Many marketers contend that recent developments in the philosophy of science imply that objectivity in marketing research is an illusion, a chimera, or impossible. Five arguments are customarily put forth that supposedly demonstrate the impossibility of objectivity: (1) linguistic relativism, (2) paradigm incommensurability, (3) theories are underdetermined by facts, (4) perception is theory-laden, and (5) epistemically significant observations are theory-laden. The author evaluates the five arguments, shows that there is nothing in the philosophy of science that dooms objective marketing research, and puts forth the “positive case” for objectivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AMA Task Force on the Development of Marketing Thought (1988), “Developing, Disseminating, and Utilizing Marketing Knowledge,”Journal of Marketing, 52 (October), 1–25.
2.
AndersonJames C., and GerbingDavid W. (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two Step Approach,”Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411–23.
3.
AndersonPaul F. (1983), “Marketing, Scientific Progress, and Scientific Method,”Journal of Marketing, 47 (Fall), 18–31.
4.
AndersonPaul F. (1986), “On Method in Consumer Research: A Critical Relativist Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (September), 155–73.
5.
AndersonPaul F. (1989), “On Relativism and Interpretivism—With a Prolegomenon to the ‘Why Question’,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 10–23.
6.
BagozziRichard P. (1980), Causal Models in Marketing.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
7.
BarchasIsaac D. (1989), “After the Fall,”Academic Questions, 3 (Winter), 24–34.
8.
BarzumJacques (1991), “Reflections on Teaching and Learning,”Academic Questions, 4 (Spring), 30–40.
9.
BeachEdward (1984), “The Paradox of Cognitive Relativism Revisited: A Reply to Jack W. Meiland,”Metaphilosophy, 15, 1–15.
10.
BerlinBrent, and KayPaul (1969), Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution.Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
BernsteinRichard J. (1983), Beyond Objectivism and Relativism.Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
BrownHarold I. (1977), Perception Theory and Commitment.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
BrownR., and LennebergE. H. (1954), “A Study in Language and Cognition,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 454–62.
14.
BungeMario (1967), Scientific Research, Vol. 2: The Search for Truth.New York: Springer-Verlag.
15.
CalderBobby J., PhillipsLynn W., and TyboutAlice M. (1983), “Beyond External Validity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (June), 112–14.
16.
CalderBobby J., and TyboutAlice M. (1989), “Interpretive, Qualitative, and Traditional Scientific Consumer Behavior Research,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
17.
CarnapRudolph (1950), Logical Foundations of Probability.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
CarnapRudolph (1956), “The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts,” in The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1, FeiglHerbert, and ScrivenMichael, eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 38–76.
19.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr. (1979), “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 64–73.
20.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., FordNeil M., HartleySteven W., and WalkerOrville C.Jr. (1985), “The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (May), 103–18.
21.
ChurchlandPaul M. (1988), “Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality: A Reply to Jerry Fodor,”Philosophy of Science, 55 (June), 167–87.
22.
DavidsonDonald (1973), “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme,”Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association, 1973–74.Newark, DE: American Philosophical Association, 5–20.
23.
DennettD. C. (1981), Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
FeyerabendPaul K. (1975), Against Method.Thetford, England: Low and Brydone.
25.
FeyerabendPaul K. (1987), Farewell to Reason.London: Verso, New Left Books.
26.
FiratFuat (1989), “Science and Human Understanding,” in AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, ChildersT. L., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 93–8.
27.
FlewAnthony (1985), Thinking About Social Thinking: The Philosophy of the Social Sciences.New York: Basil Black-well, Ltd.
28.
FodorJerry (1984), “Observation Reconsidered,”Philosophy of Science, 51 (March), 23–43.
29.
FodorJerry (1988), “A Reply to Churchland's ‘Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality’,”Philosophy of Science, 55 (June), 188–98.
30.
FullertonRonald A. (1986), “Historicism: What It Is, and What It Means for Consumer Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, WallendorfM., and AndersonP. F., eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 431–4.
31.
GiereRonald N. (1988), Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
GilmanDaniel (1991), “The Neurobiology of Observation,”Philosophy of Science, 58 (September), 496–502.
