Marketers know the importance of online reviews, but what can be done to improve the prompts asking consumers to review? Across eight studies, the present work shows that a prompt that encourages writing reviews for a close audience enhances consumers’ use of narrative language. A growing body of literature reveals that narratives are powerful persuasive devices for shaping audiences’ beliefs, including when reading online reviews. However, little is known about what aspects shape the communicator's use of narrative language in the first place. A prompt that encourages writers to imagine as though they were writing for a close audience increases narrativity, an effect mediated by consumers’ tendency to write in a natural, less effortful style when writing for a close (vs. distant) audience. The effect is attenuated when people write about material (vs. experiential) purchases, and when people write on a smartphone (vs. PC). Consumers find writing for close others to be at least as enjoyable as several other prompts, but with improved outcomes for firms. As most review sites provide limited guidance on how to write, this research offers an inexpensive and scalable intervention to improve reviews and the review writing experience.
ArgoJennifer J.WhiteKatherineDahlDarren W. (2006), “Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (1), 99–114.
3.
AronArthurAronElaine N.SmollanDanny (1992), “Inclusion of Other in the Self-Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (4), 596–612.
4.
Baca-MotesKatieBrownAmberGneezyAyeletKeenanElizabeth A.NelsonLeif D. (2013), “Commitment and Behavior Change: Evidence from the Field,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (5), 1070–84.
5.
BaraschAlixandraBergerJonah (2014), “Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (3), 286–99.
6.
BarghJohn A.McKennaKatelyn Y.A.FitzsimonsGrainne (2002), “Can You See the Real Me? Activation and Expression of the ‘True Self’ on the Internet,” Journal of Social Issues, 58 (1), 33–48.
7.
BastosWilsonBrucksMerrie (2017), “How and Why Conversational Value Leads to Happiness for Experiential and Material Purchases,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 598–612.
8.
BergerJonah (2024), “What Gets Shared, and Why? Interpersonal Communication and Word of Mouth,” Annual Review of Psychology, 76, 559–81.
9.
BergerJonahHumphreysAshleeLudwigStephanMoeWendy W.NetzerOdedSchweidelDavid A. (2020), “Uniting the Tribes: Using Text for Marketing Insight,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (1), 1–25.
10.
BerloDean (1960), The Process of Communication. Rinehart & Winston.
BoydRyan L.AshokkumarAshwiniSerajSarahPennebakerJames W. (2022), The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC-22. University of Texas at Austin.
13.
BrehmJack W. (1966), A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press.
14.
BröhlChristinaRaschePeterJablonskiJaninaTheisSabineWilleMatthiasMertensAlexander (2018), “Desktop PC, Tablet PC, or Smartphone? An Analysis of Use Preferences in Daily Activities for Different Technology Generations of a Worldwide Sample,” in Proceedings of ITAP 2018. Springer International Publishing, 3–20.
15.
BrunerJerome (1986), Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Harvard University Press.
16.
BullockOlivia M.ShulmanHillary C.HuskeyRichard (2021), “Narratives Are Persuasive Because They Are Easier to Understand: Examining Processing Fluency as a Mechanism of Narrative Persuasion,” Frontiers in Communication, 6, 719615.
17.
ChenZoey (2017), “Social Acceptance and Word of Mouth: How the Motive to Belong Leads to Divergent WOM with Strangers and Friends,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 613–32.
18.
ChenZoeyBergerJonah (2013), “When, Why, and How Controversy Causes Conversation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 580–93.
19.
ChenCharlene Y.LeeLeonardYapAndy J. (2017), “Control Deprivation Motivates Acquisition of Utilitarian Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (6), 1031–47.
20.
ChevalierJudith A.MayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 345–54.
21.
CialdiniRobert (2007), Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. HarperCollins.
22.
DoSydni FomasReimannMartinLópezAlbertoCastañoRaquel (2024), “When Brand Narratives Are Written in Metaphoric Terms, Can They Weaken Self-Brand Connections?” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 9 (1), 21–31.
23.
DuboisDavidBonezziAndreaAngelisMatteo De (2016), “Sharing with Friends Versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Close- Ness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (5), 712–27.
24.
EscalasJennifer Edson (1998), “Advertising Narratives: What Are They and How Do They Work?” in Representing Consumers: Voices, Views, and Visions, SternBarbara, ed. Routledge, 267–89.
25.
EscalasJennifer Edson (2004), “Narrative Processing: Building Consumer Connections to Brands,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1–2), 168–80.
26.
EscalasJennifer Edson (2007), “Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation Versus Analytical Elaboration,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (4), 421–29.
27.
FangEricDongBeibeiZhuangMengzhouCaiFengyan (2023), “‘We Earned the Coupon Together’: The Missing Link of Experience Cocreation in Shared Coupons,” Journal of Marketing, 87 (3), 451–71.
28.
GalloIñigoEscalasJennifer EdsonSoodSanjay (2024), “Transported Through Time: The Narrative Processing of Experiential Purchases,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 9 (1), 32–45.
29.
GinoFrancescaGalinskyAdam D. (2012), “Vicarious Dishonesty: When Psychological Closeness Creates Distance from One’s Moral Compass,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119 (1), 15–26.
