Contextual advertising involves matching features of ads to features of the media context where they appear. The authors propose AdGazer, a new machine learning procedure to support contextual advertising. It comprises a theoretical framework organizing high- and low-level features of ads and contexts, feature engineering models grounded in this framework, an XGBoost model predicting ad and brand attention, and an algorithm optimally assigning ads to contexts. AdGazer includes a multimodal large language model to extract high-level topics predicting the ad–context match. This research uses a unique eye-tracking database containing 3,531 digital display ads and their contexts, and aggregate ad and brand gaze times. The authors compare AdGazer’s predictive performance with that of two feature learning models, VGG16 and ResNet50. AdGazer predicts highly accurately with holdout correlations of .83 for ad gaze and .80 for brand gaze, outperforming both feature learning models and generalizing better to out-of-distribution ads. Context features jointly contributed at least 33% to predicted ad gaze and about 20% to predicted brand gaze, good news for managers practicing or considering contextual advertising. The authors demonstrate that the theory-informed AdGazer effectively matches ads to advertising vehicles and their contexts, optimizing ad gaze more than current practice and alternatives like text-based and native contextual advertising.
AakerDavid A.BrownPhillip K. (1972), “Evaluating Vehicle Source Effects,” Journal of Advertising Research, 12 (4), 11–16.
2.
AffonsoFelipe M.JaniszewskiChris (2023), “Marketing by Design: The Influence of Perceptual Structure on Brand Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 87 (5), 736–54.
3.
ApleyDaniel W.ZhuJingyu (2020), “Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black-Box Supervised Learning Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 82 (4), 1059–86.
4.
AribargAnochaSchwartzEric M. (2020), “Native Advertising in Online News: Trade-Offs Among Clicks, Brand Recognition, and Website Trustworthiness,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (1), 20–34.
5.
ArrietaAlejandro BarredoDíaz-RodríguezNataliaDel SerJavierBennetotAdrienTabikSihamBarbadoAlbertoSalvadorGarciaSergioGil-LopezDanielMolina, et al. (2020), “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges Toward Responsible AI,” Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.
6.
BaiJinzeBaiShuaiChuYunfeiCuiZeyuDangKaiDengXiaodongFanYangGeWenbinHanYuHuangFeiHuiBinyuanJiLuoLinMeiJunyangLiLinRunjiLiuDayihengLiuGaoLuChengqiangLuKemingMaJianxin, et al. (2023), “Qwen Technical Report,” arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.16609.
7.
BelancheDanielFlaviánCarlosPérez-RuedaAlfredo (2017), “Understanding Interactive Online Advertising: Congruence and Product Involvement in Highly and Lowly Arousing, Skippable Video Ads,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37 (1), 75–88.
8.
BorjiAliIttiLaurent (2012), “State-of-the-Art in Visual Attention Modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35 (1), 185–207.
BroderAndreiFontouraMarcusJosifovskiVanjaRiedelLance (2007), “A Semantic Approach to Contextual Advertising,” in Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Association for Computing Machinery, 559–66.
11.
BrunswikEgon (1955), “Representative Design and Probabilistic Theory in a Functional Psychology,” Psychological Review, 62 (3), 193–217.
12.
BurkardRainerDell’AmicoMauroMartelloSilvano (2012), “Linear Sum Assignment Problem,” in Assignment Problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 73–144.
13.
CannonHugh M. (1982), “A New Method for Estimating the Effect of Media Context,” Journal of Advertising Research, 22 (5), 41–48.
14.
CarrillatFrançois AMazodierMarcEckertChristine (2024), “Why Advertisers Should Embrace Event Typicality and Maximize Leveraging of Major Events,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52, 1585–1607.
15.
Casado-ArandaLuis-AlbertoSánchez-FernándezJuanIbáñez-ZapataJosé-Ángel (2023), “Evaluating Communication Effectiveness Through Eye Tracking: Benefits, State of the Art, and Unresolved Questions,” International Journal of Business Communication, 60 (1), 24–61.
16.
