The authors update and extend their 1978 review of conjoint analysis. In addition to discussing several new developments, they consider alternative approaches for measuring preference structures in the presence of a large number of attributes. They also discuss other topics such as reliability, validity, and choice simulators.
AgarwalManoj (1988), “An Empirical Comparison of Traditional Conjoint and Adaptive Conjoint Analysis,” Working Paper No. 88–140, School of Management, State University of New York at Binghamton.
3.
AkaahIshmael P. (1987), “Predictive Performance of Hybrid Conjoint Models in a Small-Scale Design: An Empirical Assessment,” working paper, Wayne State University (March).
AllisonNeil (1989), “Conjoint Analysis Across the Business System,” in 1989 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings.Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software, 183–96.
6.
AndersonJames C., and DonthuNaveen (1988), “A Proximate Assessment of the External Validity of Conjoint Analysis,”1988 AMA Educators’ Proceedings, FrazierG., eds. Series 54. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 87–91.
7.
BatesonJohn E. G., ReibsteinDavid J., and BouldingWilliam (1987), “Conjoint Analysis Reliability and Validity: A Framework for Future Research,” in Review of Marketing, HoustonMichael J., ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 451–81.
8.
BenbenistyRochelle L. (1983), “Attitude Research, Conjoint Analysis Guided Ma Bell's Entry Into Data Terminal Market,”Marketing News (May 13), 12.
9.
BucklinRandolph E., and SrinivasanV. (1991), “Determining Inter-Brand Substitutability Through Survey Measurement of Consumer Preference Structures,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28(February), forthcoming.
10.
CarmoneFrank J. (1986), “Conjoint Designer” (review), Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (August), 311–2.
11.
CarmoneFrank J. (1987), “ACA System for Adaptive Conjoint Analysis” (review), Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (August), 325–7.
12.
CarmoneFrank J., and GreenPaul E. (1981), “Model Misspecification in Multiattribute Parameter Estimation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 87–93.
13.
CattinPhilippe, GelfandAlan, and DanesJeffrey (1983), “A Simple Bayesian Procedure for Estimation in a Conjoint Model,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20(February), 29–35.
14.
CattinPhilippe, and PunjGirish (1984), “Factors Influencing the Selection of Preference Model Form for Continuous Utility Functions in Conjoint Analysis,”Marketing Science, 3(Winter), 73–82.
15.
ClarkeDarral G. (1987), Marketing Analysis and Decision Making.Redwood City, CA: The Scientific Press, 180–92.
16.
DarmonRené Y. (1979), “Setting Sales Quotas With Conjoint Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16(February), 133–40.
17.
DavidsonJ. D. (1973), “Forecasting Traffic on STOL,”Operations Research Quarterly, 22, 561–9.
18.
DeSarboWayne S., Douglas CarrollJ., LehmannDonald R., and O'shaughnessyJohn (1982), “Three-Way Multivariate Conjoint Analysis,”Marketing Science, 1(Fall), 323–50.
19.
ElrodTerry, LouviereJordan J., and DaveyKrishnakumar S. (1989), “How Well Can Compensatory Models Predict Choice for Efficient Choice Sets?” working paper, School of Business, Vanderbilt University.
20.
FinkbeinerCarl T., and PlatzPatricia J. (1986), “Computerized Versus Paper and Pencil Methods: A Comparison Study,” paper presented at the Association for Consumer Research Conference, Toronto (October).
GleserL. J. (1972), “On Bounds for the Average Correlation Between Subtest Scores in Ipsatively Scored Tests,”Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32(Fall), 759–65.
23.
GreenPaul E. (1974), “On the Design of Choice Experiments Involving Multifactor Alternatives,”Journal of Consumer Research, 1(September), 61–8.
24.
GreenPaul E. (1984), “Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21(May), 155–9.
25.
GreenPaul E. (1987), “Conjoint Analyzer” (review), Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (August), 327–9.
26.
GreenPaul E., GoldbergStephen M., and MontemayorMila (1981), “A Hybrid Utility Estimation Model for Conjoint Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, 45(Winter), 33–41.
27.
GreenPaul E., and HelsenKristiaan (1989), “Cross-Validation Assessment of Alternatives to Individual-Level Conjoint Analysis: A Case Study,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26(August), 346–50.
