Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A review of one of the most significant events in modern economic history, the restructuring of American Telephone and Telegraph Company, this article gives a concise summary of the legal issues, from first allegations in 1974 through the final order in 1983. It offers a six-category product-market framework for considering the economic and marketing implications of the settlement, and provides a foundation for continued study of the many opportunities and threats implicit in greatly increasing the scope and diversity of telecommunications marketing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Tobacco Co. v. U.S. (1946), 328 U.S., 781, 809.

Areeda

, and Turner

(1975), “Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section Two of the Sherman Act,” Harvard Law Review, 88, 697.

Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co. (1979), 603 F. 2d 263, 274 (2d Cir.); cert. denied, 100 S. CT. 1061 (1980).

Brodley

, and Hay

(1981), “Predatory Pricing: Competing Economic Theories and the Evolution of Legal Standards,” Cornell Law Review, 738.

Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S. (1961), 370 U.S., 294, 325.

Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc. (1977), 429 U.S., 477, 489.

Business Week (1983a), “Culture Shock Is Shaking the Bell System,” (September 26), 112–118.

Business Week (1983b), “Telecommunications: The Global Battle,” (October 24), 126–142.

Bylinsky

(1983), “Can Bell Labs Keep It Up?,” Fortune, 109 (June 27), 90–91.

10.

California Computer Products, Inc. v. IBM Corp. (1979), 613 F. 2d (9th Cir.), 727, 736.

11.

Federal Register (1982), 47 (February 17), 7170–7173.

12.

Flax

(1983), “The Orphan Called Baby Bell,” Fortune, 109 (June 27), 87–88.

13.

Flax

(1984), “The Latest Way to Foil the Phone Monopoly,” Fortune, 110 (April 16), 108–111.

14.

Greyhound Computer Corp. v. IBM Corp. (1977), 559 F. 2d (9th Cir.), 488.

15.

High

(1982), “What's Wrong with Regulation and Antitrust: The AT&T Case,” Policy Report (January), 1, 3–5.

16.

ILC Peripherals v. IBM Corp. (1977), 510 F. 2d (9th Cir.), 1379.

17.

International Boxing Club, Inc. v. U.S. (1959), 358 U.S. 242.

18.

Loomis

C. J.

(1983), “Valuing the Pieces of Eight,” Fortune, 109 (June 27), 62–68.

19.

Maryland v. U.S. (1983), 103 S. Ct. 1240.

20.

Northeastern Telephone Co. v. AT&T (1981), 651 F. 2d 76 (2d Cir.).

21.

O'Reilly

(1983), “Ma Bell's Kids Fight for Position,” Fortune, 109 (June 27), 62–68.

22.

Purex Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co. (1979), 596 F. 2d (9th Cir.), 881.

23.

Schwartz

(1982), Overview and Counterplan in the AT&T Settlement., Boston, MA: Harcourt.

24.

Standard Oil Co. v. U.S. (1911), 221 U.S. 1.

25.

Standard Oil Co. of California v. U.S. (1949), 337 U.S. 293–300, n.5.

26.

Sullivan

E. T.

(1982), The Economic Jurisprudence of the Burger Court's Antitrust Policy: The First Thirteen Years, Notre Dame Law Review, 58, 1.

27.

Tampa Elec. Co. v. Nashville Coal Co. (1961), 365 U.S. 320, 327.

28.

Taylor

R. A.

, Schiffres

, and Hildreth

J. M.

(1983), “The Bell Breakup,” U.S. News and World Report, 96 (October 24), 51–55.

29.

Telex Corp. v. IBM (1975), 510 F. 2d (10th Cir.), 894, 927; cert. denied 423 U.S. (1975) 802.

30.

Toffler

Alvin

(1982), The Third Wave, New York: Basic Books.

31.

Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co. (1975), 512 F. 2d (9th Cir.), 1264.

32.

U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America (1945), 148 F. 2d (2nd Cir.), 416, 424.

33.

U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America v. AT&T (1981), 524 F. Supp. 1336 (D.D.C. 1981), 1981–2 Trade Cases (CCH), ¶ 64 (D.D.C. Sept. 11), 227 at 74, 255.

34.

U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America v. AT&T (1982a), Competitive Impact Statement no. 74-168 (February 10), 4–5.

35.

U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America v. AT&T (1982b); 552 F. Supp. 131; aff'd. 103 S. Ct. 1240 (1983).

36.

U.S. v. Aluminum Co. of America v. AT&T (1982c), Proposed Settlement (January 8), Sections I, II.

37.

U.S. v. Columbia Steel Co. (1948), 334 U.S. 495, 527–528.

38.

U.S. v. General Dynamics (1974), 415 U.S. 486.

39.

U.S. v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. (1956), 351 U.S. 377.

40.

U.S. v. Griffith (1948), 334 U.S. 100, 107.

41.

U.S. v. Grinnell Corp. (1966), 382 U.S. 563, 570–571.

42.

U.S. v. Philadelphia National Bank (1963), 374 U.S. 321.

43.

U.S. v. Virginia National Bank Shares (1982–83), Trade Cases ¶ 64, 871.

44.

U.S. v. Western Electric Co. (1984), No. 82-0192 (D.D.C. July 26).

45.

United States Code (1976), United States v. American Tobacco Co. (1911), 221 U.S. 106, Section 15, ¶ 2.

46.

Uttal

Bro

(1983a), “The Corporate Culture Vultures,” Fortune, 109 (October 19), 66–72.

47.

Uttal

Bro

(1983b), “Western Electric's Cold New World,” Fortune, 109 (June 27), 81–84.

The AT&T Settlement: Legal Summary,Economic Analysis,and Marketing Implications

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References