This article reports the results of Project NewProd, an extensive investigation into what separates successful from unsuccessful new industrial products. Multivariate methods are used to probe this success/failure question. The dimensions underlying success and failure are identified. The dominant role of product strategy and the need for a strong market orientation clearly are demonstrated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoozAllen, & Hamilton (1968), Management Of New Products, New York: Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc.
2.
CalantoneRoger J., and CooperRobert G. (1977), “A Typology Of Industrial New Product Failure,” in Contemporary Marketing Thought, Greenberg & Bellanger, eds., Chicago: American Marketing Association, 492–497.
3.
CooperRobert G. (1975), “Why New Industrial Products Fail,”Industrial Marketing Management, 4(January), 315–326.
4.
CooperRobert G. (1976), “Introducing Successful New Products,”MCB Monographs, European Journal of Marketing, 10, Bradford, England.
5.
CooperRobert G. (1979), “Identifying Industrial New Product Success: Project NewProd,”Industrial Marketing Management, 8(May).
6.
CrawfordC. Merle (1977), “Marketing Research And The New Product Failure Rate,”Journal of Marketing, 41(April), 51–61.
7.
DavidsonHugh J. (1976), “Why Most New Consumer Brands Fail,”Harvard Business Review, 54(March-April), 117–122.
8.
GerstenfeldArthur (1976), “A Study of Successful Projects, Unsuccessful Projects, and Projects in Process in West Germany,”IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 23(August), 116–123.
9.
GlobeSamuel, LevyGirard W., and SchwartzCharles M. (1973), “Key Factors and Events in The Innovation Process,”Research Management, 16(July), 8–15.
10.
HatchR.S. (1957), “Product Failures Attributed Mainly to a Lack of Testing, Faulty Marketing,”Industrial Marketing, 43(February), 112–126.
11.
HopkinsDavid S., and BaileyEarly L. (1971), “New Product Pressures,”The Conference Board Record, 8(June), 16–24.
12.
KulvikHanser (1977), Factors Underlying The Success or Failure of New Products, Helsinki: University Of Technology, Report No. 29, Finland.
13.
LazoHector (1965), “Finding a Key to Success in New Product Failures,”Industrial Marketing, 50(November), 74–77.
14.
LittleBlair (1970), “Characterizing The New Product For Better Evaluation and Planning,”Working Paper Series, No. 21, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada (July).
15.
MarquisDonald G. (1969), “The Anatomy of Successful Innovations,”Innovation Magazine, 1(November), 28–37.
16.
MontgomeryDavid B. (1975), “New Product Distribution: An Analysis of Supermarket Buyer Decisions,”Journal Of Marketing Research, 12(August), 255–264.
17.
MyersSummer, and MarquisDonald G. (1969), “Successful Industrial Innovations,”National Science Foundation, NSF 69–17.
18.
National Industrial Conference Board (1964), “Why New Products Fail,”The Conference Board Record, New York: NICB.
19.
RobertsR.W., and BurkeJ.E. (1974), “Six New Products —What Made Them Successful,”Research Management, 16(May), 21–24.
20.
RothwellRoy (1972), “Factors For Success in Industrial Innovations,”from Project SAPPHO -A Comparative Study Of Success And Failure in Industrial Innovation, Brighten, Sussex: S.P.R.U.
21.
RothwellRoy (1974), “The ‘Hungarian Sappho': Some Comments And Comparison,”Research Policy3, 30–38.
22.
RothwellRoy (1976), “Innovation In Textile Machinery: Some Significant Factors In Success and Failure,”SPRU Occasional Paper Series, No. 2, Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom, (June).
RubensteinAlbert H., ChakrabartiAlok K., and O'KeefeRobert D. (1974 ed.), “Field Studies of The Technological Innovation Process,” in Progress in Assessing Technical Innovations by ClauserH.R., Technomic Publication, Westport, CT.
25.
RubensteinAlbert H., ChakrabartiAlok K., O'KeefeRobert D., SounderW.E., and YoungH.C. (1976), “Factors Influencing Innovation Success at The Project Level,”Research Management, 16(May), 15–20.
26.
ShockerAllen D., GenschDennis, and SimonLeonard S. (1969), “Toward The Improvement of New Product Search and Screening,”AMA Conference Proceedings, (Fall), 168–175.
27.
UtterbackJames M., AllenThomas J., Herbert HollomanJ., and SirbuMarvin H. (1976), “The Process Of Innovation in Five Industries in Europe and Japan,”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, No. 1 (February), 3–9.
28.
WindYoram (1973), “A New Procedure For Concept Evaluation,”Journal of Marketing, 37(October), 2–11.
