The past few years have seen the development in Germany of a discourse on the phenomenon of ‘new wars’. This debate on the nature and cause of new wars is linked to changes in German military policy in the 1990s as well as to growing criticism of globalization. In particular, this review discusses as examples two books that have found wide audiences. In contrast to much of current Anglo-Saxon mainstream research on internal conflicts, emphasis in Germany is placed on the effects of globalization as a major factor in the causation of new wars. Globalization speeds up the decay of states and provides rebels with opportunities they previously did not have. In addition, new wars are characterized by asymmetry in warfare. Therefore, with the growing availability of small arms and light weapons, these wars have grown in number. The authors of the books under review have preferred to adopt a holistic approach to examining collective violence, which allows for the integration into their analysis, in addition to warfare, of a good number of contemporary phenomena, including terrorism and globalization. However, there are methodological shortcomings. In particular, general propositions are often made on the basis of reports from selected cases, without recourse to quantitative evidence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Addison, Tony & S. Mansoob Murshed, 2001. ‘From Conflict to Reconstruction: Reviving the Social Contract’, UNU/WIDER Discussion Paper 48. Helsinki: UNU/WIDER.
Ayoob, Mohammed, 1995. The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
4.
Beisheim, Marianne; Sabine Dreher, Gregor Walter, Michael Zürn & Bernhard Zangl, 1999. Im Zeitalter der Globalisierung? Thesen und Daten zur gesellschaftlichen und politischen Denationalisierung [In the Age of Globalization? Thesis and Data About Societal and Political Denationalization]. Baden-Baden: Nomos .
5.
Bordo, Michael D.; Alan M. Taylor & Jeffrey G. Williamson, eds, 2003. Globalization in Historical Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
Collier, Paul; Lani Elliott, Håvard Hegre, Anke Hoeffler, Marta Reynal-Querol & Nicholas Sambanis, 2003. Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. New York: Oxford University Press & World Bank .
9.
Daase, Christopher, 1999. Kleine Kriege, große Wirkung [Small Wars, Large Effects]. Baden Baden: Nomos .
10.
de Soysa, Indra & Nils Petter Gleditsch, 2002. ‘The Liberal Globalist Case’, in Björn Hettne & Bertil Odén, eds, Global Governance in the 21st Century: Alternative Perspectives on World Order. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell (26–73).
11.
Duffield, Mark, 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merger of Development and Security. London: Zed .
12.
Elwert, Georg, 1997. ‘Gewaltmärkte. Beobachtungen zur Zweckrationalität von Gewalt’ [Violence Markets. Observations on the Rationality of Violence], in Trutz von Trotha, ed., Soziologie der Gewalt [Sociology of Violence]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag (86–102) (special issue of Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 37).
13.
Eppler, Erhard, 2002. Vom Gewaltmonopol zum Gewaltmarkt? [From the Monolopy of Violence to a Market of Violence?]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp .
14.
Esty, Daniel C.; Jack Goldstone, Ted Robert Gurr, Barbara Harff, Pamela T. Surko, Alan N. Unger & Robert Chen, 1998. ‘The State Failure Project: Early Warning Research for US Foreign Policy Planning’, in John L. Davies & Ted Robert Gurr, eds, Preventive Measures: Building Risk Assessment and Crisis Early Warning Systems. Boulder, CO & Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield (27–38).
15.
Gantzel, Klaus Jürgen, 1997. ‘Kriegsursachen–Tendenzen und Perspektiven’ [Causes of War–Tendencies and Perspectives] , Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften8(3): 257–266 .
16.
Gantzel, Klaus Jürgen, 2002. ‘Neue Kriege? Neue Krieger? [New Wars? New Warriors?]’, in Bruno Schoch, Corinna Hauswedell, Christoph Weller, Ulrich Ratsch & Reinhard Mutz, eds, Friedensgutachten 2002 [Peace Appraisal 2002]. Baden-Baden: Nomos (80–89).
17.