CelsiRichard L.OlsonJerry C. (1988), “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 210–24.
17.
CeylanGizemDiehlKristinProserpioDavide (2024), “Words Meet Photos: When and Why Photos Increase Review Helpfulness,” Journal of Marketing Research, 61 (1), 5–26.
18.
ChatterjeePatraliHoffmanDonna L.NovakThomas P. (2003), “Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts,” Marketing Science, 22 (4), 520–41.
19.
ChenTianqiGuestrinCarlos (2016), “XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, 785–94.
20.
ChiangAng-Yu DebraBergDavidIttiLaurent (2011), “Saliency, Memory, and Attention Capture in Marketing,” Journal of Vision, 11 (11), 493.
21.
CohrsKai-HendrikDiazEmilianoSitokonstantinouVasileiosVarandoGherardoCamps-VallsGustau (2025), “Large Language Models for Causal Hypothesis Generation in Science,” Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 6 (1), 013001.
22.
ChunKwang YeunSongJi HeeHollenbeckCandice R.LeeJong-Ho (2014), “Are Contextual Advertisements Effective? The Moderating Role of Complexity in Banner Advertising,” International Journal of Advertising, 33 (2), 351–71.
23.
DagalpIleyhaSödergrenJonatan (2024), “On Ads as Aesthetic Objects: A Thematic Review of Aesthetics in Advertising Research,” Journal of Advertising, 53 (1), 126–47.
24.
DahlénMicael (2005), “The Medium as a Contextual Cue: Effects of Creative Media Choice,” Journal of Advertising, 34 (3), 89–98.
De PelsmackerPatrickGeuensMaggieAnckaertPascal (2002), “Media Context and Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Context Appreciation and Context/Ad Similarity,” Journal of Advertising, 31 (2), 49–61.
27.
DonderiDon C. (2006), “An Information Theory Analysis of Visual Complexity and Dissimilarity,” Perception, 35 (6), 823–35.
28.
EbbesPeterPapiesDominikVan HeerdeHarald J. (2011), “The Sense and Non-Sense of Holdout Sample Validation in the Presence of Endogeneity,” Marketing Science, 30 (6), 1115–22.
29.
ElharroussOmarAkbariYounesAlmaadeedNoorAl-MaadeedSomaya (2022), “Backbones-Review: Feature Extraction Networks for Deep Learning and Deep Reinforcement Learning Approaches,” arXiv, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100645.
FuchsDouglas A. (1964), “Two Source Effects in Magazine Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (3), 59–62.
32.
FusterJoaquin M. (2002), Cortex and Mind: Unifying Cognition. Oxford University Press.
33.
GibsonJames J. (2014), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. Psychology Press.
34.
GoldbergMarvin E.GornGerald J. (1987), “Happy and Sad TV Programs: How They Affect Reactions to Commercials,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (3), 387–403.
35.
GoodsteinRonald C. (1993), “Category-Based Applications and Extensions in Advertising: Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (1), 87–99.
36.
Grill-SpectorKalanitKanwisherNancy (2005), “Visual Recognition: As Soon as You Know It Is There, You Know What It Is,” Psychological Science, 16 (2), 152–60.
37.
HagtvedtHenrikPatrickVanessa M. (2008), “Art Infusion: The Influence of Visual Art on the Perception and Evaluation of Consumer Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (3), 379–89.
38.
HartmannJochenHeitmannMarkSchampChristinaNetzerOded (2021), “The Power of Brand Selfies,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (6), 1159–77.
39.
HeKaimingZhangXiangyuRenShaoqingSunJian (2016), “Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 770–78.
40.
HendersonJohn M.WeeksPhillip A.HollingworthAndrewJr. (1999), “The Effects of Semantic Consistency on Eye Movements During Complex Scene Viewing,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 (1), 210–28.
41.
HigginsEmilyLeinengerMallorieRaynerKeith (2014), “Eye Movements When Viewing Advertisements,” Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 210.
42.
