Marketers strive to create cool brands, but the literature does not offer a blueprint for what “brand coolness” means or what features characterize cool brands. This research uses a mixed-methods approach to conceptualize brand coolness and identify a set of characteristics typically associated with cool brands. Focus groups, depth interviews, and an essay study indicate that cool brands are perceived to be extraordinary, aesthetically appealing, energetic, high status, rebellious, original, authentic, subcultural, iconic, and popular. In nine quantitative studies (surveys and experiments), the authors develop scale items to reliably measure the component characteristics of brand coolness; show that brand coolness influences important outcome variables, including consumers’ attitudes toward, satisfaction with, intentions to talk about, and willingness to pay for the brand; and demonstrate how cool brands change over time. At first, most brands become cool to a small niche, at which point they are perceived to be more subcultural, rebellious, authentic, and original. Over time, some cool brands become adopted by the masses, at which point they are perceived to be more popular and iconic.
AakerJennifer L. (1997), “Dimensions of Brand Personality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (3), 347–56.
2.
AnikLalinMilesJohnnyHauserRyan (2017), “A General Theory of Coolness,” Darden Case No. UVA-M-0953.
3.
BagozziRichard P. (2007), “On the Meaning of Formative Measurement and how it Differs from Reflective Measurement: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007),” Psychological Methods, 12 (2), 229–37.
4.
BagozziRichard P. (2011), “Measurement and Meaning in Information Systems and Organizational Research: Methodological and Philosophical Foundations,” MIS Quarterly, 35 (2), 261–92.
5.
BagozziRichard P.EdwardsJeffrey R. (1998), “A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research,” Organizational Research Methods, 1 (1), 45–87.
6.
BagozziRichard P.HeathertonTodd F. (1994), “A General Approach to Representing Multifaceted Personality Constructs: Application to State Self-Esteem,” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1 (1), 35–67.
7.
BagozziRichard P.YiYoujae (2012), “Specification, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (1), 8–34.
8.
BartlChristopherGouthierMatthias H.J.LenkerMarkus (2013), “Delighting Consumers Click by Click: Antecedents and Effects of Delight Online,” Journal of Service Research, 16 (3), 386–99.
9.
BatraRajeevAhuviaAaronBagozziRichard P. (2012), “Brand Love,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (2), 1–16.
10.
BeardenWilliam O.NetemeyerRichard G.TeelJesse E. (1989), “Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (4), 473–81.
11.
BeckerMarenWiegandNicoReinartzWerner J. (2019), “Does It Pay to Be Real? Understanding Authenticity in TV Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (1), 24–50.
12.
BelkRussell W.TianKellyPaavolaHeli (2010), “Consuming Cool: Behind the Unemotional Mask,” in Research in Consumers Behavior, Vol. 12, BelkRussel W., ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 183–208.
13.
BergerJonahHeathChip (2007), “Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (2), 121–34.
14.
BeverlandMichael B.LindgreenAdamVinkMichiel W. (2008), “Projecting Authenticity Through Advertising: Consumer Judgments of Advertisers’ Claims,” Journal of Advertising, 37 (1), 5–15.
15.
BiragliaAlessandroBrakusJ.JoskoNewmanGeorge E. (2019), “Be True to Be Cool: How Underdog Positioning and Authenticity Make Autonomous Brands Cool,”working paper, University of Leeds.
16.
BirdSaraTappAlan (2008), “Societal Marketing and the Meaning of Cool,” Social Marketing Quarterly, 14 (1), 18–29.
17.
BruunAndersRaptisDimitriosKjeldskovJesperSkovMikael B. (2016), “Measuring the Coolness of Interactive Products: The COOL Questionnaire,” Behaviour & Information Technology, 35 (3), 233–49.
18.
ConnorMarlene K. (1995), What Is Cool? Understanding Black Manhood in America. New York: Crown.
19.
DanesiMarcel (1994), Cool: The Signs and Meanings of Adolescence. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
20.
