Given the high failure rates of brand extensions, insights into the drivers of brand extension success are critical for marketing practitioners and scholars. Prior research has inferred that parent brand equity and extension fit are the two key success drivers; however, empirical findings are mixed. Drawing on signaling theory, categorization theory, and a large database of 2,134 effect sizes from research spanning 1990–2020, the authors address these mixed findings through a meta-analysis to develop empirical generalizations. The results show that parent brand equity and extension fit positively influence extension success. However, the multifaceted dimensions of these two drivers have differential effects. For example, among the fit dimensions, usage fit has the weakest effect. While the results suggest an overall positive interaction effect between the two drivers, a fine-grained perspective that considers the drivers’ various dimensions reveals differences. For example, brand familiarity appears to have a lower interaction effect with extension fit than the other dimensions of parent brand equity. Furthermore, the authors provide a comprehensive analysis of five groups of moderators: contextual factors (parent brand, extension, communication, and consumer factors) and research method factors. The authors offer managerial and future research implications for the design of brand extension strategies.
AakerDavid A. (1996), “Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets,” California Management Review, 38 (3), 102–20.
2.
AakerDavid A.JacobsonRobert (2001), “The Value Relevance of Brand Attitude in High-Technology Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (4), 485–93.
3.
AakerDavid A.KellerKevin Lane (1990), “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (1), 27–41.
4.
AhluwaliaRohini (2008), “How Far Can a Brand Stretch? Understanding the Role of Self-Construal,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (3), 337–50.
5.
AuerJohannesPapiesDominik (2020), “Cross-Price Elasticities and Their Determinants: A Meta-Analysis and New Empirical Generalizations,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (3), 584–605.
6.
Babić RosarioAnaSotgiuFrancescaDe ValckKristineBijmoltTammo H.A. (2016), “The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (3), 297–318.
7.
BijmoltTammo H.APietersRik G.M. (2001), “Meta-Analysis in Marketing When Studies Contain Multiple Measurements,” Marketing Letters, 12 (2), 157–69.
8.
BijmoltTammo H.A.Van HeerdeHarald J.PietersRik G.M (2005), “New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (2), 141–56.
9.
BorensteinMichaelHedgesLarry V.HigginsJulian P.T.RothsteinHannah R. (2009), Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BottomleyPaul A.DoyleJohn R. (1996), “The Formation of Attitudes Towards Brand Extensions: Testing and Generalising Aaker and Keller’s Model,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (4), 365–77.
11.
BottomleyPaul A.HoldenStephen J.S. (2001), “Do We Really Know How Consumers Evaluate Brand Extensions? Empirical Generalizations Based on Secondary Analysis of Eight Studies,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (4), 494–500.
12.
BoushDavid M.LokenBarbara (1991), “A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (1), 16–28.
13.
BroniarczykSusan M.AlbaJoseph W. (1994), “The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (2), 214–28.
14.
CarrillatFrançois A.LegouxRenaudHadidaAllègre L. (2018), “Debates and Assumptions About Motion Picture Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46 (2), 273–99.
15.
CarterRobert E.CurryDavid J. (2013), “Perceptions Versus Performance When Managing Extensions: New Evidence About the Role of Fit Between a Parent Brand and an Extension,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41 (2), 253–69.
16.
ChangChung-ChauLinBo-ChiChangShin-Shin (2011), “The Relative Advantages of Benefit Overlap Versus Category Similarity in Brand Extension Evaluation: The Moderating Role of Self-Regulatory Focus,” Marketing Letters, 22 (4), 391–404.
17.
CohenJacob (1992), “A Power Primer,” Psychological Bulletin, 112 (1), 155–59.
18.
ColeCatherine A.BalasubramanianSiva K. (1993), “Age Differences in Consumers’ Search for Information: Public Policy Implications,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (1), 157–69.
19.
