This article discusses the FTC's 1983 policy statement on the meaning of deception. It places the statement in historical context and discusses the relations between the statement and other FTC documents, including the 1980 policy statement on unfairness and recent FTC opinions in consumer protection cases. Considerable attention is given to the specific elements of deception, the concrete meaning of those elements, and likely implications for future policy and for the role of consumer research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advertising Age (1984), “Debate” (Commissioners Bailey and Douglas), 55 (February 13), M–27.
2.
ArmstrongG., GurolM., and RussF. (1980), “Defining and Measuring Deception in Advertising: A Review and Evaluation,”Current Issues and Research in Advertising:41 (April), 17–40.
3.
AverittN. (1981), “The Meaning of ‘Unfair Acts or Practices’ in Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act,”Georgetown Law Journal, 70 (October), 225–296.
4.
BaileyP., and PertschukM. (1984a), “Deception Policy Statement Prepared by Commissioners Bailey and Pertschuk and Transmitted on Feb. 29 to the House Energy and Commerce Committee,”46ATRR372–399 (March 1).
5.
BaileyP., and PertschukM. (1984b), “The Law of Deception: The Past as Prologue,”American University Law Review, 33 (Summer), 849–897.
6.
BarnesD. (1983), “The Significance of Quantitative Evidence in Federal Trade Commission Deceptive Advertising Cases,”Law and Contemporary Problems, 46, 25–47.
7.
BealesH., CraswellR., and SalopS. (1981), “The Efficient Regulation of Consumer Information,”Journal of Law and Economics, 24 (December), 491–531.
8.
BonamiciS. (1983), “Comment: The Use and Reliability of Survey Evidence in Deceptive Advertising Cases,”Oregon Law Review, 62 (no. 4), 561–602.
9.
BrandtM., and PrestonI. (1977), “The Federal Trade Commission's Use of Evidence to Determine Deception,”Journal of Marketing, 41 (January), 54–62.
10.
BrownJ. P. (1973), “Toward an Economic Theory of Liability,”Journal of Legal Studies, 41 (June), 323.
11.
CalfeeJ. E. (1985), “Cigarette Advertising, Health Information, and Regulation before 1970,”FTC, Bureau of Economics, working paper no. 134.
12.
CalfeeJ. E. (1986), “Economic Aspects of the Federal Trade Commission's Policy toward Unfair and Deceptive Advertising,” unpublished paper.
13.
CalfeeJ. E., and FordG. (1985), “The FTC's Product Defects Program and Consumer Perception of Product Quality,” in Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, JacobyJ., and OlsonJ., eds., Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 175–191.
14.
ClantonD. (1982), “Statement of David A. Clanton, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission, before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate,” (July 22), 7pages.
15.
ClarksonK., and MurisT., eds. (1981), The Federal Trade Commission Since 1970: Economic Regulation and Bureaucratic Behavior, New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CraswellR. (1981), “The Identification of Unfair Acts and Practices by the Federal Trade Commission,”Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 1981 (no. 1), 107–53.
17.
CraswellR. (1985), “Interpreting Deceptive Advertising,”Boston University Law Review, 65 (July).
18.
DahringerL., and JohnsonD. (1984), “The Federal Trade Commissioners’ Redefinition of Deception and Public Policy Implications: Let the Buyer Beware,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 18 (no. 2), 326–342.
19.
DarbyM., and KamiE. (1973), “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud,”Journal of Law and Economics, 16 (April), 67–88.
DingellJ. (1983), “Letter to James C. Miller III,” (October 25), 2 pages.
22.
DoneganT. (1982), “Unfairness Power Still Needed for FTC Enforcement,”Legal Times, 4 (June 21), 15.
23.
DouglasG. (1983), “Remarks of George W. Douglas before the Seventh Annual Advertising Law and Public Affairs Conference of the American Advertising Federation,” (December 8), 16 pages.
24.
