The sharing economy has become an increasingly widespread way for peers to rent out their owned goods to others seeking to rent them. This research (1) investigates how providers (i.e., owners renting out their belongings) decide what price to charge and (2) identifies the provider WTA effect, where, in the context of a peer-to-peer collaborative consumption model, providers are willing to accept (WTA) less than renters (i.e., nonowners) are willing to pay (WTP). These findings diverge from prior research, which has repeatedly demonstrated that owners typically demand more to part with their belongings than nonowners are WTP in a seller–buyer transaction (i.e., the endowment effect). The provider WTA effect is explained by providers having a more accessible empathy lens, which in turn dampens the accessibility of their exchange lens when renting out their item. This drives WTA below WTP. The effect is moderated when the renter is identified as a dissimilar transaction partner. This research provides actionable implications for providers and platforms.
ApteUday M.DavisMark M. (2019), “Sharing Economy Services: Business Model Generation,” California Management Review, 61 (2), 104–31.
4.
BardhiFlueraEckhardtGiana M. (2012), “Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (4), 881–98.
5.
BarnesStuart J.MattssonJan (2016), “Understanding Current and Future Issues in Collaborative Consumption: A Four-Stage Delphi Study,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 200–211.
6.
BastonsMiquelMasMartaReyCarlos (2017), “Pro-Stakeholders Motivation: Uncovering a New Source of Motivation for Business Companies,” Journal of Management & Organization, 23 (5), 621–32.
7.
BegganJames K. (1992), “On the Social Nature of Nonsocial Perception: The Mere Ownership Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (2), 229–37.
8.
BelkRussell (2007), “Why Not Share Rather Than Own?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, 126–40.
9.
BelkRussell (2010), “Sharing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 715–34.
10.
BenoitSabineBakerThomas L.BoltonRuth N.GruberThorstenKandampullyJay (2017), “A Triadic Framework for Collaborative Consumption (CC): Motives, Activities and Resources & Capabilities of Actors,” Journal of Business Research, 79, 219–27.
11.
BroughAaron R.IsaacMatthew S. (2012), “Finding a Home for Products We Love: How Buyer Usage Intent Affects the Pricing of Used Goods,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 78–91.
12.
BucherElianeFieselerChristianLutzChristoph (2016), “What’s Mine Is Yours (for a Nominal Fee) – Exploring the Spectrum of Utilitarian to Altruistic Motives for Internet-Mediated Sharing,” Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 316–26.
CarlsonKurt A.TannerRobinMeloyMargaret G.RussoJ. Edward (2014), “Catching Nonconscious Goals in the Act of Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123 (1), 65–76.
15.
CarmonZivArielyDan (2000), “Focusing on the Forgone: Why Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and Sellers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360–70.
16.
CarreArnaudStefaniakNicolasD’AmbrosioFannyBansalahLeilaBesche-RichardChrystel (2013), “The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor Structure of a Revised Form,” Psychological Assessment, 25 (3), 679–91.
17.
ChopikWilliam J.O’BrienEdKonrathSara H. (2017), “Differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking Across 63 Countries,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48 (1), 23–38.
18.
ChungJaeyeon (Jae)JoharGita VenkataramaniLiYanyanNetzerOdedPearsonMatthew (2022), “Mining Consumer Minds: Downstream Consequences of Host Motivations for Home-Sharing Platforms,” Journal of Consumer Research, 48 (5), 817–38.
19.
CostelloJohnReczekRebecca W. (2020), “Providers Versus Platforms: Marketing Communications in the Sharing Economy,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (6), 22–38.
20.
DavlembayevaDinaraPapagiannidisSavvas (2023), “Platform-Provider Relationship Dynamics in the Sharing Economy: Challenges and Implications,” Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 242–56.
21.
DogruTarikHanksLydiaModyMakarandSuessCourtneySirakaya-TurkErcan (2020), “The Effects of Airbnb on Hotel Performance: Evidence from Cities Beyond the United States,” Tourism Management, 79, 104090.
