The author summarizes 11 hypotheses from agency theory, transaction cost analysis, and Ouchi's theoretical approach about the impact of environmental, company, and salesperson characteristics on the design of sales force control systems (outcome- versus behavior-based) and tests them on a data set of 270 German sales organizations. Many of the hypotheses receive empirical support. Sales force size, the only construct for which the author derives two opposing hypotheses, is related negatively to the use of behavior-based control in sales forces. Thus, the hypothesis derived from Ouchi's approach is supported, whereas the contradictory hypothesis from transaction cost analysis is rejected.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbersSonke (1996), “Optimization Models for Salesforce Compensation,” European Journal of Operational Research, 89 (1), 1–17.
2.
AlbersSonke, KrafftManfred, and BielertWilhelm (1998), “Global Salesforce Management: Comparing German and U.S. Practices,” in Emerging Trends in Sales Thought and Practice, BauerGerald J., BaunchalkMark S., IngramThomas N., and LaForgeRaymond W., eds. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 193–211.
3.
AndersonErin (1985), “The Salesperson as Outside Agent or Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis,” Marketing Science, 4 (Summer), 234–54.
4.
AndersonErin (1988), “Strategic Implications of Darwinian Economics for Selling Efficiency and Choice of Integrated or Independent Sales Forces,” Management Science, 34 (May), 599–618.
5.
AndersonErin and OliverRichard L. (1987), “Perspectives on Behavior-Based Versus Outcome-Based Salesforce Control Systems,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (October), 76–88.
6.
BabakusEmin, CravensDavid W., GrantKen, IngramThomas N., and LaForgeRaymond W. (1996), “Investigating the Relationships Among Sales, Management Control, Sales Territory Design, Salesperson Performance, and Sales Organization Effectiveness,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (October), 345–63.
7.
BasuAmiya K., LalRajiv, SrinivasanV., and StaelinRichard (1985), “Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective,” Marketing Science, 4 (Fall), 267–91.
8.
BergenMark, DuttaShantanu, and WalkerOrville C.Jr. (1992), “Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (July), 1–24.
9.
BollenKenneth and LennoxRichard (1991), “Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective,” Psychological Bulletin, 110 (September), 305–14.
10.
BucklinLouis P. and SenguptaSanjit (1993), “Organizing Successful Comarketing Alliances,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (April), 32–46.
11.
ChallagallaGoutam N. and ShervaniTasadduq A. (1996), “Dimensions and Types of Supervisory Control: Effects on Salesperson Performance and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (January), 89–105.
12.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., FordNeil M., HartleySteven W, and WalkerOrville C.Jr. (1985), “The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (May), 103–18.
13.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., FordNeil M., and WalkerOrville C.Jr. (1997), Sales Force Management, 5th ed. Burr Ridge, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
14.
CoaseRonald H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, N.S., 4, 386–405.
15.
CoughlanAnne T. (1993), “Salesforce Compensation: A Review of MS/OR Advances,” in Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 5: Marketing, EliashbergJehoshua and LilienGary L., eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 611–51.
16.
CoughlanAnne T. and NarasimhanChakravarthi (1992), “An Empirical Analysis of Sales-Force Compensation Plans,” Journal of Business, 65 (1), 93–121.
17.
CoughlanAnne T. and SenSubrata K. (1989), “Salesforce Compensation: Theory and Managerial Implications,” Marketing Science, 8 (Fall), 324–42.
18.
CravensDavid W., IngramThomas N., LaForgeRaymond W., and YoungClifford E. (1993), “Behavior-Based and Outcome-Based Sales Force Control Systems,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (October), 47–59.
19.
DalrympleDouglas J. and StrahleWilliam M. (1990), “Career Path Charting: Framework for Sales Force Evaluation,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 10 (Summer), 59–68.
20.
EisenhardtKathleen M. (1985), “Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches,” Management Science, 31 (February), 134–49.
21.
EisenhardtKathleen M. (1988), “Agency- and Institutional-Theory Explanations: The Case of Retail Sales Compensation,” Academy of Management Journal, 31 (3), 488–511.
22.
EisenhardtKathleen M. (1989), “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,” Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 57–74.
23.
FavaJoseph L. and VelicerWayne F. (1992), “An Empirical Comparison of Factor, Image, Component, and Scale Scores,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27 (3), 301–22.
24.
FordNeil M., WalkerOrville C.Jr., and ChurchillGilbert A.Jr. (1985), “Differences in the Attractiveness of Alternative Rewards Among Industrial Salespeople,” Journal of Business Research, 13 (April), 123–38.
25.
HeideChristen P. (1994), Dartnell's 28th Sales Force Compensation Survey 1994–1995.Chicago: Dartnell Corporation.
26.