DouglasG. (1984), “Common Sense Used in FTC Deception Policy,”Legal Times, (January 16), 8.
25.
Erxleben (1975), “The FTC's Kaleidoscopic Unfairness Statute: Section 5,”Gonzaga Law Review, 10, 333.
26.
Federal Trade Commission (1980a), “Unfairness Statement” (letter to Senators Ford and Danforth), (December 17); reprinted in Averitt (1981); appended to FTC v. International Harvester Corp., 104 FTC 949, 1071–1076 (1984).
27.
Federal Trade Commission (1980b), “Companion Statement on the Commission's Consumer Unfairness Jurisdiction” (accompanying 1980 policy statement); reprinted in H.R. Rep. No. 156, Pt. 1, 98th Cong., 1st Sess. 41, 42 (1983).
28.
Federal Trade Commission (1982), “Letter from FTC Chairman to Senator Packwood and Senator Kasten,” (March 5), 42ATRR568, reprinted in H.R. Rep. No. 156, Pt. 1, 98th Cong., 1st Sess. 27, 32 (1983).
29.
Federal Trade Commission (1983), “Policy Statement on Deception,” followed by dissenting statement of Commissioners Bailey and Pertschuk and concurring statement of Commissioner Douglas, 45ATRR, 689 (October 27); Policy Statement is reprinted in “In re FTC's Enforcement Policy against Deceptive Acts or Practices,” CCH 50,445 (Nov. 1983); appended to FTC v. Cliffdale Associates, Inc. et al., 103 FTC 110, 174–184(1984).
30.
Federal Trade Commission (1984a), “Advertising Substantiation Program: Analysis of Public Comments and Recommended Changes,”Bureau of Consumer Protection, (July 23).
31.
Federal Trade Commission (1984b), “Advertising Substantiation Policy Statement,” (July 27), Mimeo; reprinted in 47 ATRR 234–235 (August 2, 1984); appended to the Commission's Thompson Medical Company, Inc. opinion.
32.
FooteS., and MnookinR.1980), “The ‘Kid Vid’ Crusade,”The Public Interest, 61 (Fall), 90–105.
33.
FordG., and YalchR. (1982), “Viewer Miscomprehension of Televised Communication: A Comment,”Journal of Marketing, 46 (Fall), 27–31.
34.
GardnerD. (1975), “Deception in Advertising: A Conceptual Approach,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (January), 40–46.
35.
GellhornE. (1969), “Proof of Consumer Deception before the Federal Trade Commission,”Kansas Law Review, 17, 559–572.
36.
GellhornE. (1983), “Trading Stamps, S & H, and the FTC's Unfairness Doctrine,” in Duke Law Journal, (November), 903–958.
37.
GuerardC., and NiemasikJ. (1978), “Evolution and Evaluation of the Ad Substantiation Program Since 1971,” FTC staff memo, (December 1).
38.
Hammer (1978), “FTC Knights and Consumer Daze: The Regulation of Deceptive or Unfair Advertising,”Arkansas Law Review, 32, 446.
39.
HandlerM. (1982), “Deception Policies Call for a Return to Common Law,”Legal Times, 4 (November 22), 39.
40.
JacobyJ., and HoyerW. (1982a), “Viewer Miscomprehension of Televised Communication: Selected Findings,”Journal of Marketing, 46 (Fall), 12–26.
41.
JacobyJ., and HoyerW. (1982b), “On Miscomprehension of Televised Communication: A Rejoinder,”Journal of Marketing, 46 (Fall), 35–43.
42.
JacobyJ., HoyerW., and ShelugaD. (1980), The Miscomprehension of Televised Communication, New York: American Association of Advertising Agencies.
43.
JacobyJ., and SmallC. (1975), “The FDA Approach to Defining Misleading Advertising,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (October), 65–73.
44.
LynchJ., and SrullT. (1982), “Memory and Attention Factors in Consumer Research: Concepts and Research Methods,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (June), 18–37.
