Evaluative verbal content represents those advertising claims which refer to intangible product attributes or benefits. Theoretical arguments and empirical evidence indicate that such advertising may deceive receivers via an implication mechanism. But even in the absence of deception, advertisers may find success with evaluative advertising due to the operation of a low involvement information processing dynamic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AakerD. S. (1974), “Deceptive Advertising,” in Consumerism, 2nd ed., AakerD. A. and DayG. S., eds., New York: The Free Press, 137–156.
2.
AakerD. S., and MyersJ. G. (1975), Advertising Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
Advertising Age (1978a). “Comparative Ads’ Effect Praised by Pertschuk” (November 27), 40.
4.
Advertising Age (1978b), “Westen Raps Lack of ‘Hard’ Data in National Ads” (August 14), 70.
5.
ArmstrongG. M.KendallC. L., and RussF. A. (1975), “Application of Consumer Information Processing Work to Public Policy Issues,” Communication Research, 2 (July), 232–245.
6.
ArmstrongG. M., and RussF. A. (1975), “Detecting Deception in Advertising,” MSU Business Topics, 23 (Spring), 21–31.
7.
BarclayJ. R. (1973), “The Role of Comprehension in Remembering Sentences,” Cognitive Psychology, 4 (March), 229–254.
8.
BerdineW. R. (1974), “Some Relationships between Perceived Generality and Ambiguity in a Set of Words,” Language and Speech, 17 (October-December), 305–311.
9.
BettmanJ. R. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
BogartL. (1978), “Is All This Advertising Necessary?” Journal of Advertising Research, 18 (October), 17–26.
11.
BonomaT. V. and FelderL. C. (1977), “Nonverbal Communication in Marketing: Toward A Communicational Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (May), 169–180.
12.
BransfordJ. D. and FranksJ. J. (1972), “The Abstraction of Linguistic Ideas,” Cognition, 1 (#2–3), 211–249.
13.
BrewerW. F. and LichtensteinE. H. (1975), “Recall of Logical and Pragmatic Implications in Sentences with Dichotomous and Continuous Antonyms,” Memory and Cognition, 3 (May), 315–318.
14.
CohenD. (1972), “Surrogate Indicators and Deception in Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 36 (July), 10–15.
15.
ConeyK. A. and PattiC. H. (1978), “Can Marketers Substantiate Their Claims?” Unpublished working paper, Arizona State University.
16.
FishbeinM. (1967), “A Behavior Theory Approach to the Relations between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward the Object,” in Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, FishbeinM., ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17.
FishbeinM., and AjzenI. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
FossD. J.BeverT. G., and SilverM. (1968), “The Comprehension and Verification of Ambiguous Sentences,” Perception and Psychophysics, 4 (November), 304–306.
19.
GardnerD. M. (1975), “Deception in Advertising: a Conceptual Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 39 (January), 40–46.
20.
GardnerM. P.MitchellA. A., and RussoJ. E. (1978), “Chronometric Analysis: An Introduction and an Application to Low Involvement Perception of Advertisements,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, HuntH. Keith, ed., Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 581–89.
21.
GlucksbergS. and DanksJ. (1975), Experimental Psycholinguistics: An Introduction, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22.
GreenwaldA. G. (1968), “Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change,” in Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, GreenwaldA. G., BrockT. C., and OstrumT. M., eds., New York: Academic Press.
23.
HarrisR. J. (1977), “Comprehension of Pragmatic Implications in Advertising,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 62 (October), 603–608.
24.
HarrisR. J., and MonacoG. E. (1978), “The Psychology of Pragmatic Implications: Information Processing between the Lines,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 107 (March), 1–22.
25.
HolbrookM. B. (1978), “Beyond Attitude Structure: Toward the Informational Determinants of Attitude,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (November), 545–556.
26.
HoustonM. J., and RothschildM. L. (1978), “Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives on Involvement,” in Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, JainSubhash C., ed., Chicago: American Marketing Association, 184–87.
27.
HuntS. D. (1976), “Informational vs. Persuasive Advertising: An Appraisal,” Journal of Advertising, 5 (Summer), 5–8.
28.
JacobyJ., and SmallC. (1975), “The FDA Approach to Defining Misleading Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 39 (October), 65–73.
29.
JohnsonM. K.BransfordJ. D., and SolomonS. K. (1973), “Memory for Tacit Implications of Sentences,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98 (April), 203–205.
30.
JustM. A., and ClarkH. H. (1973), “Drawing Inferences from the Presuppositions of Affirmative and Negative Sentences,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12 (February), 21–31.
31.
KintschW. (1974), The Representation of Meaning in Memory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
Kroeber-RielW. (1979), “Activation Research: Psychobiological Approaches to Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 5 (March), 240–250.
33.
