Although consumers often value minimalist aesthetics, little work has examined why and when simple packaging designs of consumable products enhance consumer outcomes. The authors theorize that simple packaging evokes a symbolic association whereby minimizing design complexity signals that the product contains few ingredients, which increases perceived product purity and willingness to pay (WTP). A field study examining a supermarket chain's product packages (N = 1,353) provided preliminary support for this increase in WTP and two boundary conditions. Six preregistered studies replicated these effects and tested the underlying process. Studies 1a and 1b showed that the increase in WTP for simple packaging is driven by few-ingredients inferences increasing perceived product purity. Study 2 demonstrated the increase in WTP using an incentive-compatible design. Study 3 reinforced the proposed process via moderated mediation. Lastly, Studies 4 and 5 tested the boundary conditions in the field study, showing that WTP for simple packaging decreases when the product is from a store (vs. nonstore) brand and when consumers have an indulgence (vs. health) goal. These findings offer theoretical and managerial insight into minimalist aesthetics.
ArgoJennifer J.DahlDarren W.MoralesAndrea C. (2006), “Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by Others,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (2), 81–94.
3.
BiswasDipayanLundKaisaSzocsCourtney (2019), “Sounds Like a Healthy Retail Atmospheric Strategy: Effects of Ambient Music and Background Noise on Food Sales,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47, 37–55.
4.
BlochPeter H. (1995), “Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (3), 16–29.
ChandonPierre (2013), “How Package Design and Packaged-Based Marketing Claims Lead to Overeating,” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 35 (1), 7–31.
7.
CoxDenaCoxAnthony D. (2002), “Beyond First Impressions: The Effects of Repeated Exposure on Consumer Liking of Visually Complex and Simple Product Designs,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (2), 119–30.
8.
DengXiaoyanKahnBarbara E. (2009), “Is Your Product on The Right Side? The ‘Location Effect’ on Perceived Product Heaviness and Package Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (6), 725–38.
9.
DitlevsenKiaSandøePeterLassenJesper (2019), “Healthy Food Is Nutritious, but Organic Food Is Healthy Because It Is Pure: The Negotiation of Healthy Food Choices by Danish Consumers of Organic Food,” Food Quality and Preference, 71, 46–53.
10.
DonderiDon C. (1973), “Changes in Visual Recall Memory Following Discrimination Learning,” Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 27 (2), 210–19.
11.
DonderiDon C. (2006), “Visual Complexity: A Review,” Psychological Bulletin, 132 (1), 73–97.
12.
DouglasMary (1966), Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
13.
FajardoTatiana M.ZhangJiaoTsirosMichael (2016), “The Contingent Nature of the Symbolic Associations of Visual Design Elements: The Case of Brand Logo Frames,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (4), 549–66.
14.
FavierManonCelhayFranckPantin-SohierGaëlle (2019), “Is Less More or a Bore? Package Design Simplicity and Brand Perception: An Application to Champagne,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 46 (January), 11–20.
15.
GrahamDan J.JefferyRobert W. (2011), “Location, Location, Location: Eye-Tracking Evidence That Consumers Preferentially View Prominently Positioned Nutrition Information,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 111 (11), 1704–11.
16.
GrahamJesseNosekBrian A.HaidtJonathanIyerRaviKolevaSpassenaDittoPeter H. (2011), “Mapping the Moral Domain,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101 (2), 366–85.
17.
GramppWilliam D. (2000), “What Did Smith Mean by the Invisible Hand?” Journal of Political Economy, 108 (3), 441–65.
18.
HagtvedtHenrik (2020), “Dark Is Durable, Light Is User-Friendly: The Impact of Color Lightness on Two Product Attribute Judgments,” Psychology and Marketing, 37 (7), 864–75.
19.
HanYoung JeeNunesJoseph C.DrèzeXavier (2010), “Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (4), 15–30.
20.
HawsKelly L.ReczekRebecca WalkerSampleKevin L. (2017), “Healthy Diets Make Empty Wallets: The Healthy = Expensive Intuition,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (6), 992–1007.
