This research distinguishes between the goal of maintaining status and advancing status and investigates how consumers’ political ideology triggers sensitivity to a status-maintenance (vs. status-advancement) goal, subsequently altering luxury consumption. Because conservative political ideology increases the preference for social stability, the authors propose that conservatives (vs. liberals) are more sensitive to status maintenance (but not status advancement) and thus exhibit a greater desire for luxury goods when the status-maintenance goal is activated. Six studies assessing status maintenance using sociodemographic characteristics (Studies 1, 2, and 3a) and controlled manipulations, including ad framing (Study 3b) and semantic priming (Studies 4 and 5), provide support for this proposition. The studies show that the effect is specific to status maintenance and does not occur (1) in the absence of a status goal or (2) when the status-advancement goal (a focus on increasing status) is activated. Overall, the findings reveal that conservatives’ desire for luxury goods stems from the goal of maintaining status and offer insights into how luxury brands can effectively tailor their communications to audiences with a conservative ideology.
AdlerNancy E.EpelElissa S.CastellazzoGraceIckovicsJeanette R. (2000), “Relationship of Subjective and Objective Social Status with Psychological and Physiological Functioning: Preliminary Data in Healthy White Women,” Health Psychology, 19 (6), 586–92.
2.
AlterJonathan (2013), The Center Holds: Obama and His Enemies. New York: Simon & Schuster.
3.
AndersonCameronBrownCourtney E. (2010), “The Functions and Dysfunctions of Hierarchy,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 55–89.
4.
AndersonCameronHildrethJohn Angus D.HowlandLaura (2015), “Is the Desire for Status a Fundamental Human Motive? A Review of the Empirical Literature,” Psychological Bulletin, 141 (3), 574–601.
5.
AndersonCameronKrausMichael W.GalinskyAdam D.KeltnerDacher (2012), “The Local Ladder Effect: Social Status and Subjective Well-being,” Psychological Science, 23 (7), 764–71.
6.
AustinJames T.VancouverJeffrey B. (1996), “Goal Constructs in Psychology: Structure, Process, and Content,” Psychological Bulletin, 120 (3), 338–75.
7.
BallTerenceDaggerRichard (2006), Political Ideologies and the Democratic Ideal. New York: Pearson Longman.
8.
BasuA. K. (1968), “Correlates of Political Conservatism,” Western Political Quarterly, 21 (4), 725–30.
9.
BenoitKennethLaverMichael (2006), Party Policy in Modern Democracies. New York: Routledge.
10.
BergerJonahWardMorgan (2010), “Subtle Signals of Inconspicuous Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (4), 555–69.
11.
BernsteinJacob (2016), “My Headphones, My Self,” (accessed September 14, 2017), [available at https://goo.gl/ys5dE6].
12.
BishopBill (2009), The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
BladerSteven L.ChenYa-Ru (2014), “What’s In a Name? Status, Power, and Other Forms of Social Hierarchy,” in The Psychology of Social Status, ChengJ.TracyJ.AndersonC., eds. New York: Springer, 71–95.
14.
BourdieuPierre (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
BoutylineAndreiWillerRob (2017), “The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks,” Political Psychology, 38 (3), 551–69.
16.
CastlesFrancis G.MairPeter (1984), “Left–Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgments,” European Journal of Political Research, 12 (1), 73–88.
17.
ConoverPamela JohnstonFeldmanStanley (1981), “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications,” American Journal of Political Science, 25 (4), 617–45.
18.
Currid-HalkettElizabeth (2017), The Sum of Small Things: A Theory of the Aspirational Class. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
D’ArpizioClaudiaLevatoFedericaKamelMarc-AndreMontgolfierJoelle de (2017), “Luxury Goods Worldwide Market Study, Fall-Winter 2017,” (accessed February 27, 2018), [available athttps://goo.gl/PxxhST].
20.
DuboisBernardDuquesnePatrick (1993), “The Market for Luxury Goods: Income Versus Culture,” European Journal of Marketing, 27 (1), 35–44.
21.
DuboisDavidOrdabayevaNailya (2015), “Social Hierarchy, Social Status and Status Consumption,” in Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology, NortonMichael I.RuckerDerek D.LambertonCait, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 332–67.
22.