ConnellyBrian L.CertoS. TrevisIrelandR. DuaneReutzelChristopher R. (2011), “Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment,” Journal of Management, 37 (1), 39–67.
20.
CoulterKeith S. (2005), “An Examination of Qualitative vs. Quantitative Elaboration Likelihood Effects,” Psychology & Marketing, 22 (1), 31–49.
21.
CzellarSandor (2003), “Consumer Attitude Toward Brand Extensions: An Integrative Model and Research Propositions,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20 (1), 97–115.
22.
DacinPeter A.SmithDaniel C. (1994), “The Effect of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (2), 229–42.
23.
DawarNirajParkerPhilip (1994), “Marketing Universals: Consumers’ Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (2), 81–95.
24.
DelVecchioDevonSmithDaniel C. (2005), “Brand-Extension Price Premiums: The Effects of Perceived Fit and Extension Product Category Risk,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33 (2), 184–96.
25.
DensNathalieDe PelsmackerPatrick (2010), “Advertising for Extensions: Moderating Effects of Extension Type, Advertising Strategy, and Product Category Involvement on Extension Evaluation,” Marketing Letters, 21 (2), 175–89.
26.
DickAlanChakravartiDipankarBiehalGabriel (1990), “Memory-Based Inferences During Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (1), 82–93.
27.
DimitriuRaduWarlopLuk (2022), “Is Similarity a Constraint for Service-to-Service Brand Extensions?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39 (4), 1019–41.
DunlapWilliam P. (1994), “Generalizing the Common Language Effect Size Indicator to Bivariate Normal Correlations,” Psychological Bulletin, 116 (3), 509–11.
30.
EchambadiRajArronizInigoReinartzWernerLeeJunsoo (2006), “Empirical Generalizations from Brand Extension Research: How Sure Are We?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (3), 253–61.
31.
EisdorferCarl (1965), “Verbal Learning and Response Time in the Aged,” Journal of Genetic Psychology, 107 (1), 15–22.
32.
ErdemTiilinSwaitJoffre (1998), “Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7 (2), 131–57.
33.
GierlHeribertHuettlVerena (2011), “A Closer Look at Similarity: The Effects of Perceived Similarity and Conjunctive Cues on Brand Extension Evaluation,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28 (2), 120–33.
34.
Gürhan-CanliZeynepMaheswaranDurairaj (1998), “The Effects of Extensions on Brand Name Dilution and Enhancement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (4), 464–73.
35.
HagtvedtHenrikPatrickVanessa M. (2008), “Art and the Brand: The Role of Visual Art in Enhancing Brand Extendibility,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18 (3), 212–22.
36.
HeYiChenQimeiTamLeonaLeeRuby P. (2016), “Managing Sub-Branding Affect Transfer: The Role of Consideration Set Size and Brand Loyalty,” Marketing Letters, 27 (1), 103–13.
37.
HogreveJensIsekeAnjaDerfussKlausEllerTönnjes (2017), “The Service–Profit Chain: A Meta-Analytic Test of a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (3), 41–61.
38.
HongSung-MookGiannakopoulosEffyLaingDebbieWilliamsNicole A. (1994), “Psychological Reactance: Effects of Age and Gender,” Journal of Social Psychology, 134 (2), 223–28.
39.
IyerGopalkrishnan R.BlutMarkusXiaoSarah HongGrewalDhruv (2020), “Impulse Buying: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (3), 384–404.
40.
JacksonDanTurnerRebecca (2017), “Power Analysis for Random-Effects Meta-Analysis,” Research Synthesis Methods, 8 (3), 290–302.
41.
JacobyJacobKaplanLeon B. (1972), “The Components of Perceived Risk,” in Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, VenkatesanM., ed. Association for Consumer Research, 382–93.
42.
JohnDeborah RoedderColeCatherine A. (1986), “Age Differences in Information Processing: Understanding Deficits in Young and Elderly Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (3), 297–315.
43.