Dar-NimrodIlanHansenIan G.ProulxTravisLehmanD. R. (2012), “Coolness: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Individual Differences, 33 (3), 175–85.
21.
Dar-NimrodIlanGanesanAshaMacCannCarolyn (2018), “Coolness as a Trait and Its Relations to the Big Five, Self-Esteem, Social Desirability, and Action Orientation,” Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 1–6.
22.
DiamantopoulosAdamantiosRieflerPetraRothKatharina P., (2008), “Advancing Formative Measurement Models,” Journal of Business Research, 61 (12), 1203–18.
23.
EdwardsJeffrey R. (2011), “The Fallacy of Formative Measurement,” Organizational Research Methods, 14 (2), 370–88.
24.
EscalasJennifer E.BettmanJames R. (2003), “You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (3), 339–48.
25.
FinnAdam (2005), “Reassessing the Foundations of Customer Delight,” Journal of Service Research, 8 (2), 103–16.
26.
FiskeSusan T.CuddyAmy J.C.GlickPeter (2007), “Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 (2), 77–83.
27.
FittonDanielHortonMatthewReadJanet C.LittleLindaTothNicola (2012), “Climbing the Cool Wall: Exploring Teenage Preferences of Cool,” PsychNology Journal, 10 (2), 141–62.
28.
FrankThomas (1997), The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture, Counterculture, and the Rise of Hip Consumerism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
GerzemaJohnLebarEdwardRiversAnne (2009), “Measuring the Contributions of Brand to Shareholder Value,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 21 (4), 38–54.
31.
GladwellMalcolm (1997), “The Coolhunt,” The New Yorker(March 17), 78–87.
32.
GouldingChristina (2000), Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. London: Sage Publications.
33.
GubriumJaber F.HolsteinJames A. (2001). Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34.
GeuensMaggieWeijtersBertDe WulfKristof (2009), “A New Measure of Brand Personality,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26 (2), 97–107.
HurtH. ThomasJosephKatherineCookChester D. (1977), “Scales for the Measurement of Innovativeness,” Human Communication Research, 4 (1), 58–65.
45.
ImSubinBhatSubodhLeeYikuan (2015), “Consumer Perceptions of Product Creativity, Coolness, Value and Attitude,” Journal of Business Research, 68 (1), 166–72.
46.
KellerKevin Lane (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 1–22.
47.
KernerNoahPressmanGeneEssexAndrew (2007), Chasing Cool: Standing Out in Today’s Cluttered Marketplace. New York: Atria Books.
48.
LevySidney J. (1959), “Symbols for Sale,” Harvard Business Review, 37 (4), 117–24.
49.
MailerNorman (1957), The White Negro. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
50.
MartinPatricia YanceyTurnerBarry A. (1986), “Grounded Theory and Organizational Research,” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22 (2), 141–57.
51.
McCrackenGrant (1988), The Long Interview, Vol. 13. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
52.
MilnerMurray (2013), Freaks, Geeks, and Cool Kids. New York: Routledge.
53.
MohiuddinKhondker Galib B.GordonRossMageeChristopherLeeJeong Kyu (2016), “A Conceptual Framework of Cool for Social Marketing,” Journal of Social Marketing, 6 (2), 121–43.
54.
MorhartFelicitasMalärLuciaGuevremontAmelieGirardinFlorentGrohmannBianca (2015), “Brand Authenticity: An Integrative Framework and Measurement Scale,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (2), 200–218.
55.
NancarrowCliveNancarrowPamelaPageJulie (2003, “An Analysis of the Concept of Cool and Its Marketing Implications,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1 (4), 311–22.
56.
NapoliJulieDickinsonSonia J.BeverlandMichael B.FarrellyFrancis (2014), “Measuring Consumer-Based Brand Authenticity,” Journal of Business Research, 67 (6), 1090–98.
57.
