While prior research has found that consumer-influenced production improves purchase intentions, the author proposes that it can counterintuitively backfire. This work demonstrates that when consumers have some control over production (e.g., ordering products on demand, customization, preordering), they have lower purchase intentions for products made with unethical processes (e.g., pollution, underpaid labor) than if they had no role in production (i.e., buying what is already in inventory). This effect reverses, however, with positive ethical production (e.g., recycled materials). Because consumers have direct responsibility for whether a product is made, feelings of anticipated guilt or gratification result depending on the ethicality of the production process. This work also proposes a novel threefold conceptualization of responsibility that can be used as managerial levers: direct responsibility, diffusion of responsibility, and broad responsibility. Field studies using Facebook’s advertising platform demonstrate positioning strategies for fair-trade brands and advocacy groups.
AgrawalVishalLeeDeishin (2016), “Responsible Sourcing,” in Environmentally Responsible Supply Chains: Opportunities and Challenges, AtasuA., ed. New York: Springer Publishing, 71–87.
2.
AgrawalVishalLeeDeishin (2019), “The Effect of Sourcing Policies on a Supplier’s Sustainable Practices,” Production and Operations Management, 28 (4), 767–87.
3.
AhluwaliaRohini (2002), “How Prevalent Is the Negativity Effect in Consumer Environments?” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2), 270–79.
BanduraAlbert (1977), “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191–215.
6.
BaronJonathanSprancaMark (1997), “Protected Values,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70 (1), 1–16.
7.
BasilDebra Z.RidgwayNancy M.BasilMichael D. (2006), “Guilt Appeals: The Mediating Effect of Responsibility,” Psychology & Marketing, 23 (12), 1035–54.
8.
BaumeisterRoy F.VohsKathleen D.DeWallC. NathanZhangLiqing (2007), “How Emotion Shapes Behavior: Feedback, Anticipation, and Reflection, Rather Than Direct Causation,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11 (2), 167–203.
9.
BendapudiNeeliSinghSurendra N.BendapudiVenkat (1996), “Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning,” Journal of Marketing, 60 (3), 33–49.
10.
BeyerFrederikeSidarusNuraBonicalziSofiaHaggardPatrick (2017), “Beyond Self-Serving Bias: Diffusion of Responsibility Reduces Sense of Agency and Outcome Monitoring,” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12 (1), 138–45.
11.
BhattacharjeeAmitBergerJonahMenonGeeta (2014), “When Identity Marketing Backfires: Consumer Agency in Identity Expression,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (2), 294–309.
12.
BiehalGabriel J.SheininDaniel A. (2007),“The Influence of Corporate Messages on the Product Portfolio,” Journal of Marketing, 71 (2), 12–25.
13.
BottiSimonaMcGillAnn L. (2006), “When Choosing Is Not Deciding: The Effect of Perceived Responsibility on Satisfaction,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (2), 211–19.
14.
BottiSimonaMcGillAnn L. (2011), “The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (6), 1065–78.
15.
BottiSimonaOrfaliKristinaIyengarSheena S. (2009), “Tragic Choices: Autonomy and Emotional Responses to Medical Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3), 337–52.
16.
BrownTom J.DacinPeter A. (1997), “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), 68–84.
17.
BuellRyan W.KimTamiTsayChia-Jung (2017), “Creating Reciprocal Value Through Operational Transparency,” Management Science, 63 (6), 1673–95.
18.
BuellRyan W.KalkanciBasak (2019), “How Transparency into Internal and External Responsibility Initiatives Influences Consumer Choice: Evidence from the Field and Lab,” Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper19-115.
19.
CachonGerardTerwieschChristian (2013), Matching Supply with Demand: An Introduction to Operations Management. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
CampbellMargaret C.WinterichKaren Page (2018), “A Framework for the Consumer Psychology of Morality in the Marketplace,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28 (2), 167–79.
22.
ChenLiLeeHau L. (2016), “Sourcing Under Supplier Responsibility Risk: The Effects of Certification, Audit, and Contingency Payment,” Management Science, 63 (9), 2795–2812.
23.
ChoSoo-HaengFangXinTayurSridharXuYing (2019), “Combating Child Labor: Incentives and Information Disclosure in Global Supply Chains,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21 (3), 692–711.
24.
