Drawing on recent liberal peace and Asian security research, this article assesses the relevance of prominent ‘Kantian’ hypotheses for understanding the international politics of Asia. While there is some evidence that the dynamics of war and peace are different in Asia than in other parts of the world, this does not mean that liberal theories are irrelevant. There is at best weak support for the pacific effects of democracy or international institutions in Asia. But liberal expectations, and those of some Asia analysts, about the importance of economic interdependence for reducing conflict in Asia are robustly confirmed. This result obtains even with a control for the simultaneous trade-dampening effect of conflict using structural equations. But the strong intra-Asian effect of trade interdependence does not translate into a robust pacific effect between Asian states and those outside the region. A more nuanced picture emerges; the democratic peace appears most relevant for interactions between Asian states and the rest of the world. The findings show that analysts can rely neither on beliefs that Asia is sui generis nor on purely realist models as guides to Asian security issues. Kantian and realist theories are both relevant. The results also indicate that some common assumptions of analysts, especially regarding the importance of alliances and institutions, are not in accord with the regularities of conflict and peace in Asia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acharya, Amitav , 1991. ‘The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: “Security Community” or “Defense Community”?’ , Pacific Affairs64(2): 159-178 .
2.
Acharya, Amitav , 2003. ‘Will Asia’s Past Be Its Future?’ , International Security28(3): 149-164 .
3.
Achen, Christopher H. , 2002. ‘Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART’ , Annual Review of Political Science5 (June): 423-450 .
4.
Alagappa, Muthiah , ed., 2003. Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
5.
Ayoob, Mohammed , 1995. The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
6.
Barbieri, Katherine , 1996. ‘Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?’ , Journal of Peace Research33(1): 29-49 .
7.
Bearce, David H. , 2003. ‘Grasping the Commercial Institutional Peace’ , International Studies Quarterly47(3): 347-370 .
8.
Bennett, D. Scott & Allan Stam , 2000. ‘EUGene: A Conceptual Manual’ , International Interactions26(2): 179-204 (updated versions available at http://eugenesoftware.org).
9.
Berger, Thomas , 2000. ‘Set for Stability? Prospects for Conflict and Cooperation in East Asia’ , Review of International Studies26(3): 405-428 .
10.
Berry, William D. , 1999. ‘Testing for Interaction in Models with Binary Dependent Variables’, unpublished paper (accessed 7 November 2005 at http://polmeth.wustl.edu/workingpapers.php?year=1999).
11.
Brambor, Thomas ; William Roberts Clark & Matt Golder , 2005. ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’ , Political Analysis Advanced Access (http://pan.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/mpi014v2).
12.
Braumoeller, Bear F. , 2004. ‘Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms’ , International Organization58(4): 807-820 .
13.
Buzan, Barry & Ole Wæver , 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
14.
Cederman, Lars-Erik & Mohan Penubarti Rao , 2001. ‘Exploring the Dynamics of the Democratic Peace’ , Journal of Conflict Resolution45(6): 818-833 .
15.
Chan, Steve , 1995. ‘Regime Transition in the Asia/Pacific Region: Democratization as a Double-Edged Sword’ , Journal of Strategic Studies18(3): 52-67 .
16.
Chiang, Johnny Ci-Chen , 2000. ‘Conceptualizing the APEC Way: International Cooperation in a Non-Institutionalized Regime’ , Issues and Studies36(6): 177-204 .
17.
Cornwell, Derekh D. F. & Michael P. Colaresi , 2002. ‘Holy Trinities, Rivalry Termination, and Conflict’ , International Interactions28(4): 325-353 .
18.
Friedberg, Aaron L. , 1993/94. ‘Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia’ , International Security18(3): 5-33 .
19.
Friedrich, Robert J. , 1982. ‘In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression’ , American Journal of Political Science26(4): 797-833 .
20.
Gartzke, Erik ; Quan Li & Charles Boehmer , 2001. ‘Investing in Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict’ , International Organization55(2): 391-438 .
21.
Gibler, Douglas M. , 2000. ‘Alliances: Why Some Cause War and Others Cause Peace’, in John A. Vasquez , ed., What Do We Know About War?Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield (145-164).
22.
Gibler, Douglas M. & John A. Vasquez , 1998. ‘Uncovering the Dangerous Alliances, 1495-1980’ , International Studies Quarterly42(4): 785-807 .
23.
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede , 2002a. All International Politics Is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
24.
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede , 2002b. ‘Expanded Trade and GDP Data’ , Journal of Conflict Resolution46(5): 712-724 .
25.
Goenner, Cullen F. , 2004. ‘Uncertainty of the Liberal Peace’ , Journal of Peace Research41(5): 589-605 .
26.
Goldsmith, Benjamin E. , 2006, ‘A Universal proposition? Region, Conflict, War, and the Robustness of the Kantian Peace’ , European Journal of International Relations12(4): 533-563 .
27.
Goldsmith, Benjamin E. ; Stephan K. Chalup & Michael J. Quinlan , 2005. ‘Regime Type and International Conflict: Towards a General Model’, unpublished manuscript.
28.
Hegre, Håvard , 2000. ‘Development and the Liberal Peace: What Does It Take to Be a Trading State?’ , Journal of Peace Research37(1): 5-30 .