JohnDeborah RoedderLokenBarbaraJoinerChristopher (1998), “The Negative Impact of Extensions: Can Flagship Products Be Diluted?” Journal of Marketing, 62 (1), 19–32.
44.
KamakuraWagner A.RussellGary J. (1993), “Measuring Brand Value with Scanner Data,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10 (1), 9–22.
45.
KellerKevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 1–22.
46.
KellerKevin LaneAakerDavid A. (1992), “The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (1), 35–50.
47.
KellerKevin LaneKotlerPhilip (2015), Marketing Management, 15th global ed.Pearson.
KimHakkyunJohnDeborah Roedder (2008), “Consumer Response to Brand Extensions: Construal Level as a Moderator of the Importance of Perceived Fit,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18 (2), 116–26.
50.
KimKyeongheuiParkJongwon (2019), “Cultural Influences on Brand Extension Judgments: Opposing Effects of Thinking Style and Regulatory Focus,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36 (1), 137–50.
51.
KimKyeongheuiParkJongwonKimJungkeun (2014), “Consumer–Brand Relationship Quality: When and How It Helps Brand Extensions,” Journal of Business Research, 67 (4), 591–7.
52.
KirmaniAmnaSoodSanjayBridgesSheri (1999), “The Ownership Effect in Consumer Responses to Brand Line Stretches,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (1), 88–101.
53.
KlinkRichard R.SmithDaniel C. (2001), “Threats to the External Validity of Brand Extension Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (3), 326–35.
54.
KozlenkovaIrina V.LeeJu-YeonXiangDiandianPalmatierRobert W. (2021), “Sharing Economy: International Marketing Strategies,” Journal of International Business Studies, 52 (8), 1445–73.
55.
KushwahaTarunShankarVenkatesh (2013), “Are Multichannel Customers Really More Valuable? The Moderating Role of Product Category Characteristics,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (4), 67–85.
56.
LandwehrJan R.WentzelDanielHerrmannAndreas (2013), “Product Design for the Long Run: Consumer Responses to Typical and Atypical Designs at Different Stages of Exposure,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (5), 92–107.
57.
LaneVicki (2000), “The Impact of Ad Repetition and Ad Content on Consumer Perceptions of Incongruent Extensions,” Journal of Marketing, 64 (2), 80–91.
58.
LaneVickiJacobsonRobert (1995), “Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (1), 63–77.
59.
LeiJingPruppersRogerOuwerslootHansLemminkJos (2004), “Service Intensiveness and Brand Extension Evaluations,” Journal of Service Research, 6 (3), 243–55.
60.
LiuMatthew TingchiWongIpKin AnthonyTsengTing-HsiangChangAngela Wen-YuPhauIan (2017), “Applying Consumer-Based Brand Equity in Luxury Hotel Branding,” Journal of Business Research, 81, 192–202.
61.
MaheswaranDurairajMackieDiane M.ChaikenShelly (1992), “Brand Name as a Heuristic Cue: The Effects of Task Importance and Expectancy Confirmation on Consumer Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1 (4), 317–36.
62.
MaoHuifangKrishnanH. Shanker (2006), “Effects of Prototype and Exemplar Fit on Brand Extension Evaluations: A Two-Process Contingency Model,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (1), 41–9.
63.
MaozEyalTyboutAlice M. (2002), “The Moderating Role of Involvement and Differentiation in the Evaluation of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (2), 119–31.
64.
MartinIngrid M.StewartDavid W. (2001), “The Differential Impact of Goal Congruency on Attitudes, Intentions, and the Transfer of Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (4), 471–84.
65.
MartinIngrid M.StewartDavid W.MattaShashi (2005), “Branding Strategies, Marketing Communication, and Perceived Brand Meaning: The Transfer of Purposive, Goal-Oriented Brand Meaning to Brand Extensions,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33 (3), 275–94.
66.
MathurPragyaMalikaMalikaAgrawalNidhiMaheswaranDurairaj (2023), “The Context (In)Dependence of Low-Fit Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing, 87 (1), 114–32.
