Differences in preference models between segments often are influenced by the background characteristics of individuals. Based on the relationship between preference weights and background characteristics, predictions of preference are made for new segments and geographic areas. Preference models are found to be transferable in some cases, with better predictions for new segments than for geographic areas. Generalizability of results, limitations of research, and conditions for finding transferable models are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongJ. Scott (1970), “How to Avoid Exploratory Research,”Journal of Advertising Research, 10 (August), 27–30.
2.
BarfRichard, MackayDavid, and OlshavskyRichard W. (1982), “A Selective Review of Travel-Mode Choice Models,”Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (March), 370–80.
3.
CarmoneFrank J., GreenPaul E., and JainArun K. (1978), “The Robustness of Conjoint Analysis: Some Monté Carlo Results,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (May), 300–3.
4.
CattinPhilippe, and BliemelFriedhelm (1978), “Metric vs. Nonmetric Procedures for Multiattribute Modeling: Some Simulation Results,”Decision Sciences, 9 (July), 472–80.
5.
CherlowJay R. (1981), “Measuring Values of Travel Time Savings,”Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (March), 360–71.
CurrimImran S. (1981), “Using Segmentation Approaches for Better Prediction and Understanding from Consumer Mode Choice Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (August), 301–9.
8.
DeSarboWayne, and RaoVithala (1984), “GENFOLD2: A Set of Models and Algorithms for the GENeral Un-FOLDing Analysis of Preference/Dominance Data,”Journal of Classification, 1, 147–86.
9.
DeSarboWayne, and RaoVithala (1986), “A Constrained Unfolding Methodology for Product Position,”Marketing Science, 5 (Winter), 1–19.
10.
EngelJames F., WarshawMartin R., and KinnearThomas (1983), Promotional Strategy: Managing the Marketing Communication Process, 5th ed.Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
11.
GreenPaul E., and DeSarboWayne S. (1979), “Componential Segmentation in the Analysis of Consumer Trade-offs,”Journal of Marketing, 43 (Fall), 83–91.
12.
GreenPaul E., and SrinivasanV. (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,”Journal of Consumer Research, 5 (September), 103–23.
13.
HaleyR. I. (1968), “Benefit Segmentation: A Decision-Oriented Research Tool,”Journal of Marketing, 32 (July), 30–5.
14.
KoppelmanFrank S. (1974), “Prediction with Disaggregate Models: The Aggregation Issue,”Transportation Research Record, No. 527, Transportation Research Board, 73–80.
15.
KoppelmanFrank S. (1976), “Methodology for Analysis of Errors in Prediction with Disaggregate Choice Models,”Transportation Research Record, No. 592, Transportation Research Board.
16.
KoppelmanFrank S., and WilmotChester G. (1982), Identification of Conditions for Effective Transferability of Disaggregate Choice Models, Transportation Center, Northwestern University.
17.
McFaddenDaniel (1973), “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,” in Frontiers in Econometrics, ZarembkaP., ed. New York: Academic Press, Inc.,105–42.
18.
MooreWilliam L. (1980), “Levels of Aggregation in Conjoint Analysis: An Empirical Comparison,”Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (November), 516–23.
19.
PunjGirish, and StewartDavid W. (1983), “Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (May), 134–48.
20.
SrinivasanV., FlachsbartPeter G., DajaniJarir S., and HartleyRolfe G. (1981), “Forecasting the Effectiveness of Work-Trip Gasoline Conservation Policies Through Conjoint Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, 45 (Summer), 157–72.
21.
TalvitieAntti, and KirshnerDaniel (1978), “Specification, Transferability and the Effect of Data Outliers in Modeling the Choice of Mode in Urban Travel,”Transportation, 7, 311–31.
22.
TrainKenneth E. (1978), “A Validation Test of a Disaggregate Mode-Choice Model,”Transportation Research, 12, 167–74.
23.
WindYoram (1978), “Issues and Advances in Segmentation Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (August), 317–37.
24.
WittinkDick R., and MontgomeryDavid B. (1979), “Predictive Validity of Trade-Off Analysis for Alternative Segmentation Schemes,” in Educators’ Conference Proceedings, Series #44, BeckwithNeil E., eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association,69–73.
25.
WittinkDick R., and CattinPhilippe (1981), “Alternative Estimation Methods for Conjoint Analysis: A Monté Carlo Study,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 101–6.
