This study examines how the timing of review reminders affects the likelihood and quality of product review postings. The authors postulate that review reminders have two distinct effects, depending on the delivery timing. On the one hand, reminders of review posting given immediately or shortly after a product experience may threaten a consumer's freedom and prompt an adverse reaction. On the other hand, as time after the product experience passes, it may be advantageous to revive memories of review posting using delayed review reminders. To evaluate the effect of review reminders, the authors conduct two randomized field experiments. The findings show that immediate reminders reduce the chance of review postings relative to a randomized immediate control group who did not receive a reminder, consistent with the notion that the reactance induced by the violation of freedom due to instant review reminders outweighs the benefit of memory recall. Conversely, delayed reminders significantly increase the likelihood of review posting compared with a randomized delayed control, suggesting that the memory recall benefit surpasses reactance. However, the timing of review reminders has little effect on review content. The study contributes to the literature on the temporal effects of marketing activities and provides practical advice for online marketplaces to collect more product reviews.
AakerDavid A.BruzzoneDonald E. (1985), “Causes of Irritation in Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 49 (2), 47–57.
2.
AlantariHuwail J.CurrimImran S.DengYitingSinghSameer (2022), “An Empirical Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Text-Based Sentiment Analysis of Online Consumer Reviews,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39 (1), 1–19.
3.
AmarnathDebora DhanyaJaidevUma Pricilda (2021), “Toward an Integrated Model of Consumer Reactance: A Literature Analysis,” Management Review Quarterly, 71 (1), 41–90.
BleierAlexanderEisenbeissMaik (2015a), “The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising,” Journal of Retailing, 91 (3), 390–409.
6.
BleierAlexanderEisenbeissMaik (2015b), “Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where,” Marketing Science, 34 (5), 669–88.
7.
BrehmJack Williams (1966), A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press.
8.
BrehmSharon S.BrehmJack W. (2013), Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press.
9.
BrownJohn (1958), “Some Tests of the Decay Theory of Immediate Memory,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10 (1), 12–21.
10.
BurgoonMichaelAlvaroEusebioGrandpreJosephVoulodakisMichael (2002), “Revisiting the Theory of Psychological Reactance: Communicating Threats to Attitudinal Freedom,” in The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice,DillardJames PricePfauMichael, eds. SAGE Publications, 213–32.
11.
BurtchGordonHongYiliBapnaRaviGriskeviciusVladas (2018), “Stimulating Online Reviews by Combining Financial Incentives and Social Norms,” Management Science, 64 (5), 2065–82.
12.
CarteeNataleeFinkNicolePakRichard (2013), “The Effects of Reminder Type and Anticipatory Interval on Prospective Memory,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57 (1), 1750–54.
13.
ChenYanHarperF. MaxwellKonstanJosephLiSherry Xin (2010), “Social Comparisons and Contributions to Online Communities: A Field Experiment on Movielens,” American Economic Review, 100 (4), 1358–98.
14.
ChenChien ChinTsengYou-De (2011), “Quality Evaluation of Product Reviews Using an Information Quality Framework,” Decision Support Systems, 50 (4), 755–68.
15.
CohenJacob (2013), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
16.
DanaherPeter J.SmithMichael S.RanasingheKulanDanaherTracey S. (2015), “Where, When, and How Long: Factors That Influence the Redemption of Mobile Phone Coupons,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (5), 710–25.
17.
DarleyWilliam K.BlanksonCharlesLuethgeDenise J. (2010), “Toward an Integrated Framework for Online Consumer Behavior and Decision Making Process: A Review,” Psychology & Marketing, 27 (2), 94–116.
DellarocasChrysanthosNarayanRitu (2006), “A Statistical Measure of a Population’s Propensity to Engage in Post-Purchase Online Word-of-Mouth,” Statistical Science, 21 (2), 277–85.
20.
DengHuixinJinLiyinXuQian (2022), “‘Right’ on the Day: How the Timing of Date-Specific Promotions Influences Consumer Responses,” Psychology & Marketing, 39 (2), 429–40.
DoseDavid B.WalshGianfrancoBeattySharon E.ElsnerRalf (2019), “Unintended Reward Costs: The Effectiveness of Customer Referral Reward Programs for Innovative Products and Services,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (3), 438–59.
23.
DuanWenjingGuBinWhinstonAndrew B. (2008), “Do Online Reviews Matter? An Empirical Investigation of Panel Data,” Decision Support Systems, 45 (4), 1007–16.
24.
EinsteinGilles O.HollandLindsay J.McDanielMark A.GuynnMelissa J. (1992), “Age-Related Deficits in Prospective Memory: The Influence of Task Complexity,” Psychology and Aging, 7 (3), 471–78.
25.
EinsteinGilles O.McDanielMark A. (1996), “Retrieval Processes in Prospective Memory: Theoretical Approaches and Some New Empirical Findings,” Prospective Memory: Theory and Applications, BrandimonteMaria A.EinsteinGilles O.McDanielMark A., eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 115–41.
26.