28.
GreenPaul E., HelsenKristiaan, and ShandlerBruce (1988), “Conjoint Validity Under Alternative Profile Presentations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(December), 392–7.
29.
GreenPaul E., and KriegerAbba M. (1988), “Choice Rules and Sensitivity Analysis in Conjoint Simulators,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(Spring), 114–27.
30.
GreenPaul E., and KriegerAbba M. (1989), “Recent Contributions to Optimal Product Positioning and Buyer Segmentation,”European Journal of Operational Research, 41, 127–41.
31.
GreenPaul E., and KriegerAbba M. (1990), “A Hybrid Conjoint Model for Price-Demand Estimation,”European Journal of Operational Research, 44, 28–38.
32.
GreenPaul E., KriegerAbba M., and AgarwalManoj K. (1990), “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis: Some Caveats and Suggestions,” working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
33.
GreenPaul E., KriegerAbba M., and BansalPradeep (1988), “Completely Unacceptable Levels in Conjoint Analysis: A Cautionary Note,”Journal of Marketing Research, 25(August), 293–300.
34.
GreenPaul E., and RaoVithala R. (1971), “Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8(August), 355–63.
35.
GreenPaul E., and SrinivasanV. (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,”Journal of Consumer Research, 5(September), 103–23.
36.
GreenPaul E., and SrinivasanV. (1990), “A Bibliography on Conjoint Analysis and Related Methodology in Marketing Research,” working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (March).
37.
GreenPaul E., and WindYoram (1975), “New Way to Measure Consumers’ Judgments,”Harvard Business Review, 53(July-August), 107–17.
38.
HagertyMichael R. (1985), “Improving the Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 22(May), 168–84.
39.
HagertyMichael R. (1986), “The Cost of Simplifying Preference Models,”Marketing Science, 5(Fall), 298–319.
40.
HagertyMichael R., and SrinivasanV. (1991), “Comparing the Predictive Powers of Alternative Multiple Regression Models,”Psychometrika (forthcoming).
41.
HahnG. J., and ShapiroS. S. (1966), A Catalog and Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and Asymmetric Fractional Factorial Experiments, Report No. 66-C-165. Schenectady, NY: General Electric Research and Development Center (May).
42.
HuberG. P. (1974), “Multiattribute Utility Models: A Review of Field and Field-Like Studies,”Management Science, 20, 1393–402.
43.
HuberJoel (1987), “Conjoint Analysis: How We Got Here and Where We Are,” in Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing.Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software, 237–51.
44.
HuberJoel, and HansenDavid, (1986), “Testing the Impact of Dimensional Complexity and Affective Differences of Paired Concepts in Adaptive Conjoint Analysis,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, WallendorfM., and AndersonP., eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 159–63.
45.
JainArun K., AcitoFranklin, MalhotraNaresh K., and MahajanVijay, (1979), “A Comparison of Internal Validity of Alternative Parameter Estimation Methods in Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16(August), 313–22.
46.
JohnsonEric, MeyerRobert J., and GhoseSanjay (1989), “When Choice Models Fail: Compensatory Models in Negatively Correlated Environments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26(August), 255–70.
47.
JohnsonRichard M. (1974), “Trade-off Analysis of Consumer Values,”Journal of Marketing Research, 11(May), 121–7.
48.
JohnsonRichard M. (1976), “Beyond Conjoint Measurement: A Method of Pairwise Tradeoff Analysis,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 3, AndersonBeverlee B., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 353–8.
49.
JohnsonRichard M. (1987), “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis,” in Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing.Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software, 253–65.
50.
JohnstonJ. (1984), Econometric Methods.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
51.
JonesFrank D. (1975), “A Survey Technique to Measure Demand Under Various Pricing Strategies,”Journal of Marketing, 39(July) 75–7.
KamakuraWagner (1988), “A Least Squares Procedure for Benefit Segmentation With Conjoint Experiments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 25(May), 157–67.
54.
KamakuraWagner, and SrivastavaRajendra K. (1984), “Predicting Choice Shares Under Conditions of Brand Interdependence,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21(November), 420–34.
55.
KleinNoreen M. (1986), “Assessing Unacceptable Attribute Levels in Conjoint Analysis,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, WallendorfM., and AndersonP., eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 154–8.