KrugmanH. E. (1965), “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning without Involvement,” The Public Opinion Quarterly, 29 (Fall), 349–356.
34.
KrugmanH. E. (1977), “Memory Without Recall, Exposure Without Perception,” Journal of Advertising Research, 17 (August), 7–12.
35.
LindsayP. H., and NormanD. A. (1972), Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology, New York: Academic Press.
36.
LutzK. A., and LutzR. J. (1977), “Effects on Interactive Imagery on Learning: Application to Advertising,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 62 (August), 493–498.
37.
LutzK. A., and LutzR. J. (1978), “Imagery-Eliciting Strategies: Review and Implications of Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, HuntH. Keith, ed., Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 611–620.
38.
LutzR. J. (1975), “First-Order and Second-Order Cognitive Effects in Attitude Change,” Communication Research, 2 (July), 289–299.
39.
MarquezF. T. (1977), “Advertising Content: Persuasion, Information, or Intimidation?” Journalism Quarterly, 54 (Autumn), 482–491.
40.
MitchellA. A., and OlsonJ. C. (1979), “Are Product Beliefs the Only Mediator of Attitude Formation and Change? An Examination of the Theoretical Logic of the Fishbein Model,” Working Paper #60-79-80, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie-Mellon University.
41.
NelsonP. (1970), “Information and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, 78 (March-April), 311–29.
42.
NelsonP. (1974), “Advertising as Information,” Journal of Political Economy, 83 (July-August), 729–54.
43.
OffirC. (1973), “Recognition Memory for Presuppositions of Relative Clause Sentences,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12 (December), 636–643.
44.
OliverR. L. (1979), “An Interpretation of the Attitudinal and Behavioral Effects of Puffery,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 13 (Summer), 8–27.
45.
OlsonJ. C. (1978), “Inferential Belief Formation in the Cue Utilization Process,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, HuntH. Keith, ed., Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 706–713.
46.
OlsonJ. C., and DoverP. A. (1978), “Cognitive Effects of Deceptive Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (February), 29–38.
47.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J., and TannenbaumP. H. (1957), The Measurement of Meaning, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
48.
PollayR. W.FryerC., and ZaichowskyJ. (1977), “The Information Content of Television Advertising: A Longitudinal and Cross-sectional Study,” paper presented to the American Institute for Decision Sciences, Chicago: October.
49.
PrestonI. L. (1967), “Theories of Behavior and the Concept of Rationality in Advertising,” The Journal of Communication, 17 (September), 211–222.
50.
PrestonI. L., (1970), “A Reinterpretation of the Meaning of Involvement in Krugman's Models of Advertising Communication,” Journalism Quarterly, 47 (Summer), 287–95.
51.
PrestonI. L., (1975), The Great American Blow-up: Puffery in Advertising and Selling.Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
52.
PrestonI. L., and BowenL. (1971), “Perceiving Advertisements as Emotional, Rational and Irrational,” Journalism Quarterly, 48 (Spring), 73–84.
53.
PrestonI. L., and ScharbachS. E. (1971), “Advertising: More Than Meets the Eye?” Journal of Advertising Research, 11 (June), 19–24.
54.
ResnikA., and SternB. L. (1977), “An Analysis of the Information Content in Television Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 41 (January), 50–53.
55.
RobertsonT. R. (1976), “Low Commitment Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Advertising Research, 16 (April), 19–27.
56.
RossiterJ. R., and PercyL. (1979), “Visual Communication in Advertising,” Research Working Paper No. 231A, New York: Columbia University.
57.
RotfeldH. J. (1978), “Advertising Deception, Consumer Research and Puffery: An Inquiry into Puffery's Power and Potential to Mislead Consumers,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois.
58.
RotzollK. B. (1978), “What Factors Affect Response to Ads?” Advertising Working Paper No. 5, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
59.
SchwellerK. G.BrewerW. F., and DahlD. A. (1976), “Memory for Illocutionary Forces and Perlocutionary Effects of Utterances,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15 (June), 325–337.
60.
SherifM., and SherifC. W. (1969), Social Psychology, New York: Harper and Row.
61.
ShimpT. A. (1978), “Do Incomplete Comparisons Mislead?”, Journal of Advertising Research, 18 (December), 21–27.
62.
ShimpT. A. (1979), “Social-Psychological (Misrepresentations in Television Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 13 (Summer), 28–40.
63.
ShimpT. A., and YokumJ. T. (1980), “The Influence of Deceptive Advertising on Repeat Purchase Behavior,” Center of Marketing Studies Working Paper No. 86, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina.
64.
WrightP. L. (1973), “The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (February), 53–62.
65.
WrightP. L. (1974), Analyzing Media Effects on Advertising Responses,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 38 (Summer), 192–205.