21.
HayesAndrew F. (2018), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
22.
HendersonPamela W.GieseJoan L.CoteJoseph A. (2004), “Impression Management Using Typeface Design,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 60–72.
23.
HoyerWayne D. (1984), “An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for a Common Repeat Purchase Product,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (3), 822–29.
KimHae-Young (2013), “Statistical Notes for Clinical Researchers: Assessing Normal Distribution (2) Using Skewness and Kurtosis,” Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38 (1), 52–4.
27.
KrishnaAradhnaCianLucaAydınoğluNilüfer Z. (2017), “Sensory Aspects of Package Design,” Journal of Retailing, 93 (1), 43–54.
28.
LabrecqueLauren I.PatrickVanessa M.MilneGeorge R. (2013), “The Marketers’ Prismatic Palette: A Review of Color Research and Future Directions,” Psychology and Marketing, 30 (2), 187–202.
MadzharovAdriana V.BlockLauren G. (2010), “Effects of Product Unit Image on Consumption of Snack Foods,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (4), 398–409.
31.
MaiRobertSymmankClaudiaSeeberg-ElverfeldtBerenike (2016), “Light and Pale Colors in Food Packaging: When Does This Package Cue Signal Superior Healthiness or Inferior Tastiness?” Journal of Retailing, 92 (4), 426–44.
Meyers-LevyJoanZhuRui (Juliet) (2008), “Perhaps the Store Made You Purchase It: Toward an Understanding of Structural Aspects of Indoor Shopping Environment,” in Visual Marketing: From Attention to Action, WedelMichelPietersRik, eds. Psychology Press, 193–223.
34.
MonnierArnaudThomasManoj (2022), “Experiential and Analytical Price Evaluations: How Experiential Product Description Affects Prices,” Journal of Consumer Research, 49 (4), 574–94.
35.
NemeroffCarolRozinPaul (1994), “The Contagion Concept in Adult Thinking in the United States: Transmission of Germs and of Interpersonal Influence,” Ethos, 22 (2), 158–86.
36.
O’HaganLauren Alex (2020), “Pure in Body, Pure in Mind? A Sociohistorical Perspective on the Marketisation of Pure Foods in Great Britain,” Discourse, Context & Media, 34 (April), 1–9.
37.
OpelAndy (1999), “Constructing Purity: Bottled Water and the Commodification of Nature,” Journal of American Culture, 22 (4), 67–76.
38.
OrthUlrich R.CrouchRoberta C. (2014), “Is Beauty in the Aisles of the Retailer? Package Processing in Visually Complex Contexts,” Journal of Retailing, 90 (4), 524–37.
39.
OrthUlrich R.MalkewitzKeven (2008), “Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions,” Journal of Marketing, 72 (3), 64–81.
40.
OswaldCarlynAdhikariKoushikMohanAnand (2022), “Effect of Front-of-Package Labels on Consumer Product Evaluation and Preferences,” Current Research in Food Science, 5, 131–40.
41.
PatrickVanessa M.AtefiYasharHagtvedtHenrik (2017), “The Allure of the Hidden: How Product Unveiling Confers Value,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34 (2), 430–41.
42.
PettyRichard E.CacioppoJohn T. (1986), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
43.
PhillipsBarbara J. (1997), “Thinking into It: Consumer Interpretation of Complex Advertising Images,” Journal of Advertising, 26 (2), 77–87.
44.
PietersRikWedelMichelBatraRajeev (2010), “The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (5), 48–60.
45.
PracejusJohn W.OlsenDouglasO’GuinnThomas (2006), “How Nothing Became Something: White Space, Rhetoric, History, and Meaning,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (1), 82–90.
46.
RaghubirPriyaKrishnaAradhna (1999), “Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Fool the Stomach?” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (3), 313–26.
47.
RaghunathanRajagopalNaylorRebecca WalkerHoyerWayne D. (2006), “The Unhealthy = Tasty Intuition and Its Effects on Taste Inferences, Enjoyment, and Choice of Food Products,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (4), 170–84.
