Commercializing technological innovations is a strategic goal in entrepreneurial ventures and established firms. A fundamental decision that remains understudied in this context is the form in which the innovation is to be commercialized. The authors term this decision the firm's “product-form strategy” for the innovation. In Study 1, they employ a theories-in-use approach and, using in-depth interviews and field observations with technology entrepreneurs and angel investors, develop a theory of product-form strategy—to market the innovation as know-how, a component, or a system—and identify the primary drivers of this choice. The theory is tested using a multimethod, multicontext approach. In Study 2, the authors use proprietary investment proposals generated by entrepreneurial ventures when they seek support from angel investors. In Study 3, they test the theory using video transcriptions of technology proposals from the television show Shark Tank. In Study 4, the authors assess the internal validity of the theory with active angel investors as subjects. They find consistent support for their theory and conclude with implications for theory and managerial practice.
AguinisHermanBradleyKyle J. (2014), “Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies,” Organizational Research Methods, 17 (4), 351–71.
2.
AroraAshish (1996), “Testing for Complementarities in Reduced-Form Regressions: A Note,” Economics Letters, 50 (1), 51–55.
BarneyJay (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.
5.
BigelowLyda S.BarneyJay B. (2021), “What Can Strategy Learn from the Business Model Approach?” Journal of Management Studies, 58 (2), 528–39.
6.
BosoNathanielAdeolaOgechiDansoAlbertAssadiniaShahin (2019), “The Effect of Export Marketing Capabilities on Export Performance: Moderating Role of Dysfunctional Competition,” Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 137–45.
7.
BuvikArntJohnGeorge (2000), “When Does Vertical Coordination Improve Industrial Purchasing Relationships?” Journal of Marketing, 64 (4), 52–64.
8.
ChallagallaGoutamMurthaBrian R.JaworskiBernard (2014), “Marketing Doctrine: A Principles-Based Approach to Guiding Marketing Decision Making in Firms,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (4), 4–20.
9.
ChallagallaGoutamVenkateshR.KohliAjay K. (2009), “Proactive Postsales Service: When and Why Does It Pay Off?” Journal of Marketing, 73 (2), 70–87.
10.
ChandyRajeshHopstakenBrigitteNarasimhanOmPrabhuJaideep (2006), “From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 494–508.
11.
CoaseRonald Harry (1937), “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4 (16), 386–405.
12.
CohenWesley M.LevinthalDaniel A. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–52.
13.
CorbinJulietStraussAnselm (2008), “Strategies for Qualitative Data Analysis,” in Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, 65–86.
14.
DayGeorge S. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 37.
15.
EisenhardtKathleen M.SchoonhovenClaudia Bird (1996), “Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms,” Organization Science, 7 (2), 136–50.
16.
EthirajSendil K.LevinthalDanielRoyRishi R. (2008), “The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation,” Management Science, 54 (5), 939–55.
17.
FarrellJosephWeiserPhilip J. (2003), “Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age,” Harvard Journal of Law &Technology, 17, 86–118.
18.
FossNicolai J. (2005), Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources. Oxford University Press.
19.
FürstAndreasLeimbachMartinPriggeJana-Kristin (2017), “Organizational Multichannel Differentiation: An Analysis of its Impact on Channel Relationships and Company Sales Success,” Journal of Marketing, 81 (1), 59–82.
20.
GansJoshua S.HsuDavid H.SternScott (2008), “The Impact of Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights on the Market for Ideas: Evidence from Patent Grant Delays,” Management Science, 54 (5), 982–97.
21.
GansJoshua SSternScott (2003), “The Product Market and the Market for ‘Ideas’: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs,” Research Policy, 32 (2), 333–50.
22.
GhoshMrinalDuttaShantanuStremerschStefan (2006), “Customizing Complex Products: When Should the Vendor Take Control?” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (4), 664–79.
23.
GhoshMrinalJohnGeorge (2005), “Strategic Fit in Industrial Alliances: An Empirical Test of Governance Value Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (3), 346–57.
24.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L. (2017), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge.
25.
GoldmanMichaelDuranMaximillian (2019), “Fancam: A New Channel Management Strategy,” Harvard Business Case, Main Case, Harvard, 1–10.
26.
GriffinAbbieHauserJohn R. (1993), “The Voice of the Customer,” Marketing Science, 12 (1), 1–27.
27.
HadidaAllègre L.HeideJan B.BellSimon J. (2019), “The Temporary Marketing Organization,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (2), 1–18.
28.
HairJoseph F.BabinBarry J.AndersonRolph E.BlackWilliam C. (2019), Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning.
29.
HarzNathalieHohenbergSebastianHomburgChristian (2022), “Virtual Reality in New Product Development: Insights from Prelaunch Sales Forecasting for Durables,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (3), 157–79.
30.
HauserJohnTellisGerard J.GriffinAbbie (2006), “Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science,” Marketing Science, 25 (6), 687–717.
31.
HeideJan B.JohnGeorge (1990), “Alliances in Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (1), 24–36.
32.
HilbeJoseph M.HardinJames W. (2008), “Generalized Estimating Equations for Longitudinal Panel Analysis,” in Handbook of Longitudinal Research: Design, Measurement, and Analysis, Scott Menard, ed. Elsevier, 467–74.
33.
HomburgChristianTheelMarcusHohenbergSebastian (2020), “Marketing Excellence: Nature, Measurement, and Investor Valuations,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (4), 1–22.
34.
