Following trends in entertainment streaming services, online educational platforms are increasingly offering users flexible “on-demand” content options. It is important to understand how the timing of content release affects learning behaviors and firm revenue drivers. The current research studies over 67,000 users taking a marketing course before versus after a natural experiment in which the platform switched the course from a scheduled weekly-release format to an on-demand format with all content immediately available. The switch to on-demand positively impacted short-term firm revenue by increasing the number and proportion of certificate-paying users, suggesting that on-demand content can attract a broader set of consumers who value flexibility. On the downside, the switch resulted in users exhibiting lower lecture completion rates and quiz performance and taking fewer additional business courses on the platform, representing a long-term cost. The results were robust to propensity score matching and stratification. The analyses also revealed that on-demand content enabled learning patterns that deviated from a standard evenly paced schedule, including “strategic” binge learning and stretching out engagement past the recommended course period. Thus, while on-demand formats can boost revenues by bringing in more paying users, managers must consider new strategies for maintaining performance and engagement levels within these environments.
ArielyDanWertenbrochKlaus (2002), “Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment,” Psychological Science, 13 (3), 219–24.
2.
BeloRodrigoFerreiraPedroGodinho de MatosMiguelReisFilipa (2019), “The Impact of Time Shifting on TV Consumption and Ad Viewership,” Management Science, 65 (7), 3216–34.
3.
BloomKristine C.ShuellThomas J. (1981), “Effects of Massed and Distributed Practice on the Learning and Retention of Second-Language Vocabulary,” Journal of Education Research, 74 (1), 245–48.
4.
BoyerStefanie L.EdmondsonDiane R.ArtisAndrew B.FlemingDavid (2014), “Self-Directed Learning: A Tool for Lifelong Learning,” Journal of Marketing Education, 36 (1), 20–32.
5.
BrittonBruce K.TesserAbraham (1991), “Effects of Time-Management Practices on College Grades,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (3), 405–10.
6.
BronnenbergBart J.DubéJean-PierreMelaCarl F. (2010), “Do Digital Video Recorders Influence Sales?” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (6), 998–1010.
7.
CalzadaJoanVallettiTommaso M. (2012), “Intertemporal Movie Distribution: Versioning When Customers Can Buy Both Versions,” Marketing Science, 31 (4), 649–67.
8.
CepedaNicholas J.PashlerHaroldVulEdwardWixtedJohn T.RohrerDoug (2006), “Distributed Practice in Verbal Recall Tasks: A Review and Quantitative Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, 132 (3), 354–80.
9.
ChildersJane B.TomaselloMichael (2002), “Two-Year-Olds Learn Novel Nouns, Verbs, and Conventional Actions from Massed or Distributed Exposures,” Developmental Psychology, 38 (6), 967–78.
10.
DavisDanChenGuanliangHauffClaudiaHoubenGeert-Jan (2016), “Gauging MOOC Learners’ Adherence to the Designed Learning Path,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. International Educational Data Mining Society, 54–61.
11.
De BarbaPaula G.KennedyGregor E.AinleyMary D. (2016), “The Role of Students’ Motivation and Participation in Predicting Performance in a MOOC,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32 (3), 218–31.
12.
DeciEdward L.KoestnerRichardRyanRichard M. (2001), “Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again,” Review of Educational Research, 71 (1), 1–27.
13.
De HaanEvertKannanP.K.VerhoefPeter C.WieselThorsten (2018), “Device Switching in Online Purchasing: Examining the Strategic Contingencies,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (5), 1–19.
DiverPaulMartinezIgnacio (2015), “MOOCS as a Massive Research Laboratory: Opportunities and Challenges,” Distance Education, 36 (1), 5–25.
16.
DohertyWilliam (2006), “An Analysis of Multiple Factors Affecting Retention in Web-Based Community College Courses,” The Internet and Higher Education, 9 (4), 245–55.
17.
DowellDavid JohnSmallFelicity A. (2011), “What Is the Impact of Online Resource Materials on Student Self-Learning Strategies?” Journal of Marketing Education, 33 (2), 140–48.
18.
FeldmanLaurence P.HornikJacob (1981), “The Use of Time: An Integrated Conceptual Model,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (4), 407–19.
19.
FlayelleMaèvaCanaleNataleVögeleClausKarilaLaurentMauragePierreBillieuxJoël (2019), “Assessing Binge-Watching Behaviors: Development and Validation of the ‘Watching TV Series Motives’ and ‘Binge-Watching Engagement and Symptoms’ Questionnaires,” Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 26–36.