HollemanGijs A.HoogeIgnace T.C.KemnerChantalHesselsRoy S. (2020), “The ‘Real-World Approach’ and Its Problems: A Critique of the Term Ecological Validity,” Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 721.
43.
IttiLaurentKochChristofNieburErnst (1998), “A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20 (11), 1254–59.
44.
JacobsRichard H.A.H.RenkenRemcoThumfartStefanCornelissenFrans W. (2010), “Different Judgments About Visual Textures Invoke Different Eye Movement Patterns,” Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3 (4).
45.
JaniszewskiChris (1998), “The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (3), 290–301.
46.
JullumMartinRedelmeierAnnabelleAasKjersti (2021), “groupShapley: Efficient Prediction Explanation with Shapley Values for Feature Groups,” arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.12228.
47.
KarslakeJames Spier (1940), “The Purdue Eye-Camera: A Practical Apparatus for Studying the Attention Value of Advertisements,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 24 (4), 417–40.
48.
KaufmanLeonardRousseeuwPeter J. (1990), “Partitioning Around Medoids (Program PAM),” in Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 68–125.
KirmaniAmnaYiYoujae (1991), “The Effects of Advertising Context on Consumer Responses,” ACR North American Advances, 18, 414–16.
52.
KwonEun SookKingKaren WhitehillNyilasyGregReidLeonard N. (2019), “Impact of Media Context on Advertising Memory: A Meta-Analysis of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising Research, 59 (1), 99–128.
53.
LaBergeDavid (1995), Attentional Processing: The Brain’s Art of Mindfulness. Harvard University Press.
LiHaoLoHui-Yi (2015), “Do You Recognize Its Brand? The Effectiveness of Online In-Stream Video Advertisements,” Journal of Advertising, 44 (3), 208–18.
56.
LiJunnanLiDongxuXiongCaimingHoiSteven (2022), “Blip: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation,” Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 162, 12888–900, https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/li22n/li22n.pdf.
57.
LiYiyiXieYing (2020), “Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? An Empirical Study of Image Content and Social Media Engagement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 57 (1), 1–19.
58.
LiuJiashuoShenZheyanHeYueZhangXingxuanXuRenzheYuHanCuiPeng (2021), “Towards Out-of-Distribution Generalization: A Survey,” arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.13624.
59.
Liu-ThompkinsYuping (2019), “A Decade of Online Advertising Research: What We Learned and What We Need to Know,” Journal of Advertising, 48 (1), 1–13.
60.
LoweDavid G. (2004), “Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints,” International Journal of Computer Vision, 60, 91–110.
61.
LoyGarethEklundhJan-Olof (2006), “Detecting Symmetry and Symmetric Constellations of Features,” in Computer Vision – ECCV 2006: 9th European Conference on Computer Vision, Graz, Austria, May 7–13, 2006, Proceedings, Part II. Springer, 508–21.
62.
LudwigJensMullainathanSendhil (2024), “Machine Learning as a Tool for Hypothesis Generation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 139 (2), 751–827.
MalistovAlexeyTrushinArseniy (2019), “Gradient Boosted Trees with Extrapolation,” in 2019 18th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, 783–89.
65.
MalthouseEdward C.CalderBobby J.TamhaneAjit (2007), “The Effects of Media Context Experiences on Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising, 36 (3), 7–18.
66.
Martín-LuengoBeatrizLunaKarlosMiguelesMalen (2015), “Effects of Interest, Thematic Congruence, and Typicality on Memory for Television, Radio, and Press Advertisements of new Products,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29 (4), 560–72.
67.
MartinoviciAnaPietersRikErdemTülin (2023), “Attention Trajectories Capture Utility Accumulation and Predict Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 60 (4), 625–45.
68.
MooreRobert S.StammerjohanClaire AllisonCoulterRobin A. (2005), “Banner Advertiser-Web Site Context Congruity and Color Effects on Attention and Attitudes,” Journal of Advertising, 34 (2), 71–84.
69.