33.
GoodmanN. (1973), Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Co.
34.
GoodmanN. (1978), Ways of Worldmaking.Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., Inc.
35.
GreenPaul E., and CarmoneFrank J. (1969), “Multidimensional Scaling: An Introduction and Comparison of Non-metric Unfolding Techniques,”Journal of Marketing Research, 6 (August), 330–41.
36.
GreenPaul E., and RaoVithala R. (1971), “Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (August), 355–63.
37.
GreenwoodJohn D. (1990), “Two Dogmas of Neo-Empiricism: The ‘Theory-Informity’ of Observation and the Quine-Duhem Thesis,”Philosophy of Science, 57 (December), 553–74.
38.
HansonNorwood R. (1958), Patterns of Discovery.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HarréRom (1986), Varieties of Realism.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, Ltd.
40.
HeiderE. R., and OliverD. C. (1972), “The Structure of the Color Space in Naming and Memory for Two Languages,”Cognitive Psychology, 8 (July), 337–54.
41.
HempelCarl G. (1965), “Aspects of Scientific Explanation,” in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science.New York: The Free Press, 331–496.
42.
HempelCarl G. (1970), “Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science,” in Foundations of the Unity of Science, Vol. 8, NeurathOtto, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 695.
43.
HirschmanElizabeth (1986), “Humanistic Inquiry in Marketing Research: Philosophy, Method, and Criteria,”Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (August), 237–49.
44.
HolbrookMorris B. (1986), “The Dramatic Side of Consumer Research: The Semiology of Consumption in the Arts,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, WallendorfM., and AndersonP. F., eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 237–40.
45.
HolbrookMorris B., and O'ShaughnessyJohn (1988), “On the Scientific Status of Consumer Research and the Need for an Interpretive Approach to Studying Consumption Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (December), 398–402.
46.
HoltDouglas B. (1991), “Rashomon Visits Consumer Behavior: An Interpretive Critique of Naturalistic Inquiry,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 18, HolmanR. H., and SolomonM. R., eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 57–62.
47.
HowellRoy D. (1987), “Covariance Structure Modeling and Measurement Issues: A Note,”Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (February), 119–26.
48.
HudsonLaurel A., and OzanneJulie L. (1988), “Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (March), 508–21.
49.
HuntShelby D. (1976), “The Nature and Scope of Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 40 (July), 17–28.
50.
HuntShelby D. (1983), Marketing Theory: The Philosophy of Marketing Science.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
51.
HuntShelby D. (1989), “Naturalistic, Humanistic, and Interpretive Inquiry: Challenges and Ultimate Potential,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 185–98.
52.
HuntShelby D. (1990), “Truth in Marketing Theory and Research,”Journal of Marketing, 54 (July), 1–15.
53.
HuntShelby D. (1991a), Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science.Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Co.
54.
HuntShelby D. (1991b), “The Three Dichotomies Model of Marketing Revisited,” in AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, ChildersTerry L., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 425–30.
55.
HuntShelby D. (1992), “For Reason and Realism in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 56 (April), 89–102.
56.
HymanMichael R., SkipperRobert, and TanseyRichard (1991), “Two Challenges for the Three Dichotomies Model,” in AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, ChildersTerry L., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 417–22.
57.
JacobsStruan (1989), “Vindicating Universalism,”Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 19 (March), 75–80.
58.
JaworskiBernard J., and MacInnisDeborah J. (1987), “On the Meaning of Data: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives,”AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, BelkR. W., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 161–5.
59.
KeithWilliam M., and CherwitzRichard A. (1989), “Objectivity, Disagreement, and the Rhetoric of Inquiry,” in Rhetoric in the Human Sciences, SimonsHerbert W., ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 195–210.
60.
KitcherP. (1978), “Theories, Theorists, and Theoretical Changes,”Philosophical Review, 87, 519–47.
61.
KordigCarl R. (1971), The Justification of Scientific Change.Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
62.
KuhnThomas S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
63.
