Advances in technology, particularly smartphones, have unlocked new opportunities for consumers to generate content about experiences while they unfold (e.g., by texting, posting to social media, writing notes), and this behavior has become nearly ubiquitous. The present research examines the effects of generating content during ongoing experiences. Across nine studies, the authors show that generating content during an experience increases feelings of immersion and makes time feel like it is passing more quickly, which in turn enhances enjoyment of the experience. The authors investigate these effects across a broad array of experiences both inside and outside the lab that vary in duration from a few minutes to several hours, including positive and negative videos and real-life holiday celebrations. They conclude with several studies testing marketing interventions that increase content creation and find that consumers who are incentivized or motivated by social norms to generate content reap the same experiential benefits as those who create content organically. These findings illustrate how leveraging content creation to improve experiences can mutually benefit marketers and consumers.
AinleyMaryHidiSuzanneBerndorffDagmer (2002), “Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes that Mediate Their Relationship,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (3), 545–61.
2.
AlmasiJanice F.McKeownMargaret G. (1996), “The Nature of Engaged Reading in Classroom Discussions of Literature,” Journal of Literacy Research, 28 (1), 107–46.
3.
AndradeEduardo B.CohenJoel B. (2007), “On the Consumption of Negative Feelings,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (3), 283–300.
4.
AngrilliAlessandroCherubiniPaoloPaveseAntonellaManfrediniSara (1997), “The Influence of Affective Factors on Time Perception,” Perception & Psychophysics, 59 (6), 972–82.
5.
BaraschAlixandraDiehlKristinSilvermanJackieZaubermanGal (2017), “Photographic Memory: The Effects of Volitional Photo Taking on Memory for Visual and Auditory Aspects of an Experience,” Psychological Science, 28 (8), 1056–66.
6.
BaraschAlixandraZaubermanGalDiehlKristin (2018), “How the Intention to Share Can Undermine Enjoyment: Photo-Taking Goals and Evaluation of Experiences,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (6), 1220–37.
7.
BergerJonah (2011), “Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information,” Psychological Science, 22 (7), 891–93.
8.
BergerJonah (2014), “Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586–607.
9.
BezdekMatthew A.FoyJeffrey E.GerrigRichard J. (2013), “‘Run for It!:’ Viewers’ Participatory Responses to Film Narratives,” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7 (4), 409–16.
10.
BowmanLaura L.LevineLaura E.WaiteBradley M.GendronMichael (2010), “Can Students Really Multitask? An Experimental Study of Instant Messaging while Reading,” Computers & Education, 54 (4), 927–31.
11.
BrockmyerJeanne H.FoxChristine M.CurtissKathleen A.McBroomEvanBurkhartKimberly M.PidruznyJacquelyn N. (2009), “The Development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A Measure of Engagement in Video Game Playing,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 624–34.
12.
CampbellDavid E. (2008), “Voice in the Classroom: How an Open Classroom Climate Fosters Political Engagement Among Adolescents,” Political Behavior, 30 (4), 437–54.
13.
CharnessGaryGneezyUri (2009), “Incentives to Exercise,” Econometrica, 77 (3), 909–31.
14.
ChenZoey (2017), “Social Acceptance and Word of Mouth: How the Motive to Belong Leads to Divergent WOM with Strangers and Friends,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 613–62.
15.
ChitturiRavindraRaghunathanRajagopalMahajanVijay (2008), “Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Benefits,” Journal of Marketing, 72 (3), 48–63.
16.
ContiRegina (2001), “Time Flies: Investigating the Connection between Intrinsic Motivation and the Experience of Time,” Journal of Personality, 69 (1), 1–26.
17.
CsikszentmihalyiMihaly (1990), Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
CsikszentmihalyiMihalyLeFevreJudith (1989), “Optimal Experience in Work and Leisure,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56 (5), 815–22.
DemarqueChristopheCharalambidesLaetitiaHiltonDenis J.WaroquierLaurent (2015), “Nudging Sustainable Consumption: The Use of Descriptive Norms to Promote a Minority Behavior in a Realistic Online Shopping Environment,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 166–74.
21.
DiehlKristinZaubermanGalBaraschAlixandra (2016), “How Taking Photos Increases Enjoyment of Experiences,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111 (2), 119–40.
22.
Droit-VoletSylvieBrunotSophieNiedenthalPaula (2004), “Perception of the Duration of Emotional Events,” Cognition and Emotion, 18 (6), 849–58.
23.
DunnElizabeth W.GilbertDaniel T.WilsonTimothy D. (2011), “If Money Doesn’t Make You Happy, Then You Probably Aren’t Spending It Right,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21 (2), 115–25.
