A comprehensive model of attitudes toward advertising includes three personal utility factors (product information, social image information, and hedonic amusement) and four socioeconomic factors (good for economy, fostering materialism, corrupting values, and falsity/no-sense). The proposed 7-factor model was tested on two independent samples: collegians (188) and householders (195) from Ohio and Mississippi Valley states, explaining 62% and 56% of the variance in their global attitudes, respectively. The model's dimensions were used to profile these publics and to identify attitudinal segments within them. Most respondents exhibited conflict between an appreciation of the personal uses and economic value of advertising and an apprehension of cultural degradation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AAF (1992), “Dear Mr. President (American Advertising Federation advocacy ad),”Time, March 9, p 54a.
2.
AndersonR. D., EngledowJ. L., and BeckerH. (1978), “How Consumer Reports Subscribers See Advertising, Journal of Advertising Research, 18, 29–34.
3.
AndrewsJ. C. (1989), “The Dimensionality of Beliefs Toward Advertising in General,”Journal of Advertising, 18 (1), 26–35.
4.
BagozziR. P., and PhillipsL. (1982), “Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459–89.
5.
BarksdaleH. C., and DardenW. R. (1972), “Consumer Attitudes Toward Marketing and Consumerism,”Journal of Marketing, 36 (October), 28–35.
6.
BauerR. A., and GreyserS. A. (1968), Advertising in America: The Consumer View, Boston, MA: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research.
7.
BealesH., CraswellR., and SalopS. (1981), “The Efficient Regulation of Consumer Information,”Journal of Law and Economics, 24 (December), 491–539.
8.
CalfeeJ. E., and RingoldD. J. (1988), “Consumer Scepticism of Advertising: What do the Polls Show?” in Advances in Consumer Research, M. J. Houston, ed., 15, 244–48.
9.
DurandR. M., and LambertZ. V. (1980), “Consumer Alienation and Support for Advertising Regulations,” in Current Issues and Research in Advertising, LeighJ. H., and MartinC. R., eds. 3, 183–99.
10.
DurandR. M., and LambertZ. V. (1985), “Alienation and Criticisms of Advertising,”Journal of Advertising, 14 (3), 9–17.
11.
FishbeinM., and AjzenA. (1975), Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
FolkmanS., and LazarusR. S. (1985), “If It Changes It Must Be a Process: Study of Emotion and Coping During Three Stages of a College Examination,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 48 (1), 150–70.
13.
FordG. T., SmithD. B., and SwasyJ. L. (1990), “Consumer Scepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses From the Economics of Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (March), 433–41.
14.
FriedmannR., and ZimmerM. (1988), “The Role of Psychological Meaning in Advertising,”Journal of Advertising, 17 (1), 41–8.
15.
GalbraithJ. K. (1967), The New Industrial State.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
GossageH. L. (1986), “Is Advertising Worth Saving?,” in Is There Any Hope for Advertising? GossageH. L.., eds. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
17.
GreyserS. A., and ReeceB. B. (1971), “Businessmen Look Hard at Advertising,”Harvard Business Review, 49 (May-June), 18–27.
18.
HairJ. F., AndersonR. E., and TathamR. L. (1987), Multivariate Data Analysis.New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
19.
HallerT. F. (1974), “What Students Think of Advertising,”Journal of Advertising Research, 14 (Feb), 33–8.
20.
HunterJ. E., and GerbingD. W. (1982), “Unidimensional Measurement, Second-Order Factor Analysis and Causal Models,” in Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. IV, StawB. M., and CummingsL. L., eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 267–320.
21.
JoreskogK., and SorbomD. (1984), LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood: User's Guide.Sweden: University of Uppsala.
22.
KilbornP. T. (1989), “Darman Issues Warning on ‘Self-Indulgent’ U.S.,”New York Times (July 21), D1.
23.
LarkinE. F. (1977), “A Factor Analysis of College Student Attitudes Toward Advertising,”Journal of Advertising, 6 (2), 42–6.
24.
LutzR. J. (1978), “A Functional Approach to Consumer Attitude Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, H. Keith Hunt, ed., 5, 360–69.
25.
MannesM. (1964), But Will It Sell? New York: Lippincott.
26.
MuehlingD. D. (1987), “An Investigation of Factors Underlying Attitude-Toward-Advertising-in-General,”Journal of Advertising, 16 (1), 32–40.
27.
NelsonP. (1974), “Advertising as Information,”Journal of Political Economy, 82 (July/August), 729ff.
28.
NorrisV. (1984), “The Economic Effects of Advertising: A Review of the Literature,”Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 7 (2), 39–134.
29.
PollayR. W. (1986a), “The Distorted Mirror: Reflections on the Unintended Consequences of Advertising,”Journal of Marketing, 50 (Spring), 18–36.
30.
PollayR. W. (1986b), “Quality of Life in the Padded Sell: Common Criticisms of Advertising's Cultural Character and International Public Policies,”Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 9 (2), 173–250.
31.
PollayR. W. (1991), “Adbusters and Advocates: Adversaries to Advertising,” in Proceedings of the 1991 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, R. Holman, ed., 182.
32.
PunjG., and StewartD. W. (1983), “Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (May), 134–48.
33.
ReidL. N., and SoleyL. C. (1982), “Generalized and Personalized Attitudes Toward Advertising's Social and Economic Effects,”Journal of Advertising, 11 (3), 3–7.
34.
RichinsM. (1991), “Social Comparison and the Idealized Images of Advertising,”Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (June), 71–83.
35.
RussellJ. T., and LaneW. R. (1989), Kleppner's Advertising Procedure, 11th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
SandageC. H., and LeckenbyJ. D. (1980), “Student Attitudes Toward Advertising: Institution vs. Instrument,”Journal of Advertising, 9 (2), 29–32 +.
37.
SchutzH. G., and CaseyM. (1981), “Consumer Perceptions of Advertising as Misleading,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 15 (Winter), 340–57.
38.
SoleyL. C., and ReidL. N. (1983), “Satisfaction With the Informational Value of Television and Magazine Advertising,”Journal of Advertising, 12 (3), 27–31.
39.
TharpM., and ScottL. M. (1990), “The Role of Marketing Processes in Creating Cultural Meaning,”Journal of Macromarketing, 10 (Fall), 47–60.
40.
TriffM., BenningfieldD. B., and MurphyJ. H. (1987), “Advertising Ethics: A Study of Public Attitudes and Perceptions,” in Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising, Florence Feasley, ed., 50–54.
41.
WilkieW. L. (1986), Consumer Behavior.New York: John Wiley.
42.
WrightP. L. (1986), “Schemer Schema: Consumers’ Intuitive Theories about Marketers’ Influence Tactics,” in Advances in Consumer Research, R. J. Lutz, ed., 13, 1–3.
43.
ZanotE. (1981), “Public Attitudes Toward Advertising,” in Advertising in a New Age (AAA Proceedings), Keith HuntH., ed., 142–46.
