Given the popularity and diversity of the various standardized portfolio models, a critical management question is which of the various standardized portfolio models to select. Using PIMS data for 15 businesses (SBUs) of a Fortune 500 firm, this paper compares the positionings of these businesses on a number of standardized portfolio models. Managerial implications of these results are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbellDerek F., and HammondJohn S. (1979), Strategic Market Planning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
2.
DayGeorge S. (1977), “Diagnosing the Product Portfolio,”Journal of Marketing, 41 (April), 29–38.
3.
LarréchéJean-Claude, and SrinivasanV. (1981), “STRATPORT: A Decision Support System for Strategic Planning,”Journal of Marketing, 45 (Fall), 39–52.
4.
MahajanVijay, and WindYoram (1983), “Integrating Financial Portfolio Analysis with Product Portfolio Models,” in Strategic Marketing and Management, GardnerDavid, and ThomasHoward, eds., New York: John Wiley.
5.
MahajanVijay, WindYoram, and BradfordJohn W. (1982), “Stochastic Dominance Rules for Product Portfolio Models,”Management Science: Special Studies in Marketing Planning Models, ZoltnersAndy, ed., New York: North-Holland Publishing Company.
6.
WensleyRobin (1981), “Strategic Marketing: Betas, Boxes or Basics,”Journal of Marketing, 45 (Summer), 173–182.
WindYoram, and MahajanVijay (1981a), “Designing Product and Business Portfolios,”Harvard Business Review, 59 (January-February), 155–65.
9.
WindYoram, and MahajanVijay (1981b), “Market Share: Concepts, Findings and Directions for Future Research,” in Review of Marketing 1981, EnisB., and RoeringK., eds., Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.