29.
Hemmer, Christopher & Peter J. Katzenstein , 2002. ‘Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism’ , International Organization56(3): 575-607 .
30.
Henderson, Errol A. , 2004. ‘Disturbing the Peace’ , paper presented at the 45th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Montreal, 17-20 March.
31.
Holsti, Kalevi J. , 1996. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
32.
Huxley, Tim , 1998. ‘The Changing Balance of Power in East Asia: Implications for Regional Security and International Security’ , Issues and Studies34(11/12): 90-120 .
33.
Jetly, Rajshree , 2003. ‘Conflict Management Strategies in ASEAN: Perspectives for SAARC’ , Pacific Review16(1): 53-76 .
34.
Jungblut, Bernadette M. E. & Richard J. Stoll , 2002. ‘The Liberal Peace and Conflictive Interactions: The Onset of Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1950-1978’ , Journal of Peace Research39(5): 527-546 .
35.
Kacowicz, Arie M. , 1998. Zones of Peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in Comparative Perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press .
36.
Kang, David C. , 2003. ‘Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks’ , International Security27(4): 57-85 .
37.
Kant, Immanuel , 1795/1999. ‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’, in David Williams , ed., The Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
38.
Katzenstein, Peter J. , 2000. ‘Varieties of Asian Regionalisms’, in Peter J. Katzensteinet al. , eds, Asian Regionalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell East Asia Program (1-34).
39.
Keshk, Omar M. G. , 2003. ‘CDSIMEQ: A Program to Implement Two-Stage Probit Least Squares’ , Stata Journal3(2): 157-167 .
40.
Keshk, Omar M. G. ; Brian M. Pollins & Rafael R. Reuveny , 2004. ‘Trade Still Follows the Flag: The Primacy of Politics in a Simultaneous Model of Interdependence and Armed Conflict’ , Journal of Politics66(4): 1155-1179 .
41.
Kim, Hyung Min & David L. Rousseau , 2005. ‘The Classical Liberals Were Half Right (or Half Wrong): New Tests of the “Liberal Peace”, 1960-88’ , Journal of Peace Research42(5): 523-543 .
42.
Kivimäki, Timo , 2001. ‘The Long Peace of ASEAN’ , Journal of Peace Research38(1): 5-25 .
43.
Lai, Brian & Dan Reiter , 2000. ‘Democracy, Political Similarity, and International Alliances, 1816-1992’ , Journal of Conflict Resolution44(2): 203-227 .
44.
Lemke, Douglas , 2002. Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
45.
Maddala, George S. , 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
46.
Mansfield, Edward D. & Brian M. Pollins , 2001. ‘The Study of Interdependence and Conflict: Recent Advances, Open Questions, and Directions for Future Research’ , Journal of Conflict Resolution45(6): 834-859 .
47.
Maoz, Zeev , 2000. ‘Alliances: The Street Gangs of World Politics’, in John A. Vasquez , ed., What Do We Know About War?Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield (111-144).
48.
Marshall, Monty G. & Ted Robert Gurr , 2001. ‘Polity IV Project: Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2002’ (accessed May 2004 at http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm).
49.
Oneal, John R. & Bruce Russett , 1999. ‘The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992’ , World Politics52(1): 1-37 .
50.
Oneal, John R. & Bruce Russett , 2004. ‘Seeking Peace in the Post-Cold War World of Hegemony and Terrorism’ , paper presented at the 45th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Montreal, 17-20 March.
51.
Oneal, John R. ; Bruce Russett & Michael Berbaum , 2003. ‘Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992’ , International Studies Quarterly47(3): 371-393 .
52.
Organski, A. F. K. , 1958. World Politics. New York: Knopf .
53.
Peceny, Mark ; Caroline C. Beer & Shannon Sanchez-Terry , 2002. ‘Dictatorial Peace?’ , American Political Science Review96(1): 15-26 .
54.
Pevehouse, Jon C. , 2002. ‘Democracy from the Outside In? International Organizations and Democratization’ , International Organization56(3): 515-550 .
55.
Pevehouse, Jon ; Timothy Nordstrom & Kevin Warnke , 2003. ‘Intergovernmental Organizations, 1815-2000: A New Correlates of War Data Set’, COW2 Project (accessed June 2004 at http://cow2.la.psu.edu/).
56.
Rosecrance, Richard , 1986. The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic .
57.
Russett, Bruce & John Oneal , 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton .
58.
Sarkees, Meredith R. ; Frank W. Wayman & J. David Singer , 2003. ‘Inter-State, Intra-State, and Extra-State Wars: A Comprehensive Look at Their Distribution over Time, 1816-1997’ , International Studies Quarterly47(1): 49-70 (updated data at http://www.umich.edu/%7Ecowproj/index.html).
59.
Scalapino, Robert A. , 2001. ‘Trends in East Asian International Relations’ , Journal of Strategic Studies24(4): 3-20 .
60.
Solingen, Etel , 1998. Regional Orders at Century’s Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
61.
Tow, William H. & Richard A. Gray , 1995. ‘Asia-Pacific Security Regimes: Conditions and Constraints’ , Australian Journal of Political Science30(3): 436-451 .
62.
Waltz, Kenneth N. , 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill .
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