EinsteinGilles O.McDanielMark A.SmithRebekah E.ShawPat (1998), “Habitual Prospective Memory and Aging: Remembering Intentions and Forgetting Actions,” Psychological Science, 9 (4), 284–88.
27.
FishbeinMartinAjzenIcek (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley.
28.
FolgerRobertGanegodaDeshani B.RiceDarryl B.TaylorReginaWoDavid X.H. (2013), “Bounded Autonomy and Behavioral Ethics: Deonance and Reactance as Competing Motives,” Human Relations, 66 (7), 905–24.
29.
FradkinAndreyGrewalElenaHoltzDavid (2021), “Reciprocity and Unveiling in Two-Sided Reputation Systems: Evidence From an Experiment on Airbnb,” Marketing Science, 40 (6), 1013–29.
30.
GarnefeldInaIsekeAnjaKrebsAlexander (2012), “Explicit Incentives in Online Communities: Boon or Bane?” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17 (1), 11–38.
31.
GhazaliAimi ShazwaniHamJaapBarakovaEmiliaMarkopoulosPanos (2018), “The Influence of Social Cues in Persuasive Social Robots on Psychological Reactance and Compliance,” Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 58–65.
32.
GodesDavidMayzlinDina (2009), “Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test,” Marketing Science, 28 (4), 721–39.
33.
GretzelUlrikeYooKyung Hyan (2008), “Use and Impact of Online Travel Reviews,” in Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2008, O’ConnorP.HöpkenW.GretzelU., eds. Springer, 35–46.
34.
GuynnMelissa J.McDanielMark A.EinsteinGilles O. (1998), “Prospective Memory: When Reminders Fail,” Memory & Cognition, 26 (2), 287–98.
35.
HartmannJochenHeitmannMarkSiebertChristianSchampChristina (2022), “More Than a Feeling: Accuracy and Application of Sentiment Analysis,” International Journal of Research in Marketing (published online June 20), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.05.005.
36.
HeckmanJames J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47 (1),153–61.
37.
HeckmanJamesIchimuraHidehikoSmithJeffreyToddPetra (1998), “Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6699, https://doi.org/10.3386/w6699.
38.
HicksJason L.MarshRichard L.RussellEdward J. (2000), “The Properties of Retention Intervals and Their Affect on Retaining Prospective Memories,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 (5), 1160–69.
39.
HumphreysKeithPhibbsCiaran S.MoosRudolf H. (1996), “Addressing Self-Selection Effects in Evaluations of Mutual Help Groups and Professional Mental Health Services: An Introduction to Two-Stage Sample Selection Models,” Evaluation and Program Planning, 19 (4), 301–08.
KarauSteven J.WilliamsKipling D. (2014), “Understanding Individual Motivation in Groups: The Collective Effort Model,” inGroups at Work: Theory and Research,TurnerMarlene E., ed.Psychology Press,127–56.
42.
KrishnanH. ShankerShapiroStewart (1999), “Prospective and Retrospective Memory for Intentions: A Two-Component Approach,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8 (2), 141–66.
43.
LaeraG.Joly-BurraE.ZuberS.BallhausenN.KünziM.IhleA.da Silva CoelhoC.HaasM.MikneviciuteG.TinelloD.KliegelM.HeringA. (2023), “Do Executive Functions Explain Older Adults’ Health-Related Quality of Life Beyond Event-Based Prospective Memory?” Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 30 (2), 135–49.
44.
LambrechtAnjaTuckerCatherine (2013), “When Does Retargeting Work? Information Specificity in Online Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (5), 561–76.
45.
LeeGyudongLeeJaeeunSanfordClive (2010), “The Roles of Self-Concept Clarity and Psychological Reactance in Compliance with Product and Service Recommendations,” Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (6), 1481–87.
46.
LevavJonathanZhuRui (2009), “Seeking Freedom Through Variety,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (4), 600–610.
47.
LiMengxiangHuangPu (2020), “Assessing the Product Review Helpfulness: Affective-Cognitive Evaluation and the Moderating Effect of Feedback Mechanism,” Information & Management, 57 (7), 103359.
48.
LiJingLuoXuemingLuXianghuaMoriguchiTakeshi (2021), “The Double-Edged Effects of E-Commerce Cart Retargeting: Does Retargeting Too Early Backfire?” Journal of Marketing, 85 (4), 123–40.
49.
LimaBeatrizNogueiraTatiane (2019), “Novel Features Based on Sentence Specificity for Helpfulness Prediction of Online Reviews,” in 2019 8th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS). IEEE, 84–89.
50.
LingKimberlyBeenenGerardLudfordPamelaWangXiaoqingChangKlarissaLiXinCosleyDanFrankowskiDanTerveenLorenRashidAl MamunurResnickPaulKrautRobert (2005), “Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (4).
LutzBernhardPröllochsNicolasNeumannDirk (2022), “Are Longer Reviews Always More Helpful? Disentangling the Interplay Between Review Length and Line of Argumentation,” Journal of Business Research, 144, 888–901.
53.
MagnoFrancescaCassiaFabioBonfantiAngeloVigoloVania (2018), “The Effects of Altruistic and Egoistic Motivations on Online Reviews Writing Frequency,” in Excellence in Services International Conference,447–55.
