This article critically examines a recent study by Ingene in the Journal of Marketing and finds several serious shortcomings. Suggested alternate approaches and methodology are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BagozziRichard P., and PhillipsLynn W. (1982), “Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (September), 459–489.
2.
BlalockHubert M. (1968), “The Measurement Problem: A Gap Between the Languages of Theory and Research,” in Methodology in Social Research, BlalockH. M., and BlalockA. B., eds., NY: McGraw-Hill.
FerberRobert (1958), “Variations in Retail Sales between Cities,”Journal of Marketing, 22 (January), 295–303.
5.
GoldbergerArthur S. (1971), “Econometrics and Psychometrics: A Survey of Communalities,”Psychometrika, 36 (June), 83–107.
6.
HallM., KnappJ., and WinstonC. (1961), Distribution in Great Britain and North America, London: Oxford University Press.
7.
HuntS. D. (1976), Marketing Theory: Conceptual Foundation of Research in Marketing, Columbus, OH: Grid.
8.
IngeneCharles A. (1982), “Labor Productivity in Retailing,”Journal of Marketing, 46 (Fall), 75–90.
9.
IngeneCharles A., and LuschRobert F. (1981), “A Model of Retail Structure,” in Research in Marketing, Vol. 5, ShethJagdish, ed., Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 101–163.
10.
NamboodiriN. Krishnar, CarterLewis F., and BlalockHubert M.Jr. (1975), Applied Multivariate Analysis and Experimental Designs, NY: McGraw-Hill.
11.
PearsonK. (1897), “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution—On a Form of Spurious Correlation Which May Arise When Indices Are Used in the Measurement of Organs,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 60 (no. 367), 489–498.
12.
SchuesslerKarl (1973), “Ratio Variables and Path Models,” in Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, GoldbergerArthur S., and DuncanOtis Dudley, eds., New York: Seminar Press, 201–228.
13.
SchuesslerKarl (1975), “Analysis of Ratio Variables: Opportunities and Pitfalls,”American Journal of Sociology, 80 (no. 2), 379–396.