MoormanMarjoleinNeijensPeter C.SmitEdith G. (2002), “The Effects of Magazine-Induced Psychological Responses and Thematic Congruence on Memory and Attitude Toward the Ad in a Real-Life Setting,” Journal of Advertising, 31 (4), 27–40.
70.
NelderJohn A.MeadRoger (1965), “A Simplex Method for Function Minimization,” Computer Journal, 7 (4), 308–13.
71.
NixonHoward K. (1925), “Two Studies of Attention to Advertisements,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 176–87.
72.
NorrisClaire E.ColmanAndrew M. (1992), “Context Effects on Recall and Recognition of Magazine Advertisements,” Journal of Advertising, 21 (3), 37–46.
73.
NyströmAnna-GretaMickelssonKarl-Jacob (2019), “Digital Advertising as Service: Introducing Contextually Embedded Selling,” Journal of Services Marketing, 33 (4), 396–406.
74.
O’BrienThomasStremmelJoelPio-LopezLéoMcMillenPatrickRasmussen-IveyCodyLevinMichael (2024), “Machine Learning for Hypothesis Generation in Biology and Medicine: Exploring the Latent Space of Neuroscience and Developmental Bioelectricity,” Digital Discovery, 3 (2), 249–63.
75.
PeschelAnne O.OrquinJacob L. (2013), “A Review of the Findings and Theories on Surface Size Effects on Visual Attention,” Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 902.
76.
PietersRikWarlopLukWedelMichel (2002), “Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory,” Management Science, 48 (6), 765–81.
77.
PietersRikWedelMichel (2004), “Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (2), 36–50.
78.
PietersRikWedelMichel (2007a), “Goal Control of Attention to Advertising: The Yarbus Implication,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (2), 224–33.
79.
PietersRikWedelMichel (2007b), “Pretesting: ‘Before the Rubber Hits the Road,’” in The Sage Handbook of Advertising, TellisGerard J.AmblerTim, eds. Sage, 217–32.
80.
PietersRikWedelMichel (2012), “Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation,” Marketing Science, 31 (1), 59–73.
81.
PietersRikWedelMichelBatraRajeev (2010), “The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (5), 48–60.
PintoYairvan der LeijAndries R.SligteIlja G.LammeVictor A.F.Steven ScholteH. (2013), “Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention Are Independent,” Journal of Vision, 13 (3), 16.
84.
RafieianOmidYoganarasimhanHema (2021), “Targeting and Privacy in Mobile Advertising,” Marketing Science, 40 (2), 193–218.
85.
RagodosRoniloWangTongFengLuHuYu (Jeffrey) (2024), “From Model Explanation to Data Misinterpretation: Uncovering the Pitfalls of Post Hoc Explainers in Business Research,” arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16987.
86.
RaynerKeith (1978), “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing,” Psychological Bulletin, 85 (3), 618–60.
87.
RaynerKeithCastelhanoMonica S. (2008), “Eye Movements During Reading, Scene Perception, Visual Search, and While Looking at Print Advertisements,” Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action, WedelMichelPietersRik, eds. Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 9–42.
88.
RaynerKeithRotelloCaren M.StewartAndrew J.KeirJessicaDuffySusan A. (2001), “Integrating Text and Pictorial Information: Eye Movements When Looking at Print Advertisements,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7 (3), 219–26.
89.
RedelmeierAnnabelleJullumMartinAasKjersti (2020), “Explaining Predictive Models with Mixed Features Using Shapley Values and Conditional Inference Trees,” in Proceedings of the International Cross-Domain Conference for Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction. Springer, 117–37.
RosbergenEdwardPietersRikWedelMichel (1997), “Visual Attention to Advertising: A Segment-Level Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (3), 305–14.
92.
RossiPeter E. (2014), “Even the Rich Can Make Themselves Poor: A Critical Examination of IV Methods in Marketing Applications,” Marketing Science, 33 (5), 655–72.
93.
RudinCynthiaChenChaofanChenZhiHuangHaiyangSemenovaLesiaZhongChudi (2022), “Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challenges,” Statistics Surveys, 16, 1–85.