48.
RozinPaulFischlerClaudeShields-ArgelèsChristy (2012), “European and American Perspectives on the Meaning of Natural,” Appetite, 59 (2), 448–55.
49.
RundhBo (2016), “The Role of Packaging Within Marketing and Value Creation,” British Food Journal, 118 (10), 2491–511.
50.
SchuldtJonathon P.SchwarzNorbert (2010), “The ‘Organic’ Path to Obesity? Organic Claims Influence Calorie Judgments and Exercise Recommendations,” Judgment and Decision Making, 5 (3), 144–50.
51.
ScottLinda M. (1994), “Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (2), 252–73.
52.
ScottSydney E.RozinPaul (2017), “Are Additives Unnatural? Generality and Mechanisms of Additivity Dominance,” Judgment and Decision Making, 12 (6), 572–83.
53.
SeminGün R.PalmaTomás A. (2014), “Why the Bride Wears White: Grounding Gender with Brightness,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (2), 217–25.
54.
SevillaJulioTownsendClaudia (2016), “The Space-to-Product Ratio Effect: How Interstitial Space Influences Product Aesthetic Appeal, Store Perceptions, and Product Preference,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (5), 665–81.
55.
SpencerSteven J.ZannaMark P.FongGeoffrey T. (2005), “Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experiments Are Often More Effective Than Mediational Analyses in Examining Psychological Processes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 845–51.
SuLeiWanEcho WenJiangYuwei (2019), “Filling an Empty Self: The Impact of Social Exclusion on Consumer Preference for Visual Density,” Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (4), 808–24.
58.
SunJennifer J.BellezzaSilviaPahariaNeeru (2021), “Buy Less, Buy Luxury: Understanding and Overcoming Product Durability Neglect for Sustainable Consumption,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (3), 28–43.
59.
SundarAparnaNoseworthyTheodore J. (2014), “Place the Logo High or Low? Using Conceptual Metaphors of Power in Packaging Design,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (5), 138–51.
60.
TabriNassimYungJayson J.ElliottCorinna M. (2022), “Connecting a Health-Focused Self-Concept with Orthorexia Nervosa Symptoms via Fear of Losing Control over Eating Unhealthy Food and Disgust for Unhealthy Food,” Eating and Weight Disorders–Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 27, 3569–78.
61.
ToNgoc (Rita)PatrickVanessa M. (2017), “Muji Versus Maharaja: When (and Why) Minimalist Versus Maximalist Design Differentially Influence Consumer Self-Brand Connection,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 54, GneezyAyeletGriskeviciusVladasWilliamsPatti, eds. Association for Consumer Research, 258–63.
62.
VeryzerRobert W. (1999), “A Nonconscious Processing Explanation of Consumer Response to Product Design,” Psychology and Marketing, 16 (6), 497–522.
63.
WestRobert M. (2022), “Best Practice in Statistics: The Use of Log Transformation,” Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 59 (3), 162–65.
WuFreemanSamperAdrianaMoralesAndrea C.FitzsimonsGavan J. (2017), “It’s Too Pretty to Use! When and How Enhanced Product Aesthetics Discourage Usage and Lower Consumption Enjoyment,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 651–72.
66.
YanDengfengSenguptaJaideepWyerRobert S.Jr. (2014), “Package Size and Perceived Quality: The Intervening Role of Unit Price Perceptions,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (1), 4–17.
67.
ZhangKuangjieCaiFengyanShiZhengyu (2021), “Do Promotions Make Consumers More Generous? The Impact of Price Promotions on Consumers’ Donation Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (3), 240–55.
68.
ZhongChen-BoHouseJulian (2014), “Dirt, Pollution, and Purity: A Metaphorical Perspective on Morality,” in The Power of Metaphor: Examining Its Influence on Social Life, LandauMark J.RobinsonMichael D.MeierBrian P., eds. APA Press, 109–31.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