20.
FlayelleMaèvaMauragePierreBillieuxJoël (2017), “Toward a Qualitative Understanding of Binge-Watching Behaviors: A Focus Group Approach,” Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6 (4), 457–71.
21.
FörsterJensHigginsE. ToryIdsonLorraine Chen (1998), “Approach and Avoidance Strength During Goal Attainment: Regulatory Focus and the ‘Goal Looms Larger’ Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (5), 1115–31.
22.
GalakJeffKrugerJustinLoewensteinGeorge (2013), “Slow Down! Insensitivity to Rate of Consumption Leads to Avoidable Satiation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (5), 993–1009.
23.
GhoshBikramStockAxel (2010), “Advertising Effectiveness, Digital Video Recorders, and Product Market Competition,” Marketing Science, 29 (4), 639–49.
24.
Godinho de MatosMiguelFerreiraPedro (2020), “The Effect of Binge-Watching on the Subscription of Video on Demand: Results from Randomized Experiments,” Information Systems Research, 31 (4), 1337–60.
25.
GoldfarbAviTuckerCatherineWangYanwen (2022), “Conducting Research in Marketing with Quasi-Experiments,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (3), 1–20.
26.
GoliAliChintaguntaPradeep K.SriramS. (2022), “Effects of Payment on User Engagement in Online Courses,” Journal of Marketing Research, 59 (1), 11–34.
27.
GormallyJimBlackSionagDastonSandyRardinDavid (1982), “The Assessment of Binge Eating Severity Among Obese Persons,” Addictive Behaviors, 7 (1), 47–55.
28.
HeathertonTodd F.BaumeisterRoy F. (1991), “Binge Eating as Escape from Self-Awareness,” Psychological Bulletin, 110 (1), 86–110.
29.
Hennig-ThurauThorstenHenningVictorSattlerHenrikEggersFelixHoustonMark B. (2007), “The Last Picture Show? Timing and Order of Movie Distribution Channels,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (4), 63–83.
30.
InmanJ. Jeffrey (2001), “The Role of Sensory-Specific Satiety in Attribute-Level Variety Seeking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (1), 105–20.
31.
KhalilHananEbnerMartin (2014), “MOOCs Completion Rates and Possible Methods to Improve Retention - A Literature Review,” in EdMedia + Innovate Learning. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 1305–13.
32.
KivetzRanUrminskyOlegZhengYuhuang (2006), “The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (1), 39–58.
33.
KizilcecRené F.HalawaSherif (2015), “Attrition and Achievement Gaps in Online Learning,” in Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. Association for Computing Machinery, 57–66.
34.
KizilcecRené F.Pérez-SanagustínMarMaldonadoJorge J. (2017), “Self-Regulated Learning Strategies Predict Learner Behavior and Goal Attainment in Massive Open Online Courses,” Computers and Education, 104, 18–33.
KumarVineetSrinivasanKannan (2015), “Commentary on ‘Predicting Customer Value Using Clumpiness,’” Marketing Science, 34 (2), 209–13.
37.
LambAnneSmilackJaschaHoAndrewReichJustin (2015), “Addressing Common Analytic Challenges to Randomized Experiments in MOOCs: Attrition and Zero-Inflation,” in Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. Association for Computing Machinery, 21–30.
38.
LaTourKathryn A.NoelHayden N. (2021), “Self-Directed Learning Online: An Opportunity to Binge,” Journal of Marketing Education, 43 (2), 174–88.
39.
LuJoyBradlowEric T.HutchinsonJ. Wesley (2022), “Testing Theories of Goal Progress in Online Learning,” Journal of Marketing Research, 59 (1), 35–60.
40.
LuJoyKarmarkarUma R.VenkatramanVinod (2024), “Planning-to-Binge: Time Allocation for Future Media Consumption,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 30 (1), 169–86.
41.
MacanTherese Hoff (1994), “Time Management: Test of a Process Model,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (3), 381–91.
42.
MacKinnonDavid P.KrullJennifer L.LockwoodChondra M. (2000), “Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect,” Prevention Science, 1 (4), 173–81.
43.
McAlisterLeigh (1982), “A Dynamic Attribute Satiation Model of Variety-Seeking Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (2), 141–50.
44.
MerikiviJaniBraggeJohannaScornavaccaEusebioVerhagenTibert (2019), “Binge-Watching Serialized Video Content: A Transdisciplinary Review,” Television & New Media, 21 (7), 697–711.
