Despite evidence that consumers appreciate freedom of choice, they also enjoy recommendation systems, subscription services, and marketplace encounters that seemingly occur by chance. This article proposes that enjoyment can, in some contexts, be higher than that in contexts involving choice. This occurs as a result of feelings of serendipity that arise when a marketplace encounter is positive, unexpected, and attributed to some degree of chance. A series of studies shows that feelings of serendipity positively influence an array of consumer outcomes, including satisfaction and enjoyment, perceptions of meaningfulness of an experience, likelihood of recommending a company, and likelihood of purchasing additional products from the company. The findings show that strategies based on serendipity are even more effective when consumers perceive that randomness played a role in how an encounter occurred, and not effective when the encounter is negative, the encounter occurs deterministically (i.e., planned by marketers to target consumers), and consumers perceive that they have enough knowledge to make their own choices. Altogether, this research suggests that marketers can influence customer satisfaction by structuring marketplace encounters to appear more serendipitous, as opposed to expected or entirely chosen by the consumer.
BottiSimonaIyengarSheena S. (2006), “The Dark Side of Choice: When Choice Impairs Social Welfare,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25 (1), 24–38.
2.
BottiSimonaMcGillAnn L. (2006), “When Choosing Is Not Deciding: The Effect of Perceived Responsibility on Satisfaction,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (2), 211–19.
3.
BrehmJack W. (1972), Responses to Loss of Freedom: A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
4.
CalvoManuel G.CastilloM. Dolores (2001), “Selective Interpretation in Anxiety: Uncertainty for Threatening Events,” Cognition and Emotion, 15 (3), 299–320.
5.
CarmonZivWertenbrochKlausZeelenbergMarcel (2003), “Option Attachment: When Deliberating Makes Choosing Feel Like Losing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (1), 15–29.
6.
CelmaOscar (2010), “Music Recommendation,” in Music Recommendation and Discovery: The Long Tail, Long Fail, and Long Play in the Digital Music Space, CelmaOscar, ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 43–85.
7.
ChernevAlexander (2003), “When More Is Less and Less Is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (2), 170–83.
8.
CunhaMiguel Pina (2005), “Serendipity: Why Some Organizations Are Luckier than Others,” working paper, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, FEUNL Working Paper Series.
9.
CutrightKeisha M.SamperAdriana (2014), “Doing It the Hard Way: How Low Control Drives Preferences for High-Effort Products and Services,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (3), 730–45.
10.
DuranteKristinaLaranJuliano (2016), “The Effect of Stress on Consumer Saving and Spending,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (5), 814–28.
11.
Faraji-RadAliPhamMichel Tuan (2017), “Uncertainty Increases the Reliance on Affect in Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (1), 1–21.
12.
FeatherNorman T.SimonJerrold G. (1971), “Attribution of Responsibility and Valence of Outcome in Relation to Initial Confidence and Success and Failure of Self and Other,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18 (2), 173–88.
13.
FeldmanJack M.LynchJohn G. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (3), 421–35.
14.
GeYongXiongHuiTuzhilinAlexanderXiaoKeliGruteserMarcoPazzaniMichael (2010), “An Energy-Efficient Mobile Recommender System,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, RaoBharatKrishnapuramBalaji, eds. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 899–908.
HayesAndrew F. (2018), An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford.
17.
HeilmanCarrie M.NakamotoKentRaoAmbar G. (2002), “Pleasant Surprises: Consumer Response to Unexpected In-Store Coupons,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (2), 242–52.
18.
HeineSteven J.ProulxTravisVohsKathleen D. (2006), “The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10 (2), 88–110.
19.
HerlockerJonathan L.KonstanJoseph A.TerveenLoren G.RiedlJohn T. (2004), “Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 22 (1), 5–53.
20.
IyengarSheena S.LepperMark R. (1999), “Rethinking the Value of Choice: A Cultural Perspective on Intrinsic Motivation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (3), 349–66.
21.
KimMin GyungMattilaAnna S. (2010), “The Impact of Mood States and Surprise Cues on Satisfaction,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29 (3), 432–36.
22.
KingLaura A.HicksJoshua A.KrullJennifer L.GaisoAmber K. Del (2006), “Positive Affect and the Experience of Meaning in Life,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (1), 179–96.
23.
KotkovDenisWangShuaiqiangVeijalainenJari (2016), “A Survey of Serendipity in Recommender Systems,” Knowledge-Based Systems, 111, 180–92.
24.
KrantzDavid L. (1998), “Taming Chance: Social Science and Everyday Narratives,” Psychological Inquiry9 (2), 87–94.
25.
KrayLaura J.GeorgeLinda G.LiljenquistKatie A.GalinskyAdam D.TetlockPhilip E.RoeseNeal J. (2010), “From What Might Have Been to What Must Have Been: Counterfactual Thinking Creates Meaning,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (1), 106–18.
