The authors investigate app publishers’ decisions to offer free, paid, or both versions of an app over an app’s lifetime by taking into account the interplays between the demand for the free and paid versions and publishers’ consideration of future profit streams. Their empirical analyses are based on a comprehensive model of publishers’ versioning decisions calibrated on a data set of 584 top-downloaded apps on Google Play. They find contemporaneous cannibalization but positive intertemporal cross-effects on new users’ demand between the two versions. In addition, the free version’s active user base and in-app purchase and advertising revenues are reduced by the presence of a paid version, but not vice versa. Among the three options, offering the paid version first is the most common optimal launch strategy and applies to 40% of apps in the data. The evolutionary patterns of optimal versioning decisions vary by app category and are related to apps’ abilities to monetize different revenue sources. This study provides insights on how to strategically manage the versioning decision over an app’s lifetime and shows how publishers can make their free version apps more profitable via the deployment or elimination of the paid version.
AroraSandeepTer HofstedeFrenkelMahajanVijay (2017), “The Implications of Offering Free Versions for the Performance of Paid Mobile Apps,” Journal of Marketing,
81 (6), 62–78.
4.
Ben-AkivaMoshe E.LermanSteven R. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Vol. 9. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
CalzadaJoanVallettiTommaso M. (2012), “Intertemporal Movie Distribution: Versioning When Customers Can Buy Both Versions,” Marketing Science, 31 (4), 649–67.
11.
CarareOctavian (2012), “The Impact of Bestseller Rank on Demand: Evidence from the App Market,” International Economic Review, 53 (3), 717–42.
12.
ChengHsing K.TangQian C. (2010), “Free Trial or No Free Trial: Optimal Software Product Design with Network Effects,” European Journal of Operational Research,
205 (2) 437–47.
13.
ChingAndrew T.ImaiSusumuIshiharaMasakazuJainNeelam (2012), “A Practitioner’s Guide to Bayesian Estimation of Discrete Choice Dynamic Programming Models,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10 (2), 151–96.
DengYitingLambrechtAnjaLiuYongdong (2020), “Spillover Effects and Freemium Strategy in the Mobile App Market,” SSRN (March 26), https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3149550.
17.
GelfandAlan. E.DeyDipak K. (1994), “Bayesian Model Choice: Asymptotics and Exact Calculations,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 56 (3), 501–14.
18.
GewekeJohn (1992), “Evaluating the Accuracy of Sampling-Based Approaches to the Calculation of Posterior Moments,” in Bayesian Statistics 4, BernardoJ.M.BergerJ.DawidA.P.SmithA.F.M., eds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 169–93.
19.
GhoseAnindyaHanSang P. (2014), “Estimating Demand for Mobile Applications in the New Economy,” Management Science, 60 (6), 1470–88.
20.
GraceMichael C.ZhouWuJiangXuxianSadeghiAhmed-Reza (2012), “Unsafe Exposure Analysis of Mobile In-App Advertisements,” in Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 101–12.
HaruvyErnanPrasadAshutosh (2001), “Optimal Freeware Quality in the Presence of Network Externalities: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11 (2), 231–48.
23.
HolmesJohn H.LettJohn D. (1977), “Product Sampling and Word of Mouth,” Journal of Advertising, 17 (5), 35–40.
IshiharaMasakazuChingAndrew T. (2019), “Dynamic Demand for New and Used Durable Goods Without Physical Depreciation: The Case of Japanese Video Games,” Marketing Science, 38 (3), 392–416.
26.
JiangRennaManchandaPuneetRossiPeter E. (2009), “Bayesian Analysis of Random Coefficient Logit Models Using Aggregate Data,” Journal of Econometrics, 149 (2), 136–48.
27.
JiangZhengruiSarkarSumit (2009), “Speed Matters: The Role of Free Software Offer in Software Diffusion,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 26 (3), 207–40.
KadiyaliVrindaSudhirK.RaoVithala R. (2011), “Structural Analysis of Competitive Behavior: New Empirical Industrial Organization Methods in Marketing,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18 (1/2), 161–86.
KublerRaoulPauwelsKoenYildirimGokhanFandrichThomas (2018), “App Popularity: Where in the World Are Consumers Most Sensitive to Price and User Ratings?” Journal of Marketing, 82 (5), 20–44.
32.
KumarSubodhaSethiSuresh P. (2009), “Dynamic Pricing and Advertising for Web Content Providers,” European Journal of Operational Research, 197 (3), 924–44.
33.
LambrechtAnjaGoldfarbAviBonattiAviGhoseAnindyaGoldsteinDaniel G.LewisRandall, et al. (2014), “How Do Firms Make Money Selling Digital Goods Online?” Marketing Letters, 25 (3), 331–41.
34.
MoorthyK. SridharPngIvan P.L. (1992), “Market Segmentation, Cannibalization, and the Timing of Product Introductions,” Management Science,
38 (3), 345–59.
PrasadAshutoshMahajanVijayBronnenbergBart (2003), “Advertising Versus Pay-Per-View in Electronic Media,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20 (1), 13–30.
38.
RustJohn (1987), “Optimal Replacement of GMC Bus Engines: An Empirical Model of Harold Zurcher,” Econometrica, 55 (5), 999–1033.
39.
RutzOliverAravindakshanAshwinRubelOlivier (2019), “Measuring and Forecasting Mobile Game App Engagement,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36 (2), 185–99.
WilcoxMarkVoskoglouChristina (2014), “Developer Economics: State of the Developer Nation Q3 2014,” research report, Vision Mobile.
46.
ZhouYiyi (2017), “Bayesian Estimation of a Dynamic Model of Two-Sided Markets: Application to the U.S. Video Game Industry,” Management Science, 63 (11), 3874–94.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
