This research proposes an integrative model of the antecedents and consequences of salesforce role stress, with particular emphasis on two outcomes important to sales reps and firms alike: salesforce performance and satisfaction. Drawing on data from 196 sales representatives for five major industrial firms, the linkages in the proposed model are tested with path analysis procedures. The model is sufficiently comprehensive that it provides a basis to replicate and extend, in one study, much of the key research on the sales representative's role environment, especially as it relates to role conflict, role ambiguity, and their relationships with job performance and satisfaction. Implications of this research for sales managers and researchers in the sales area are given.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. Stacy (1976), “The Structure and Dynamics of Behavior in Organizational Boundary Roles,” in Handbook of Organizational Psychology, DunnetteM. D., ed., Chicago: Rand McNally, 1175–1199.
2.
AlbaumGerald, and ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., eds. (1979), Critical Issues in Sales Management: State-of-the-Art and Future Research Needs, Eugene: University of Oregon, Division of Research, College of Business Administration.
3.
AndersonCarl R. (1977), “Locus of Control, Coping Behaviors, and Performance in a Stress Setting: A Longitudinal Study,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 62 (no. 4), 446–451.
4.
BagozziRichard P. (1976), “Toward A General Theory for the Explanation of the Performance of Sales People,” Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.
5.
BagozziRichard P. (1978), “Sales Force Performance and Satisfaction as a Function of Individual Difference, Interpersonal and Situational Factors,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (November), 517–531.
6.
BagozziRichard P. (1980), “Performance and Satisfaction in the Industrial Salesforce: An Examination of Their Antecedents and Simultaneity,”Journal of Marketing, 44 (Spring), 65–77.
7.
BehrmanDouglas N. (1979), “A Multivariate Examination of the Relationship between Salesmen Role Characteristics and Performance Outcomes,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina.
8.
BehrmanDouglas N., BigonessWilliam J., and PerreaultWilliam D.Jr. (1981), “Sources of Job Related Ambiguity and Their Consequences upon Salesperson's Job Satisfaction and Performance,”Management Science, 27 (November), 1246–1260.
9.
BehrmanDouglas N., and PerreaultWilliam D.Jr. (1982), “Measuring the Performance of Industrial Salespersons,”Journal of Business Research, 10 (September), 355–370.
10.
BelascoJames A. (1966), “The Salesman's Role Revisited,”Journal of Marketing, 30 (April), 6–8.
11.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr., FordNeil M., and WalkerOrville C.Jr. (1974), “Measuring the Job Satisfaction of Industrial Salesmen,”Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (August), 254–260.
12.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr. (1976), “Organizational Climate and Job Satisfaction in the Salesforce,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (November), 323–332.
13.
CocanougherA. Benton, and IvancevichJohn M. (1978), “‘BARS’ Performance Rating for Sales Force Personnel,”Journal of Marketing, 42 (July), 87–95.
14.
DitzGerhard W. (1964), “The Internal-External Dichotomy in Business Organizations,”Industrial Management Review, 6 (Fall), 54–55.
15.
DonnellyJames H.Jr., and IvancevichJohn M. (1975), “Role Clarity and the Salesman,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (January), 71–74.
16.
FordNeil M., WalkerOrville C.Jr., and ChurchillGilbert A.Jr. (1975), “Expectation Specific Measures of the Inter-Sender Conflict and Role Ambiguity Experienced by Industrial Salesmen,”Journal of Business Research, 3 (April), 83–94.
17.
FrankeGeorge R., BehrmanDouglas N., and PerreaultWilliam D.Jr. (1982), “Salesforce Performance and Satisfaction: Contemporaneous Relationships and Selected Antecedents,” in An Assessment of Marketing Thought and Practice, WalkerB., eds., Chicago: American Marketing, 233–237.
18.
FriisRobert H., and KnoxAlan B. (1972), “A Validity Study of Scales to Measure Need Achievement, Need Affiliation, Impulsiveness, and Intellectuality,”Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32 (Spring), 147–154.
19.
