Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Federal and state courts have exhibited an increasing tendency during the past 15 years to receive consumer survey findings into evidence. This article examines the ways in which the prudent marketing manager can take advantage of this trend.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Basketball Ass'n v. AMF Voit, Inc., 358 F.Supp. 981 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 487 F.2d 1393 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 986 (1974).

American Home Products Corp. v. Johnson and Johnson, 436 F.Supp. 785 (D.C. N.Y. 1977).

American Luggage Works, Inc. v. United States Trunk Co., 158 F.Supp. 50 (D.Mass. 1957).

Bank of Utah v. Commercial Sec. Bank, 369 F.2d 19 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1018 (1967).

Barksdale

Hiram C.

(1957), The Use of Survey Research Findings as Legal Evidence, Pleasantville, NY: Printers’ Ink Books.

Bass Buster, Inc. v. Gapen Mfg. Co., Inc., 420 F.Supp. 144 (D.C. Mo. 1976).

Berman v. New Hampshire Jockey Club, Inc., 324 F.Supp. 1156 (D.C. N.H. 1971).

Brandt

Michael T.

, and Preston

Ivan L.

(1977), “The Federal Trade Commission's Use of Evidence to Determine Deception,” Journal of Marketing, 41(January), 54–62. Bristol-Myers Co. v. FTC, 185 F.2d 58 (4th Cir. 1950).

Business Week (1978), “Backyard Liabilities” (July 10), 102–104. Butler v. Goldblatt Bros., Inc., 432 F.Supp. 1122 (D.C. Ill. 1977).

10.

Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co., 81 F.Supp. 114 (E.D. Pa. 1948). Coca-Cola Co. v. Chero-Cola Co., 10 Trademark Rep. 94, 99 (Comm'r Patents 1920), rev'd, 273 F. 755 (D.D. Cir. 1921).

11.

Coca-Cola Co. v. Nehi Corp., 36 A.2d 156 (Sup. Ct. 1944).

12.

Cohen

Dorothy

(1978), “Advertising & the First Amendment,” Journal of Marketing, 42(July), 59–68.

13.

Elgin Nat'l Watch Co. v. Elgin Clock Co., 26 F.2d 376 (D. Del. 1928).

14.

Federal Rules Decisions, “Proof of Facts Requiring Resort to Bulk Underlying Documents or to Numerous Witnesses: Samples and Polls,” 25, 351–429.

15.

Federal Rules of Evidence (1975), Frito Co. v. Buckeye Foods, Inc., 130 U.S.P.Q. 347 (T.T.A.B. 1961).

16.

General Motors Corp. v. Cadillac Marine & Boat Co., 226 F.Supp. 716 (W.D. Mich. 1964).

17.

Hawley Prods. Co. v. United States Trunk Co., 259 F.2d 69 (1st Cir. 1958).

18.

Jacob Seigel Co. v. FTC, 150 F.2d 751 (3d Cir. 1944).

19.

King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Aladdin Inds., Inc., 321 F.2d 577 (2d Cir. 1963).

20.

Lerner Stores Corp. v. Lerner, 162 F.2d 160 (9th Cir. 1947). Lever Bros. Co. v. Butler Mfg. Co., 111 F.2d 910 (C.C.P.A. 1940).

21.

Loudenback

Lynn J.

, and Goebel

John W.

(1974), “Marketing in the Age of Strict Liability,” Journal of Marketing, 38(January), 62–66.

22.

Marcalus Mfg. Co. v. Watson, 156 F.Supp. 161 (D.D.C. 1957).

23.

Manner

Ronald L.

(1976), “Opinion Polls and the Law of Evidence,” Virginia Law Review, 62(October), 1101–1133.

24.

McCoid

Allan H.

(1957), “The Admissibility of Sample Data into a Court of Law: Some Further Thoughts,” UCLA Law Review, 4(February), 233–250.

25.

McElroy

B. Thomas

(1976), “Public Surveys—The Latest Exception to the Hearsay Rule,” Baylor Law Review, 28(Winter), 59–76.

26.

Meadville Master Antenna, Inc., v. FCC, 535 F.2d 214 (3d Cir. 1976).