45.
MichinovNicolasBrunotSophieLe BohecOlivierJuhelJacquesDelavalMarine (2011), “Procrastination, Participation, and Performance in Online Learning Environments,” Computers & Education, 56 (1), 243–52.
46.
MoeWendy W. (2003), “Buying, Searching, or Browsing: Differentiating Between Online Shoppers Using In-Store Navigational Clickstream,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (1–2), 29–39.
47.
NarangUnnatiYadavManjit S.RindfleischAric (2022), “The ‘Idea Advantage’: How Content Sharing Strategies Impact Engagement in Online Learning Platforms,” Journal of Marketing Research, 59 (1), 61–78.
48.
NelsonLeif D.MeyvisTom (2008), “Interrupted Consumption: Disrupting Adaptation to Hedonic Experiences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (6), 654–64.
49.
NelsonLeif D.MeyvisTomGalakJeff (2009), “Enhancing the Television-Viewing Experience Through Commercial Interruptions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (2), 160–72.
50.
NortheyGavinBucicTaniaChylinskiMathewGovindRahul (2015), “Increasing Student Engagement Using Asynchronous Learning,” Journal of Marketing Education, 37 (3), 171–80.
51.
ParkChang Hee (2017), “Online Purchase Paths and Conversion Dynamics Across Multiple Websites,” Journal of Retailing, 93 (3), 253–65.
PattersonRichard W. (2018), “Can Behavioral Tools Improve Online Student Outcomes? Experimental Evidence from a Massive Open Online Course,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 153, 293–321.
54.
PeachRobert L.YalirakiSophia N.LefevreDavidBarahonaMaurcio (2019), “Data-Driven Unsupervised Clustering of Online Learner Behaviour,” NPJ Science of Learning, 4 (14), 1–11.
55.
PlatzerMichaelReuttererThomas (2016), “Ticking Away the Moments: Timing Regularity Helps to Better Predict Customer Activity,” Marketing Science, 35 (5), 779–99.
56.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F. (2008), “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models,” Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–91.
57.
RosenbaumPaul R. (2002), Observational Studies. Springer.
58.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B. (1983), “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70 (1), 41–55.
59.
SchunkDale H. (1990), “Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy During Self-Regulated Learning,” Educational Psychologist, 25 (1), 71–86.
60.
SchwartzEric M.BradlowEric T.FaderPeter S. (2014), “Model Selection Using Database Characteristics: Developing a Classification Tree for Longitudinal Incidence Data,” Marketing Science, 33 (2), 188–205.
61.
SchweidelDavid A.MoeWendy W. (2016), “Binge Watching and Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (5), 1–19.
62.
SonLisa K.SimonDominic A. (2012), “Distributed Learning: Data, Metacognition, and Educational Implications,” Educational Psychology Review, 24, 379–99.
63.
StuartElizabeth A.KingGaryImaiKosukeHoDaniel (2011), “MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference,” Journal of Statistical Software, 42 (8), 1–28.
64.
TingleyDustinYamamotoTeppeiHiroseKentaroKeeleLukeImaiKosuke (2014), “Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis,” Journal of Statistical Software, 59 (5), 1–38.
65.
WechslerHenryLeeJae EunKuoMeichunLeeHang (2000), “College Binge Drinking in the 1990s: A Continuing Problem. Results of the Harvard School of Public Health 1999 College Alcohol Study,” Journal of American College Health, 48 (5), 199–210.
66.
ZhangDennis J.AllonGadVan MieghemJan A. (2017), “Does Social Interaction Improve Learning Outcomes? Evidence from Field Experiments on Massive Open Online Courses,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19 (3), 347–67.
67.
ZhangYaoBradlowEric T.SmallDylan S. (2013), “New Measures of Clumpiness for Incidence Data,” Journal of Applied Statistics, 40 (11), 2533–48.
68.
ZhangYaoBradlowEric T.SmallDylan S. (2015), “Predicting Customer Value Using Clumpiness: From RFM to RFMC,” Marketing Science, 34 (2), 195–208.
69.
ZhaoXinshuLynchJohn G.Jr.ChenQimei (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths About Mediation Analysis.” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (2), 197–206.
70.
ZhaoClariceMehtaNitinShiMengze (2023), “The Consumption of Serial Media Products and the Optimal Release Strategy,” working paper.
71.
ZimmermanBarry J.BanduraAlbertMartinez-PonsManuel (1992), “Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting,” American Educational Research Journal, 29 (3), 663–76.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