94.
RussoJ. Edward (1978), “Eye Fixations Can Save the World: A Critical Evaluation and a Comparison Between Eye Fixations and Other Information Processing Methodologies,” Advances in Consumer Research, 5 (1).
95.
SanhVictorDebutLysandreChaumondJulienWolfThomas (2019), “DistilBERT, a Distilled Version of BERT: Smaller, Faster, Cheaper and Lighter,” arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.01108.
96.
SchmucklerMark A. (2001), “What Is Ecological Validity? A Dimensional Analysis,” Infancy, 2 (4), 419–36.
97.
ShmueliGalit (2010), “To Explain or to Predict?” Statistical Science, 25 (3), 289–310.
98.
SidhuShumetha K.AllenHarriet A.KeebleDavid R.T. (2023), “Eye Movements Are Made to the Centre of Gravity of Texture-Defined Targets,” Vision Research, 210, 108264.
99.
SimolaJaanaKuismaJarmoÖörniAnssiUusitaloLiisaHyönäJukka (2011), “The Impact of Salient Advertisements on Reading and Attention on Web Pages,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17 (2), 174–90.
100.
SimonHerbert A. (1971), “Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World,” in Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest, GreenbergerMartin, ed. Johns Hopkins Press, 37–72.
101.
SimonovAndreyVallettiTommaso M.VeigaAndre (2025), “Attention Spillovers from News to Ads: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Experiment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 62 (2), 294–315.
102.
SimonsohnUriMontealegreAndresEvangelidisIoannis (2025), “Stimulus Sampling Reimagined: Designing Experiments with Mix-and-Match, Analyzing Results with Stimulus Plots,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 129 (1), 71–90.
SmithRobert E.ChenJiemiaoYangXiaojing (2008), “The Impact of Advertising Creativity on the Hierarchy of Effects,” Journal of Advertising, 37 (4), 47–62.
StefaniniMatteoCorniaMarcellaBaraldiLorenzoCascianelliSilviaFiameniGiuseppeCucchiaraRita (2022), “From Show to Tell: A Survey on Deep Learning-Based Image Captioning,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45 (1), 539–59.
107.
StippHorst (2018), “How Context Can Make Advertising More Effective,” Journal of Advertising Research, 58 (2), 138–45.
108.
ŠtrumbeljErikKononenkoIgor (2014), “Explaining Prediction Models and Individual Predictions with Feature Contributions,” Knowledge and Information Systems, 41, 647–65.
109.
StuartElizabeth A. (2010), “Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward,” Statistical Science, 25 (1), 1–21.
110.
StylesElizabeth (2006), The Psychology of Attention. Psychology Press.
111.
SundararajanMukundDhamdhereKedarAgarwalAshish (2020), “The Shapley Taylor Interaction Index,” Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 119, 9259–68, https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/sundararajan20a.html.
TheeuwesJan (2010), “Top-Down and Bottom-Up Control of Visual Selection,” Acta Psychologica, 135 (2), 77–99.
114.
TinioPablo P.L.LederHelmut (2009), “Just How Stable Are Stable Aesthetic Features? Symmetry, Complexity, and the Jaws of Massive Familiarization,” Acta Psychologica, 130 (3), 241–50.
115.
TongSongMaoKaiHuangZhenZhaoYukunPengKaiping (2024), “Automating Psychological Hypothesis Generation with AI: When Large Language Models Meet Causal Graph,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 896.
116.
TreismanAnne M.GeladeGarry (1980), “A Feature-Integration Theory of Attention,” Cognitive Psychology, 12 (1), 97–136.
117.
Van der LansRalfPietersRikWedelMichel (2021), “Online Advertising Suppresses Visual Competition During Planned Purchases,” Journal of Consumer Research, 48 (3), 374–93.
118.
WangAlex (2006), “Advertising Engagement: A Driver of Message Involvement on Message Effects,” Journal of Advertising Research, 46 (4), 355–68.
119.