DahlDarren W.FuchsChristophSchreierMartin (2015), “Why and When Consumers Prefer Products of User-Driven Firms: A Social Identification Account,” Management Science, 61 (8), 1978–88.
25.
DellaertBenedict G.C.StremerschStefan (2005), “Marketing Mass-Customized Products: Striking a Balance Between Utility and Complexity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (2), 219–27.
EhrichKristine R.IrwinJulie R. (2005), “Willful Ignorance in the Request for Product Attribute Information,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (3), 266–77.
28.
ErlandssonArvidJungstrandAmanda Å.VästfjällDaniel (2016), “Anticipated Guilt for Not Helping and Anticipated Warm Glow for Helping Are Differently Impacted by Personal Responsibility to Help,” Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1475.
29.
ForsythDonelson R.ZyzniewskiLinda E.GiammancoCheryl A. (2002), “Responsibility Diffusion in Cooperative Collectives,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (1), 54–65.
30.
FrankeNikolausPillerFrank (2004),“Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21 (6), 401–15.
31.
FrankeNikolausSchreierMartin (2008), “Product Uniqueness as a Driver of Customer Utility in Mass Customization,” Marketing Letters, 19 (2), 93–107.
32.
FrankeNikolausSchreierMartinKaiserUlrike (2010), “The ‘I Designed It Myself’ Effect in Mass Customization,” Management Science, 56 (1), 125–40.
33.
FrithChris D. (2014), “Action, Agency and Responsibility,” Neuropsychologia, 55, 137–42.
34.
FuchsChristophPrandelliEmanuelaSchreierMartin (2010), “The Psychological Effects of Empowerment Strategies on Consumers’ Product Demand,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (1), 65–79.
35.
FuchsChristophPrandelliEmanuelaSchreierMartinDahlDarren W. (2013), “All That Is Users Might Not Be Gold: How Labeling Products as User Designed Backfires in the Context of Luxury Fashion Brands,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (5), 75–91.
36.
FuchsChristophSchreierMartin (2010), “Customer Empowerment in New Product Development,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (1), 17–32.
37.
FuchsChristophSchreierMartinVan OsselaerStijn M.J. (2015), “The Handmade Effect: What’s Love Got to Do with It?” Journal of Marketing, 79 (2), 98–110.
38.
GhingoldMorry (1981), “Guilt Arousing Marketing Communications: An Unexplored Variable,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 8, MonroeKent B., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 442–48.
HayesAndrew (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford.
42.
HoffmanMartin L. (1982), “Development of Prosocial Motivation: Empathy and Guilt,” in Development of Prosocial Behavior, Eisenberg-BorgN., ed. New York: Academic Press, 281–313.
43.
HseeChristopher K. (1996), “The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67 (3), 247–57.
HuhmannBruce A.BrothertonTimothy P. (1997), “A Content Analysis of Guilt Appeals in Popular Magazine Advertisements,” Journal of Advertising, 26 (2), 35–45.
IrwinJulie R.BaronJonathan (2001), “Response Mode Effects and Moral Values,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84 (2), 177–97.
48.
IrwinJulie R.NaylorRebecca Walker (2009), “Ethical Decisions and Response Mode Compatibility: Weighting of Ethical Attributes in Consideration Sets Formed by Excluding Versus Including Product Alternatives,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (2), 234–46.
49.
JeffreyScott A. (2009), “Justifiability and the Motivational Power of Tangible Noncash Incentives,” Human Performance, 22 (2), 143–55.
50.
KangCharlesGermannFrankGrewalRajdeep (2016), “Washing Away Your Sins? Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Irresponsibility, and Firm Performance,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (2), 59–79.
51.
KarauSteven J.WilliamsKipling D. (1993), “Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (4), 681–706.
52.
KimSang-Hyun (2015), “Time to Come Clean? Disclosure and Inspection Policies for Green Production,” Operations Research63 (1), 1–20.
53.
KleinJill GabrielSmithN. CraigJohnAndrew (2004), “Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (3), 92–109.
54.
KotlerPhilip (1986), “The Prosumer Movement: A New Challenge for Marketers,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, LutzRichard J., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 510–13.
55.
KraftTimValdésLeónZhengYanchong (2019), “Motivating Supplier Social Responsibility Under Incomplete Visibility,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,forthcoming.
56.