27.

Monsanto Chem. Co. v. Perfect Fit Prods. Mfg. Co., 349 F.2d 389 (2d Cir. 1965).

28.

Morgan

Edmund M.

(1948), “Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept,” Harvard Law Review, 62(December), 185–188.

29.

National Biscuit Co. v. Princeton Mining Co., Inc., 137 U.S.P.Q. 250 (T.T.A.B.), aff'd, 338 F.2d 1022 (C.C.P.A. 1964).

30.

People v. Franklin Nat'l Bank of Franklin Square, 200 Misc. 557, 105 N.Y.S.2d 81 (Sup. Ct. 1951).

31.

Porter v. U.S., 409 F.Supp. 757 (Cust. Ct. 1976).

32.

President & Trustees of Colby College v. Colby College-N.H., 374 F.Supp. 1141 (D. N.H. 1974), rev'd, 508 F.2d 804 (1st Cir. 1975).

33.

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Sweets Labs., Inc., 137 F.2d 365 (C.C.P.A. 1943).

34.

Quaker Oats Co. v. General Mills, Inc., 134 F.2d 429 (7th Cir. 1943).

35.

Randy's Studebaker Sales, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A., 533 F.2d 510 (C.A. Utah 1976).

36.

Rogers

Edward S.

(1910), “The Unwary Purchaser: A Study in the Psychology of Trade Mark Infringement,” Michigan Law Review, 8(June), 613–622.

37.

Roper

Burns W.

(1965), “Public Opinion Surveys in Legal Proceedings,” American Bar Association Journal, 51(January), 46–47.

38.

Roux Labs., Inc. v. Clairol, Inc., 427 F.2d 823 (C.C.P.A. 1970).

39.

S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Gold Seal Co., 90 U.S.P.Q. 373 (Comm'r Pats. 1951).

40.

Scott Paper Co. v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., 439 F.Supp. 1022 (D.C. Del. 1977).

41.

Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Allstate Driving School, Inc., 30 F.Supp. 4 (E.D. N.Y. 1969).

42.

Seven-Up Co. v. Cheer Up Sales Co., 153 F.2d 231 (8th Cir. 1946).

43.

Seven-Up Co. v. Green Mill Beverage Co., 191 F.Supp. 32 (N.D. Ill. 1961).

44.

Sorensen

Robert C.

, and Sorensen

Theodore C.

(1955), “Responding to Objections Against the Use of Opinion Survey Findings in the Courts,” Journal of Marketing, 20(October), 133–142.

45.

Sorensen

Robert C.

, and Sorensen

Theodore C.

(1953), “The Admissibility and Use of Opinion Research Evidence,” New York University Law Review, 28(November), 1213–1261.

46.

Sprawls

R. Clay

(1957), “The Admissibility of Sample Data Into a Court of Law: A Case History,” UCLA Law Review, 4(February), 222–232.

47.

Trombetta

William L.

, and Wilson

Timothy

(1975), “Foreseeability of Misuse and Abnormal Use of Products by the Consumer,” Journal of Marketing, 39(July), 48–55.

48.

Twerski

Aaron D.

(1974), “Old Wine in a New Flask—Restructuring Assumption of Risk in the Products Liability Era,” Iowa Law Review, 60(October), 1–51.

49.

United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange Beverage, 187 F.2d 967 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 861 (1951).

50.

U.S. News & World Report (1978a), “When Firms Get Sued for Faulty Goods” (May 22), 93–95.

51.

U.S. News & World Report (1978b), “Why Everybody Is Suing Everybody” (December 4), 50–54.

52.

W. F. Bassett Co. v. H. C. Cook Co., 164 F.Supp. 278 (D. Conn. 1958).

53.

Wiener King, Inc. v. Wiener King Corp., 407 F.Supp. 1274 (D.C. N.J. 1976).

54.

Zeisel

Hans

(1960), “The Uniqueness of Survey Evidence,” Cornell Law Quarterly, 45(Winter), 322–346.

55.

Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Rogers Import, Inc., 216 F.Supp. 670 (S.D. N.Y. 1963).

The Admissibility of Consumer Surveys as Legal Evidence in Courts

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References