56.
KriegerAbba M., and GreenPaul E. (1988), “On the Generation of Pareto Optimal, Conjoint Profiles From Orthogonal Main Effects Plans,” working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (August).
57.
KrishnamurthiLakshman (1988), “Conjoint Models of Family Decision Making,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5, 185–98.
58.
LeighT. W., MacKayDavid B., and SummersJohn O. (1984), “Reliability and Validity of Conjoint Analysis and Self-Explicated Weights: A Comparison,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21(November), 456–62.
59.
LevyMichael, WebsterJohn, and KerinRoger A. (1983), “Formulating Push Marketing Strategies: A Method and Application,”Journal of Marketing, 47(Fall), 25–34.
60.
LouviereJordan J. (1988), Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
61.
LouviereJordan J., and WoodwormGeorge (1983), “Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice on Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20(November), 350–67.
62.
LussierDennis A., and OlshavskyRichard W. (1979), “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Brand Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 6(September), 154–65.
63.
MahajanV., GreenPaul E., and GoldbergStephen M. (1982), “A Conjoint Model for Measuring Self- and Cross-Price/ Demand Relationships,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19(August), 334–42.
64.
MallowsColin L. (1973), “Some Comments on Cp,”Technometrics, 15, 661–76.
65.
MehtaRaj, MooreWilliam L., and PaviaTeresa M. (1989), “An Examination of Unacceptable Levels in Conjoint Analysis,” working paper, Graduate School of Business, The University of Utah.
MontgomeryDavid B. (1986), “Conjoint Calibration of the Customer/Competitor Interface in Industrial Markets,” in Industrial Marketing: A German-American Perspective, BackhausKlaus, and WilsonDavid T., eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 297–319.
68.
MooreWilliam L. (1980), “Levels of Aggregation in Conjoint Analysis: An Empirical Comparison,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17(November), 516–23.
69.
MooreWilliam L., and HolbrookMorris B. (1990), “Conjoint Analysis on Objects With Environmentally Correlated Attributes: The Questionable Importance of Representative Design,”Journal of Consumer Research, 16(March), 490–7.
70.
MooreWilliam L., and SemenikRichard J. (1988), “Measuring Preference With Hybrid Conjoint Analysis: The Impact of a Different Number of Attributes in the Master Design,”Journal of Business Research, 16, 261–74.
71.
MoskowitzH. R., StanleyD. W., and ChandlerJ. W. (1977), “The Eclipse Method: Optimizing Product Formulation Through a Consumer Generated Ideal Sensory Profile,”Canadian Institute of Food Science Technology Journal, 10(July), 161–8.
72.
NeslinScott, and GreenhalghLeonard (1983), “Nash's Theory of Cooperative Games as a Predictor of the Outcomes of Buyer-Seller Negotiations: An Experiment in Media Purchasing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20(November), 368–79.
73.
OgawaKahsuki (1987), “An Approach to Simultaneous Estimation and Segmentation in Conjoint Analysis,”Marketing Science, 6(Winter), 66–81.
74.
PageAlbert L., and RosenbaumHarold F. (1987), “Redesigning Product Lines With Conjoint Analysis: How Sunbeam Does It,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 120–37.
75.
PayneJohn W. (1976), “Task Complexity and Contingent Processing in Decision Making: An Information Search and Protocol Analysis,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366–87.
76.
ReibsteinDavid, BatesonJohn E. G., and BouldingWilliam (1988), “Conjoint Analysis Reliability: Empirical Findings,”Marketing Science, 1 (Summer), 271–86.
77.
RobinsonPatrick J. (1980), “Application of Conjoint Analysis to Pricing Problems,” in Proceedings of the First ORSA/TIMS Special Interest Conference on Market Measurement and Analysis, MontgomeryD. B., and WittinkD. R., eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 183–205.
78.
SoftwareSawtooth (1989), “Conjoint Analysis Used for Personnel Applications,”Sawtooth News, 5(Fall), 5–7.
79.
SchwartzDavid (1978), “Locked Box Combines Survey Methods, Helps End Woes of Probing Industrial Field,”Marketing News (January 27), 18.
80.
SegalMadhav N. (1982), “Reliability of Conjoint Analysis: Contrasting Data Collection Procedures,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19(February), 139–43.
