In this article, the authors investigate the effectiveness of advertising alliances (in which two brands from different product categories are featured together in an advertisement) for introducing new brands. The authors identify degree of complementarity between the featured products, type of differentiation strategy (common versus unique advertised attributes), and type of ad processing strategy (top-down or bottom-up) as important factors in determining ad effectiveness. The conceptualization captures the effects of these factors on brand awareness, brand accessibility, brand beliefs, belief accessibility, and brand attitudes. The theory was tested in an experiment using print advertisements to manipulate the three factors in conditions of high consumer involvement. The results show an interesting pattern of interactions among the factors, which has important implications for managers of new and established brands.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerDavid A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name.New York: The Free Press.
2.
AndersonJohn R. (1983), “A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22 (3), 261–95.
3.
BroniarczykSusan M. and AlbaJoseph W. (1994), “The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (May), 214–28.
4.
CacioppoJohn T. and PettyRichard E. (1982), “The Need for Cognition,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (1), 116–31.
5.
CacioppoJohn T., PettyRichard E., and KaoC.F. (1984), “The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 48 (3), 306–307.
6.
CohenJoel B. and ChakravartiDipankar (1990), “Consumer Psychology,” Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 243–88.
7.
CollinsAlan M. and LoftusElizabeth F. (1975), “A Spreading Activation Theory of Semantic Processing,” Psychological Review, 82 (6), 407–28.
8.
CollinsAlan M. and QuillianM. Ross (1972), “How to Make a Language User,” in Organization of Memory, TulvingEndel and DonaldsonWayne, eds. New York: Academic Press, 309–51.
9.
CraikFergus I.M. and LockhartRobert S. (1972), “Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11 (6), 671–84.
10.
de GrootA.M.B. (1989), “Representational Aspects of Word Imageability and Word Frequency as Assessed Through Word Association,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15 (5), 824–45.
11.
DharRavi and ShermanSteven J. (1996), “The Effect of Common and Unique Features in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (3), 193–203.
12.
FishbeinMartin and AjzenIsek (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
GoodsteinRonald C. (1993), “Category-Based Applications and Extensions in Advertising: Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (1), 87–99.
14.
HecklerSusan E. and ChildersTerry L. (1992), “The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency?” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (March), 475–92.
15.
HerrPaul M., FarquharPeter H., and FazioRussel H. (1993), “Using Dominance Measures to Evaluate Brand Extensions,” Report No. 93-120.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
16.
HuntReed R., AusleyJayne Ann, and SchultzE. EugeneJr. (1986), “Shared and Item-Specific Information in Memory for Event Descriptions,” Memory and Cognition, 14 (1), 49–54.
17.
JohnsonMichael D. (1989), “The Differential Processing of Product Category and Noncomparable Choice Alternatives,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (3), 300–309.
18.
JonesEdward E. and DavisKeith (1965), “From Acts to Dispositions,” Advances in Experimental Psychology, Vol. 2, BerkowitzLeonard, ed. New York: Academic Press, 219–66.
19.
KardesFrank R. (1988), “Spontaneous Inference Processes in Advertising: The Effects of Conclusion Omission and Involvement on Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 225–33.
20.
KellerKevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 1–22.
21.
KelleyHarold H. (1973), “The Process of Causal Attribution,” American Psychologist, 28 (February), 107–28.
22.
KrishnanH. Shanker (1996), “Characteristics of Memory Associations: A Consumer-Based Brand Equity Perspective,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (4), 389–405.
23.
LingleJohn H, AltomMark W., and MedinDouglas L. (1984), “Of Cabbages and Kings: Assessing the Extendibility of Natural Object Concept Models to Social Things,” in Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol. 1, WyerRobert S. and SrullThomas K., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 71–118.
24.
LokenBarbara and JohnDeborah Roedder (1993), “Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact?” Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 71–84.
25.
LokenBarbara and WardJames (1990), “Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (June), 39–54.
26.
MacKenzieScott B. and LutzRichard J. (1989), “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude Toward the Ad in an Advertising Pre-Testing Context,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (April), 48–65.
27.
MandlerGeorge (1982), “The Structure of Value: Accounting for Taste,” in Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium, ClarkMargaret S. and FiskeSusan T, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3–36.
28.
MervisCarolyn B. and RoschEleanor (1981), “Categorization of Natural Objects,” in Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 32, RosenzweigM.R. and PorterW.L., eds. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 89–115.
29.
Meyers-LevyJoan, LouieTherese, and CurrenMary (1994), “How Does the Congruity of Brand Names Affect Evaluations of Brand Name Extensions,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (February), 46–53.
30.
Meyers-LevyJoan, and TyboutAlice M. (1989), “Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (June), 39–54.
31.
NedungadiPrakash (1990), “Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice Without Altering Brand Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (3), 263–76.
32.
NelsonDouglas L., BennettDavid J., GeeNancy R., SchreiberThomas A., and McKinneyVanessa M. (1993), “Implicit Memory: Effects of Network Size and Interconnectivity on Cued Recall,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19 (4), 747–64.
33.
OwenStewart (1993), “The Landor ImagePower Survey: A Global Assessment of Brand Strength,” in Brand Equity and Advertising's Role in Building Strong Brands, AakerD.A. and BielA.L., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 11–30.
34.
ParkC. Whan, JaworskiBernard J., and MacInnisDeborah J. (1986), “Strategic Brand Concept–Image Management,” Journal of Marketing, 50 (October), 621–35.
35.
ParkC. Whan, JunSung Youl, and ShockerAllan D. (1996), “Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, 33 (November), 453–66.
36.
ParkC. Whan, and SmithDaniel C. (1989), “Product-Level Choice: A Top-Down or Bottom-Up Process,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (3), 289–99.
37.
QuillianM. Ross (1969), “The Teachable Language Comprehender: A Simulation Program and Theory of Language,” Communications of the ACM, 12, 459–76.
38.
RaoAkshay R. and RuekertRobert W. (1994), “Brand Alliances as Signals of Product Quality,” Sloan Management Review, 36 (Fall), 87–97.
39.
RigbyDarrell K. and BuchananRobin W.T. (1994), “Putting More Strategy into Strategic Alliances,” Director & Boards, 18 (Winter), 25–27.
40.
RumelhartDavid E., LindsayPeter H., and NormanDonald A. (1972), “A Process Model for Long-Term Memory,” in Organization of Memory, TulvingEndel and DonaldsonWayne, eds. New York: Academic Press, 197–246.
41.
SimoninBernard L. and RuthJulie A. (1995), “Co–Marketing with Asia: The Impact of International Strategic Alliances on Brand Equity,” in Marketing Theory and Applications, StewartDavid W. and VilcassimNaufel J., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 183–84.
42.
SmithRobert E. and HuntShelby D. (1978), “Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 5 (December), 149–58.
43.
SrullThomas K., LichtensteinMeryl, and RothbartMyron (1985), “Associative Storage and Retrieval Processes in Person Memory,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11 (2), 316–45.
44.
Advertisers Standard Directory of (1995), Brand Index.Skokie, IL: National Register Publishing Company.
45.
SujanMita and BettmanJames R. (1989), “The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers’ Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights from Schema Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (November), 454–68.
46.
SujanMita and DeklevaChristine (1987), “Product Categorization and Inference Making: Some Implications for Comparative Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (3), 372–78.
VaradarajanP. Rajan (1986), “Horizontal Cooperative Sales Promotion: A Framework for Classification and Additional Perspectives,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (April), 61–73.
49.
ZaichkowskyJudith Lynne (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (December), 341–52.
