The reader who wishes to become familiar with the theory of sampling in its recent developments may start to advantage by reading Archibald M. Crossley, “Theory and Application of Representative Sampling as Applied to Marketing,” journal of marketing 5 (1941), 456 and Arnold J. King and Dale E. McCarty, “Application of Sampling to Agricultural Statistics with Emphasis on Stratified Samples,” journal of marketing 5 (1941), 462 after which he should turn to the following expository papers and the papers to which they refer:
2.
CochranW. G., “The Use of the Analysis of Variance in Enumeration by Sampling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 34 (1939), 492;
3.
CraigA. T., “On the Mathematics of the Representative Method of Sampling,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 10 (1939), 26;
4.
McNemarQuinn, “Sampling in Psychological Research,” Psychological Bulletin, 37 (1940), 331;
5.
NeymanJ., “On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 97 (1934), 558.
6.
SarleC. F., “The Possibilities and Limitations of Objective Sampling in Strengthening Agricultural Statistics,” Econometrica, 8 (1940), 45;
7.
StephanFrederick F., “Representative Sampling in Large-scale Surveys,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 34 (1939), 343.
