Promotion strategies for a major car company are developed for different international market segments by comparing consumer preferences measured by tradeoff analysis with their perceptions of new and existing products.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckwithN. E., and LehmannD. R. (1975), “The Importance of Halo Effects in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models,”Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (August), 265–75.
2.
BoydH. W., RayM. L., and StrongE. (1972), “An Attitudinal Framework for Advertising Strategy,”Journal of Marketing, 36 (April), 27–33.
3.
GreenP. E., and SrinivasanV. (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,”Journal of Consumer Research, 5 (September), 103–23.
4.
JohnsonR. M. (1974), “Trade-off Analysis of Consumer Values,”Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May), 121–27.
5.
KruskalJ.B. (1965), “Analysis of Factorial Experiments by Estimating Monotone Transformations of the Data,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 27, 251–63.
6.
PeeblesD. M., RyanJ. K., and VernonI. R. (1977), “A New Perspective on Advertising Standardisation,”European Journal of Marketing, 11, 569–76.
7.
RayM. L. (1978), “The Present and Potential Linkages Between Microtheoretical Notions of Behavioral Science and the Problems of Advertising—A Proposal for a Research System,” in The Behavioral Sciences in Marketing, DaviesH. L., and SilkA. J., eds., New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8.
RobinsonP. J., and WindYoram (1977), “Multinational Tradeoff Segmentation,” in Moving A Head with Attitude Research, WindY., and GreenbergM. G., eds., Chicago: American Marketing Association.
9.
WestwoodR., LunnA., and BeazleyD. (1974), “The Trade-off Model and Its Extensions,”Journal of the Market Research Society, 16 (July), 227–41.
10.
WindY. (1978), “Issues and Advances in Segmentation Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (August), 317–37.