KuhnThomas S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
KuhnThomas S. (1976), “Theory-Change as Structure-Change: Comments on the Sneed Formalism,”Erkenntnis, 10, 179–99.
65.
KuhnThomas S. (1977), The Essential Tension.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
KuhnThomas S. (1978), Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity 1884–1912.New York: Oxford University Press.
67.
LakoffGeorge, and JohnsonMark (1980), Metaphors We Live By.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
LantzD., and StefflreV. (1964), “Language and Cognition Revisited,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69 (November), 472–81.
69.
LaudanLarry (1976), “Discussion: Two Dogmas of Methodology,”Philosophy of Science, 43 (December), 585–97.
70.
LaudanLarry (1990), Science and Relativism.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
LaudanLarry, DonovanArthur, LaudanRachel, BarkerPeter, BrownHarold, LeplinJarrett, ThagardPaul, and WykstraSteve (1986), “Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research,”Synthese, 69, 141–223.
72.
LennebergE. (1967), The Biological Foundations of Language.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
73.
LevinMichael E. (1979), “On Theory-Change and Meaning-Change,”Philosophy of Science, 46 (September), 407–24.
74.
MacCormacEarl R. (1985), A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75.
MakiUskali (1988), “How to Combine Rhetoric and Realism in the Methodology of Economics,”Economics and Philosophy, 4, 89–109.
76.
MartinLaura, and PullmanGeoffrey K. (1991), The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77.
McCloskeyD. N. (1985), The Rhetoric of Economics, Series in the Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
78.
McMullinErnan (1985), “Empiricism at Sea,” in A Portrait of Twenty-Five Years, CohenR. S., and WartofskyM. W., eds. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 121–32.
79.
MickDavid Glen (1986), “Consumer Research and Semiotics: Exploring the Morphology of Signs, Symbols, and Significance,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (September), 196–213.
80.
MobergD. W. (1979), “Are There Rival, Incommensurable Theories?”Philosophy of Science, 46 (June), 244–62.
81.
MoormanChristine (1984), “Creative Inquiry: The Role of the Prepared Mind,” in AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, AndersonP. F., and RyanM. J., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 53–6.
82.
NagelErnest (1961), The Structure of Science.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
83.
OlsonJerry C. (1987), “The Construction of Scientific Meaning,” in Marketing Theory, BelkR. W., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
84.
OzanneJulie L., and HudsonLaurel Anderson (1989), “Exploring Diversity in Consumer Research,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth C., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
85.
PeterJ. Paul (1983), “Some Philosophical and Methodological Issues in Consumer Research,” in Marketing Theory: The Philosophy of Marketing Science, HuntShelby D., ed. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 382–94.
86.
PeterJ. Paul (1991), “Philosophical Tensions in Consumer Inquiry,” in Handbook of Consumer Behavior, RobertsonT. S., and KassarjianH. H., eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 548–91.
87.
PeterJ. Paul, and DacinPeter A. (1991), “Measurement Scales, Permissible Statistics, and Marketing Research,” in AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, ChildersTerry L., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 275–83.
88.
PeterJ. Paul, and OlsonJerry C. (1983), “Is Science Marketing?”Journal of Marketing, 47 (Fall), 111–25.
89.
PeterJ. Paul, and OlsonJerry C. (1989), “The Relativist/Constructionist Perspective on Scientific Knowledge and Consumer Research,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth C., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
90.
PopperKarl R. (1972), Objective Knowledge.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
91.
PutnamHillary (1981), Reason, Truth, and History.Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
92.
QuineW. V. (1960), Word and Object.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93.
RexeisenRichard J. (1984), “Theory Development in Perspective: Exposing the Cultural Bias,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, KinnearThomas C., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 329–32.
94.
RobinDonald P. (1991), “Comments on Two Challenges for the Three Dichotomies Model,” in AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings, ChildersTerry L., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 423–5.
95.
SalmonWesley C. (1963), Logic.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
96.
SapirEdward (1949), Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality, MandelbaumDavid G., ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
97.
SapireD. (1988), “Jarvie on Rationality and the Unity of Mankind,”Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 18 (December), 497–508.