WangJingCalderBobby J. (2009), “Media Engagement and Advertising: Transportation, Matching, Transference and Intrusion,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19 (3), 546–55.
120.
WedelMichelDongChen (2020), “BANOVA: Bayesian Analysis of Experiments in Consumer Psychology,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30 (1), 3–23.
121.
WedelMichelDongChen (2022), “A Tutorial on the Analysis of Experiments Using BANOVA,” Psychological Methods, 27 (3), 433.
122.
WedelMichelPietersRik (2008), “A Review of Eye-Tracking Research in Marketing,” in Review of Marketing Research, Vol. 4, MalhotraNaresh K., ed. Emerald Group Publishing, 123–47.
123.
WedelMichelPietersRik (2015), “The Buffer Effect: The Role of Color When Advertising Exposures Are Brief and Blurred,” Marketing Science, 34 (1), 134–43.
124.
WedelMichelPietersRikvan der LansRalf (2022), “Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review,” Psychometrika, 88 (2), 697–729.
125.
WolfeJeremy M.HorowitzTodd S. (2004), “What Attributes Guide the Deployment of Visual Attention and How Do They Do It?” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5 (6), 495–501.
126.
YanLiZhangHai-TaoGoncalvesJorgeXiaoYangWangMaolinGuoYuqiSunChuanTangXiuchuanJingLiangZhangMingyangHuangXiangXiaoYingCaoHaosenChenYanyanRenTongxinWangFangXiaoYaruHuangSufangTanXiHuangNiannian, et al. (2020), “An Interpretable Mortality Prediction Model for COVID-19 Patients,” Nature Machine Intelligence, 2 (5), 283–88.
127.
YaoYuanYuTianyuZhangAoWangChongyiCuiJunboZhuHongjiCaiTianchiLiHaoyuZhaoWeilinHeZhihuiChenQianyuZhouHuarongZouZhenshengZhangHaoyeHuShengdingZhengZhiZhouJieCaiJieHanXuZengGuoyang, et al. (2024), “MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4 V Level MLLM on Your Phone,” arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.01800.
128.
YarbusAlfred L. (1967), “Eye Movements During Perception of Complex Objects,” in Eye Movements and Vision. Springer, 171–211.
129.
YarkoniTalWestfallJacob (2017), “Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons from Machine Learning,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12 (6), 1100–1122.
130.
YaverogluIdilDonthuNaveen (2008), “Advertising Repetition and Placement Issues in On-Line Environments,” Journal of Advertising, 37 (2), 31–44.
131.
YiYoujae (1990), “The Effects of Contextual Priming in Print Advertisements,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2), 215–22.
132.
YiYoujae (1993), “Contextual Priming Effects in Print Advertisements: The Moderating Role of Prior Knowledge,” Journal of Advertising, 22 (1), 1–10.
133.
YooSeung-ChulEastinMatthew S. (2017), “Contextual Advertising in Games: Impacts of Game Context on a Player’s Memory and Evaluation of Brands in Video Games,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 23 (6), 614–31.
134.
ZanjaniShabnam H.A.DiamondWilliam D.ChanKwong (2011), “Does Ad-Context Congruity Help Surfers and Information Seekers Remember Ads in Cluttered E-Magazines?” Journal of Advertising, 40 (4), 67–84.
135.
ZhangJieWedelMichelPietersRik (2009), “Sales Effects of Attention to Feature Advertisements: A Bayesian Mediation Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (5), 669–81.
ZhangShunyuanLeeDokyunSinghParam VirSrinivasanKannan (2022), “What Makes a Good Image? Airbnb Demand Analytics Leveraging Interpretable Image Features,” Management Science, 68 (8), 5644–66.
138.
ZhengLiangYangYiTianQi (2017), “SIFT Meets CNN: A Decade Survey of Instance Retrieval,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 40 (5), 1224–44.
139.
ZhouXinyuYaoCongWenHeWangYuzhiZhouShuchangHeWeiranLiangJiajun (2017), “EAST: An Efficient and Accurate Scene Text Detector,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, 5551–60.
