Our understanding of how organizations process market information can be advanced substantially on the basis of principles derived from models of organizational learning. Accordingly, the author examines the extant literature on organizational learning, proposes a hierarchy of market sense making, and provides research propositions that will enhance marketers’ understanding of information processing and knowledge creation in organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyrisChris and SchönDonald A. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BatesonGregory (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind.New York: Ballantine Books.
3.
BedeianA. G. (1986), “Contemporary Challenges in the Study of Organizations,” Journal of Management, 12 (Winter), 185–201.
4.
BonDurantWilliam R. (1992) “Research: the ‘HP Way’,” Marketing Research, 4 (June), 28–33.
5.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr. (1979), “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 64–73.
6.
CohenMichael D. (1991), “Individual Learning and Organizational Routine: Emerging Connections’” Organization Science, 2 (February), 135–9.
7.
CyertRichard M. and MarchJames G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
8.
DaftRichard L. and HuberGeorge P. (1987), “How Organizations Learn: A Communications Framework,” in Research in the Sociology of Organizations, DitomasoNancy and BacharachSamuel B., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1–36.
9.
DaftRichard L., HuberGeorge P., and WeickKarl E. (1984), “Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems,” Academy of Management Review, 9 (April), 284–95.
10.
DayGeorge S. (1991), “Learning About Markets,” Marketing Science Institute Report Number 91–117.Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
11.
DeshpandéRohit. (1982), “The Organizational Context of Market Research Use,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Fall), 91–101.
12.
DeshpandéRohit, FarleyJohn U., and WebsterFrederick E. (1993),” Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 23–37.
13.
DeshpandéRohit and WebsterFrederick E. (1989), “Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (January), 3–15.
14.
DeshpandéRohit and ZaltmanGerald R. (1982), “Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (February), 14–31.
15.
DeshpandéRohit and ZaltmanGerald R. (1984), “A Comparison of Factors Affecting Researcher and Manager Perceptions of Market Research Use,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (February), 32–38.
16.
DeshpandéRohit and ZaltmanGerald R. (1987), “A Comparison of Factors Affecting Use of Marketing Information in Consumer and Industrial Firms,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (February), 114–18.
17.
DixonNancy M. (1992), “Organizationl Learning: A Review of the Literature with Implications for HRD Professionals,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, 3 (Spring), 29–49.
FaranceRichard V., MongePeter R., and RussellHamish M. (1977), Communicating and Organizing.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
FeldmanJack (1986), “On the Difficulty of Learning From Experience,” in The Thinking Organization, SimmsHenry P.Jr., Dennis A. Gioia and Associates, eds., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 263–92.
21.
FiolCM. and LylesM.A. (1985), “Organizational Learning,” Academy of Management Review, 10 (October), 803–13.
22.
GalbraithJay R. (1977), Organizational Design.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
GioiaDennis A. and SimmsHenry P. (1986), “Introduction: Social Cognition in Organizations,” in The Thinking Organization, SimmsHenry P.Jr., Dennis A. Gioia and Associates, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1–19.
24.
GoldsteinDavid K., and ZackMichael H. (1989), “The Impact of Marketing Information Supply on Product Managers: An Organizational Information Processing Perspective,” Office: Technology and People, 4 (Winter), 313–36.
25.
GrudzinaDorothea M. (1992), “Merrill Lynch: Bullish on Marketing Research,” Marketing Research, 4 (March), 3–7.
26.
HuMichael Y. (1986), “An Experimental Study of Managers’ and Researchers’ Use of Consumer Market Research,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 14 (Fall), 44–51.
27.
HuberGeorge P. (1991), “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures,” Organization Science, 2 (February), 88–115.
28.
JelinekMariann (1979), Institutionalizing Innovation: A Study of Organizational Learning Systems.New York: Praeger Publishers.
29.
KayNeil M. (1979), The Innovating Firm.New York: St. Martin's Press.
30.
KeiserSteven K., KrumJames R., and RauPradeep A. (1987), “Changing Patterns in Marketing Research,” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 5 (Spring), 10–18.
31.
LawsonRobert B. and VentrissCurtis L. (1992), “Organizational Change: The Role of Organizational Culture and Organizational Learning,” The Psychological Record, 42 (Summer), 205–19.
32.
LeeS., CourtneyJ.F.Jr., and O'KeefeR.M. (1992), “A System for Organizational Learning Using Cognitive Maps,” OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 20 (Spring), 23–36.
33.
LevittB. and MarchJ.G. (1988), “Organizational Learning,” in Annual Review of Sociology, ScottW. Richard and BlakeJudith, eds. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc, 319–40.
34.
MarchJames G. (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organization Science, 2 (February) 71–87.
35.
MarchJames G. and ShapiraJur (1982), “Behavioral Decision Theory and Organizational Decision Theory,” in Decision Making an Interdisciplinary Inquiry, UngsonGerardo R. and BraunsteinDaniel N., eds. Boston: Kent Publishing.
36.
MenonAnil and VaradarajanP. Rajan (1992), “A Model of Marketing Knowledge Use Within Firms,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (October), 53–71.
37.
MintzbergHenry (1979), The Structuring of Organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
38.
MoormanChristine, DeshpandéRohit, and ZaltmanGerald (1993), “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 81–101.
39.
MoormanChristine, ZaltmanGerald, and DeshpandéRohit (1992), “Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (August), 314–28.
40.
MyersJohn G., MassyWilliam G., and GreyserStephen A. (1980), Marketing Research and Knowledge Development.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
PayneJerry L. (1991), “Marketing Insights in the 1990s: The View from Coca–Cola USA,” Marketing Research, 3 (December), 3–7.
43.
SackmannSonja A. (1991) Cultural Knowledge in Organizations.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
44.
SieglerR.S. (1983), “Five Generalizations about Cognitive Development,” American Psychologist, 38 (March), 263–77.
45.
SimonHerbert A. (1991), “Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning,” Organization Science, 2 (February), 125–34.
46.
SinkulaJames M. (1990), “Perceived Characteristics, Organizational Factors, and the Utilization of External Market Research Suppliers,” Journal of Business Research, 16 (August), 1–17.
47.
SinkulaJames M. (1992), “Market Information Use: An Organizational Learning Perspective,” unpublished working paper, The University of Vermont.
48.
SinkulaJames M. and HamptonRonald D. (1988), “Centralization and Information Acquisition by In-House Market Research Departments,” Journal of Business Research, 16 (June), 337–49.
49.
SmithRobert M. (1992), “Research Provider Partnerships: Do They Consider the Clients Real Needs?” Marketing Research, 4 (June), 24–26.
50.
StewartThomas A. (1991a), “Brainpower,” Fortune, 123 (June 3), 44–60.
51.
StewartThomas A. (1991b), “GE Keeps Those Ideas Coming,” Fortune, 124 (August 12), 41–49.
52.
WalshJames P., and UngsonGerardo Rivera (1991), “Organizational Memory,” Academy of Management Review, 16 (January), 57–91.
53.
WeickKarl E. (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54.
WeissCarol H. (1980), “Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion,” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1 (3), 381–404.