JacobidesMichael G.BaldwinCarliss Y.DizajiReza (2007), “From the Structure of the Value Chain to the Strategic Dynamics of Industry Sectors,” conference presentation, Academy of Management Symposium, Philadelphia.
35.
JacobidesMichael G.MacDuffieJohn Paul (2013), “How to Drive Value Your Way,” Harvard Business Review, 91 (7), 92–100.
36.
JohnGeorgeWeissAllen M.DuttaShantanu (1999), “Marketing in Technology-Intensive Markets: Toward a Conceptual Framework,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 78–91.
37.
KrippendorffKlaus (2011), Computing Krippendorff’s Alpha-Reliability,” departmental paper, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
38.
KrishnanViswanathanUlrichKarl T. (2001), “Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature,” Management Science, 47 (1), 1–21.
39.
LiangKung-YeeZegerScott L.QaqishBahjat (1992), “Multivariate Regression Analyses for Categorical Data,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 54 (1), 3–24.
40.
LoDesmondZanaroneGiorgioGhoshMrinal (2022), “Contracting to (Dis) Incentivize? An Integrative Transaction-Cost Approach on How Contracts Govern Specific Investments,” Strategic Management Journal, 43 (8), 1528–55.
41.
MadhokAnoop (2002), “Reassessing the Fundamentals and Beyond: Ronald Coase, the Transaction Cost and Resource-Based Theories of the Firm and the Institutional Structure of Production,” Strategic Management Journal, 23 (6), 535–50.
42.
MaxwellAndrew L.JeffreyScott A.LévesqueMoren (2011), “Business Angel Early Stage Decision Making,” Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (2), 212–25.
43.
MolnerSvenPrabhuJaideep C.YadavManjit S. (2019), “Lost in a Universe of Markets: Toward a Theory of Market Scoping for Early-Stage Technologies,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (2), 37–61.
44.
MoormanChristineDayGeorge S. (2016), “Organizing for Marketing Excellence,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 6–35.
45.
MoormanChristineSlotegraafRebecca J. (1999), “The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2), 239–57.
46.
NovakSharonWernerfeltBirger (2012), “On the Grouping of Tasks into Firms: Make-or-Buy with Interdependent Parts,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 21 (1), 53–77.
47.
OxleyJoanne E. (1999), “Institutional Environment and the Mechanisms of Governance: The Impact of Intellectual Property Protection on the Structure of Inter-Firm Alliances,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38 (3), 283–309.
48.
PanWei (2001), “Akaike’s Information Criterion in Generalized Estimating Equations,” Biometrics, 57 (1), 120–25.
49.
PisanoGary P.TeeceDavid J. (2007), “How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture,” California Management Review, 50 (1), 278–96.
50.
RamaswamyVenkatOzcanKerimcan (2018), “Offerings as Digitalized Interactive Platforms: A Conceptual Framework and Implications,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (4), 19–31.
51.
SanchezRon (1996), “Strategic Product Creation: Managing New Interactions of Technology, Markets, and Organizations,” European Management Journal, 14 (2), 121–38.
52.
SandeJon BingenGhoshMrinal (2018), “Endogeneity in Survey Research,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35 (2), 185–204.
53.
SharapovDmitryMacAulaySamuel C. (2022), “Design as an Isolating Mechanism for Capturing Value from Innovation: From Cloaks and Traps to Sabotage,” Academy of Management Review, 47 (1), 139–61.
54.
ShockerAllan D.SrinivasanVenkataraman (1979), “Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evaluation and Generation: A Critical Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (2), 159–80.
55.
SlotegraafRebecca J.MoormanChristineInmanJeffrey J. (2003), “The Role of Firm Resources in Returns to Market Deployment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (3), 295–309.
56.
SorescuAlina B.ChandyRajesh K.PrabhuJaideep C. (2003), “Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (4), 82–102.
57.
TeeceDavid J. (1980), “Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1 (3), 223–47.
58.
TeeceDavid J. (1986), “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy,” Research Policy, 15 (6), 285–305.
59.
TohPuay KhoonAhujaGautam (2022), “Integration and Appropriability: A Study of Process and Product Components Within a Firm’s Innovation Portfolio,” Strategic Management Journal, 43 (6), 1075–1109.
60.
TuliKapil R.KohliAjay K.BharadwajSundar G. (2007), “Rethinking Customer Solutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (3), 1–17.
61.
WarrenNooshin L.SorescuAlina (2017), “Interpreting the Stock Returns to New Product Announcements: How the Past Shapes Investors’ Expectations of the Future,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (5), 799–815.
62.
WathneKenneth H.BiongHaraldHeideJan B. (2001), “Choice of Supplier in Embedded Markets: Relationship and Marketing Program Effects,” Journal of Marketing, 65 (2), 54–66.
63.
WiesSimoneMoormanChristine (2015), “Going Public: How Stock Market Listing Changes Firm Innovation Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (5), 694–709.
64.
WiesSimoneMoormanChristineChandyRajesh K. (2022), “Innovation Imprinting: Why Some Firms Beat the Post-IPO Innovation Slump,” Journal of Marketing, 1–21.
65.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1985), “Assessing Contract,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1 (1), 177–208.
66.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1991), “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (2), 269–96.
67.
ZeithamlValarie A.JaworskiBernard J.KohliAjay K.TuliKapil R.UlagaWolfgangZaltmanGerald (2020), “A Theories-in-Use Approach to Building Marketing Theory,” Journal of Marketing, 84 (1), 32–51.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
