This article highlights a systemic aspect of the liberal peace that has been underemphasized by the existing literature. It argues that the liberal peace is constructed in part by the active efforts of a variety of liberal states and international organizations to promote democracy within states. This article examines the collective defense of democracy regime in the Americas to illustrate this political dynamic and applies Immanuel Kant's original formulation of the liberal pacific union to understand the contemporary inter-American system. The combination of a stronger Organization of American States built on a liberal democratic consensus among member-states, increasing trade interdependence, and a more liberal regional hegemony has transformed the inter-American system. One of the principal manifestations of this enhanced liberalism is that states in the Americas have agreed to intervene collectively in the domestic affairs of member-states to ensure the continuation of democratic regimes. For elected leaders and economic elites throughout the region and US policymakers, this support for democratic rule reflects material self-interest more than liberal idealism. While this collective defense of democracy regime, codified in the `Santiago Commitment' of 1991, clearly reflects the increasingly liberal character of the inter-American system, this regime also challenges the principled commitment to self-determination that was essential to Kant's original formulation of the liberal pacific union. We examine the regional response to the first three overt challenges to the Santiago Commitment, in Haiti (1991), Peru (1992), and Guatemala (1993) to show how the collective defense of democracy has become a crucial element of how liberalism shapes international politics in the Americas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acevedo, Domingo E. & Claudio Grossman, 1996. `The Organization of American States and the Protection of Democracy', in Tom Farer, ed., Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press (132-149).
2.
Bloomfield, Richard J. , 1994. `Making the Western Hemisphere Safe for Democracy? The OAS Defense-of-Democracy Regime', Washington Quarterly17(2): 157-169.
3.
Brooke, James , 1994. `Latins Join in New Effort to Get Haitian Leaders to Step Down', New York Times, 15 August.
4.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce ; James Morrow, Randolph Siverson & Alistair Smith, 1999. `An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace', American Political Science Review93(4): 791-808.
5.
Cameron, Maxwell A. , 1997. `Political and Economic Origins of Regime Change in Peru: The Eighteenth Brumaire of Alberto Fujimori', in Maxwell A. Cameron & Philip Mauceri, eds, The Peruvian Labyrinth: Polity, Society, Economy. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press (37-69).
6.
Carothers, Thomas , 1991. In the Name of Democracy: US Policy Toward Latin America in the Reagan Years. Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
7.
Carothers, Thomas , 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
8.
Congress , 1992. The Situation in Peru and the Future of the War on Drugs: Hearing Before the Western Hemisphere Affairs and the Task Force on International Narcotics Control of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, 7 May. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
9.
Congress , 1994. Congressional Record, 103rd Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
10.
Diamond, Larry , 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
Dixon, William , 1994. `Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes', American Political Science Review88(1): 14-32.
12.
Doyle, Michael , 1983. `Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs', Philosophy and Public Affairs12(3-4): 205-235, 323-353.
13.
EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit) , 1995. Haiti: Country Profile 1994-1995. London: The Economist.
14.
Farer, Tom , ed., 1996. Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
FBIS (Foreign Broadcast Information Service), various dates. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
16.
Fearon, James , 1994. `Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes', American Political Science Review90(3): 715-735.
17.
Ferguson, Yale , 1972. `The United States and Political Development in Latin America: A Retrospect and Prescription', in Yale Ferguson, ed., Contemporary Inter-American Relations: A Reader in Theory and Issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (348-391).
18.
Finnemore, Martha , 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
19.
Finnemore, Martha & Kathryn Sikkink, 1998. `International Norm Dynamics and Political Change', International Organization52(4): 887-918.
20.
Forsythe, David P. , 1996. `The United Nations, Democracy, and the Americas', in Tom Farer, ed., Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press (107-131).
21.
French, Howard W. , 1991. `Haitians Consider an Interim Leader', New York Times, 10 October.
22.