EckhardtGiana M.HoustonMark B.JiangBaojunLambertonCaitRindfleischAricZervasGeorgios (2019), “Marketing in the Sharing Economy,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (5), 5–27.
24.
FanNingyuanLaiShiyangFanZhi-PingChenYuan (2023), “Exit and Transition: Exploring the Survival Status of Airbnb Listings in a Time of Professionalization,” Tourism Management, 95, 1–18.
25.
FournierSusan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 343–73.
26.
FritzeMartin P.BenkensteinMartinBelkRussellPeckJoannWirtzJochenClausBart (2021), “Commentaries on the Sharing Economy: Advancing New Perspectives,” Journal of Service Management Research, 5, 3–19.
27.
FukushimaSaekoSifianouMaria (2017), “Conceptualizing Politeness in Japanese and Greek,” Intercultural Pragmatics, 14 (4), 525–55.
28.
GieslerMarkusVeresiuElaHumphreysAshlee (2019), “How Consumer Empathy Drives Platform Success,” Working Paper No. 19-100-01, Marketing Science Institute.
29.
GilJavierSequeraJorge (2020), “The Professionalization of Airbnb in Madrid: Far from a Collaborative Economy,” Current Issues in Tourism, 25 (20), 3343–62.
HallJonathan V.KruegerAlan B. (2016), “An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States,” Working Paper 22843, National Bureau of Economic Research.
34.
HamariJuhoSjöklintMimmiUkkonenAntti (2016), “The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67 (9), 2047–59.
35.
HayesAndrew F. (2022), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. Guilford Press.
36.
HuangLiangSavaryJennifer (2022), “When Payments Go Social: The Use of Person-to-Person Payment Methods Attenuates the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Marketing Research, 60 (3), 585–601.
HuiXiangSaeediMaryamShenZeqianSundaresanNeel (2016), “Reputation and Regulations: Evidence from eBay,” Management Science, 62 (12), 3604–16.
39.
jaimegon123 (2019), “My Host Is Berating Me for Not Being Her Friend,” Reddit (July 6), https://www.reddit.com/r/AirBnB/comments/ca1mlk/my_host_is_berating_me_for_not_being_her_friend/.
40.
JohnsonEric J.HäublGeraldKeinanAnat (2007), “Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33 (3), 461–74.
41.
KahnemanDanielKnetschJack L.ThalerRichard H. (1990), “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem,” Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–48.
42.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica, 47, 263–91.
KathanWolfgangMatzlerKurtVeiderVictoria (2016), “The Sharing Economy: Your Business Model’s Friend of Foe?” Business Horizons, 59 (6), 663–72.
45.
KristoffersonKirkWhiteKatherinePelozaJohn (2014), “The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Token Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (6), 1149–66.
46.
KumarV.LahiriAvishekDoganOrhan Bahadir (2018), “A Strategic Framework for a Profitable Business Model in the Sharing Economy,” Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 147–60.
47.
LambertonCait (2015), “Consumer Sharing: Collaborative Consumption, from Theoretical Roots to New Opportunities,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology, NortonM.I.RuckerD.D.LambertonC., eds. Cambridge University Press, 693–720.
48.
LambertonCaitRoseRandall L. (2012), “When Is Ours Better Than Mine? A Framework for Understanding and Altering Participation in Commercial Sharing Systems,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 109–25.
LessigLawrence (2008), Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. Penguin Press.
51.
LiJunMorenoAntonioZhangDennis J. (2016), “Pros vs. Joes: Agent Pricing Behavior in the Sharing Economy,” Working Paper No. 1298, Ross School of Business Working Paper Series.
LoewensteinGeorgeIssacharoffSamuel (1994), “Source Dependence in the Valuation of Objects,” Journal of Behavior Decision Making, 7 (3), 157–68.
54.