30.
GoffmanErving (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.
31.
GreenMelanie C. (2006), “Narratives and Cancer Communication,” Journal of Communication, 56 (S1), S163–83.
32.
GreenMelanie C.BrockTimothy C. (2000), “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (5), 701–21.
33.
HuangChaohuaZhuangShaoshuangLiZiyuanGaoJingke (2022), “Creating a Sincere Sustainable Brand: The Application of Aristotle’s Rhetorical Theory to Green Brand Storytelling,” Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 897281.
34.
JarvisCheryl BurkeMacKenzieScott B.PodsakoffPhilip M. (2003), “A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (2), 199–218.
KumarAmitGilovichThomas (2015), “Some ‘Thing’ to Talk About? Differential Story Utility from Experiential and Material Purchases,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41 (10), 1320–31.
38.
LabrooAparna A.DharRaviSchwarzNorbert (2008), “Of Frog Wines and Frowning Watches: Semantic Priming, Perceptual Fluency, and Brand Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (6), 819–31.
39.
MelumadShiri J.InmanJ. JeffreyPhamMichael Tuan (2019), “Selectively Emotional: How Smartphone Use Changes User- Generated Content,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (2), 259–75.
40.
MelumadShiriMeyerRobert (2020), “Full Disclosure: How Smartphones Enhance Consumer Self-Disclosure,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (3), 28–45.
41.
MontoyaAmanda K.HayesAndrew F. (2017), “Two-Condition Within-Participant Statistical Mediation Analysis: A Path-Analytic Framework,” Psychological Methods, 22 (1), 6–27.
42.
MooreSarah G. (2012), “Some Things are Better Left Unsaid: How Word of Mouth Influences the Storyteller,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (6), 1140–54.
43.
MooreSarah G.McFerranBrent (2017), “She Said, She Said: Differential Interpersonal Similarities Predict Unique Linguistic Mimicry in Online Word of Mouth,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2 (2), 229–45.
44.
MurraySandra L.HolmesJohn G.BellaviaGinaGriffinDale W.DoldermanDan (2002), “Kindred Spirits? The Benefits of Egocentrism in Close Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (4), 563–81.
45.
ObaDemiBergerJonah (2023), “How Communication Mediums Shape the Message,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34 (3), 406–24.
46.
OraziDavide C.JohnstonAllen C. (2020), “Running Field Experiments Using Facebook Split Test,” Journal of Business Research, 118, 189–98.
47.
PennebakerJames W.BoydRyan L.JordanKaylaBlackburnKate (2015), “The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015,” technical report, http://hdl.handle.net/2152/31333.
48.
PeracchioLaura A.BublitzMelissa G.EscalasJennifer EdsonFurchheimPiaGrauStacy LandrethHambyAnne (2016), “Transformative Digital Storytelling: A Framework for Crafting Stories for Social Impact Organizations,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 44, MoreauPagePuntoniStefano, eds. Association for Consumer Research, 103–07.
49.
PerloffLinda S.FetzerBarbara K. (1986), “Self–Other Judgments and Perceived Vulnerability to Victimization,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 (3), 502–10.
RizzoCascioLucaGiovanniVillarroel OrdenesFranciscoPozharlievRumenAngelisMatteo DeCostabileMichele (2024), “How High-Arousal Language Shapes Micro- Versus Macro-Influencers’ Impact,” Journal of Marketing, 88 (4), 107–28.
53.
RocklageMatthew D.BergerJonahPackardGrant (2022), “Expression Modalities: How Speaking Versus Writing Shapes Word of Mouth,” Journal of Consumer Research, 49 (3), 389–408.
54.
SavitskyKennethKeysarBoazEpleyNicholasCarterTravisSwansonAshley (2011), “The Closeness-Communication Bias: Increased Egocentrism Among Friends Versus Strangers,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47 (1), 269–73.
55.
SchankRoger C. (1995), Tell Me a Story: Narrative and Intelligence. Northwestern University Press.
56.
SchlenkerBarry R. (1980), Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
57.
SchwarzNorbertJalbertMadelineNoahTomZhangLynn (2021), “Metacognitive Experiences as Information: Processing Fluency in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4 (1), 4–25.
58.
SlaterMichael D.RounerDonnaLongMarilee (2006), “Television Dramas and Support for Controversial Public Policies: Effects and Mechanisms,” Journal of Communication, 56 (2), 235–52.
Van BovenLeafGilovichThomas (2003), “To Do or to Have? That Is the Question,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (6), 1193–202.
61.
Van LaerTomDe RuyterKoViscontiLuca M.WetzelsMartin (2014), “The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Narrative Transportation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (5), 797–817.
62.
Van LaerTomEscalasJennifer EdsonLudwigStephanvan den HendeEllis A. (2019), “What Happens in Vegas Stays on Trip Advisor? Understanding the Role of Narrativity in Consumer Reviews,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (2), 267–85.
63.
ZhangHaoLiangXiaoningQiChenyue (2021), “Investigating the Impact of Interpersonal Closeness and Social Status on Electronic Word-of-Mouth Effectiveness,” Journal of Business Research, 130, 453–61.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
