Little is known about how organizations respond to consumer complaints. This paper suggests a process whereby increasing consumer complaint proportions leads to organizational suppression of the unit receiving the complaints, which subsequently contributes to a further increase in complaints due to inaction by marketing management. This vicious circle is tested in two independent studies which provide support for its existence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BestA., and AndreasenA. R. (1977), “Consumer Response to Unsatisfactory Purchases: A Survey of Perceiving Defects, Voicing Complaints, and Obtaining Redress,”Law and Society, 11 (Spring), 701–42.
2.
BlumM. L., StewartJ. B., and WheatlyE. W. (1974), “Consumer Affairs: Viability of the Corporate Response,”Journal of Marketing, 38 (April), 13–19.
3.
CampbellDonald T. (1958), “Systematic Error on the Part of Human Links in Communication Systems,”Information and Control, 1, 334–69.
4.
FornellClaes (1976), Consumer Input for Marketing Decisions—A Study of Corporate Departments for Consumer Affairs, New York: Praeger.
FornellClaes (1981), “Increasing the Organizational Influence of Corporate Consumer Affairs Departments,”Journal of Consumer Affairs, 15 (Winter), 191–213.
8.
FornellClaes, and LarckerD. F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 39–50.
9.
FrenchJ., and RavenB. (1959), “The Bases of Social Power,” in Studies in Social Power, CartwrightD., ed., Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, 150–167.
10.
GoodmanJ. (1981), “Consumer Complaint Seminar,” paper presented before the Nippon Cultural Broadcasting Company, Tokyo, September 4.
11.
GrainerM. A., McEvoyK. A., and KingD. W. (1979), “Consumer Problems and Complaints: A National View,” in Advances in Consumer Research, WilkieW. L., ed., Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 494–500.
12.
HiseR. T., GilbertP. L., and KellyJ. P. (1978), “The Corporate Consumer Affairs Effort,”MSU Business Topics (Summer), 17–26.
13.
JablinF. M. (1979), “Superior-Subordinate Communication: The State of the Art,”Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1201–22.
14.
JanisIrving, and MannLeon (1977), Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment, New York: The Free Press.
15.
JonesM. G. (1978), “The Consumer Affairs Office: Essential Element in Corporate Policy and Planning,”California Management Review, 20 (Summer), 63–73.
16.
JȯreskogK. G. (1973), “A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System,” in Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, GoldbergerA. S., and DuncanO. D., eds., New York: Seminar Press, 85–117.
17.
JȯreskogK. G., and SȯrbomD. (1981), LISREL V: Estimation of Linear Structural Equation Systems by the Maximum Likelihood and Least Squares Method, Chicago: National Educational Resources.
18.
KendallC. L., and RussF. (1975), “Warranty and Complaint Policies: An Opportunity for Marketing Management,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (April), 36–43.
19.
LawrenceP. R., and LorschJ. W. (1967), Organization and Environment—Managing Differentiation and Integration, Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
20.
MarchJames G., and SimonHerbert A. (1958), Organizations, New York: Wiley.
21.
MatlinMargaret W., and StangDavid J. (1978), The Pollyana Principle: Selectivity in Language, Memory, and Thought, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
22.
McGuireE. P. (1973), The Consumer Affairs Department: Organization and Functions, Report No. 609, New York: The Conference Board.
23.
MontgomeryDavid B., and WeinbergCharles (1979), “Toward Strategic Intelligence Systems,”Journal of Marketing, 43 (Fall), 41–52.
24.
O'ReillyC. A.III (1977), “Supervisors and Peers as Information Sources, Group Supportiveness, and Individual Performance,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 632–35.
25.
O'ReillyC. A.III, and RobertsK. H. (1974), “Information Filtration in Organizations: Three Experiments,”Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 253–65.
26.
O'ReillyC. A.III, and RobertsK. H. (1977), “Task Group Structure, Communication and Effectiveness in Three Organizations,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 674–81.
27.
PfefferJ. (1978), Organizational Design, Arlington Heights, IL: AHM Publishing.
28.
PoratA., and HaasJ. (1969), “Information Effects on Decision Making,”Behavioral Science, 14, 98–104.
29.
ReadWilliam H. (1962), “Upward Communication in Industrial Hierarchies,”Human Relations, 22, 3–15.
30.
ReddingW. C. (1972), Communication within the Organization: An Interpretive Review of Theory and Research, New York: Industrial Communication Council.
31.
RobertsK. H., and O'ReillyC. A.III (1974), “Failure in Upward Communication in Three Organizations: Three Possible Culprits,”Academy of Management Journal, 17, 205–15.
32.
RosenS., and TesserA. (1970), “On Reluctance to Communicate Undesirable Information: The MUM Effect,”Sociometry, 33, 253–63.
33.
TannenbaumA. S., and KahnR. L. (1957), “Organizational Control Structure: A General Descriptive Technique as Applied to Four Local Unions,”Human Relations, 10, 127–40.
34.
Tarp (1979), Consumer Complaint Handling in America: Final Report, Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Consumer Affairs.
35.
TaylorHumphrey (1982), Consumerism in the Eighties, study no. 822047, Washington, DC: Louis Harris and Associates, Inc.
36.
TesserAbraham, and RosenSidney (1975), “The Reluctance to Transmit Bad News,”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 193–232.
37.
WebberR. A. (1970), “Perceptions of Interactions between Supervisors and Subordinates,”Human Relations, 23, 235–48.