DuboisDavidRuckerDerek D.GalinskyAdam D. (2012), “Super Size Me: Product Size as a Signal of Status,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (6), 1047–62.
23.
FiskeSusan T. (2010), “Interpersonal Stratification: Status, Power, and Subordination,” in Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed., FiskeSusan T.GilbertDaniel T.LindzeyGardener, eds. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 941–82.
24.
FitzsimonsGrainne M.FishbachAyelet (2010), “Shifting Closeness: Interpersonal Effects of Personal Goal Progress,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (4), 535–49.
25.
FrankRobert H. (1985), Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
FrankRobert H. (1999), Luxury Fever: Money and Happiness in an Era of Excess. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
GlasgowM. RuthCartierAdrienne M.WilsonGlenn D. (1985), “Conservatism, Sensation-Seeking and Music Preferences,” Personality and Individual Differences, 6 (3), 395–96.
28.
GrahamJesseHaidtJonathanNosekBrian A. (2009), “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 (5), 1029–46.
29.
HanYoung JeeNunesJoseph C.DrèzeXavier (2010), “Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (July), 15–30.
30.
HawsKelly L.PoynorCait (2008), “Seize the Day! Encouraging Indulgence for the Hyperopic Consumer,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (4), 680–91.
31.
HayesAndrew F. (2012), “PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling,” white paper, (accessed February 8, 2013), [available atwww.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf].
32.
HaysNicholas A.BenderskyCorinne (2015), “Not All Inequality Is Created Equal: Effects of Status Versus Power Hierarchies on Competition for Upward Mobility,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108 (6), 867–82.
33.
HoeggJoandreaLewisMichael V. (2011), “The Impact of Candidate Appearance and Advertising Strategies on Election Results,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (October), 895–909.
34.
IyengarShantoHahnKyu S. (2009), “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use,” Journal of Communication, 59 (1), 19–39.
35.
JostJohn T. (2017), “The Marketplace of Ideology: ‘Elective Affinities’ in Political Psychology and Their Implication for Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (4), 502–20.
36.
JostJohn T.BanajiMahzarin R.NosekBrian A. (2004), “A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo,” Political Psychology, 25 (6), 881–919.
37.
JostJohn T.GlaserJackKruglanskiArie W.SullowayFrank J. (2003), “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition,” Psychological Bulletin, 129 (3), 339–75.
38.
KapfererJean-NoëlBastienVincent (2009), The Luxury Strategy Break the Rules of Marketing to Build Luxury Brands. London, UK: Kogan Page.
KidwellBlairFarmerAdamHardestyDavid M. (2013), “Getting Liberals and Conservatives to Go Green: Political Ideology and Congruent Appeals,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (2), 350–67.
41.
KosinskiMichalWangYilunLakkarajuHimabinduLeskovecJure (2016), “Mining Big Data to Extract Patterns and Predict Real-Life Outcomes,” Psychological Methods, 21 (4), 493–506.
KrausMichael W.PiffPaul K.KeltnerDacher (2009), “Social Class, Sense of Control, and Social Explanation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97 (6), 992–1004.
44.
KruglanskiArie W.ShahJames Y.FishbachAyeletFriedmanRonChunWoo YoungSleeth-KepplerDavid (2002), “A Theory of Goal Systems,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ZannaMark P., ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 331–78.
45.
LevinShanaSidaniusJimRabinowitzJoshua L.FedericoChristopher (1998), “Ethnic Identity, Legitimizing Ideologies, and Social Status: A Matter of Ideological Asymmetry,” Political Psychology, 19 (2), 373–404.
46.
MageeJoe C.GalinskyAdam D. (2008), “Social Hierarchy: The Self-Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status,” Academy of Management Annals, 2 (1), 351–98.
47.
MandelNaomiPetrovaPetia K.CialdiniRobert B. (2006), “Images of Success and the Preference for Luxury Brands,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (1), 57–69.
48.
MehrabianAlbert (1996), “Relations Among Political Attitudes, Personality, and Psychopathology Assessed with New Measures of Libertarianism and Conservatism,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18 (4), 469–91.
49.
MorrisMichael W.CarranzaEricaFoxCraig R. (2008), “Mistaken Identity Activating Conservative Political Identities Induces ‘Conservative’ Financial Decisions,” Psychological Science, 19 (11), 1154–60.
