Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A recent landmark settlement between the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the US. Department of Justice addressed many crucial issues relating to the eligibility of high school students with learning disabilities (LD) and their participation in college freshman athletics. Although the changes agreed upon in the consent decree should have wide-ranging ramifications generally in favor of students with LD, the more subjective nature of these changes opens the door for inevitable inconsistencies, biases, and possible abuses. In addition, larger issues remain unresolved, including (a) the NCAA's denial that is covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, (b) the inconclusive status of whether college athletics is a major life activity, (c) the NCAA acting as a de facto national school board without rigorous research for setting policy on an informed basis, and (d) the lack of serious initiative on the part of the NCAA to take on a more supportive role in educational reform.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brinckerhoff, L.C. , Shaw, S.F. , & McGuire, J.M. (1993). Prornoting postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: A handbook for practitioners. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Diegmueller, K. (1995, December 13). NCAA rules violate ADA, student charges: Question of accommodating athletes with disabilities at issue. Education Week, p. 5.

Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children. (1998). NCAA and students with learning disabilities. The DLD Times, 15(3), 9.

Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation & Roper Strach Worldwide. (1995). Learning disabilities and the American public: A look at American awareness and knowledge. Maraoneck, NY: Roper Strach Worldwide.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission & U.S. Department of Justice . (1991). Americans with Disabilities Act handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Hishinuma, E.S. (1998). Issues related to WAIS-R testing modifications for individuals with learning disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 228-240.

Hishinuma, E.S. , & Fremstad, J.S. (1996). ACT and SAT modifications: A summary Perspertives, 22(4), 7-9.

Hishinuma, E.S. , & Fremstad, J.S. (1997). NCAA college freshmen academic requirements: Academic standards or unfair roadblocks for students with learning disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities , 30, 589-598.

Knapp v. Northwestern University, 101 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 1996).

10.

Lower test standards proposed. (1998, May 27). The Honolulu Advertiser, p. C5.

11.

Nathan, J. (1998). The NCAA: Major barriers to high school reform . Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 764-768.

12.

National Collegiate Athletic Association. ( 1995).1995-96 NCAA guide for the college-bound student-athlete . Overland Park, KS: Author.

13.

National Collegiate Athletic Association. ( 1998a). NCAA core course review: Learning disabled core course requirements and core courses submission form. Overland Park, KS: Author.

14.

National Collegiate Athletic Association. ( 1998b). 1998-99 NCAA guide for the college-bound student-athlete . Overland Park, KS: Author.

15.

Naughton, J. (1997, November 7). Justice Department finds NCAA bias against athletes with learning disabilities. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A44.

16.

NCAA alters policy: Students with learning disabilities can play college sports under Justice Department agreement. (1998). LDA Newsbriefs, 33(4), 1.

17.

NCAA test score rules face setbacks in two court cases. (1997 , Fall). FairTest Examiner, pp. 2-3.

18.

Pahulu v. University of Kansas, 897 F. Supp. 1387 (D. Kan. 1995).

19.

Recommendations of the McIntosh Commission for Fair Play in Student-Athlete Admissions. (1994-1995). FairTest Examiner, 9(1), 4.

20.

Selingo, J. , & Naughton, J. (1998, June 5). NCAA agrees to loosen its rules for athletes with learning disabilities. The Chronicle of Higher Education , pp. 47-48.

21.

United States of America v. National Collegiate Athletic Association , 1998. [Also available on the World Wide Web at http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/ncaafact.htm]

22.

Vogel, S.A. (1987). Issues and concerns in LD college programming . In D. J. Johnson & J. W. Blalock (Eds.), Adults with learning disabilities: Clinical studies (pp. 239-275). New York: Grune & Stratton.

23.

Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale (rev. ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

24.

Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

An Update on NCAA College Freshman Academic Requirements

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References