Friedman, Thomas , 1993. `Dole Plans Bill to Bar the Use of GIs in Haiti', New York Times, 18 October.
23.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor , 1991. `Electoral Cycles and War', Journal of Conflict Resolution35(2): 212-244.
24.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor , 1996. `Democracy and Commitment', International Organization50(1): 109-140.
25.
Golden,Tim , 1993a. 'Guatemalan Leader is Pressed to Yield Power', New York Times, 1 June.
26.
Golden, Tim , 1993b. `Guatemala's Countercoup: A Military About-Face', New York Times, 3 June.
27.
Hagopian, Frances , 1998. `Democracy and Political Representation in Latin America in the 1990s: Pause, Reorganization, or Decline?', in Felipe Aguero & Jeffrey Stark, eds, Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America. Miami, FL: North-South Center Press at the University of Miami (99-144).
28.
Huntley, Wade , 1996. `Kant's Third Image: Systemic Sources of the Liberal Peace', International Studies Quarterly40(1): 45-76.
29.
IACHR (Inter-American Commission on Human Rights) , 1994. Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Haiti. Washington, DC: Organization of American States.
30.
IDB (Inter-American Development Bank) , 1996. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: 1996 Report. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
Ikenberry, G. John , 1998. `Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Post-War Order', International Security23(3): 43-78.
32.
Ikenberry, G. John & Charles Kupchan, 1990. `Socialization and Hegemonic Power', International Organization44(3): 283-315.
33.
Kant, Immanuel , [1795] 1995. `Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch', in Hans Reiss, ed., Kant: Political Writings. New York: Cambridge University Press (93-130).
34.
Karl, Terry , 1987. `Mexico, Venezuela, and the Contadora Initiative', in Morris J. Blachman, William M. Leogrande & Kenneth Sharpe, eds, Confronting Revolution: Security Through Diplomacy in Central America. New York: Pantheon (271-292).
35.
LADB (Latin American Data Base), various dates. Albuquerque, NM: Latin American and Iberian Institute.
36.
Lake, Anthony , 1993. `From Containment to Enlargement: Address at the School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, 21 September, 1993', US Department of State Dispatch4(39).
37.
Lake, David , 1992. `Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War', American Political Science Review86(1): 24-37.
38.
LAWR (Latin American Weekly Report) , 1992a. `IMF Credit Hinges on Peru's Performance'. London: Latin American Reports, 7 May.
39.
LAWR , 1992b. `With 38% of the Vote, Fujimori Gets a 55% Majority in the Assembly'. London: Latin American Reports, 3 December.
40.
Lowenthal, Abraham & Gregory F. Treverton, eds, 1994. Latin America in a New World. Boulder, CO: Westview.
41.
McClintock, Cynthia , 2000. `Explaining the Breakdown of Democratic Regimes in Latin America at Century's Turn: The Case of Fujimori's Peru', paper prepared for the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 31 August-3 September, Washington, DC.
42.
Mauceri, Philip , 1997. `Return of the Caudillo: Autocratic Democracy in Peru', Third World Quarterly18(5): 899-911.
43.
Moravcsik, Andrew , 2000. `The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe', International Organization54(2): 217-252.
44.
Morgan, T. Clifton & Sally Campbell, 1991. `Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War: So Why Can't Democracies Fight?', Journal of Conflict Resolution35(2): 187-211.
45.
Muñoz, Heraldo , 1998. `The Right to Democracy in the Americas', Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs40(1): 1-18.
46.
OAS (Organization of American States) , 1948. Charter of the Organization of American States. Washington, DC: OAS.
47.
OAS , 1991. The Santiago Commitment to Democracy and the Renewal of the Inter-American System. Washington, DC: OAS.
48.
OAS , 1993a. Annual Report of the Secretary General. Washington, DC: OAS.
49.
OAS , 1993b. Report on the Secretary General's Mission to Guatemala. Washington, DC: OAS.
