The FTC's advertising substantiation program—a regulatory mechanism effecting many marketer's decision making—is examined. The program's genesis and current status are described, suggestions for managerial policies designed to meet the regulatory requirement offered, and questions relevant to an evaluation of the program from a public policy perspective raised.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Report (1972), “Advertising Substantiation and the Truth in Advertising Act of 1971,” No. 563 (May).
2.
Federal Trade Commission, DNA & OPPE (undated), “Policy Planning Protocol, Deceptive and Unsubstantiated Claims,”Washington: Federal Trade Commission.
3.
Freidman v. Rogers, 47 U.S.L.W. 4151,4153 (U.S. Feb. 21, 1979).
4.
General Accounting Office (1978), “Victims of Unfair Business Practices Get Limited Help from the Federal Trade Commission,”Report to the Congress of the United States by the Comptroller General, Washington: U.S. General Accounting Office (October 17).
5.
GrainerMarc A., McEvoyK. A., and KingD. W. (1978), “Consumer Problems and Complaints: A National View,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. IV, Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference, Association for Consumer Research, WilkieWilliam L., ed., New York: Association for Consumer Research, 494–500.
6.
HealeyJohn Samuel (1978), “The Federal Trade Commission Advertising Substantiation Program and Changes in the Content of Advertising in Selected Industries,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles: University of California.
7.
HerzogRichard (1976), “The Policy Planning Protocol for Deceptive and Unsubstantiated Claims: A Management and Legal Perspective,” address before the Institute of Advanced Advertising Studies, American Association of Advertising Agencies, New York Council (June 24–27), Tarrytown, NY, 18–21.
8.
“In re Pfizer, Inc.,” 81 FTC 23 (1972).
9.
KingWilliam R. (1977), Marketing Management Information Systems, New York: Petrocelli/Charter.
10.
MorganFred W. (1979), “The Admissibility of Consumer Surveys as Legal Evidence in Courts,”Journal of Marketing, 43(Fall), 33–40.
11.
NaderR., AdamsA. (1970), “Petition for Trade Regulation Rule Proceeding and Issuance of Enforcement Policies,”Washington: Federal Trade Commission.
12.
Ohralikv. Ohio State Bar Association, 486 U.S. 447, 455–456 (1978).
13.
PitofskyRobert (1977), “Beyond Nader: Consumer Protection and the Regulation of Advertising,”Harvard Law Review, 90(February), 675–685.
14.
ReichRichard (1979), “Advertising and the Public,”Sandage Symposium II (June 17–19), Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
15.
SnyderWallace S. (1975), Address to the American Marketing Association, New York Chapter conference (October 23), 2–5.
16.
Trade Regulation Reporter (1970), “In re Ford Motor Company,”3 (April), ¶ 21,537.