HeideJan B. and JohnGeorge (1992), “Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?” Journal of Marketing, 56 (April), 32–44.
27.
HofstedeGeert (1980), “Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?” Organizational Dynamics, 42–63.
28.
HofstedeGeert (1997), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
HolmstromBengt (1979), “Moral Hazard and Observability,” Bell Journal of Economics, 10 (Spring), 74–91.
30.
IngramThomas N., LaForgeRaymond W., and SchwepkerCharles H.Jr. (1997), Sales Management: Analysis and Decision Making, 3d ed. Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press.
31.
JacksonDonaldJr., SchlacterJohn, and WolfeWilliam (1995), “Examining the Bases Utilized for Evaluating Salespeople's Performance,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 15 (Fall), 57–65.
32.
JaworskiBernard J., StathakopoulosVlasis, and KrishnanH. Shanker (1993), “Control Combinations in Marketing: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 57–69.
33.
JohnGeorge and WeitzBarton (1989), “Sales Force Compensation: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Related to Use of Salary Versus Incentive Compensation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (February), 1–14.
34.
JosephKissan and KalwaniManohar (1995), “The Impact of Environmental Uncertainty on the Design of Salesforce Compensation Plans,” Marketing Letters, 6 (3), 183–97.
35.
JosephKissan and ThevaranjanA. (1998), “Monitoring and Incentives in Sales Organizations: An Agency-Theoretic Perspective,” Marketing Science, 17 (2), 107–23.
36.
KrafftManfred, LalRajiv, and AlbersSönke (1998), “Relative Explanatory Power of Agency Theory and Transaction Cost Analysis in German Salesforces,” working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
37.
LalRajiv, OutlandDonald, and StaelinRichard (1994), “Sales-force Compensation Plans: An Individual-Level Analysis,” Marketing Letters, 5, 117–30.
38.
LalRajiv, and SrinivasanV. (1993), “Compensation Plans for Single- and Multi-Product Salesforces: An Application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom Model,” Management Science, 39 (July), 777–93.
39.
MacCallumRobert C. and BrowneMichael W. (1993), “The Use of Causal Indicators in Covariance Structure Models: Some Practical Issues,” Psychological Bulletin, 114 (November), 533–41.
40.
MacCrimmonKenneth R. and WehrungDonald A. (1986), Taking Risks: The Management of Uncertainty.New York: The Free Press.
41.
MahajanJayashree and ChurchillGilbert A.Jr. (1990), “Alternative Approaches for Investigating Contingency-Based Organizational Predictions in Personal Selling,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1 (2, 3), 149–69.
42.
MorrisMichael H., DavisDuaen L., AllenJeffrey W., AvilaRamon A., and ChapmanJoseph (1991), “Assessing the Relationships Among Performance Measures, Managerial Practices, and Satisfaction When Evaluating the Salesforce: A Replication and Extension,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 11 (Summer), 25–35.
43.
MoynahanJohn K. (1983), “Salary Plus Commission, Despite Its Drawbacks, Is Right for Some Situations,” Sales and Marketing Management, 130 (March 14), 106–108.
44.
OliverRichard L. and AndersonErin (1994), “An Empirical Test of the Consequences of Behavior- and Outcome-Based Sales Control Systems,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (October), 53–67.
45.
OliverRichard L. and AndersonErin (1995), “Behavior- and Outcome-Based Sales Control Systems: Evidence and Consequences of Pure-Form and Hybrid Governance,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 15 (Fall), 1–15.
46.
OliverRichard L. and WeitzBarton A. (1991), “The Effects of Risk Preference, Uncertainty, and Incentive Compensation on Salesperson Motivation,” Report No. 91-104.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
47.
OuchiWilliam G. (1979), “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms,” Management Science, 25 (September), 833-49.
48.
OuchiWilliam G. and MaguireMary Ann (1975), “Organizational Control: Two Functions,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 20 (December), 559–69.
49.
PlankRichard E. and ReidDavid A. (1994), “The Mediating Role of Sales Behaviors: An Alternative Perspective of Sales Performance and Effectiveness,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 14 (Summer), 43–56.
50.
RindfleischAric and HeideJan B. (1997), “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (October), 30–54.
51.
RossWilliam T.Jr. (1991), “Performance Against Quota and the Call Selection Decision,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (August), 292–306.
VroomVictor H. (1964), Work and Motivation.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
54.
WalkerG. and PoppoLaura (1991), “Profit Centers, Single-Source Suppliers, and Transaction Costs,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (1), 66–87.
55.
WalkerOrville C.Jr., ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., and FordNeil M. (1977), “Motivation and Performance in Industrial Selling: Present Knowledge and Needed Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (May), 156–68.
56.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1981), “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach,” American Journal of Sociology, 87 (3), 548–77.
57.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism.New York: The Free Press.
