Globalization has substantially influenced the world economy. However, managers have a limited understanding of how local–global identity influences consumers’ price perceptions and behavior. In this research, the authors propose that consumers’ local (vs. global) identity leads to a greater tendency to make price–perceived quality (PPQ) associations. Perceived quality variance among comparison brands is a key mechanism underlying these effects. Two field studies (Studies 1 and 7), seven experiments (Studies 2–6, 9, and 10), and a systematic review of secondary data (Study 8) provide converging and robust evidence for the effect of local–global identity on PPQ. Consistent with the perceived quality variance account, when quality differences among the brands are made salient, PPQ associations of consumers high in global (but not local) identity significantly increase, compared with baseline conditions. However, when perceived quality similarities are made salient, PPQ associations of consumers high in local (but not global) identity significantly decrease. Product type and distribution of customer ratings represent natural boundaries for the relationship between local–global identity and PPQ. The authors conclude with the implications for managers’ targeting endeavors. We also provide specific tools that marketers can use in ads and point-of-purchase materials to encourage or discourage consumers in making PPQ associations.
ArnettJeffrey J. (2002), “The Psychology of Globalization,” American Psychologist, 57 (10), 774–83.
2.
BaoYongchuanBaoYeqingShengShibin (2011), “Motivating Purchase of Private Brands: Effects of Store Image, Product Signatureness, and Quality Variation,” Journal of Business Research, 64 (2), 220–26.
3.
CronleyMaria L.PosavacSteven S.MeyerTracyKardesFrank R.KellarisJames J. (2005), “A Selective Hypothesis Testing Perspective on Price-Quality Inference and Inference-Based Choice,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (2), 159–69.
4.
DawarNirajParkerPhilip (1994), “Marketing Universals: Consumers’ Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (2), 81–95.
5.
FeldmanJack M.LynchJohn G.Jr. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (3), 421–35.
6.
FreitasAntonio L.GollwitzerPeterTropeYaacov (2004), “The Influence of Abstract and Concrete Mindsets on Anticipating and Guiding Others’ Self-Regulatory Efforts,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752.
7.
GaoHuachaoZhangYinlongMittalVikas (2017), “How Does Local–Global Identity Affect Price Sensitivity?” Journal of Marketing, 81 (3), 62–79.
8.
HanDaheeLalwaniAshok K.DuhachekAdam (2017), “Power Distance Belief, Power, and Charitable Giving,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 182–195.
9.
HayesAndrew F. (2012), PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling. Columbus: Ohio State University.
10.
HeathTimothy B.McCarthyMichael S.MothersbaughDavid L. (1994),“Spokesperson Fame and Vividness Effects in the Context of Issue-Relevant Thinking: The Moderating Role of Competitive Setting,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 520–34.
11.
HobmanElizabeth V.BordiaPrashantGalloisCynthia (2003), “Consequences of Feeling Dissimilar from Others in a Work Team,” Journal of Business and Psychology, 17 (3), 301–25.
12.
Holbrook MorrisB.HirschmanElizabeth C. (1982), “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (2), 132–40.
13.
KardesFrank R.CronleyMaria L.KellarisJames J.PosavacSteven S. (2004), “The Role of Selective Information Processing in Price-Quality Inference,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (2), 368–74.
14.
LalwaniAshok K.ForcumLura (2016), “Does a Dollar Get You a Dollar’s Worth of Merchandise? The Impact of Power Distance Belief on Price-Quality Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (2), 317–33.
15.
LalwaniAshok K.MonroeKent B. (2005), “A Re-Examination of Frequency-Depth Effects in Consumer Price Judgments.” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 480–85.
16.
LalwaniAshok K.ShavittSharon (2009), “The ‘Me’ I Claim to Be: Cultural Self-Construal Elicits Self-Presentational Goal Pursuit,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97 (1), 88–102.
17.
LalwaniAshok K.ShavittSharon (2013), “You Get What You Pay for? Self-Construal Influences Price-Quality Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 255–67.
18.
LalwaniAshok K.ShavittSharonJohnsonTimothy (2006), “What Is the Relation Between Cultural Orientation and Socially Desirable Responding?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (1), 165–78.
19.
LalwaniAshok K.ShrumL.J.ChiuChi-Yue (2009), “Motivated Response Styles: The Role of Cultural Values, Regulatory Focus, and Self-Consciousness in Socially Desirable Responding,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 (4), 870–82.
20.