FutrellC. M., SwanJ. E., and ToddJ. T. (1976), “Job Performance Related to Management Control Systems for Pharmaceutical Salesmen,”Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (February), 25–33.
20.
GreeneCharles N. (1972), “The Satisfaction–Performance Controversy,”Business Horizons, 15 (October), 31–41.
21.
GreeneCharles N., and OrganD. W. (1973), “An Evaluation of Causal Models Linking Perceived Role and Job Satisfaction,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 18 (March), 95–103.
22.
HeiseDavid R. (1975), Causal Analysis, New York: Wiley.
23.
HoustonB. K. (1972), “Control Over Stress, Locus of Control, and Response to Stress,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21 (no. 2), 249–255.
24.
KerlingerF. N., and PedhauserE. J. (1973), Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research, New York: Holt, Rinehart.
25.
LamontL. M., and LundstromW. J. (1975), “Defining Industrial Sales Behavior: A Factor Analytic Study,” in AMA Conference Proceedings, CurhanR. C., ed., Chicago: American Marketing, 238–245.
26.
LockeE. A. (1970), “Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Theoretical Analysis,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5 (September), 484–500.
27.
MilesR. H. (1976), “Role Requirements as Sources of Organizational Stress,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 61 (April), 172–179.
28.
MilesR. H. (1980), “Organization Boundary Roles,” in Current Concerns in Occupational Stress, CooperG. L., and PayneR., eds., New York: Wiley.
29.
MilesR. H., and PerreaultWilliam D.Jr. (1976), “Organizational Role Conflict: Its Antecedents and Consequences,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17 (October), 19–44.
30.
National Industrial Conference Board (1965), Measuring Salesman Performance, Studies in Business Policy #114, New York: NICB.
31.
OrganD. W. (1977), “A Reappraisal and Reinterpretation of the Satisfaction Causes Performance Hypothesis,”Academy of Management Review, 2 (no. 1), 42–53.
32.
PrudenH. O. (1969a), “The Outside Salesman: Interorganizational Link,”California Management Review, 12 (Winter), 57–66.
33.
PrudenH. O. (1969b), “Interorganizational Conflict, Linkage, and Exchange: A Study of Industrial Salesmen,”Academy of Management Journal, 12 (September), 339–350.
34.
PrudenH. O., and ReeseR. M. (1972), “Interorganizational Role-Set Relations and the Performance and Satisfaction of Industrial Salesmen,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (no. 4), 601–609.
35.
RizzoJ. R., HouseR. J., and LirtzmanS. E. (1970), “Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 15 (no. 2), 150–163.
36.
RotterJ. B. (1966), “Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement,”Psychological Monographs, 80 (no. 1), Whole No. 609.
37.
SheridanJ. E., and SlocumJ.Jr. (1975), “The Direction of the Causal Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Work Performance,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14 (October), 159–172.
38.
TeasRoy K. (1983), “Supervisory Behavior, Role Stress, and the Job Satisfaction of Industrial Salespeople,”Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (February), 84–91.
39.
TeasRoy K., WackerJohn G., and DellvaW. H. (1980), “Role Stress and the Industrial Salesman,”AIDS Proceedings, 1 (November), 268–270.
40.
TeasRoy K., WackerJohn G., and Eugene HughesR. (1979), “A Path Analysis of Causes and Consequences of Salesmen's Perceptions of Role Clarity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (August), 335–369.
41.
WalkerO. C., ChurchillG. A.Jr., and FordN. M. (1972), “Reactions to Role Conflict: The Case of the Industrial Salesman,”Journal of Business Administration, 3 (Spring), 25–36.
42.
WalkerO. C. (1975), “Organizational Determinants of the Industrial Salesperson's Role Conflict and Ambiguity,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (January), 32–39.
43.
WalkerO. C. (1977), “Motivation and Performance in Industrial Selling: Present Knowledge and Needed Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (May), 156–168.
44.
WeissE. B. (1962), “The 5–Hour Selling Week,”Sales Management, 89 (August), 48–52.