Gantzel, Klaus Jürgen & Torsten Schwinghammer, 1999. Warfare Since the Second World War. Somerset, NJ: Transaction .
18.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter; Peter Wallensteen, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg & Håvard Strand, 2002. ‘Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset’ , Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637 .
19.
Hasenclever, Andreas, 2002. ‘Sie bewegt sich doch. Neue Erkenntnisse und Trends in der quantitativen Kriegsursachenforschung’ [Still It Is Moving. New Results and Trends in Quantitative Research on the Causes of War] , Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen9(2): 331–363 .
20.
Held, David; Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt & Jonathan Perraton, 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity .
21.
Jean, François & Jean-Christophe Rufin, eds, 1996. L’Economie des guerres civiles [The Economics of Civil Wars]. Paris: Hachette .
22.
Kaldor, Mary, 1999. New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity .
23.
Kalyvas, Stathis N., 2002. ‘ “New” And “Old” Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?’ , World Politics54(1): 99–118 .
24.
Krumwiede, Heinrich-Wilhelm & Peter Waldmann, 1998. Bürgerkriege: Folgen und Regulierungsmöglichkeiten [Civil Wars: Effects and Possibilities for Regulation]. Baden-Baden: Nomos .
25.
Lock, Peter, 2001. ‘Sicherheit à la carte’ [Security à la carte], in Tanja Brühl, Tobias Debiel, Brigitte Hamm, Hartwig Hummel & Jens Martens, eds, Privatisierung der Weltpolitik [Privatization of World Politics]. Bonn: Stiftung Entwicklung und Frieden (200–229).
26.
Malone, David & Mats Berdal, eds, 1999. Greed and Grievance Economic Agendas in Civil War. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner .
27.
Marshall, Monty G. & Ted Robert Gurr, with contributions by Jonathan Wilkenfeld, Mark Lichbach & David Quinn, 2003. Peace and Conflict 2003: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-Determination Movements, and Democracy. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management (http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/paper.asp?id=2).
28.
Migdal, Joel S., 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State–Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
29.
Münkler, Herfried, 2002a. Die neuen Kriege [The New Wars]. Reinbek: Rowohlt .
30.
Münkler, Herfried, 2002b. Über den Krieg. Stationen der Kriegsgeschichte im Spiegel ihrer theoretischen Reflexion [On War. Stations of a History of War Mirrored in Its Theoretical Reflections]. Weilerswist: Velbrück .
31.
Murshed, S. Mansoob, 2002. ‘Conflict, Civil War and Underdevelopment: An Introduction’ , Journal of Peace Research39(4): 387–393 .
32.
Schlichte, Klaus, 1998. ‘Why States Decay. A Preliminary Assessment’, Arbeitspapier 2/98. Hamburg: Forschungsstelle Kriege, Rüstung und Entwicklung .
33.
Schlichte, Klaus, 2002. ‘Neues über den Krieg? Einige Anmerkungen über den Stand der Kriegsforschung in den Internationalen Beziehungen’ [Anything New on War? Some Remarks about the State of Research on War in International Relations] , Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen9(1): 113–138 .
34.
Siegelberg, Jens, 1994. Kapitalismus und Krieg [Capitalism and War]. Münster: Lit .
35.
Small Arms Survey, 2002. Small Arms Survey 2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
36.
Sofsky, Wolfgang, 2002. Zeiten des Schreckens. Amok, Terror, Krieg [Scary Times. Amok, Terror, War]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp .
37.
Stewart, Frances & Valpy Fitz Gerald, 2001. War and Underdevelopment. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
38.
van Creveld, Martin, 1991. The Transformation of War. New York: Free Press .
39.
von Trotha, Trutz, 2002. ‘Über die Zukunft der Gewalt’ [About the Future of Violence] , Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform85(5): 349–368 .
40.
Wolin, Richard, 1990. ‘Carl Schmitt, Political Existentialism and the Total State’ , Theory and Society19(2): 389–416 .