50.
OAS , 1993c. Report of the Mission of the Secretary General to Guatemala, Second Visit. Washington, DC: OAS.
51.
OAS , 2000. Executive Summary of the Final Report of the Chief of the Electoral Observation Mission for the General Elections in the Republic of Peru, 5 June 2000. Washington, DC: OAS.
52.
O'Donnell, Guillermo , 1994. `Delegative Democracy', Journal of Democracy5(1): 55-69.
53.
Parish, Randall , 2000. `Political Prisms: Domestic Institutions and Interstate Cooperation', paper presented at the 96th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 31 August-3 September, Washington, DC.
54.
Parish, Randall, 2001. `Presidents, Parties, and Foreign Policy: Interstate Cooperation in South America', unpublished manuscript.
55.
Pastor, Robert , 1992. Whirlpool. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
Peceny, Mark , 1999. Democracy at the Point of Bayonets. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
57.
Peceny, Mark & William Stanley, 2001. `Liberal Social Reconstruction and the Resolution of Civil Wars in Central America', International Organization55(1): 149-182.
58.
Ray, James Lee , 1995. Democracy and International Conflict. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
59.
Remmer, Karen L. , 1993. `The Process of Democratization in Latin America', Studies in Comparative International Development27 (Winter): 2-24.
60.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas , 1996. `Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO', in Peter Katzenstein, ed., The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press (357-399).
61.
Roberts, Kenneth , 1995. `Neo-Liberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case', World Politics48 (October): 82-116.
62.
Roberts, Kenneth , 1998. Deepening Democracy: The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63.
Ruggie, John Gerard , 1997. `The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy', International Security21(4): 89-125.
64.
Russett, Bruce , 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
Russett, Bruce & John Oneal, 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.
66.
Schultz, Kenneth , 1999. `Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War', International Organization53(2): 233-266.
67.
Sikkink, Kathryn , 1993. `Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America', International Organization47(3): 411-442.
68.
Sikkink, Kathryn , 1996. `Transnational Advocacy Networks, Human Rights, and Democracy in Latin America', paper prepared for the 92nd Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 29 August-1 September, San Francisco, CA.
69.
Smith, Gaddis , 1994. The Last Years of the Monroe Doctrine 1945-1993. New York: Hill & Wang.
70.
Smith, Peter H. , ed., 1993. The Challenge of Integration: Europe and the Americas. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
71.
Smith, Peter H. , 1996. Talons of the Eagle: Dynamics of US-Latin American Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
72.
Smith, Tony , 1994a. America's Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73.
Smith, Tony , 1994b. `In Defense of Intervention', Foreign Affairs73(6): 34-46.
74.
Solingen, Etel , 1998. Regional Orders at Century's Dawn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75.
Stallings, Barbara , 1993. `International Influence on Economic Policy: Debt, Stabilization and Structural Reform', in Stephan Haggard & Robert Kaufman, eds, The Politics of Economic Adjustment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (41-88).
76.
Stanley, William & David Holiday, 2000. `Everyone Participates, No One is Responsible: Peace Implementation in Guatemala', unpublished manuscript.
77.
Stokes, Susan C. , 1996. `Economic Reforms and Public Opinion in Peru, 1900-1995', Comparative Political Studies29(5): 544-565.
78.
White House , 1994. Communication from the President of the United States Transmitting a Report on the Objectives and Character of the Planned Deployment of United States Armed Forces into Haiti. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
79.
Wise, Carol , 1997. `State Policy and Social Conflict in Peru', in Maxwell A. Cameron & Philip Mauceri, eds, The Peruvian Labyrinth: Polity, Society, Economy. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press (70-103).
80.
WOLA (Washington Office on Latin America), 1991. Andean Initiative Legislative Update.
81.
Yergin, Daniel & Joseph Stanislaw, 1998. The Commanding Heights. New York: Simon & Schuster.
