This study uses a causal modelling methodology to examine competing methodological and theoretical hypotheses concerning the effects of product quality on direct costs and business unit return on investment (ROI). Results show that the PIMS’ measures under study exhibit high reliability across all samples. The findings fail to support the widely held view that a high relative quality position is incompatible with achieving a low relative cost position in an industry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BagozziRichard P. (1980), Causal Models in Marketing, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
2.
BagozziRichard P. (1981a), “An Examination of the Validity of Two Models of Attitude,”Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16 (July), 323–59.
3.
BagozziRichard P. (1981b), “Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 (October), 607–26.
4.
BagozziRichard P., and PhillipsLynn W. (1982), “Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (September), 459–489.
5.
BassFrank M., and WittinkDick R. (1975), “Pooling Issues and Methods in Regression Analysis with Examples in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (November), 414–25.
6.
BassFrank M., CattinPhilippe, and WittinkDick R. (1978), “Firm Effects and Industry Effects in the Analysis of Market Structure and Profitability,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (February), 3–10.
7.
BentlerPeter M., and BonettDouglas G. (1980), “Significance Tests and Goodness-of-Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures,”Psychological Bulletin, 88 (no. 3), 588–606.
8.
BuzzellRobert D. (1978), “Product Quality,”PIMSLETTER No. 41, Strategic Planning Institute.
9.
BuzzellRobert D., GaleBradley, and SultanRobert (1975), “Market Share—A Key to Profitability,”Harvard Business Review, 53 (January-February), 97–106.
10.
BuzzellRobert D., and WiersemaFrederik D. (1981a), “Successful Share Building Strategies,”Harvard Business Review, 59 (January-February), 135–144.
11.
BuzzellRobert D., and WiersemaFrederik D. (1981b), “Modelling Changes in Market Share: A Cross-Sectional Analysis,”Strategic Management Journal, 2 (January-March), 27–42.
12.
ChurchillGilbert (1979), Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, New York: Dryden.
13.
FarrisPaul, and ReibsteinDavis (1979), “How Prices, Ad Expenditures and Profits are Linked,”Harvard Business Review, 57 (November-December), 173–184.
14.
FineCharles H. (1983), “Quality Control and Learning in Productive Systems,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
15.
FlahertyM. Therese (1982), “Market Share, Technology Leadership and Competition in International Semiconductor Markets,” working paper, Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
16.
FornellClaes, and LarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 39–50.
17.
GaleBradley T., and BranchBen S. (1982), “Concentration versus Market Share: Which Determines Performance and Why Does It Matter?,”The Antitrust Bulletin, 27 (Spring), 83–105.
18.
GaleBradley T., and SwireDonald J. (1977), The Limited Information Report: A Strategic Planning Tool for Business Decision Making When Information is Difficult to Obtain, Cambridge, MA: Strategic Planning Institute.
19.
HallWilliam K. (1980), “Survival Strategies in a Hostile Environment,”Harvard Business Review, 58 (September-October), 75–85.
20.
HattenKenneth, and SchendelDan (1977), “Heterogeneity Within an Industry: Firm Conduct in the U.S. Brewing Industry,”The Journal of Industrial Economics, 26 (December), 97–112.
21.
HendersonBruce D. (1979), Henderson on Corporate Strategy, Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
22.
JöreskogKarl, and SörbomDag (1979), Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models, Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
23.
JöreskogKarl, and SörbomDag (1982), LISREL: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Method of Maximum Likelihood, Chicago, IL: National Educational Resources.
24.
KiechelWalter (1981), “Three (or Four, or More) Ways to Win,”Fortune, 104 (October 19), 181, 184, 188.
25.
PenningsJohannes (1973), “Measures of Organizational Structure: A Methodological Note,”American Journal of Sociology, 69, 41–52.
26.
PhillipsLynn W. (1981), “Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (November), 395–415.
27.
PhillipsLynn W. (1982), “Explaining Control Losses in Corporate Marketing Channels: An Organizational Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (November), 525–549.
28.
PhillipsLynn W., and BuzzellRobert D. (1982), “An Examination of the Reliability of PIMS Relative Competitive Strategy Measures,” paper presented at American Institute for Decision Sciences Conference, San Francisco, November.
29.
PhillipsLynn W., ChangDae, and BuzzellRobert D. (1982), “Product Quality, Cost Position and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses,” working paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
30.
PorterMichael E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press.
31.
RavenscraftDavid J. (1981), “Structure-Profit Relationships at the Line of Business and Industry Level,” working paper, Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission.
RumeltRichard P. (1981a), “How Important is Industry in Explaining Firm Profitability,” working paper, Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles.
34.
RumeltRichard P. (1981b), “Toward a Strategic Theory of the Firm,” paper presented at a conference on “Non-Traditional Approaches to Policy Research,” University of Southern California, November 12–13.
35.
RumeltRichard P., and RobinJ., WensleyC. (1981), “Market Share and the Rate of Return: Testing the Stochastic Hypothesis,” working paper, Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles.
36.
SchererF. M. (1980), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally Publishing Company.
37.
SchoefflerSidney, BuzzellRobert D., and HeanyDonald F. (1974), “Impact of Strategic Planning on Profit Performance,”Harvard Business Review, 52 (March-April), 137–45.
38.
ShapiroBenson P. (1977), “Can Marketing and Manufacturing Coexist?,”Harvard Business Review, 56 (September-October), 104–114.
39.
SmithWard C. (1980), “Finding New Opportunities for Profitability in Manufacturing Cost,”Management Review, 69 (March), 60–62.
40.
Strategic Planning Institute (1978), The PIMS Data Manual, Cambridge, MA: SPI.
41.
Strategic Planning Institute (1980), The SPI Research Data Bases, Cambridge, MA: SPI.
42.
WeissLeonard, and PascoeGeorge (1981), “Some Early Results on the Concentration-Profits Relationship from the FTC's Line of Business Data,” working paper, Federal Trade Commission.
43.
WensleyJ., RobinC. (1981), “Strategic Marketing: Betas, Boxes, or Basics?,”Journal of Marketing, 45 (Summer), 173–82.
44.
WheelwrightSteven C. (1981), “Japan—Where Operations Really are Strategic,”Harvard Business Review, 59 (July-August), 67–74.