24.
DwyerRyan J.KushlevKostadinDunnElizabeth W. (2017), “Smartphone Use Undermines Enjoyment of Face-to-Face Social Interactions,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233–39.
25.
EscalasJennifer E. (2007), “Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation Versus Analytical Elaboration,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (4), 421–29.
26.
EtkinJordan (2016), “The Hidden Cost of Personal Quantification,” Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (6), 967–84.
27.
GablePhilip A.PooleBryan D. (2012), “Time Flies when You’re Having Approach-Motivated Fun: Effects of Motivational Intensity on Time Perception,” Psychological Science, 23 (8), 879–86.
28.
GallagherKelly SimsMuehleggerErich (2011), “Giving Green to Get Green? Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61 (1), 1–15.
29.
GerrigRichard J.JacovinaMatthew E. (2009), “Reader Participation in the Experience of Narrative,” Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 223–54.
30.
GoldsteinNoah J.CialdiniRobert B.GriskeviciusVladas (2008), “A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (3), 472–82.
31.
GoundarSam (2014), “The Distraction of Technology in the Classroom,” Journal of Education & Human Development, 3 (1), 211–29.
GreenMelanie C.BrockTimothy C. (2000), “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (5), 701–21.
34.
GrossJames J.LevensonRobert W. (1997), “Hiding Feelings: The Acute Effects of Inhibiting Negative and Positive Emotion,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106 (1), 95–103.
35.
HaYoungImHyunjoo (2012), “Role of Web Site Design Quality in Satisfaction and Word of Mouth Generation,” Journal of Service Management, 23 (1), 79–96.
36.
HavitzMark E.MannellRoger C. (2005), “Enduring Involvement, Situational Involvement, and Flow in Leisure and Non-Leisure Activities,” Journal of Leisure Research, 37 (2), 152–77.
37.
HembrookeHeleneGayGeri (2003), “The Laptop and the Lecture: The Effects of Multitasking in Learning Environments,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15 (1), 46–64.
38.
JacksonSusan A. (1995), “Factors Influencing the Occurrence of Flow State in Elite Athletes,” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7 (2), 138–66.
39.
JennettCharleneCoxAnna L.CairnsPaulDhopareeSamiraEppsAndrewTijsTim, et al. (2008), “Measuring and Defining the Experience of Immersion in Games,” International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 66 (9), 641–61.
40.
KillingsworthMatthew A.GilbertDaniel T. (2010), “A Wandering Mind is an Unhappy Mind,” Science, 330 (6006), 932–32.
41.
KimMyonghee (2004), “Literature Discussions in Adult L2 Learning,” Language and Education, 18 (2), 145–66.
42.
KumarViswanathanPansariAnita (2016), “Competitive Advantage Through Engagement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (4), 497–514.
43.
KwakNojinWilliamsAnn E.WangXiaoruLeeHoon (2005), “Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships Between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement,” Communication Research, 32 (1), 87–111.
44.
LadhariRiadh (2007), “The Effect of Consumption Emotions on Satisfaction and Word-of-Mouth Communications,” Psychology & Marketing, 24 (12), 1085–108.
45.
LemonKatherine N.VerhoefPeter C. (2016), “Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 69–96.
MakiAlexanderBurnsRachel J.HaLongRothmanAlexander J. (2016), “Paying People to Protect the Environment: A Meta-Analysis of Financial Incentive Interventions to Promote Proenvironmental Behaviors,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 242–55.
48.
ManiaKaterinaChalmersAlan (2001), “The Effects of Levels of Immersion on Memory and Presence in Virtual Environments: A Reality Centered Approach,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4 (2), 247–64.
49.
MannellRoger C.ZuzanekJiriLarsonReed (1988), “Leisure States and ‘Flow’ Experiences: Testing Perceived Freedom and Intrinsic Motivation Hypotheses,” Journal of Leisure Research, 20 (4), 289–304.
50.
McShaneBlake B.BöckenholtUlf (2017), “Single-Paper Meta-Analysis: Benefits for Study Summary, Theory Testing, and Replicability,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (6), 1048–63.
51.
MeierBrian P.NollSabrina W.MolokwuOluwatobi J. (2017), “The Sweet Life: The Effect of Mindful Chocolate Consumption on Mood,” Appetite, 108, 21–27.
O’BrienEdward H.AnastasioPhyllis A.BushmanBrad J. (2011), “Time Crawls when You’re Not Having Fun: Feeling Entitled Makes Dull Tasks Drag On,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37 (10), 1287–96.
54.
