Markets in which technology assumes a central role are becoming driving forces of the economy. The authors label these “technology-intensive” (TI) markets. Despite their importance, however, there is not a clear understanding of the features of a TI market. Using scientific know-how as the foundational concept, the authors explore the nuances of know-how creation, dissemination, and use to identify eight features of TI markets. With a series of reputable empirical propositions, they also study four marketing decisions, beginning with the most fundamental, that is, the vertical positioning decision (the firm's decision about what it sells). Product design decisions (both platform and modularity), transfer rights decisions (incorporating both price formats and licensing restrictions), and migration decisions (whether and how to move customers through an ongoing stream of technological innovations) round out the set.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArthurBrian (1994), Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
2.
BollierDavid (1998), The Global Advance of Electronic Commerce.Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
3.
BrynjolfssonErik and KemererChris F. (1995), “Network Externalities in Microcomputer Software: An Econometric Analysis of the Spreadsheet Market,” working paper, MIT Center for Information Systems Research, No. 265.
4.
CaponNoel and GlazerRashi (1987), “Marketing and Technology: A Strategic Coalignment,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (July), 1–14.
FarrellJoseph, MonroeHunter K., and SalonerGarth (1998), “The Vertical Organization of Industry: Systems Competition Versus Component Competition,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,’‘ 7 (Summer), 143–82.
7.
FarrellJoseph, and SalonerGarth (1985), “Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation,” RAND Journal of Economics, 16, 70–83.
8.
FishburnPeter, OdlyzkoAndrew M., and SidersRyan C. (1997), “Fixed Fee Versus Unit Pricing for Information Goods: Competition, Equilibria and Price Wars,” (accessed August 2), [available at http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue2-7/odlyzko/index.html].
9.
GlazerRashi (1991), “Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset,” Journal of Marketing, 55 (October), 1–19.
10.
GrenadierS. and WeissA.M. (1997), “Investments in Technological Innovations: An Options Pricing Approach,” Journal of Financial Economics, 44, 397–416.
11.
IansitiMarco and WestJonathan (1997), “Technology Integration: Turning Great Research into Great Products,” Harvard Business Review, 76 (May/June), 69–79.
12.
JaffeAdam B. (1986), “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firm's Patents Profits and Market Value,” American Economic Review, 76 (December), 984–1001.
13.
JaffeAdam B. (1989), “Real Effects of Academic Research,” American Economic Review, 79 (5), 957–70.
14.
KaysenCarl (1956), United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corporation: An Economic Analysis of an Antitrust Case.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
LiebowitzStephen J. and MargolisStephen (1990), “The Fable of the Keys,” Journal of Law and Economics, 33 (April), 1–26.
16.
LiebowitzStephen J. and MargolisStephen (1995), “Path Dependence, Lock-In and History,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11 (April), 205–26.
17.
MandelMichael (1998), “Innovation You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet,” BusinessWeek, (August 31), 60–63
18.
MokyrJoel (1990), The Lever of Riches.New York: The Free Press.
19.
MorrisCharles R. and FergusonCharles H. (1993), “How Architecture Wins Technology Wars,” Harvard Business Review, 72 (March/April), 86–95.
20.
NortonJohn A. and BassFrank M. (1987), “Diffusion Theory Model of Adoption and Substitution for Successive Generations of Technology Intensive Products,” Management Science, 33 (September), 1069–86.
21.
PasserHarold (1953), The Electrical Manufacturers, 1875–1900.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
PolanyiMichael (1962), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy.New York: Harper and Row.
23.
PorterMichael E. (1985), Competitive Strategy: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance.New York: The Free Press.
24.
QuinnJames Brian (1992), Intelligent Enterprise.New York: The Free Press.
25.
QuinnJames Brian, BaruchJordan J., and ZienKaren Anne (1997), Innovation Explosion.New York: The Free Press.
26.
ReddyMohan (1987), “Technology, Standards, and Markets; A Market Institutionalization Perspective,” in Product Standardization and Competitive Strategy, GabelH. Landis, ed. Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 135–37.
27.
RomerPaul M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5), S71–90.
SanchezRon and MahoneyJoseph T. (1996), “Modularity, Flexibility and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design,” Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), 63–76.
30.
ShanklinWilliam L. and RyansJohn K.Jr. (1984), Marketing High Technology.Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
31.
ShapiroCarl (1996), “Antitrust in Network Industries,” speech delivered to American Law Institute and American Bar Association, San Francisco, CA (January 25), [available at http://usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/shapir.mar].
32.
Technology in the National Interest (1996), Committee on Civilian Industrial Technology, Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, (accessed July 17, 1998) [available at http://www.ta.doc.gov/reports/TechNI/TNI.pdf].
33.
TeeceDavid J. (1988), “Capturing Value from Technological Innovation: Integration, Strategic Partnering, and Licensing Decisions,” Interfaces, 18 (3), 46–61.
34.
ThurowLester C. (1997), “Needed: A New System of Intellectual Property Rights,” Harvard Business Review, 76 (September/October), 95–103.
35.
VarianHal R. (1996) “Buying, Renting and Sharing Information Goods,” working paper, Economics Department, University of California, Berkeley.
36.
VarianHal R. (1997), “Versioning Information Goods,” working paper, Economics Department, University of California, Berkeley.
37.
von HippelEric (1986), “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts,” Management Science, 32 (7), 791–805.
38.
WeissA.M. (1994), “The Effects of Expectations on Technology Adoption: Some Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 42 (December), 1–19.
39.
WeissA.M. and HeideJ. (1993), “The Nature of Organizational Search in High-Technology Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (May), 220–33.
40.
WilsonLynn O., WeissAllen M., and JohnGeorge (1990), “Unbundling of Industrial Systems,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (May), 123–38.
41.
WorkmanJohn P.Jr. (1993), “Marketing's Limited Role in New Product Development in One Computer Systems Firm,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (November), 405–21.
