A fundamental tension exists in creativity between novelty and similarity. This research exploits this tension to help creators craft successful projects in crowdfunding. To do so, the authors apply the concept of combinatorial creativity, analyzing each new project in connection to prior similar projects. By using machine learning techniques (Word2vec and Word Mover’s Distance), they measure the degrees of similarity between crowdfunding projects on Kickstarter. They analyze how this similarity pattern relates to a project’s funding performance and find that (1) the prior level of success of similar projects strongly predicts a new project’s funding performance, (2) the funding performance increases with a balance between being novel and imitative, (3) the optimal funding goal is close to the funds raised by prior similar projects, and (4) the funding performance increases with a balance between atypical and conventional imitation. The authors use these findings to generate actionable recommendations for project creators and crowdfunding platforms.
AgrawalAjayCataliniChristianGoldfarbAvi (2015), “Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24 (2), 253–74.
2.
AndersonChris (2006), The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. New York: Hyperion Books.
3.
BapnaSofia (2017), “Complementarity of Signals in Early-Stage Equity Investment Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment,” Management Science, 65 (2), 933–52.
BergerJonahPackardGrant (2018), “Are Atypical Things More Popular?” Psychological Science, 29 (7), 1178–84.
7.
BleiDavid M.NgAndrew Y.JordanMichael I. (2003), “Latent Dirichlet Allocation,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3 (January), 993–1022.
8.
BurtchGordonGhoseAnindyaWattalSunil (2015), “The Hidden Cost of Accommodating Crowdfunder Privacy Preferences: A Randomized Field Experiment,” Management Science, 61 (5), 949–62.
9.
ButticèVincenzoColomboMassimo G.WrightMike (2017), “Serial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41 (2), 183–207.
10.
DahlDarren W.MoreauPage (2002), “The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking During New Product Ideation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (1), 47–60.
11.
DaiHengchenZhangDennis J. (2019), “Prosocial Goal Pursuit in Crowdfunding: Evidence from Kickstarter,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (3), 498–517.
12.
DeerwesterScottDumaisSusan T.FurnasGeorge W.LandauerThomas K.HarshmanRichard (1990), “Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (6), 391–407.
13.
EbbesPeterPapiesDominikvan HeerdeHarald J. (2011), “The Sense and Non-Sense of Holdout Sample Validation in the Presence of Endogeneity,” Marketing Science, 30 (6), 1115–22.
14.
FinkeRonald A.WardThomas B.SmithSteven M. (1992), Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. Cambridge: MIT Press.
15.
GoldenbergJacobMazurskyDavid (2002), Creativity in Product Innovation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GoldenbergJacobLehmannDonald R.MazurskyDavid (2001), “The Idea Itself and the Circumstances of Its Emergence as Predictors of New Product Success,” Management Science, 47 (1), 69–84.
17.
GoldenbergJacobMazurskyDavidSolomonSorin (1999), “Toward Identifying the Inventive Templates of New Products: A Channeled Ideation Approach,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2), 200–210.
18.
HyytinenAriPajarinenMikaRouvinenPetri (2015), “Does Innovativeness Reduce Startup Survival Rates?” Journal of Business Venturing, 30 (4), 564–81.
19.
ImSubinWorkmanJohn P.Jr. (2004), “Market Orientation, Creativity, and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (2), 114–32.
KuppuswamyVenkatBayusBarry L. (2017), “Does My Contribution to Your Crowdfunding Project Matter?” Journal of Business Venturing, 32 (1), 72–89.
22.
KusnerMattSunYuKolkinNicholas I.WeinbergerKilian Q. (2015), “From Word Embeddings to Document Distances,” in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 957–66.
23.
LinMingfengPrabhalaNagpurnanand R.ViswanathanSiva (2013), “Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending,” Management Science, 59 (1), 17–35.
24.
LuoLanToubiaOlivier (2015), “Improving Online Idea Generation Platforms and Customizing the Task Structure on The Basis of Consumers’ Domain-Specific Knowledge,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (5), 100–114.
25.
MikolovTomasChenKaiCorradoGregDeanJeffrey (2013), “Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space,” in Proceedings of Workshop at International Conference on Learning Representations, https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.
26.
MikolovTomasSutskeverIlyaChenKaiCorradoGregDeanJeffrey (2013), “Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and Their Compositionality,” in Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3111–19, https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4546.
27.
MollickEthan (2014), “The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (1), 1–16.
28.
NetzerOdedLemaireAlainHerzensteinMichal (2019), “When Words Sweat: Identifying Signals for Loan Default in the Text of Loan Applications,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (6), 960–80.
29.
SchumpeterJoseph A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
SethiRajeshSmithDaniel C.Whan ParkC. (2001), “Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (1), 73–85.
31.
StankoMichael A.HenardDavid H. (2016), “How Crowdfunding Influences Innovation,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 57 (3), 15.
32.
SteigenbergerNorbertWilhelmHendrik (2018), “Extending Signaling Theory to Rhetorical Signals: Evidence from Crowdfunding,” Organization Science, 29 (3), 529–46.
33.
StephenAndrew T.ZubcsekPeter PalGoldenbergJacob (2016), “Lower Connectivity Is Better: The Effects of Network Structure on Redundancy of Ideas and Customer Innovativeness in Interdependent Ideation Tasks,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (2), 263–79.
34.
TellisGerard J.MacInnisDeborah J.TirunillaiSeshadriZhangYanwei (2019), “What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (4), 1–20.
Van de RijtArnoutKangSoong MoonRestivodMichaelPatileAkshay (2014), “Field Experiments of Success-Breeds-Success Dynamics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (19), 6934–39.
38.
WeiYanhao Max (2020), “The Similarity Network of Motion Pictures,” Management Science, 66 (4), 1647–71.
39.
WeitzmanMartin L. (1998), “Recombinant Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (2), 331–60.
YounHyejinStrumskyDeborahBettencourtLuis M.A.LoboJose (2015), “Invention as a Combinatorial Process: Evidence from US Patents,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12 (106), 20150272.
42.
YounkinPeterKuppuswamyVenkat (2017), “The Colorblind Crowd? Founder Race and Performance in Crowdfunding,” Management Science, 64 (7), 3269–87.
ZvilichovskyDavidDanzigerShaiSteinhartYael (2018), “Making-the-Product-Happen: A Driver of Crowdfunding Participation,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 41, 81–93.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