OfferShiraSchneiderBarbara (2011), “Revisiting the Gender Gap in Time-Use Patterns: Multitasking and Well-Being Among Mothers and Fathers in Dual-Earner Families,” American Sociological Review, 76 (6), 809–33.
PennebakerJames W.BoydRyan L.JordanKaylaBlackburnKate (2015), “The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015,”Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
57.
PineB. JosephGilmoreJames H. (1999), The Experience Economy: Work Is Theater and Every Business a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
58.
PrzybylskiAndrew K.WeinsteinNetta (2013), “Can You Connect with Me Now? How the Presence of Mobile Communication Technology Influences Face-to-Face Conversation Quality,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30 (3), 237–46.
59.
QuoidbachJordiBerryElizabeth V.HansenneMichelMikolajczakMoïra (2010), “Positive Emotion Regulation and Well-Being: Comparing the Impact of Eight Savoring and Dampening Strategies,” Personality and Individual Differences, 49 (5), 368–73.
60.
RoccaKelly A. (2010), “Student Participation in the College Classroom: An Extended Multidisciplinary Literature Review,” Communication Education, 59 (2), 185–213.
61.
RuedyNicole E.MooreCeliaGinoFrancescaSchweitzerMaurice E. (2013), “The Cheater’s High: The Unexpected Affective Benefits of Unethical Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105 (4), 531–48.
62.
SackettAaron M.MeyvisTomNelsonLeif D.ConverseBenjamin A.SackettAnna L. (2010), “You’re Having Fun When Time Flies: The Hedonic Consequences of Subjective Time Progression,” Psychological Science, 21 (1), 111–17.
63.
SanaFariaWestonTinaCepedaNicholas J. (2013), “Laptop Multitasking Hinders Classroom Learning for Both Users and Nearby Peers,” Computers & Education, 62, 24–31.
64.
SbarraDavid A.BriskinJulia L.SlatcherRichard B. (2019), “Smartphones and Close Relationships: The Case for an Evolutionary Mismatch,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14 (4), 596–618.
65.
SchmittBernd (1999), Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, and Relate to Your Company and Brands. New York: Free Press.
66.
SchultzWesley P.KhazianAzar M.ZaleskiAdam C. (2008), “Using Normative Social Influence to Promote Conservation Among Hotel Guests,” Social Influence, 3 (1), 4–23.
ThorntonBillFairesAlysonRobbinsMaijaRollinsEric (2014), “The Mere Presence of a Cell Phone May Be Distracting,” Social Psychology, 45 (6), 479–88.
69.
ToniettoGabriela N.MalkocSelin A. (2016), “The Calendar Mindset: Scheduling Takes the Fun Out and Puts the Work In,” Journal of Marketing Research, 53(6), 922–36.
70.
Van BovenLeafGilovichThomas (2003), “To Do or to Have? That Is the Question,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193–202.
71.
Villarroel OrdenesFranciscoGrewalDhruvLudwigStephanDe RuyterKoMahrDominikWetzelsMartin (2019), “Cutting Through Content Clutter: How Speech and Image Acts Drive Consumer Sharing of Social Media Brand Messages,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (5), 988–1012.
72.
VohsKathleen D.SchmeichelBrandon J. (2003), “Self-Regulation and Extended Now: Controlling the Self Alters the Subjective Experience of Time,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (2), 217–30.
73.
WardAdrian F.DukeKristenGneezyAyeletBosMaarten W. (2017), “Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2 (2), 140–54.
74.
WeibelDavidWissmathBartholomäus (2011), “Immersion in Computer Games: The Role of Spatial Presence and Flow,” International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2011, Article ID 282345.
75.
WirtzDerrickKrugerJustinScollonChristie NapaDienerEd (2003), “What to Do on Spring Break? The Role of Predicted, On-line, and Remembered Experience in Future Choice,” Psychological Science, 14 (5), 520–24.
76.
WoodEileenZivcakovaLuciaGentilePetriceArcherKarinde PasqualeDomenica, et al. (2012), “Examining the Impact of Off-task Multi-tasking with Technology on Real-Time Classroom Learning,” Computers & Education, 58 (1), 365–74.
77.
WoodRichard TAGriffithsMark D.ParkeAdrian (2007), “Experiences of Time Loss Among Videogame Players: An Empirical Study,” Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10 (1), 38–44.
78.
WuXiaoyingAndersonRichard C.Nguyen-JahielKimMillerBrian (2013), “Enhancing Motivation and Engagement Through Collaborative Discussion,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (3), 622–32.
79.
ZakayDan (2014), “Psychological Time as Information: The Case of Boredom,” Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 917.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