KuppuswamyVenkatBayusBarry L. (2013), “Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers in Kickstarter,” UNC Kenan-Flagler Research Paper No. 2013-15, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
LewisHelen Block (1971), “Shame and Guilt in Neurosis,” Psychoanalytic Review, 58 (3), 419–38.
59.
LuchsMichael G.NaylorRebecca W.IrwinJulie R.RaghunathanRajagopal (2010), “The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (5), 18–31.
60.
MallettRobyn K.MelchioriKala J.StrickrothTheresa (2013), “Self-Confrontation Via a Carbon Footprint Calculator Increases Guilt and Support for a Proenvironmental Group,” Ecopsychology, 5 (1), 9–16.
61.
McWilliamsAbagailSiegelDonald (2001). “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 117–27.
62.
MenonAjayMenonAnil (1997), “Enviropreneurial Marketing Strategy: The Emergence of Corporate Environmentalism as Market Strategy,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), 51–67.
63.
MichelettiMichele (2003), “Shopping with and for Virtues,” in Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 149–68.
64.
MoreauC. PageHerdKelly B. (2010), “To Each His Own? How Comparisons with Others Influence Consumers’ Evaluations of Their Self-Designed Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 806–19.
65.
MynattCliffordShermanSteven J. (1975), “Responsibility Attribution in Groups and Individuals: A Direct Test of the Diffusion of Responsibility Hypothesis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (6), 1111–18.
PahariaNeeruAveryJillKeinanAnat (2014), “Positioning Brands Against Large Competitors to Increase Sales,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (6), 647–56.
68.
PahariaNeeruVohsKathleen. D.DeshpandéRohit (2013), “Sweatshop Labor Is Wrong Unless the Shoes Are Cute: Cognition Can Both Help and Hurt Moral Motivated Reasoning,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121 (1), 81–88.
69.
PelozaJohnWhiteKatherineShangJingzhi (2013), “Good and Guilt-Free: The Role of Self-Accountability in Influencing Preferences for Products with Ethical Attributes,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 104–19.
70.
PineB. Joseph (1999), Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
71.
PoppW. (1965), “Simple and Combined Inventory Policies, Production to Stock or to Order?” Management Science, 11 (9), 868–73.
72.
ReczekRebecca R.IrwinJulie R.ZaneDannyEhrichKristine (2018), “That’s Not How I Remember It: Willfully Ignorant Memory for Ethical Product Attributes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (1), 185–207.
73.
RajagopalanSampath (2002), “Make to Order or Make to Stock: Model and Application,” Management Science, 48 (2), 241–56.
74.
RubinMarkPaoliniStefaniaCrispRichard J. (2010), “A Processing Fluency Explanation of Bias Against Migrants,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (1), 21–28.
75.
SamiliA. Coskun (2001), Empowering the American Consumer: Corporate Responsiveness and Market Profitability. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
76.
SandıkcıÖzlemEkiciAhmet (2009), “Politically Motivated Brand Rejection,” Journal of Business Research, 62 (2), 208–17.
77.
SchreierMartinFuchsChristophDahlDarren W. (2012), “The Innovation Effect of User Design: Exploring Consumers’ Innovation Perceptions of Firms Selling Products Designed by Users,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (5), 18–32.
78.
SenSankarBhattacharyaChitra Bhanu (2001), “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), 225–43.
79.
SenSankarGürhan-CanliZeynepMorwitzVicki (2001), “Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (3), 399–417.
TofflerAlvin (1980), The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books.
85.
TropeYaacovLibermanNira (2010), “Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance,” Psychological Review, 117 (2), 440–63.
86.
TrudelRemiCotteJune (2009), “Does It Pay to Be Good?” MIT Sloan Management Review, 50 (2), 61–68.
87.
Von HippelEric (2001), “Perspective: User Toolkits for Innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18 (4), 247–57.
88.
WhiteKatherineHabibRishadHardistyDavid J. (2019), “How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to Be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework,” Journal of Marketing83 (3), 22–49.
89.
WhiteKatherineMacDonnellRhiannonEllardJohn H. (2012), “Belief in a Just World: Consumer Intentions and Behaviors Toward Ethical Products,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (1), 103–18.
90.
ZeelenbergM.BreugelmansS.M. (2008), “The Role of Interpersonal Harm in Distinguishing Regret from Guilt,” Emotion, 8 (5), 589–96.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