54.
MahyCaitlin E.V.MosesLouis J. (2011), “Executive Functioning and Prospective Memory in Young Children,” Cognitive Development, 26 (3), 269–81.
55.
McDanielMark A.EinsteinGilles O. (2000), “Strategic and Automatic Processes in Prospective Memory Retrieval: A Multiprocess Framework,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14 (7), S127–44.
56.
McHughMary L. (2012), “Interrater Reliability: The Kappa Statistic,” Biochemia Medica, 22 (3), 276–82.
57.
MelnykVladimirCarrillatFrançois A.MelnykValentyna (2022), “The Influence of Social Norms on Consumer Behavior: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (3), 98–120.
58.
MillerClaude H.LaneLindsay T.DeatrickLeslie M.YoungAlice M.PottsKimberly A. (2007), “Psychological Reactance and Promotional Health Messages: The Effects of Controlling Language, Lexical Concreteness, and the Restoration of Freedom,” Human Communication Research, 33 (2), 219–40.
59.
MontagutiElisaNeslinScott A.ValentiniSara (2016), “Can Marketing Campaigns Induce Multichannel Buying and More Profitable Customers? A Field Experiment,” Marketing Science, 35 (2), 201–17.
60.
MudambiSusan M.SchuffDavid (2010), “Research Note: What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com,” MIS Quarterly, 34 (1), 185–200.
61.
OrbellSheinaHodgkinsSarahSheeranPaschal (1997), “Implementation Intentions and the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23 (9), 945–54.
62.
Picazo-VelaSergioChouShih YungMelcherArlyn J.PearsonJohn M. (2010), “Why Provide an Online Review? An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior and the Role of Big-Five Personality Traits,” Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (4), 685–96.
63.
PokrywczynskiJamesCrowleyJohn H. (1993), “The Influence of Irritating Commercials on Radio Listening Habits,” Journal of Radio Studies, 2 (1), 51–68.
PriestleyGinaRobertsSusanPipeMargaret-Ellen (1999), “Returning to the Scene: Reminders and Context Reinstatement Enhance Children’s Recall,” Developmental Psychology, 35 (4), 1006–19.
66.
PuhaniPatrick (2000), “The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 14 (1), 53–68.
67.
QiaoDandanLeeShun-YangWhinstonAndrew B.WeiQiang (2020), “Financial Incentives Dampen Altruism in Online Prosocial Contributions: A Study of Online Reviews,” Information Systems Research, 31 (4), 1361–75.
68.
QuickBrian L.ShenLijiangDillardJames Price (2013), “Reactance Theory and Persuasion,” in The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, DillardJames PriceShenLijiang, eds. SAGE Publications, 167–83.
69.
RanjanPriyadarshiAcharyuluG.V.R.K. (2022), “An Exploration of Online Marketplace Quality Dimension and Relationship with Purchase Intention: The Mediating Roles of Trust and e-WOM,” International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, 13 (4), 490–512.
70.
ReichJohn W.RobertsonJerie L. (1979), “Reactance and Norm Appeal in Anti-Littering Messages,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9 (1), 91–101.
SahniNavdeep S.NarayananSridharKalyanamKirthi (2019), “An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Retargeted Advertising: The Role of Frequency and Timing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (3), 401–18.
73.
SemykinaAnastasiaWooldridgeJeffrey M. (2010), “Estimating Panel Data Models in the Presence of Endogeneity and Selection,” Journal of Econometrics, 157 (2), 375–80.
74.
SheppardBlair H.HartwickJonWarshawPaul R. (1988), “The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (3), 325–43.
75.
SimJuliusWrightChris C. (2005), “The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements,” Physical Therapy, 85 (3), 257–68.
76.
StockJames H.WatsonMark W. (2003), Introduction to Econometrics. Addison-Wesley.
77.
SunYachengDongXiaojingMcIntyreShelby (2017), “Motivation of User-Generated Content: Social Connectedness Moderates the Effects of Monetary Rewards,” Marketing Science, 36 (3), 329–37.
78.
ThakurRakhi (2018), “Customer Engagement and Online Reviews,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 48–59.
79.
TongSiliangLuoXuemingXuBo (2020), “Personalized Mobile Marketing Strategies,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (1), 64–78.
80.
VermeulenIvar E.SeegersDaphne (2009), “Tried and Tested: The Impact of Online Hotel Reviews on Consumer Consideration,” Tourism Management, 30 (1), 123–27.
81.
WendlandtMarkSchraderUlf (2007), “Consumer Reactance Against Loyalty Programs,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24 (5), 293–304.
WollerKevin M.P.BuboltzWalter C.LovelandJames M. (2007), “Psychological Reactance: Examination Across Age, Ethnicity, and Gender,” The American Journal of Psychology, 120 (1), 15–24.
84.
YooKyung HyanGretzelUlrike (2008), “What Motivates Consumers to Write Online Travel Reviews?” Information Technology & Tourism, 10 (4), 283–95.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
