The traditional view of truth as the central goal of marketing theory and research has been questioned in marketing's crisis literature by proponents of relativistic truth and critical relativism. Hunt reviews the development of the relativist views on truth. He then discusses a philosophy of science, scientific relativism, that retains truth as the overriding objective of theory and research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerMortimer J. (1985), Ten Philosophical Mistakes.New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
2.
AndersonPaul F. (1983), “Marketing, Scientific Progress and Scientific Method,”Journal of Marketing, 47(Fall), 18–31.
3.
AndersonPaul F. (1986), “On Method in Consumer Research: A Critical Relativist Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(September), 155–73.
4.
AndersonPaul F. (1988a), “Relative to What—That Is the Question: A Reply to Siegel,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(June), 133–7.
5.
AndersonPaul F. (1988b), “Relativism Revidivus: In Defense of Critical Relativism,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(December), 403–6.
6.
AndersonPaul F. (1989), “On Relativism and Interpretivism—With a Prolegomenon to the ‘Why Question’,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
7.
BagozziRichard P. (1980), Causal Models in Marketing.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8.
BagozziRichard P. (1984), “A Prospectus for Theory Construction in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 48(Winter), 11–29.
9.
BhaskerRoy (1979), The Possibility of Naturalism.Brighton, England: Harvester Press.
10.
BlairEdward, and ZinkhamGeorge M. (1984), “The Realist View of Science: Implications for Marketing,” in Scientific Method in Marketing, AndersonP., and RyanM., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 26–9.
11.
BynumW. F., BrowneE. J., and PorterRoy (1985), Dictionary of the History of Science.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
CauseyRobert L. (1979), “Theory and Observation,” in Current Research in Philosophy, AsquithP. D., and KyburgH. E., eds. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 187–206.
13.
CookThomas D., and CampbellDonald T. (1986), “The Causal Assumptions of Quasi-Experimental Practice,”Synthese, 68, 141–80.
14.
Doppelt, Gerald (1978), “Kuhn's Epistemological Relativism,” originally published in Inquiry; reprinted in KrauszM., and MeilandJ. (1982), Relativism: Cognitive and Moral.Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 113–48.
15.
FeyerabendPaul K. (1970), “Against Method,” in Analysis of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, RadnerMichael, and WinokurStephen, eds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
FeyerabendPaul K. (1975), Against Method.Thetford, England: Lowe and Brydone.
17.
FeyerabendPaul K. (1978), Science in a Free Society.London: Verso.
18.
FeyerabendPaul K. (1987), “Putnam on Incommensurability,”British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 38(March), 75–92.
19.
GiereRonald N. (1985), “Constructive Realism,” in Images of Science, ChurchlandPaul M., and HookerClifford A., eds. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 75–98.
20.
HarréRom (1986), Varieties of Realism.Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
21.
HintikkaJaakko (1988), “On the Incommensurability of Theories,”Philosophy of Science, 55, 25–38.
22.
HolbrookMorris B., BellStephen, and GraysonMark W. (1989), “The Role of the Humanities in Consumer Research: Close Encounters and Coastal Disturbances,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
23.
HookerClifford A. (1985), “Surface Dazzle, Ghostly Depths: An Exposition and Critical Evaluation of van Fraussen's Vindication of Empiricism Against Realism,” in Images of Science, ChurchlandPaul M., and HookerClifford A., eds. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 153–96.
24.
HudsonLaural Anderson, and OzanneJulie L. (1988), “Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14(March), 508–21.
25.
HuntShelby D. (1976), Marketing Theory: Conceptual Foundations of Research in Marketing.Columbus, OH: Grid, Inc.
26.
HuntShelby D. (1984), “Should Marketing Adopt Relativism?” in Scientific Method of Marketing, AndersonPaul F., and RyanMichael J., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 30–4.
27.
HuntShelby D. (1989a), “Naturalistic, Humanistic, and Interpretive Inquiry: Challenges and Ultimate Potential,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
28.
HuntShelby D. (1989b), “Reification and Realism in Marketing: In Defense of Reason,”Journal of Macromarketing, 9(Fall), 4–10.
29.
HuntShelby D. (1990), Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science.Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.
30.
HuntShelby D., ChonkoLawrence B., and WilcoxJames B. (1984), “Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21(August), 309–24.
31.
HuntShelby D., and SpeckPaul S. (1985), “Does Logical Epiricism Imprison Marketing?” in Changing the Course of Marketing: Alternative Paradigms for Widening Marketing Theory, DholakiaNikhilesh, and ArndtJohan, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., 27–35.
32.
KassarjianHarold H. (1989), book review of Philosophical and Radical Thought in Marketing, Fuat FiratA., DholakiaNikhilesh, and BagozziRichard P., eds. (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1987), Journal of Marketing, 53 (January), 123–6.
33.
KordigCarl R. (1980), “Progress Requires Invariance,”Philosophy of Science, 47, 141.
34.
KrauszMichael, and MeilandJack W. (1982), Relativism: Cognitive and Moral.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
35.
KripsH. (1980), “Some Problems for ‘Progress and Its Problems’,”Philosophy of Science, 47, 601–16.
36.
KuhnThomas S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
37.
KuhnThomas S. (1970a), “Reflections on My Critics,” in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, LakatosImre, and MusgraveAlan, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 231–78.
38.