98.
SauerWilliam J., NighswongerNancy, and ZaltmanGerald (1982), “Current Issues in Philosophy of Science: Implication of the Study of Marketing,” in Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives, BushPaul, and HuntShelby D., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
99.
SchefflerIsrael (1967), Science and Subjectivity.Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Co.
100.
SchefflerIsrael (1982), Science and Subjectivity, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., Inc.
101.
SchlickMoritz (1934), “Uber das Fundament der Erkenntnis,”Erkenntnis, 4. English translation by David Rynin, in Logical Positivism, AyerA. J., ed. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. (Page numbers refer to English translation.)
102.
SchwandtThomas R. (1990), “Paths to Inquiry in the Social Disciplines: Scientific, Constructivist, and Critical Theory Methodologies,” in The Paradigm Dialog, GubaEgon G., ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 258–76.
103.
ShapereDudley (1964), “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,”Philosophical Review, 73, 383–94.
104.
ShapereDudley (1966), “The Structure of Scientific Change,” in Mind and Cosmos: Explanations in the Philosophy of Science, ColodnyR., ed. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 41–85.
105.
ShapereDudley (1982), “The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy,”Philosophy of Science, 49 (December), 485–525.
106.
SherryJohn F.Jr. (1990), “Postmodern Alternatives: The Interpretive Turn in Consumer Research,” in Handbook of Consumer Behavior, RobertsonT. S., and KassarjianH. H., eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 548–91.
107.
ShimpTerence A., and SharmaSubhash (1987), “Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of CETSCALE,”Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (August), 280–9.
108.
ShortThomas (1988), “‘Diversity’ and ‘Breaking the Disciplines’,”Academic Questions, 1 (Summer), 6–29.
109.
ShwederRichard A. (1989), “Post-Nietzschian Anthropology: The Idea of Multiple Objective Worlds,” in Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, KrauszMichael, ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
110.
SiegelHarvey (1987), Relativism Refuted.Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
111.
SilberJohn (1990), “Free Speech and the Academy,”The Intercollegiate Review, 26 (Fall), 33–42.
112.
SimonsHerbert W. (1989), “Distinguishing the Rhetorical From the Real: The Case of Psychotherapeutic Placebos,” in Rhetoric in the Human Sciences, SimonsHerbert W., ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 109–18.
113.
SinghJagdip, HowellRoy D., and RhoadsGary K. (1990), “Adaptive Designs for Likert-Type Data: An Approach for Implementing Marketing Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (August), 304–21.
114.
StefflreV., Castillo-ValesV., and MorleyL. (1966), “Language and Cognition in Yucatan: A Cross-Cultural Replication,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 (July), 112–15.
115.
SteinfattThomas M. (1989), “Linguistic Relativity: Toward a Broader View,” in Language, Communication, and Culture, Ting-ToomeyS., and KorzennyF., eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 35–78.
116.
SternthalBrian, TyboutAlice, and CalderBobby J. (1987), “Confirmatory Versus Comparative Approaches to Judging Theory Tests,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (June), 114–25.
117.
SuppeFrederick (1977), The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
118.
SuppeFrederick (1984), “Beyond Skinner and Kuhn,”New Ideas in Psychology, 2, 89–104.
119.
ThompsonCraig J. (1990), “Eureka! And Other Tests of Significance: A New Look at Evaluating Interpretive Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, GoldbergM., GornG., and PollayR., eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 25–30.
120.
ThompsonCraig J. (1991), “May the Circle Be Unbroken: A Hermeneutic Consideration of How Interpretive Approaches to Consumer Research Are Understood by Consumer Researchers,” in Advances in Consumer Research, HolmanR. H., and SolomonM. R., eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 63–9.
121.
WallendorfMelanie, and BelkRussell W. (1989), “Assessing Trustworthiness in Naturalistic Consumer Research,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
122.
WatkinsJohn (1984), Science and Skepticism.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
123.
WeberMax (1947), The Theory of Social and Economic Organization.New York: Oxford University Press.
124.
WhorfB. L. (1956), Language, Thought, and Reality.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
