A study is presented in which three characteristics of dyslexia were examined: (a) speed limitations in word identification, (b) sensitivity to increasing task demands, and (c) orthographic compensation. Ten students with dyslexia (10 years old) were compared to 10 chronological-age controls and 20 reading-age controls on their performance in reading. Response latencies of the students with dyslexia were slower when familiar words, letter clusters, and nonwords had to be named. A larger word-frequency effect and a larger word-length effect in the these students indicates that they have difficulty with increasing task demands. In addition, a subword-frequency effect was found to be larger in the students with dyslexia. These differences among the three groups of students are interpreted in terms of automatization. Furthermore, it is suggested that students with dyslexia may have a preference for large orthographic units, which is used as a compensatory tool in reading.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaron, P.J. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests?Journal of Learning Disabilities , 24, 178-191.
2.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
3.
Bouma, H., & Legein, C.P. (1980). Dyslexia: A specific recoding deficit? An analysis of response latencies for letters and words in dyslectics and in average readers . Neuropsychologia, 18, 285-298.
4.
Cheng, P.W. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychological Review, 92, 414-423.
5.
Das-Smaal, E.A., Klapwijk, M.J.G., & Van der Leij, A. (1996). Training of perceptual unit processing in children with a reading disability. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 221-250.
6.
Downing, J. (1979). Reading and reasoning. New York: Springer Verlag.
7.
Dunn, D., & Lloyd, M. (1965). Peabody picture vocabulary test. Washington: American Guidance Service.
8.
Elbro, C. (1996). Early linguistic abilities and reading development: A review and a hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 453-486.
9.
Fowler, A.E. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processing in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 97-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: LEA.
11.
Guttentag, R.E. (1979). Picture-naming interference with good and poor readers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 67-70.
12.
Hogaboam, T.W., & Perfetti, C.A. (1978). Reading skill and the role of verbal experience in decoding. Journal of Educational Psychology , 70, 717-729.
13.
Kappers, E.J. (1997). Outpatient treatment of dyslexia through stimulation of the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 30, 100-125.
14.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
15.
Metsala, J.L., & Stanovich, K. (1995, April). An examination of young children's phonological processing as a function of lexical development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
16.
Olson, R.K., Wise, B.W., & Rack, J.P. (1989). Dyslexia: Deficits, genetic aetiology and computer-based remediation. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 10, 494-508.
17.
Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Perfetti, C.A. (1992). The presentation problem in reading acquisition . In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J., & Olson, R.K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28-53.
20.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
Reitsma, P. (1983). Phonemic and graphemic codes in learning to read. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit: Amsterdam.
22.
Rutter, M. (1978). Prevalence and types of dyslexia. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 5-28). New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Samuels, J. (1985). Automaticity and repeated reading. In J. Osborn, P. T. Wilson & R. C. Anderson (Eds.), Reading education: Foundations for a literate America (pp. 215-230). Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
Shiffrin, R.M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attention and general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
26.
Snowling, M. (1987). Dyslexia: A cognitive developmental perspective. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
27.
Spear, L.C., & Sternberg, R.J. (1987). An information-processing framework for understanding reading disability. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
28.
Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-604.
29.
Staphorsius, G., Krom, R.S.H., & De Geus, K. (1988). Frequenties van woordvormen en letterposities in jeugdlectuur [Frequencies of words and letter positions in reading matter for youngsters]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO.
30.
Swan, D., & Goswami, U. (1997). Picture naming deficits in dyslexia: The phonological representations hypothesis. Brain &Language, 56, 334-353.
31.
Van der Leij, A. (1993). The development of the autonomous lexicon of reading disabled students. In S. F. Wright & R. Groner (Eds.), Facets of dyslexia and its remediation (pp. 393-410). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland.
32.
Van der Leij, A. (1994). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on word and pseudoword reading of reading-disabled students. In K. P. van den Bos, L. S. Siegel, D. J. Bakker, & D. L. Share (Eds.), Current directions in dyslexia research (pp. 251-267). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
33.
Van der Leij, A., & Van Daal, V.H.P. (1989). Repeated reading and severe reading disability. In H. Mandl , E. De Corte, N. Bennett , & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Learning and instruction 2.2 (pp. 235-251). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
34.
Verhoeven, L. (1993).Drie-minuten-toets. Handleiding [Three minute test, Manual]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO.
35.
Yap, R.L., & Van der Leij, A. (1993). Word processing in dyslexics: An automatic decoding deficit?Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 261-279.
36.
Yap, R.L., & Van der Leij, A. (1994). Automaticity deficits in word reading. In A. Fawcett & R. Nicolson (Eds.), Dyslexia and children: The acquisition and development of skills (pp. 77-107). Hemel Hemp-stead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