45.
McGrewT. (1985), “Advertising Issues Avoided by FTC in Past Year,”Legal Times, 7 (January 7), 12–13.
46.
MillerJ. C.III (1982a), “Testimony,” in Reauthorization of the FTC: Hearings before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. (July 22).
47.
MillerJ. C.III (1982b), “Regulating Advertising: Myths and Realities,” remarks before the National Advertising Review Board, New York, (December 14).
48.
MillerJ. C.III (1983), “Letter to John D. Dingell,” (October 26), 5 pages.
49.
MillsteinI. (1964), “The Federal Trade Commission and False Advertising,”Columbia Law Review, 64, 439–499.
50.
MizerskiR. (1982), “An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (December), 301–310.
51.
MurisT. (1982a) [Untitled] Annotated List of Past Deception Cases, reprinted in 42 ATRR 657–659 (March 25).
52.
MurisT. (1982b), “Memorandum for the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission: Defining Deception,” (March 25); reprinted in 45 ATRR 699–708 (April 1 1982) and in Reauthorization of the FTC: Hearings before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. (July 22, 1982), at 76–81.
53.
MurisT. (1982c), “Memorandum for the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission: Advertising Substantiation,” (November 8), unpublished paper.
54.
NelsonP. (170), “Information and Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Political Economy, 78 (March-April), 311–329.
55.
NelsonP. (1974), “Advertising as Information,”Journal of Political Economy, 82 (July-August), 729–754.
56.
NelsonP. (1978), “Advertising as Information Once More,” in Issues in Advertising: The Economics of Persuasion, DavidG. Tuerck, ed., Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
57.
PeltzmanS. (1981), “The Effects of FTC Advertising Regulation,”Journal of Law and Economics, (December), 403–448.
58.
PertschukM. (1984), “The Performance of the Federal Trade Commission, 1977–1984,” Report to the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, (September).
59.
PosnerR. (1969), “The Federal Trade Commission,”University of Chicago Law Review, 37 (no. 1), 47–89.
60.
PosnerR. (1973), Regulation of Advertising by the FTC, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
61.
PrestonI. (1976), “A Comment on ‘Defining Misleading Advertising’ and ‘Deception in Advertising,'”Journal of Marketing, 40 (July), 54–57.
62.
PrestonI. (1980), “Research at the Federal Trade Commission—Peril and Promise,” in Current Issues and Research in Advertising: 1980, 1–15.
63.
PrestonI. (1983), “A Review of the Literature on Advertising Regulation,” in Current Issues and Research in Advertising: 1983, 1–37.
64.
PrestonI., and RichardsJ. (1986), “Consumer Miscomprehension as a Challenge to FTC Prosecutions of Deceptive Advertising,”John Marshall Law Review, in press.
65.
PriestG. (1985), “Measuring Legal Change,”Yale Law School, working paper.
66.
PriestG., and KleinB. (1984), “The Selection of Disputes for Litigation,”Journal of Legal Studies, 13 (January), 1–55.
67.
Reauthorization of the FTC: Hearings before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. (1982).
68.
RosdenG., and RosdenP. (1981), The Law of Advertising, New York: Bender.
69.
RotfeldH., and PrestonI. (1981), “The Potential Impact of Research on Advertising Law,”Journal of Advertising Research, 21 (April), 9–17.
70.
RussoJ., MetcalfB., and StephensD. (1981), “Identifying Misleading Advertising,”Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (September), 119.
71.
SchmittleinD., and MorrisonD. (1983), “Measuring Miscomprehension of Televised Communication Using True-False Questions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (September), 147–156.
72.
SchwartzT. (1977), “Regulating Unfair Practice under the FTC Act: The Need for a Legal Standard of Unfairness,”Akron Law Review, 11 (Summer), 1–28.
73.
ShavellS. (1980), “Strict Liability vs. Negligence,”Journal of Legal Studies, 9 (January), 1.