67.
MervisCarolyn B.RoschEleanor (1981), “Categorization of Natural Objects,” Annual Review of Psychology, 32 (1), 89–115.
68.
Meyers-LevyJoanLokenBarbara (2015), “Revisiting Gender Differences: What We Know and What Lies Ahead,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (1), 129–49.
69.
Meyers-LevyJoanLouieTherese A.CurrenMary T. (1994), “How Does the Congruity of Brand Names Affect Evaluations of Brand Name Extensions?” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (1), 46–53.
70.
Meyers-LevyJoanMaheswaranDurairaj (1991), “Exploring Differences in Males’ and Females’ Processing Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (1), 63–70.
71.
Meyers-LevyJoanSternthalBrian (1991), “Gender Differences in the Use of Message Cues and Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (1), 84–96.
72.
Meyers-LevyJoanTyboutAlice M. (1989), “Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1), 39–54.
73.
MeyvisTomJaniszewskiChris (2004), “When Are Broader Brands Stronger Brands? An Accessibility Perspective on the Success of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (2), 346–57.
74.
MilbergSandra J.CuneoAndresSilvaMonicaGoodsteinRonald C. (2023), “Parent Brand Susceptibility to Negative Feedback Effects from Brand Extensions: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Consumer Findings,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33 (1), 21–44.
75.
MongaAlokparna BasuGürhan-CanliZeynep (2012), “The Influence of Mating Mind-Sets on Brand Extension Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (4), 581–93.
76.
MongaAlokparna BasuJohnDeborah Roedder (2007), “Cultural Differences in Brand Extension Evaluation: The Influence of Analytic Versus Holistic Thinking,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (4), 529–36.
77.
MongaAlokparna BasuJohnDeborah Roedder (2010), “What Makes Brands Elastic? The Influence of Brand Concept and Styles of Thinking on Brand Extension Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (3), 80–92.
NoseworthyTheodore J.CotteJuneLeeSeung Hwan (2011), “The Effects of Ad Context and Gender on the Identification of Visually Incongruent Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (2), 358–75.
81.
OrsingherChiaraValentiniSaraDe AngelisMatteo (2010), “A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction with Complaint Handling in Services,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (2), 169–86.
82.
ParasuramanAnantharanthanZeithamlValarie A.BerryLeonard L. (1985), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (4), 41–50.
83.
ParkC. WhanJaworskiBernard J.MacInnisDeborah J. (1986), “Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management,” Journal of Marketing, 50 (4), 135–45.
84.
ParkC. WhanMilbergSandra J.LawsonRobert (1991), “Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2), 185–93.
85.
ParkChan SuSrinivasanVern (1994), “A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and Its Extendibility,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (2), 271–88.
86.
PettyRichard E.CacioppoJohn T.SchumannDavid (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (2), 135–46.
87.
PhillipsLynn W.SternthalBrian (1977), “Age Differences in Information Processing: A Perspective on the Aged Consumer,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (4), 444–57.
88.
PuligaddaSanjayRossWilliam T.Jr.GrewalRajdeep (2012), “Individual Differences in Brand Schematicity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (1), 115–30.
89.
RangaswamyArvindBurkeRaymond R.OlivaTerence A. (1993), “Brand Equity and the Extendibility of Brand Names,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10 (1), 61–75.
90.
ReddySrinivas K.HolakSusan L.BhatSubodh (1994), “To Extend or Not to Extend: Success Determinants of Line Extensions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (2), 243–62.
91.
RoschEleanorMervisCarolyn B. (1975), “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories,” Cognitive Psychology, 7 (4), 573–605.
92.
RoschkHolgerHosseinpourMasoumeh (2020), “Pleasant Ambient Scents: A Meta-Analysis of Customer Responses and Situational Contingencies,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (1), 125–45.
93.