81.
SmithScott M. (1988), “Statistical Software for Conjoint Analysis,” in Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing.Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software (June), 109–16.
82.
SrinivasanV. (1979), “Network Models for Estimating Brand-Specific Effects in Multi-Attribute Marketing Models,”Management Science, 25(January), 11–21.
83.
SrinivasanV. (1982), “Comments on the Role of Price in Individual Utility Judgments,” in Choice Models for Buyer Behavior, McAlisterLeigh, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., 81–90.
84.
SrinivasanV. (1988), “A Conjunctive-Compensatory Approach to the Self-Explication of Multiattributed Preferences,”Decision Sciences, 19(Spring), 295–305.
85.
SrinivasanV., FlaschsbartPeter G., DajaniJarir S., and HartleyRolfe G. (1981), “Forecasting the Effectiveness of Work-Trip Gasoline Conservation Policies Through Conjoint Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, 45(Summer), 157–72.
86.
SrinivasanV., JainArun K., and MalhotraNaresh K. (1983), “Improving Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis by Constrained Parameter Estimation,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20(November), 433–8.
87.
SrinivasanV., and ShockerAllan D., (1973a), “Linear Programming Techniques for Multidimensional Analysis of Preferences,”Psychometrika, 38, 337–69.
88.
SrinivasanV., and ShockerAllan D. (1973b), “Estimating the Weights for Multiple Attributes in a Composite Criterion Using Pairwise Judgments,”Psychometrika, 38, 473–93.
89.
SrinivasanV., and WynerGordon A. (1989), “CASEMAP: Computer-Assisted Self-Explication of Multi-Attributed Preferences,” in New Product Development and Testing, HenryW., MenascoM., and TakadaH., eds. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 91–111.
90.
SteckelJoel H., DeSarboWayne S., and MahajanVijay (1990), “On the Creation of Feasible Conjoint Analysis Experimental Designs,”Decision Sciences (forthcoming).
91.
SteckelJoel H., and O'shaughnessyJohn (1989), “Towards a New Way to Measure Power: Applying Conjoint Analysis to Group Discussions,”Marketing Letters, 1(December), 37–46.
92.
SwinnenG. (1983), “Decisions on Product-Mix Changes in Supermarket Chains,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, UFSIA, Antwerp University, Belgium.
93.
TheilHenri (1969), “A Multinomial Extension of the Linear Logit Model,”International Economics Review, 10(October), 251–9.
94.
WileyJames B. (1977), “Selecting Pareto Optimal Subsets From Multiattribute Alternatives,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 4, PerreaultW. D.Jr., ed. Atlanta: Association for Consumer Research, 171–4.
95.
WilkieWilliam L., and PessemierEdgar A. (1973), “Issues in Marketing's Use of Multi-Attribute Attitude Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10(November), 428–41.
96.
WittinkDick R., and CattinPhilippe (1989), “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update,”Journal of Marketing, 53(July), 91–6.
97.
WittinkDick R., KrishnamurthiLakshman, and NutterJulia B. (1982), “Comparing Derived Importance Weights Across Attributes,”Journal of Consumer Research, 8(March), 471–4.
98.
WittinkDick R., KrishnamurthiLakshman, and ReibsteinDavid J. (1990), “The Effect of Differences in the Number of Attribute Levels on Conjoint Results,”Marketing Letters (forthcoming).
99.
WittinkDick R., and MontgomeryDavid B. (1979), “Predictive Validity of Trade-Off Analysis for Alternative Segmentation Schemes,” in Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Series 44, BeckwithNeil, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 69–73.
100.
WittinkDick R., ReibsteinDavid J., BouldingWilliam, BatesonJohn E. G., and WalshJohn W. (1990), “Conjoint Reliability Measures,”Marketing Science (forthcoming).
101.
WrightPeter (1975), “Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying Vs. Optimizing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 12(February), 60–7.
102.
WrightPeter, and KriewallMary Ann (1980), “State of Mind Effects on the Accuracy With Which Utility Functions Predict Marketplace Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19(August), 277–93.
103.
WynerGordon A., BenedettiLois H., and TrappBart M. (1984), “Measuring the Quantity and Mix of Product Demand,”Journal of Marketing, 48(Winter), 101–9.
