In view of the importance of interpersonal communication in the face-to-face selling interaction, this discussion seeks to provide a more complete picture of the actual communication process by introducing a concept new to the marketing literature. The concept is relational communication, which refers to that part of a message beyond the actual content which allows communicators to negotiate their relative positions. Thus, the message sender can either bid for dominance, deference, or equality. The message receiver, in turn, can accept the bid or deny it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalesRobert F. (1950), Interaction Process Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BonomaThomas V., and RosenbergHelen (1978), “Theory-Based Content Analysis: A Social Influence Perspective for Evaluating Group Process,”Social Science Research, 1 (June), 213–256.
3.
BrockTimothy C. (1965), “Communicator-Recipient Similarity and Decision Change,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(June), 650–654.
4.
BrunerJerome (1973), Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing, New York: Norton.
5.
ChristieRichard, and GeisFlorence L. (1970), Studies in Machiavellianism, New York: Academic Press.
6.
CourtrightJohn A., MillerFrank E., and Edna Rogers-MillarL. (1979), “Domineeringness and Dominance: Replication and Expansion,”Communication Monographs, 46(August), 179–192.
7.
DonohueWilliam A. (1981), “Development of a Model of Rule Use in Negotiation Interaction,”Communication Monographs, 48(June), 106–120.
8.
DuncanHugh D. (1968), Symbols and Society, New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
EllisDonald G. (1979), “Relational Control in Two Group Systems,”Communication Monographs, 46(August), 153–166.
10.
EllisDonald G., Aubrey FisherB., DreckselGay L., HochDebbie D., and WerbelWayne S. (n.d.), “Relational Communication,” unpublished coding manual, University of Utah.
11.
EricsonPhilip M., and Edna RogersL. (1973), “New Procedures for Analyzing Relational Communication,”Family Process, 12(September), 245–267.
12.
FarleyJohn U., and SwinthRobert L. (1967), “Effects of Choice and Sales Message on Customer-Salesman Interaction,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(April), 107–110.
13.
FestingerLeon (1968), “The Application of Behavioral Science Knowledge,” paper presented at the Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
14.
FitzpatrickMary Anne, and BestPatricia (1979), “Dyadic Adjustments in Relational Types: Consensus, Cohesion, Affectional Expression, and Satisfaction in Enduring Relationships,”Communication Monographs, 46(August), 167–178.
15.
GrikscheitGary M. (1971), “An Investigation of the Ability of Salesmen to Monitor Feedback,” Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.
16.
HarperRobert G., WiensArthur, and MatarazzoJoseph D. (1978), Nonverbal Communication: The State of the Art, New York: Wiley.
17.
MarshU. Grant (1972), Salesmanship: Modern Principles and Practices, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
McGrathJohn E., and JulianJames W. (1963), “Interaction Process and Task Outcome in Experimentally-Created Negotiation Groups,”Journal of Psychological Studies, 14(September), 117–138.
19.
McMahonEva M. (1976), “Nonverbal Communication as a Function of Attribution in Impression Formation,”Communication Monographs, 43(November), 287–294.
MillerFrank E., Edna Rogers-MillarL., and CourtrightJohn E. (1979), “Relational Control and Dyadic Understanding: An Exploratory Predictive Regression Model,” in Communication Yearbook HI, NemoDan, ed., New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 213–224.
22.
O'Donnell-TrujilloNick (1981), “Relational Communication: A Comparison of Coding Systems,”Communication Monographs, 48(June), 91–105.
23.
OlshavskyRichard W. (1973), “Customer-Salesman Interaction in Appliance Retailing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 10(May), 208–212.
24.
PearceW. Barnett, and ConklinForrest (1979), “A Model of Hierarchical Meanings in Coherent Conversation and a Study of Indirect Responses,”Communication Monographs, 46(August), 179–192.
25.
PenningtonAllan L. (1968), “Customer-Salesman Bargaining Behavior in Retail Transactions,”Journal of Marketing Research, 5(August), 255–262.
26.
RogersL. Edna, and FaraceRichard V. (1975), “Analysis of Relational Communication in Dyads: New Measurement Procedures,”Human Communication Research, 1(June), 222–239.
27.
RogersL. Edna, CourtrightJohn A., and MillerFrank E. (1980), “Message Control Intensity: Rationale and Preliminary Findings,”Communication Monographs, 47(September), 201–219.
28.
SnyderMark (1974), “The Self-Monitoring of Expressive Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(October), 526–537.
29.
SnyderMark, and MonsonThomas C. (1975), “Persons, Situations, and the Control of Social Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(October), 637–644.
30.
WatzlawickPaul, BeavinJanet, and JacksonDon (1967), Pragmatics of Human Communication, New York: Norton.
31.
WebsterFrederick E.Jr. (1968), “Interpersonal Communication and Salesman Effectiveness,”Journal of Marketing, 32(July), 7–13.
32.
WeitzBarton A. (1981), “Effectiveness in Sales Interactions: A Contingency Framework,”Journal of Marketing, 45(Winter), 85–103.
33.
WilletRonald P., and PenningtonAllan (1966), “Customer” and Salesman: The Anatomy of Choice and Influence in a Retail Setting,” in Fall Proceedings, Chicago: American Marketing, 598–616.
34.
ZimbardoPaul, and EbbesenEbbe B. (1969), Influencing Attitudes and Changing Behavior, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