LuoXuemingTongSiliangLinZhijieZhangCheng (2021), “The Impact of Platform Protection Insurance on Buyers and Sellers in the Sharing Economy: A Natural Experiment,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (2), 50–69.
55.
MartinezLuis F.ZeelenbergMarcelRijsmanJohn B. (2011), “Behavioral Consequences of Regret and Disappointment in Social Bargaining Games,” Cognition and Emotion, 25, 351–59.
56.
McAlexanderJames H.SchoutenJohn W.KoenigHarold F. (2002), “Building Brand Community,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (1), 38–54.
57.
MilanovaVeselinaMaasPeter (2017), “Sharing Intangibles: Uncovering Individual Motives for Engagement in a Sharing Service Setting,” Journal of Business Research, 75, 159–71.
58.
MinamiAdriana LuriRamosCarlaBortoluzzoAdriana Bruscato (2021), “Sharing Economy Versus Collaborative Consumption: What Drives Consumers in the New Forms of Exchange?” Journal of Business Research, 128, 124–37.
59.
NayakankuppamDhananjayMishraHimanshu (2005), “The Endowment Effect: Rose-Tinted and Dark-Tinted Glasses,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 390–95.
60.
NaylorRebecca WalkerLambertonCait PoynorNortonDavid A. (2011), “Seeing Ourselves in Others: Reviewer Ambiguity, Egocentric Anchoring, and Persuasion,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (3), 617–31.
61.
O’NeillJ.W.OuyangYuxia (2016), “From Air Mattresses to Unregulated Business: An Analysis of the Other Side of Airbnb,” Penn State School of Hospitality Management.
62.
OzanneLucie K.BallantinePaul W. (2010), “Sharing as a Form of Anti-Consumption? An Examination of Toy Library Users,” Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9 (6), 485–98.
63.
PerrenRebeccaKozinetsRobert V. (2018), “Lateral Exchange Markets: How Social Platforms Operate in a Networked Economy,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (1), 20–36.
64.
PiscicelliLauraCooperTimFisherTom (2015), “The Role of Values in Collaborative Consumption: Insights From a Product-Service System for Lending and Borrowing in the UK,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 21–9.
65.
RavenelleAlexandrea (2017), “Sharing Economy Workers: Selling, Not Sharing,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10 (2), 281–95.
66.
RossGretchen R.MeloyMargaret G.CarlsonKurt A. (2020), “Preference Refinement After a Budget Contraction,” Journal of Consumer Research, 47, 412–30.
SchaffnerDorotheaGeorgiDominikFederspielEsther (2017), “Comparing Customer Experiences and Usage Intentions Regarding Peer-to-Peer Sharing Platforms with Conventional Online Booking Websites: The Role of Social, Hedonic, and Functional Values,” in Marketing at the Confluence Between Entertainment and Analytics. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science, RossiP., ed. Springer.
69.
SchorJuliet B.Attwood-CharlesWilliamCansoyMehmetLadegaardIaskWengronowitzRobert (2020), “Dependence and Precarity in the Platform Economy,” Theory and Society, 49, 833–61.
70.
SchorJuliet B.VallasSteven P. (2021), “The Sharing Economy: Rhetoric and Reality,” Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 369–89.
SundararajanArun (2016), The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism. MIT Press.
73.
ThalerRichard H. (1980), “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1 (1), 60–74.
74.
Torrent-SellensJoan (2019), “Collaborative Behavior and the Sharing Economy: Pan-European Evidence for a New Economic Approach,” in Strategy and Behaviors in the Digital Economy, Beatrice Orlando, ed. IntechOpen.
75.
Von RichthofenGeorgWangenheimFlorian von (2021), “Managing Service Providers in the Sharing Economy: Insights from Airbnb’s Host Management,” Journal of Business Research, 134, 765–77.
76.
WilhelmsMark-PhilippMerfeldKatrinHenkelSven (2017), “Yours, Mine, and Ours: A User-Centric Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges in Peer-to-Peer Asset Sharing,” Business Horizons, 60 (6), 771–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