RosenthalRobert (1979), “The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results,” Psychological Bulletin, 86 (3), 638–41.
94.
SalthouseTimothy A. (1991), Theoretical Perspectives on Cognitive Aging. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
95.
SchampChristinaHeitmannMarkBijmoltTammo H.A.KatzensteinRobin (2023), “The Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing: A Meta-Analysis on Consumer Responses,” Journal of Marketing Research, 60 (1), 189–215.
96.
SichtmannChristinaDiamantopoulosAdamantios (2013), “The Impact of Perceived Brand Globalness, Brand Origin Image, and Brand Origin–Extension Fit on Brand Extension Success,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41 (5), 567–85.
97.
SmithDaniel C.ParkC. Whan (1992), “The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (3), 296–313.
98.
SoKevin Kam FungKingCeridwyn (2010), “‘When Experience Matters’: Building and Measuring Hotel Brand Equity: The Customers’ Perspective,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22 (5), 589–608.
99.
SoodSanjayKellerKevin Lane (2012), “The Effects of Brand Name Structure on Brand Extension Evaluations and Parent Brand Dilution,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (3), 373–82.
100.
SuLeiMongaAlokparna BasuJiangYuwei (2021), “How Life-Role Transitions Shape Consumer Responses to Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 58 (3), 579–94.
101.
SundeLorraineBrodieRoderick J. (1993), “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions: Further Empirical Results,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10 (1), 47–53.
102.
SwaminathanVanithaGürhan-CanliZeynepKubatUmutHayranCeren (2015), “How, When, and Why Do Attribute-Complementary Versus Attribute-Similar Cobrands Affect Brand Evaluations: A Concept Combination Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (1), 45–58.
103.
SwaminathanVanithaPageKaren L.Gürhan-CanliZeynep (2007), “‘My’ Brand or ‘Our’ Brand: The Effects of Brand Relationship Dimensions and Self-Construal on Brand Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (2), 248–59.
104.
TorelliCarlos J.ÖzsomerAyşegülCarvalhoSergio W.KehHean TatMaehleNatalia (2012), “Brand Concepts as Representations of Human Values: Do Cultural Congruity and Compatibility Between Values Matter?” Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 92–108.
105.
Van RielAllard C.R.LemminkJosOuwerslootHans (2001), “Consumer Evaluations of Service Brand Extensions,” Journal of Service Research, 3 (3), 220–31.
106.
VeryzerRobert W.Jr.HutchinsonJ. Wesley (1998), “The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 374–94.
107.
VölcknerFranziskaSattlerHenrik (2006), “Drivers of Brand Extension Success,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (2), 18–34.
108.
VölcknerFranziskaSattlerHenrik (2007), “Empirical Generalizability of Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (2), 149–62.
109.
VölcknerFranziskaSattlerHenrikHennig-ThurauThorstenRingleChristian M. (2010), “The Role of Parent Brand Quality for Service Brand Extension Success,” Journal of Service Research, 13 (4), 379–96.
110.
WangPengyuanXiongGuiyangYangJian (2019), “Serial Position Effects on Native Advertising Effectiveness: Differential Results Across Publisher and Advertiser Metrics,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (2), 82–97.
111.
WernerfeltBirger (1988), “Umbrella Branding as a Signal of New Product Quality: An Example of Signalling by Posting a Bond,” RAND Journal of Economics, 19 (3), 458–66.
112.
WooldridgeJeffrey M. (2015), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 6th ed.Cengage Learning.
113.
YeoJunsangParkJongwon (2006), “Effects of Parent-Extension Similarity and Self Regulatory Focus on Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (3), 272–82.
114.
YooBoongheeDonthuNaveenLeeSungho (2000), “An Examination of Selected Marketing Mix Elements and Brand Equity,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 195–211.
115.
YouYaVadakkepattGautham G.JoshiAmit M. (2015), “A Meta-Analysis of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Elasticity,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (2), 19–39.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