LalwaniAshok K.WangJessie J. (2019), “How Do Consumers’ Cultural Backgrounds and Values Influence Their Coupon Proneness?: A Multi-Method Investigation,” Journal of Consumer Research(published online April 12, 2018), DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucy033.
21.
LambertonCait PoynorDiehlKristin (2013), “Retail Choice Architecture: The Effects of Benefit-and Attribute-based Assortment Organization on Consumer Perceptions and Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 393–411.
22.
LiJianshengWangSiyaZhengHaoPanDefuWangYueYangYang (2018), “Overseas Study Experience and Global Processing Style,” Current Psychology, 1–6.
23.
LichtensteinDonald R.RidgwayNancy M.NetemeyerRichard G. (1993), “Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 234–245.
24.
LovelockChristopherGummessonEvert (2004), “Whither Services Marketing? In Search of a New Paradigm and Fresh Perspectives,” Journal of Service Research, 7 (1), 20–41.
25.
LynchJohn G.Jr. (2006), “Accessibility-Diagnosticity and the Multiple Pathway Anchoring and Adjustment Model,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (1), 25–27.
26.
MaZhenfengYangZhiyongMouraliMehdi (2014), “Consumer Adoption of New Products: Independent Versus Interdependent Self-Perspectives,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (2), 101–17.
27.
MonroeKent B. (2003), Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
MouraliMehdiYangZhiyong (2013), “The Dual Role of Power in Resisting Social Influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (3), 539–54.
29.
MullerDominiqueJuddCharles M.YzerbytVincent Y. (2005), “When Moderation Is Mediated and Mediation Is Moderated,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89 (6), 852–63.
30.
MussweilerThomas (2001), “‘Seek and Ye Shall Find’: Antecedents of Assimilation and Contrast in Social Comparison,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (5), 499–509.
31.
MussweilerThomas (2003), “Comparison Processes in Social Judgment: Mechanisms and Consequences,” Psychological Review, 110 (3), 472–89.
32.
NgSharonBatraRajeev (2017), “Regulatory Goals in a Globalized World,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (2), 270–77.
33.
ParkHanyongLalwaniAshok K.SilveraDavid (2019), “The Impact of Resource Scarcity on Price-Quality Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, forthcoming.
34.
ReedAmericusForehandMark R.PuntoniStefanoWarlopLuk (2012), “Identity-Based Consumer Behavior,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (4), 310–21.
35.
RheeEunUlemanJames S.LeeHoon K. (1996), “Variations in Collectivism and Individualism by Ingroup and Culture: Confirmatory Factor Analyses,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (5), 1037–54.
36.
SchwarzNorbertOysermanDaphnaPeytchevaEmilia (2010), “Cognition, Communication, and Culture: Implications for the Survey Response Process,” in Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional and Multicultural Contexts, HarknessJanet A.BraunMichaelEdwardsBradJohnsonTimothy P.LybergLarsMohlerPeter P.. eds. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 177–90.
37.
ShavittSharonLalwaniAshok K.ZhangJingTorelliCarlos (2006), “The Horizontal/Vertical Distinction in Cross-Cultural Consumer Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (4), 325–42.
38.
SongReoMoonSanglilChenHaipeng (Allan)HoustonMark B. (2018), “When Marketing Strategy Meets Culture: The Role of Culture in Product Evaluations,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46 (3), 384–02.
39.
StruchNaomiSchwartzShalom H. (1989), “Intergroup Aggression: Its Predictors and Distinctness from In-Group Bias,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56 (3), 364–73.
40.
TuLingjiangKhareAdwaitZhangYinlong (2012), “A Short 8-Item Scale for Measuring Consumers’ Local–Global Identity,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (1), 35–42.
41.
VallacherRobin R.WegnerDaniel M. (1989), “Levels of Personal Agency: Individual Variation in Action Identification,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (4), 660–71.
42.
VölcknerFranziskaHofmannJulian (2007), “The Price-Perceived Quality Relationship: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Determinants,” Marketing Letters, 18 (3), 181–96.
43.
XiaLanMonroeKent B.CoxJennifer L. (2004), “The Price Is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 1–15.
44.
YanDengfengSenguptaJaideep (2011), “Effects of Construal Level on the Price-Quality Relationship,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (2), 376–89.
45.
ZhangYinlongKhareAdwait (2009), “The Impact of Accessible Identities on the Evaluation of Global Versus Local Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3), 524–37.
46.
ZielkeStephanKomorMarcin (2015), “Cross-National Differences in Price–Role Orientation and Their Impact on Retail Markets,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (2), 159–80.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
