Only recently have marketing scientists become concerned with issues in the philosophy of science. This paper points to one neglected area—the implications of a theoretical tradition for the selection of research methods (design, data collection, and data analysis). It is argued that marketing has been relying primarily on only one theoretical tradition. The dominance of this philosophy has led to marketing science growing more rapidly in the area of hypothesis testing than in the development of new, rich explanatory theories. Several suggestions are made to achieve a balance in theory construction and testing, with implications for reducing methods bias by a process of triangulating methodologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArndtJohan (1978), “Comments on the Sociology of Marketing Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, HuntKeith, ed., 185–190.
2.
BagozziRichard P. (1980), Causal Models in Marketing, New York: Wiley.
3.
BellengerDanny N., BernhardtKenneth L., and GoldstuckerJac L. (1976), Qualitative Research in Marketing, Chicago: American Marketing.
4.
BogdanRobert, and TaylorSteven J. (1975), Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods, New York: Wiley.
5.
BrodbeckMay (1982), “Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science,” in Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives, BushRonald F., and HuntShelby D., eds., Chicago: American Marketing, 1–6.
6.
BushRonald F., and HuntShelby D., eds. (1982), Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives, Chicago: American Marketing.
7.
CalderBobby J. (1977), “Focus Groups and the Nature of Qualitative Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (August), 353–364.
8.
CronbachLee J. (1975), “Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology,”American Psychologist, 30 (February), 116–127.
9.
DeutscherIrwin (1970), “Words and Deeds: Social Science and Social Policy,” in Qualitative Methodology, WilliamJ. Filstead, ed., Chicago: Markham.
10.
DichterErnest (1964), Handbook of Consumer Motivations: The Psychology of the World of Objects, New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
EngelJames, and BlackwellRoger D. (1982), Consumer Behavior, 4th ed., Chicago: Dryden.
12.
FerberRobert, and WalesHugh G., eds. (1958), Motivation and Market Behavior, Homewood, IL: Irwin.
13.
FernEdward J. (1982), “The Use of Focus Groups for Idea Generation: The Effects of Group Size, Acquaintanceship, and Moderator on Response Quantity and Quality,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (February), 1–13.
14.
FilsteadWilliam J., ed. (1970), Qualitative Methodology: Firsthand Involvement with the Social World, Chicago: Markham.
15.
FilsteadWilliam J., ed. (1979), “Qualitative Methods: A Needed Perspective in Evaluation Research,” in Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research, CookThomas D., and ReichardtCharles S., eds., Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 33–48.
16.
GlaserBarney, and StraussAnselm (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago: Aldine.
17.
GreenbergBarnett A., GoldstuckerJac L., and BellengerDanny N. (1977), “What Techniques Are Used by Marketing Researchers in Business,”Journal of Marketing, 41 (April), 61–68.
18.
HolznerBurkhart, and MarxJohn (1979), Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19.
HowardJohn A., and ShethJagdish N. (1969), The Theory of Consumer Behavior, New York: Wiley.
20.
HuntShelby D. (1982), “Are the Logical Empiricist Models of Explanation Dead?” in Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives, BushRonald F., and HuntShelby D., eds., Chicago: American Marketing, 7–10.
21.
HuntShelby D. (1983), Marketing Theory: The Philosophy of Marketing Science, Homewood, IL: Irwin.
22.
JacobyJacob (1978), “Consumer Research: A State of the Art Review,”Journal of Marketing, 42 (April), 87–96.
23.
KuhnThomas (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
LeoneRobert P., and ShultzRandall L. (1980), “A Study of Marketing Generalizations,”Journal of Marketing, 44 (Winter), 10–18.
25.
MertonRobert S. (1957), Social Theory and Social Structure, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
26.
MitroffIan I. (1974), The Subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Psychology of Apollo Moon Scientists, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27.
MursteinB. I. (1965), Handbook of Projective Techniques, New York: Basic Books, Inc.
28.
NewmanJoseph W. (1957), Motivation Research and Marketing Management, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
PattonMichael Q. (1978), Utilization-Focused Evaluation, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
PattonMichael Q. (1980), “Making Methods Choices,”Evaluation and Program Planning, 3 (no. 4), 219–228.
31.
PeterJ. Paul (1982), “Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science: Implications for Marketing Theory—A Panel Discussion,” in Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives, BushRonald F., and HuntShelby D., eds., Chicago: American Marketing, 11–16.
32.
PhillipsLynn W., and SternthalBrian (1977), “Age Differences in Information Processing: A Perspective on the Aged Consumer,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (November), 444–457.
33.
ReichardtCharles S., and CookThomas D. (1979), “Beyond Qualitative versus Quantitative Methods,” in Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research, CookThomas D., and ReichardtCharles S., eds., Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 7–32.
34.
ReichardtCharles S., and CookThomas D. (1980), “Paradigms Lost: Some Thoughts on Choosing Methods in Evaluation Research,”Evaluation and Program Planning, 3 (no. 4), 229–236.
35.
RistRay C. (1977), “On the Relations among Educational Research Paradigms: From Disdain to Detente,”Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 8 (May), 42–49.
36.
SampsonPeter (1978), “Qualitative Research and Motivation,” in Consumer Market Research Handbook, 2nd edition, WorcesterRobert M., and DownhamJohn, eds., New York: Van Nostrand.
37.
SchwartzH., and JacobsJ. (1979), Qualitative Sociology, New York: Free Press.
38.
ShethJagdish N. (1975), “Some Thoughts on the Future of Marketing Models,” faculty working paper no. 232, College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
39.
ShethJagdish N. (1979), “The Future of Market Research Products and Markets,” faculty working paper no. 554, College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
40.
ShethJagdish N. (1981), “Discussion” comments, in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 8, MonroeKent, ed., Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, 355–356.
41.
SieberSam D. (1973), “The Integration of Field Work and Survey Methods,”American Journal of Sociology, 78 (May), 1335–1359.
42.
SimonJohn (1980), Paradigms Lost: Reflections on Literacy and Its Decline, New York: Clarkson N. Potter, Inc.
43.
SjobergGideon, and NettRoger (1966), A Methodology for Social Research, New York: Harper.
44.
SpekmanRobert E., and SternLouis W. (1979), “Environmental Uncertainty and Buying Group Structure: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of Marketing, 43 (Spring), 54–64.
45.
SuppeFrederick ed. (1977), The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd edition, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
46.
SuppesPatrick (1974), “The Place of Theory in Educational Research,”Educational Researcher, 3 (no. 6), 3–10.
47.
WebbE. J., CampbellD. T., SchwartzR. D., and SechrestL. (1966), Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences, Chicago: Rand McNally.
48.
WindYoram (1978), “Organizational Buying Behavior,” in Review of Marketing 1978, ZaltmanGerald, and BonomaThomas V., eds., Chicago: American Marketing, 160–193.
49.
ZaltmanGerald, LeMastersKaren, and HeffringMichael (1982), Theory Construction in Marketing: Some Thoughts on Thinking, New York: Wiley.
50.
ZaltmanGerald, PinsonChristian, and AngelmarReinhard (1973), Metatheory and Consumer Research, Hinsdale, IL: Dry-den.
51.
ZaltmanGerald, SrivastavaRajendra, and DeshpandeRohit (1978), “Perceptions of Unfair Marketing Practices: Consumerism Implications,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, HuntKeith, ed., Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, 247–253.
