The landslide victory of Michigan's “bottle bill” by popular vote contradicts previous findings regarding the small size of the ecologically concerned consumer segment. A survey of voter preference conducted just prior to the 1976 general election addresses this contradiction and some broader aspects of consumer environmental behavior. Implications for ecological marketers are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AberbachJoel D. (1969), “Alienation and Political Behavior,” American Political Science Review, 63 (March), 86–99.
2.
AndersonW. Thomas Jr. and CunninghamWilliam H. (1972), “The Socially Conscious Consumer,” Journal of Marketing, 36 (July), 23–31.
3.
AndersonW. ThomasJr., HenionKarl E., and CoxEli P.III (1974), “Socially vs. Ecologically Responsible Consumers,” in American Marketing Association Conference Proceedings.
4.
AndrewsF. M.MorganJ. N.SonquistJ. A., and KlemL. (1973), The Multiple Classification Analysis Program, 2nd ed., Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.
5.
AntrilJohn H. and BennettPeter D. (1979), “Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Socially Responsible Consumption Behavior,” in The Conserver Society, HenionKarl E. and KinnearThomas C., eds., Chicago: American Marketing Association, 51–68.
6.
ArndtJohan and HelgesenThorolf (1979), “Marketing of Ecologically Compatible Products: Public Policy Issues and a Market Test,” in 1979 Educators’ Conference Proceedings, BeckwithNeil, eds., Chicago: American Marketing Association, 594–597.
7.
BrookerGeorge (1976), “The Self-Actualizing Socially Conscious Consumer,” Journal of Consumer Research, 3, (September), 107–112.
8.
DraperN. R. and SmithH. (1966), Applied Regression Analysis, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
9.
FrankelMartin R. and FrankelLester R. (1977), “Some Recent Developments in Sampling Design,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (August), 280–93.
10.
FullerDonald A. (1978), “Recycling Consumer Solid Waste: A Commentary on Selected Channel Alternatives,” Journal of Business Research, 6 (January), 17–31.
11.
HenionKarl E. (1976), Ecological Marketing, Columbus, Ohio: Grid, Inc.
12.
HenionKarl E., and WilsonWilliam H. (1976), “The Ecologically Concerned Consumer and Locus of Control,” in Ecological Marketing, HenionKarl E. and KinnearThomas C., eds., Chicago: American Marketing Association.
13.
HortonJohn E. and ThompsonWayne E. (1962), “Powerlessness and Political Negativism: A Study of Defeated Local Referendums,” American Journal of Sociology, 67 (March), 485–494.
14.
HowardJohn A. and ShethJagdish N. (1969), The Theory of Buyer Behavior, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
15.
KinnearThomas C. and TaylorJames R. (1973), “The Effect of Ecological Concern on Brand Perceptions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (May), 191–198.
16.
KinnearThomas C. and TaylorJames R. (1974), “Identifying Ecological Buying Segments Through Attitude Measurement,” Journal of Business Administration, 3 (Spring), 33–43.
17.
KinnearThomas C., and TaylorJames R., and AhmedSadrudin A. (1974), “Ecologically Concerned Consumers: Who Are They?” Journal of Marketing, 38 (April), 20–24.
18.
LeighJames and WarshawMartin R. (1977), “The Michigan Bottle Bill: Will Consumers Put Their Money Where They Put Their Votes?” Michigan Business Review, 29 (November), 13–18.
19.
LepistoLawrence R. (1979), “Environmental Product Attributes and Product Preference,” in Proceedings, FranzRobert S., HopkinsRobert M., and TomaAlfred G., eds., Lafayette, LA: Southern Marketing Association.
20.
MayerRobert N. (1976), “The Socially Conscious Consumer—Another Look at the Data,” Journal of Consumer Research, 3 (September), 113–115.
21.
McEvoyJ. (1972), “The American Concern with the Environment,” in Social Behavior, Natural Resources, and the Environment, BurchW. R.Jr., ed., New York: Harper and Row, 214–236.
22.
MiddletonR. (1963), “Alienation, Race, and Education,” American Sociological Review, 28 (December), 973–77.
23.
MurphyPatrick E. (1978), “Environmentally Concerned Consumers: Demographic Dimensions,” in Proceedings of the 1978 Educators’ Conference, JainSubhash C., ed., Chicago: American Marketing Association.
24.
MurphyPatrick E., KangunNorman, and LocanderWilliam B. (1978), “Environmentally Concerned Consumers—Racial Variations,” Journal of Marketing, 42 (October), 61–66.
25.
NelsonJames E. (1974), “An Empirical Investigation of the Nature and Incidence of Ecologically Responsible Consumption of Housewives,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
26.
NunnallyJim C. (1967), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
27.
RideoutSusan R. and ReyesRamon V. (1976), “A Study of the Impacts of Proposed Beverage Container Legislation in Michigan,” unpublished report, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business, University of Michigan.
28.
StipakB. (1973), “An Analysis of the 1968 Rapid Transit Vote in Los Angeles,” Transportation, 2 (May), 71–86.
29.
StoneClarence N. (1965), “Local Referendums: An Alternative to the Alienated-Voter Model,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Winter), 199–222.
30.
TatsuokaMaurice M. (1971), Multivariate Analysis: Techniques for Educational and Psychological Research, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
31.
WebsterFrederick E.Jr. (1975), “Determining the Characteristics of the Socially Conscious Consumer,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (December), 188–196.
32.
WebsterFrederick E.Jr. (1976), “Who is the Socially-Ecologically Concerned Consumer?” in Ecological Marketing, HenionKarl E. and KinnearThomas C., eds., Chicago: American Marketing Association.
33.
WohlwillJoachim F. (1979), “The Social and Political Matrix of Environmental Attitudes: An Analysis of the Vote on the California Coastal Zone Regulation Act,” Environment and Behavior, 11 (March), 71–85.