50.
NelissenRob M. A.MeijersMarijn H. C. (2011), “Social Benefits of Luxury Brands as Costly Signals of Wealth and Status,” Evolution and Human Behavior, 32 (5), 343–55.
51.
NoëlAlainThérienJean-Philippe (2008), Left and Right in Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
NunesJoseph C.DrèzeXavierHanYoung Jee (2011), “Conspicuous Consumption in a Recession: Toning It Down or Turning It Up?” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21 (2), 199–205.
53.
OrdabayevaNailyaChandonPierre (2011), “Getting Ahead of the Joneses: When Equality Increases Conspicuous Consumption among Bottom-Tier Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (1), 27–41.
54.
OrdabayevaNailyaFernandesDaniel (2018), “Better or Different? How Political Ideology Shapes Preferences for Differentiation in the Social Hierarchy,” Journal of Consumer Research, 45 (2), 227–50.
55.
RamanathanSureshMenonGeeta (2006), “Time-Varying Effects of Chronic Hedonic Goals on Impulsive Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (4), 628–41.
56.
RentfrowPeter J.GoslingSamuel D.JokelaMarkusStillwellDavid J.KosinskiMichalPotterJeff (2013), “Divided We Stand: Three Psychological Regions of the United States and Their Political, Economic, Social, and Health Correlates,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105 (6), 996–1012.
RuckerDerek D.GalinskyAdam D. (2008), “Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (2), 257–67.
59.
ShavittSharon (2017), “Political Ideology Drives Consumer Psychology: Introduction to Research Dialogue,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27 (4), 500–01.
60.
SidaniusJimPrattoFelicia (1999), Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SimonsohnUriNelsonLeif D.SimmonsJoseph P. (2014), “p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9 (6), 666–81.
62.
SivanathanNiroPettitNathan C. (2010), “Protecting the Self Through Consumption: Status Goods as Affirmational Commodities,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (3), 564–70.
63.
SligteDaniel J.DreuCarsten K. W. DeNijstadBernard A. (2011), “Power, Stability of Power and Creativity,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47 (5), 891–97.
64.
TaylorShelley E.BrownJonathon D. (1994), “Positive Illusions and Well-Being Revisited: Separating Fact from Fiction,” Psychological Bulletin, 116 (1), 21–27.
65.
U.S. Census Bureau (2012), “Educational Attainment in the United States: 2012” (accessed September 28, 2017), [available athttps://goo.gl/eYaca7].
66.
U.S. Census Bureau (2014), “Income and Poverty in the United States: 2014” (accessed September 28, 2017), [available athttps://goo.gl/ScgXvG].
67.
VeblenThorstein (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: The Modern Library.
68.
ViechtbauerWolfgang (2010), “Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package,” Journal of Statistical Software, 36 (3), 1–48.
69.
WånkeMichaelaBohnerGerdJurkowitschAndreas (1997), “There Are Many Reasons to Drive a BMW: Does Imagined Ease of Argument Generation Influence Attitudes?” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (2), 170–78.
70.
WeberMaxGerthHans HeinrichWright MillsC. (1958), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology Paperback. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
WeinsteinArt (2004), Handbook of Market Segmentation: Strategic Targeting for Business and Technology Firms. New York: Haworth Press.
72.
WhiteKatherineDahlDarren W. (2007), “Are All Outgroups Created Equal? Consumer Identity and Dissociative Influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (4), 525–36.
73.
WinellMarlene (1987), “Personal Goals: The Key to Self-Direction in Adulthood,” in Humans as Self-Constructing Living Systems: Putting the Framework to Work, FordMartin E.FordDonald H., eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 261–87.
74.
WinterichKaren PageMittalVikasAquinoKarl (2016), “Moral and Political Identity,” in Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology, NortonMichael I.RuckerDerek D.LambertonCait, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 589–618.
75.
WinterichKaren PageZhangYinlongMittalVikas (2012), “How Political Identity and Charity Positioning Increase Donations: Insights from Moral Foundations Theory,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (4), 346–54.
76.
ZhaoXinBelkRussell W. (2008), “Politicizing Consumer Culture: Advertising’s Appropriation of Political Ideology in China’s Social Transition,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (2), 231–44.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