NetemeyerRichard G.KrishnanBalajiPulligChrisWangGuangpingYagciMehmetDeanDwane, et al. (2004), “Developing and Validating Measures of Facets of Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Business Research, 57 (2), 209–24.
58.
NewmanGeorge E.SmithRosanna K. (2016), “Kinds of Authenticity,” Philosophy Compass, 11 (10), 609–18.
59.
NunnallyJum C. (1978), Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60.
O’DonnellKathleen A.WardlowDaniel L. (2000), “A Theory on the Origins of Coolness,” Advances in Consumer Research, 27 (1), 13–18.
61.
OliverRichard L. (1980), “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (4), 460–69.
62.
OysermanDaphnaCoonHeather M.KemmelmeierMarkus (2002), “Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, 128 (1), 3–72.
63.
ParmentierMarie-AgnèsFischerEileen (2014), “Things Fall Apart: The Dynamics of Brand Audience Dissipation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (5), 1228–51.
64.
PodsakoffPhilip M.MacKenzieScott B.LeeJeong-YeonPodsakoffNathan P. (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.
65.
PountainDickRobinsDavid (2000), Cool Rules: Anatomy of an Attitude. London: Reaktion.
66.
ReadJanetFittonDanielCowanBenjaminBealeRussellGuoYukangHortonMatthew (2011), “Understanding and Designing Cool Technologies for Teenagers,” CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, May 7–12, 1567–72.
67.
RodkinPhilip C.FarmerThomas W.PearlRuthAckerRichard Van (2006), “They’re Cool: Social Status and Peer Group Supports for Aggressive Boys and Girls,” Social Development, 15 (2), 176–204.
68.
RunyanRodney C.NohMijeongMosierJon (2013), “What Is Cool? Operationalizing the Construct in an Apparel Context,” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17 (3), 322–40.
69.
RuvioAyallaShohamAvivBrenčičMaja Makovec (2008), “Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness: Short-form Scale Development and Cross-Cultural Validation,” International Marketing Review, 25 (1), 33–53.
70.
SchoutenJohn W.McAlexanderJames H. (1995), “Subcultures of Consumption—An Ethnography of the New Bikers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (1), 43–61.
71.
SouthgateNick (2003), “Coolhunting, Account Planning and the Ancient Cool of Aristotle,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21 (7), 453–61.
72.
SriramachandramurthyRajendranHodisMonica (2010), “Why Is Apple Cool? An Examination of Brand Coolness and Its Marketing Consequences,” in Proceedings from the American Marketing Association Summer Academic Conference. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 147–48.
73.
SundarS. ShyamTamulDaniel J.MuWu (2014), “Capturing ‘Cool’: Measures for Assessing Coolness of Technological Products,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72 (2), 169–80.
74.
ThorntonSarah (1995), Club Cultures: Music, Media, and Subcultural Capital. Hanover, NH: University Press.
75.
TianKelly TepperBeardenWilliam O.HunterGary L. (2001), “Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (1), 50–66.
76.
TracyJessica L.RobinsRichard W. (2007), “The Psychological Structure of Pride: A Tale of Two Facets,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (3), 506–25.
77.
WarrenCaleb (2010), “What Makes Things Cool and Why Marketers Should Care,” doctoral dissertation, Department of Marketing, University of Colorado, Boulder.
78.
WarrenCalebCampbellMargaret C. (2014), “What Makes Things Cool? How Autonomy Influences Perceived Coolness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (2), 543–63.
79.
WarrenCalebPezzutiToddKoleyShruti (2018), “Is Being Emotionally Inexpressive Cool?” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28 (4), 560–77.
80.
WarrenCalebReimannMartin (2019), “Crazy-Funny-Cool Theory: Divergent Reactions to Unusual Product Designs,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, forthcoming.
81.
WilliamsLarry J.HartmanNathanCavazotteFlavia (2010), “Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique,” Organizational Research Methods, 13 (3), 477–514.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
