–640.
73.
TosetHans Petter WollebækGleditschNils PetterHegreHåvard (2000) Shared rivers and interstate conflict. Political Geography19(8): 971–996.
74.
WardHugh (2006) International linkages and environmental sustainability: The effectiveness of the regime network. Journal of Peace Research43(2): 149–166.
75.
WolfAaron T (1998) Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy1(2): 251–265.
76.
WolfAaron TStahlKerstinMacomberMarcia F (2003) Conflict and cooperation within international river basins: The importance of institutional capacity. Water Resources Update125: 1–10.
77.
WolfAaron TYoffeShira BGiordanoMark (2003) International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy5(1): 29–60.
ZawahriNeda AMitchellSara McLaughlin (2008) Fragmented governance of international rivers: Negotiating bilateral versus multilateral treaties. Paper prepared for presentation at the 2009 annual meeting of the International Studies Association, 15–18February, New York.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