KuhnThomas S. (1970b), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
LaudanLarry (1977), Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth.Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
LaudanLarry (1982), “Commentary: Science at the Bar—Causes for Concern,”Science, Technology, and Human Values,1 (Fall), 16–19.
41.
LaudanLarry (1983), “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem,” in Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis, CohnR. S., and LaudanL., eds. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 111–27.
42.
LaudanLarry (1984), Science and Values.Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
LaudanLarry (1987), “Relativism, Naturalism and Reticulation,”Synthese, 71, 221–34.
44.
LaudanLarry, DonovanArthur, LaudanRachel, BarkerPeter, BrownHarold, LeplinJarrett, ThagardPaul, and WykstraSteve (1986), “Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research,”Synthese, 69, 141–223.
45.
LeplinJarrett (1981), “Truth and Scientific Progress,”Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 12, 269–91.
46.
LeplinJarrett (1984), Scientific Realism.Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
LeplinJarrett (1986), “Methodological Realism and Scientific Rationality,”Philosophy of Science, 53, 31–51.
48.
LincolnYvonna S., and GubaEgon G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
49.
MacKinnonEdward (1979), “Scientific Realism: The New Debates,”Philosophy of Science, 46, 501–32.
50.
McMullinErnan (1979), “Discussion Review: Laudan's Progress and Its Problems,”Philosophy of Science, 46, 623–44.
51.
McMullinErnan (1984), “A Case for Scientific Realism,” in Scientific Realism, LeplinJ., ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 8–40.
52.
MonroeKent (1988), “Developing, Disseminating, and Utilizing Marketing Knowledge,”Journal of Marketing, 52(October), 1–25.
53.
MooreGeorge Edward (1903), “The Refutation of Idealism,” reprinted in Philosophical Studies, MooreG. E., ed. London: Trench, Trubner, and Co., Ltd., 1922, 1–30.
54.
MoreheadPhilip D. (1985), The New American Roget's College Thesaurus.New York: Signet, New American Library.
55.
MuncyJames A., and FiskRaymond P. (1987), “Cognitive Relativism and the Practice of Marketing Science,”Journal of Marketing, 51(January), 20–3.
56.
MusgraveAlan (1979), “Problems With Progress,”Synthese, 42, 443–64.
57.
Newton-SmithW. (1981), “In Defence of Truth,” in Philosophy of Evolution, JensenU. J., and HarréR., eds. New York: St. Martin's Press, 269–94.
58.
OlsonJerry C. (1981), “Towards a Science of Consumer Behavior,” in Advances in Consumer Research, MitchellAndrew A., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association of Consumer Research, 9, v–x.
59.
OlsonJerry C. (1987), “The Construction of Scientific Meaning,” in Marketing Theory, BelkR. W., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
60.
PeterJ. Paul, and OlsonJerry C. (1983), “Is Science Marketing?”Journal of Marketing, 47(Fall), 111–25.
61.
PhillipsD. C. (1987), Philosophy, Science, and Social Inquiry.Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, ltd.
62.
PolkinghorneJ. C. (1984), The Quantum World.New York: Longman, Inc.
63.
PopperKarl R. (1972), Objective Knowledge.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64.
PutnamHilary (1978), Meaning and the Moral Sciencies.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
65.
RohrlichFritz, and HardinLarry (1983), “Established Theories,”Philosophy of Science, 50, 603–7.
66.
RussellBertrand (1929), Our Knowledge of the External World.New York: The New American Library.
67.
SarkarH. (1981), “Truth, Problem-Solving and Methodology,”Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 12, 61–73.
68.
SauerWilliam J., NighswongerNancy, and ZaltmanGerald (1982), “Current Issues in Philosophy of Science: Implication of the Study of Marketing,” in Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives, BushR. F., and HuntS. D., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
69.
ShwederRichard A., and FiskeDonald W. (1986), “Introduction: Uneasy Social Science,” in Metatheory in Social Science, FiskeD. W., and ShwederR. A., eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70.
SiegelHarvey (1980), “Objectivity, Rationality, Incommensurability, and More,”British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 31, 359–84.
71.
SiegelHarvey (1983), “Brown on Epistemology and the New Philosophy of Science,”Synthese, 14, 61–89.
72.
SiegelHarvey (1986), “Relativism, Truth, and Incoherence,”Synthese, 68, 225–59.
73.
SiegelHarvey (1988), “Relativism for Consumer Research? (Comments on Anderson),”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(June), 129–32.
74.
SkipperRobert, and HymanMichael R. (1987), “Evaluating and Improving Argument-Centered Works in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 51(October), 60–75.
75.
SternBarbara B. (1989), “Literary Explications: A Methodology for Consumer Research,” in Interpretive Consumer Research, HirschmanElizabeth, ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
76.
StoveDavid (1982), Popper and After.Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, Ltd.
77.
SuppeFrederick (1977), The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
78.
TarskiAlfred (1956), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, translated by J. H. Woodger. Oxford, UK: Claredon Press.
79.
WatkinsJohn (1984), Science and Skepticism.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
80.
ZaltmanGerald, and MoormanChristine (1988), “The Importance of Personal Trust in the Use of Research,”Journal of Advertising Research, 28(5), 16–24.
81.
ZukavGary (1979), The Dancing Wu-Li Masters.New York: Bantam Books, Inc.
