AbbottAndrew (2004), Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
2.
BoyerErnest L.MoserDrewReamTodd C.BraxtonJohn M. (2015), Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
ChurchillGilbert A., Jr. (1979), “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (1), 64–73.
4.
EdwardsJeffrey R.BagozziRichard P. (2000), “On the Nature and Direction of Relationships Between Constructs and Measures,” Psychological Methods, 5 (2), 155–74.
5.
HubbardRaymondArmstrongJ. Scott (2006), “Why We Don’t Really Know What Statistical Significance Means: Implications for Educators,” Journal of Marketing Education, 28 (2), 114–20.
6.
KumarV. (2014), “My Plans for Journal of Marketing: An Editor in Chief’s Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (4), 1–3.
7.
MacKenzieScott B. (2003), “The Dangers of Poor Construct Conceptualization,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (3), 323–26.
8.
PeterJ. Paul (1981), “Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (2), 133–45.
9.
SawyerAlan G.PeterJ. Paul (1983), “The Significance of Statistical Significance Tests in Marketing Research,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (2), 122–33.
10.
TeasR. KennethPalanKay M. (1997), “The Realms of Scientific Meaning Framework for Constructing Theoretically Meaningful Nominal Definitions of Marketing Concepts,” Journal of Marketing, 61 (2), 52–67.
11.
Van de VenAndrew H. (2007), Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.