26.
LambertNathaniel M.StillmanTyler F.HicksJoshua A.KambleShanmukhBaumeisterRoy F.FinchamFrank D. (2013), “To Belong Is to Matter: Sense of Belonging Enhances Meaning in Life,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39 (11), 1418–27.
27.
LaranJulianoTsirosMichael (2013), “An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Uncertainty in Marketing Promotions Involving Free Gifts,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (2), 112–23.
28.
LeeWei-PoLiuChih-HungLuCheng-Che (2002), “Intelligent Agent-Based Systems for Personalized Recommendations in Internet Commerce,” Expert Systems with Applications, 22 (4), 275–84.
29.
LeongTuckVetereFrankHowardSteve (2008), “Abdicating Choice: The Rewards of Letting Go,” Digital Creativity, 19 (4), 233–43.
30.
LindgreenAdamVanhammeJoëlle (2003), “To Surprise or Not to Surprise Your Customers: The Use of Surprise as a Marketing Tool,” Journal of Customer Behaviour, 2 (2), 219–42.
31.
LoewensteinGeorge (1994), “The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Reinterpretation,” Psychological Bulletin, 116 (1), 75–98.
32.
MakriStephannBlandfordAnn (2012), “Coming Across Information Serendipitously–Part 1: A Process Model,” Journal of Documentation, 68 (5), 684–705.
33.
MattChristianBenlianAlexanderHessThomasWeißChristian (2014), “Escaping from the Filter Bubble? The Effects of Novelty and Serendipity on Users’ Evaluations of Online Recommendations,” in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2014), MyersMichael D.StraubDetmar W., eds. Auckland, New Zealand: Association for Information Systems, 1503–20.
34.
McCay-PeetLoriTomsElaine G. (2010), “The Process of Serendipity in Knowledge Work,” in Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context, BelkinNicholas J., ed. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 377–82.
MellersBarbara A.SchwartzAlanHoKattyRitovIlana (1997), “Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options,” Psychological Science, 8 (6), 423–29.
37.
MeloRicardoCarvalhaisMiguel (2013), “The Design of Horacle: Inducing Serendipity on the Web,” in xCoAx 2013: Proceedings of the First Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics and X, VerdicchioMarioCarvalhaisMiguel, eds. Porto, Portugal: Universidade do Porto, 183–91.
38.
MorewedgeCarey K.GiblinColleen E.NortonMichael I. (2014), “The (Perceived) Meaning of Spontaneous Thoughts,” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143 (4), 1742–54.
39.
ParkerMina (2008), Silver Linings: Meditations on Finding Joy and Beauty in Unexpected Places. Newburyport, MA: Conari Press.
40.
RaghunathanRajagopalIrwinJulie R. (2001), “Walking the Hedonic Product Treadmill: Default Contrast and Mood-Based Assimilation in Judgments of Predicted Happiness with a Target Product,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (3), 355–68.
41.
ReisenzeinRainerHorstmannGernotSchützwohlAchim (2019), “The Cognitive-Evolutionary Model of Surprise: A Review of the Evidence,” Topics in Cognitive Science, 11 (1), 50–74.
42.
ShanahanMichael J.PorfeliErik J. (2006), “Chance Events in the Life Course,” Advances in Life Course Research, 11, 97–119.
43.
SharotTaliDeBenedettoMartinoDolanRaymond J. (2009), “How Choice Reveals and Shapes Expected Hedonic Outcome,” Journal of Neuroscience, 29 (12), 3760–65.
44.
Stiensmeier-PelsterJoachimMartiniAliceReisenzeinRainer (1995), “The Role of Surprise in the Attribution Process,” Cognition and Emotion, 9 (1), 5–31.
45.
ValenzuelaAnaMellersBarbaraStrebelJudi (2010), “Pleasurable Surprises: A Cross-Cultural Study of Consumer Responses to Unexpected Incentives,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 792–805.
46.
VanBergenNoahLaranJuliano (2016), “Loss of Control and Self-Regulation: The Role of Childhood Lessons,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (4), 534–48.
47.
WalpoleHorace (1754), “Letter to Horace Mann, 28 January 1754,” in Horace Walpole’s Correspondence: Yale Edition [Electronic Version], Vol. 20, LewisWilmarth S., ed. Farmington, CT: The Lewis Walpole Library, Yale University, 407–408. https://images.library.yale.edu/hwcorrespondence/page.asp?vol=20&seq=435.
48.
WestbrookRobert A.OliverRichard L. (1991), “The Dimensionality of Consumption Emotion Patterns and Consumer Satisfaction,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (1), 84–91.
49.
ZhangYuan CaoSéaghdhaDiarmuid Ó.QuerciaDanieleJamborTamas (2012), “Auralist: Introducing Serendipity into Music Recommendation,” in Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, AdarEytanTeevanJaime, eds. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 13–22.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
